SpatialBench (LatchBio)
Agentic spatial-transcriptomics data analysis problems with deterministic graders. Anthropic reports a 115-problem Verified variant.
Three problem sets carry this name. The December 2025 paper has 146 problems, the June 2026 repo is a revised set of 159, and Anthropic cards report SpatialBench Verified with 115. Scores on different sets do not compare.
- Made by
- LatchBio
- Released
- December 2025
- Kind
- Lab and data work
- Level
- Expert
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Agent task
- Tasks
- Public, plus a private test set
- Strongest model tested
- Claude Opus 5.5 #4 on the capability index
- Last in a system card
- October 2026
- Last model added
- October 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Spatial transcriptomics assays are rapidly increasing in scale and complexity, making computational analysis a major bottleneck in biological discovery. Although frontier AI agents have improved dramatically at software engineering and general data analysis, it remains unclear whether they can extract biological insight from messy, real-world spatial datasets. We introduce SpatialBench, a benchmark of 146 verifiable problems derived from practical spatial analysis workflows spanning five spatial technologies and seven task categories. Each problem provides a snapshot of experimental data immediately prior to an analysis step and a deterministic grader that evaluates recovery of a key biological result. Benchmark data on frontier models shows that base model accuracy remains low (20-38% across model families), with strong model-task and model-platform interactions. Harness design has a large empirical effect on performance, indicating that tools, prompts, control flow, and execution environment should be evaluated and improved as first-class objects. SpatialBench serves both as a measurement tool and a diagnostic lens for developing agents that can interact with real spatial datasets faithfully, transparently, and reproducibly.
GPT-5.5 leads with 57.6% among models released by May 2026
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Every run is in the next chart. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
Claude Fable 5.1 leads with 77.6%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in May 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 15 more
- 57.6 GPT-5.5
- 57.4 GPT-5.4
- 55.6
Gemini 3.5 Flash
- 55.4 Claude Opus 4.8
- 52.8 Claude Opus 4.6
- 52.4 Claude Opus 4.7
- 51.6
Gemini 3.1 Pro
- 50.1 GPT-5.2
- 45.9 grok-4.20-beta-0309-reasoning
- 44.2 Claude Sonnet 4.6
- 42.8 Claude Opus 4.5
- 41.5 Claude Sonnet 4.5
- 39.8 GPT-5.1
- 34.0 Grok 4.1 Fast
- 31.9 Grok 4
- 28.9 gemini-2.5-pro (snapshot unspecified)
- 1 GPT-5.5 57.6%
- 2 GPT-5.4 57.4%
- 3
Gemini 3.5 Flash 55.6%
- 4 Claude Opus 4.8 55.4%
- 5 Claude Opus 4.6 52.8%
- 6 Claude Opus 4.7 52.4%
- 7
Gemini 3.1 Pro 51.6%
- 8 GPT-5.2 50.1%
- 9 grok-4.20-beta-0309-reasoning 45.9%
- 10 Claude Sonnet 4.6 44.2%
- 11 Claude Opus 4.5 42.8%
- 12 Claude Sonnet 4.5 41.5%
- 13 GPT-5.1 39.8%
- 14 Grok 4.1 Fast reasoning 34%
- 15 Grok 4 31.9%
- 16 gemini-2.5-pro (snapshot unspecified) 28.9%
Source: Official SpatialBench (LatchBio) leaderboard
- 77.6 Claude Fable 5.1
- 72.5 Claude Opus 5
- 72.5 Claude Sonnet 5.5
- 72.0 Claude Opus 5.5
- 70.0 Claude Sonnet 5
- 67.7 Claude Haiku 5.5
- 57.6 GPT-5.5
- 57.4 GPT-5.4
- 55.6
Gemini 3.5 Flash
- 55.4 Claude Opus 4.8
- 52.8 Claude Opus 4.6
- 52.4 Claude Opus 4.7
- 51.6
Gemini 3.1 Pro
- 50.1 GPT-5.2
- 44.2 Claude Sonnet 4.6
- 42.8 Claude Opus 4.5
- 41.5 Claude Sonnet 4.5
- 39.8 GPT-5.1
- 34.0 Grok 4.1 Fast
- 31.9 Grok 4
- 1 Claude Fable 5.1 77.6%
- 2 Claude Opus 5 72.5%
- 3 Claude Sonnet 5.5 72.5%
- 4 Claude Opus 5.5 72%
- 5 Claude Sonnet 5 70%
- 6 Claude Haiku 5.5 67.7%
- 7 GPT-5.5 57.6%
- 8 GPT-5.4 57.4%
- 9
Gemini 3.5 Flash 55.6%
- 10 Claude Opus 4.8 55.4%
- 11 Claude Opus 4.6 52.8%
- 12 Claude Opus 4.7 52.4%
- 13
Gemini 3.1 Pro 51.6%
- 14 GPT-5.2 50.1%
- 15 Claude Sonnet 4.6 44.2%
- 16 Claude Opus 4.5 42.8%
- 17 Claude Sonnet 4.5 41.5%
- 18 GPT-5.1 39.8%
- 19 Grok 4.1 Fast reasoning 34%
- 20 Grok 4 31.9%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official SpatialBench (LatchBio) leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-5.5 | 57.6% | mini-swe-agent | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | GPT-5.4 | 57.4% | mini-swe-agent | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | | 55.6% | pi | May 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | Claude Opus 4.8 | 55.4% | claude-code | May 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | Claude Opus 4.6 | 52.8% | mini-swe-agent | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | Claude Opus 4.7 | 52.4% | mini-swe-agent | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | | 51.6% | mini-swe-agent | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | GPT-5.2 | 50.1% | mini-swe-agent | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | grok-4.20-beta-0309-reasoning | 45.9% | mini-swe-agent | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 44.2% | mini-swe-agent | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | Claude Opus 4.5 | 42.8% | mini-swe-agent | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 12 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | 41.5% | mini-swe-agent | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 13 | GPT-5.1 | 39.8% | mini-swe-agent | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 14 | Grok 4.1 Fast | 34% | reasoning, mini-swe-agent | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 15 | Grok 4 | 31.9% | mini-swe-agent | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 16 | gemini-2.5-pro (snapshot unspecified) | 28.9% | mini-swe-agent | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Fable 5.1 | 77.6% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | Claude Opus 5 | 72.5% | Jul 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 72.5% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | Claude Opus 5.5 | 72% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | Claude Sonnet 5 | 70% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | Claude Haiku 5.5 | 67.7% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | GPT-5.5 | 57.6% | mini-swe-agent | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | GPT-5.4 | 57.4% | mini-swe-agent | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | | 55.6% | pi | May 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | Claude Opus 4.8 | 55.4% | claude-code | May 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | Claude Opus 4.6 | 52.8% | mini-swe-agent | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 12 | Claude Opus 4.7 | 52.4% | mini-swe-agent | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 13 | | 51.6% | mini-swe-agent | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 14 | GPT-5.2 | 50.1% | mini-swe-agent | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 15 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 44.2% | mini-swe-agent | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 16 | Claude Opus 4.5 | 42.8% | mini-swe-agent | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 17 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | 41.5% | mini-swe-agent | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 18 | GPT-5.1 | 39.8% | mini-swe-agent | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 19 | Grok 4.1 Fast | 34% | reasoning, mini-swe-agent | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 20 | Grok 4 | 31.9% | mini-swe-agent | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 7 models in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
The best score, 57.6%, costs $1.12 a task
Runs on the cost frontier score higher than any run that's cheaper. The costs are the leaderboard's own estimates, so compare them only within this benchmark.
Source: Official SpatialBench (LatchBio) leaderboard
| Model | Effort | Harness | Score | Cost per task | Output tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-5.5 | mini-swe-agent | 57.6% | $1.12 | ||
| GPT-5.4 | mini-swe-agent | 57.4% | $0.58 | ||
| | pi | 55.6% | $1.43 | ||
| Claude Opus 4.8 | claude-code | 55.4% | $0.88 | ||
| GPT-5.5 | openai-codex | 53.7% | $3.16 | ||
| Claude Opus 4.6 | mini-swe-agent | 52.8% | $0.85 | ||
| Claude Opus 4.8 | mini-swe-agent | 52.6% | $1.11 | ||
| Claude Opus 4.7 | mini-swe-agent | 52.4% | $0.98 | ||
| | mini-swe-agent | 51.6% | $0.94 | ||
| Claude Opus 4.7 | claude-code | 51.4% | $0.80 | ||
| GPT-5.2 | mini-swe-agent | 50.1% | $0.60 | ||
| | mini-swe-agent | 48.9% | $2.76 | ||
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | mini-swe-agent | 44.2% | $0.27 | ||
| Claude Opus 4.5 | mini-swe-agent | 42.8% | $0.46 | ||
| Claude Sonnet 4.5 | mini-swe-agent | 41.5% | $0.22 | ||
| GPT-5.1 | mini-swe-agent | 39.8% | $0.16 | ||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | reasoning | mini-swe-agent | 34% | $0.02 | |
| Grok 4 | mini-swe-agent | 31.9% | $0.45 |
5 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in December 2025 8 models have held number one with claims included since its release in December 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
Sources: Official SpatialBench (LatchBio) leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official SpatialBench (LatchBio) leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Labs report it only in system cards
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.
7 system cards report it, from 1 lab
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2026 | Claude Haiku 5.5 system card | 67.7 | LatchBio Bioinformatics, SpatialBench Verified, max effort, safeguards off (8.13.1, CB-1 evaluation in 2.2.2) | Bio and chem risk |
| Sep 28, 2026 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 system card | 72.5 | LatchBio SpatialBench Verified (8.17.2, Figure 8.17.A) | Capabilities |
| Sep 22, 2026 | Claude Opus 5.5 system card | 72 | LatchBio Bioinformatics, SpatialBench Verified, 115 problems, max effort (8.17.2) | Capabilities |
| Sep 1, 2026 | Claude Fable 5.1 system card | 77.6 | LatchBio SpatialBench Verified, Mythos 5.1 | Other |
| Jul 24, 2026 | Claude Opus 5 system card | 72.5 | LatchBio Bioinformatics, SpatialBench Verified, 115 problems (8.17.2) | Capabilities |
| Jun 30, 2026 | Claude Sonnet 5 system card | 70 | LatchBio SpatialBench Verified, 115 problems, score 0.70 (8.14.2, Figure 8.14.6.A) | Capabilities |
| May 28, 2026 | Claude Opus 4.8 system card | 53.3 | LatchBio Bioinformatics, SpatialBench, no extended thinking (8.16.3) | Capabilities |
One lab claim next to the leaderboard
Each score a lab reported for its own model, beside the same model's best score on the leaderboard. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. Every benchmark.
| Model | Lab says | Board says | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.8 | 53.3% LatchBio Bioinformatics, SpatialBench, no extended thinking (8.16.3) | 55.4% Leaderboard, claude-code | −2.1 pts |
More in Science and reasoning
- GPQA Diamond In use 198 graduate-level 'Google-proof' multiple-choice questions in biology, chemistry and physics.
Gemini 4 Carbon 96.5%
- Terminal-Bench-Science In use 70 scientific research-workflow tasks across five science areas, run in Harbor containers. Hidden tests give the resolution rate. GPT-6 Astra 68.1%
- FrontierScience In use Models solve physics, chemistry, and biology problems in an Olympiad track graded by short answer and a Research track graded by 10-point rubrics.
Intern-S2-397B 87%
- BioMysteryBench In use Bioinformatics problems on anonymized real datasets that require real analysis with tools. Rubric-graded, with human-solvable and human-difficult splits. Claude Fable 5.2 83.7%
- HiPhO In use Models solve theory problems from 2024 and 2025 physics olympiad exams, some with diagrams. Official marking schemes grade answers and steps, mapped to medal levels.
Gemini 3 Pro 78.3%
- LABBench2 In use 11 biology research sub-tasks (literature, figures, tables, patents, trials and more) with tool access. Macro-averaged accuracy. GPT-5.2 60.9%