Benchmark Almanac

SQuALITY

Phi-3.5-mini 24.3% leads since August 2024
Dropped

Models write question-focused summaries of public-domain short stories. Outputs are scored against human-written reference summaries with ROUGE.

Released
May 2022
Kind
Reasoning over long documents
Level
School
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Open-ended
Tasks
All public
Last in a launch post
August 2024, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
March 2025

In the authors’ words

Summarization datasets are often assembled either by scraping naturally occurring public-domain summaries – which are nearly always in difficult-to-work-with technical domains – or by using approximate heuristics to extract them from everyday text – which frequently yields unfaithful summaries. In this work, we turn to a slower but more straightforward approach to developing summarization benchmark data: We hire highly-qualified contractors to read stories and write original summaries from scratch. To amortize reading time, we collect five summaries per document, with the first giving an overview and the subsequent four addressing specific questions. We use this protocol to collect SQuALITY, a dataset of question-focused summaries built on the same public-domain short stories as the multiple-choice dataset QuALITY (Pang et al., 2021). Experiments with state-of-the-art summarization systems show that our dataset is challenging and that existing automatic evaluation metrics are weak indicators of quality.

Abstract of SQuALITY: Building a Long-Document Summarization Dataset the Hard Way (arXiv:2205.11465, CC0)
3
Models scored in lab cards
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab
6
System cards report it, from 2 labs

Phi-3.5-mini leads with 24.3% among models released by February 2025

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in February 2025, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Phi-3.5-mini 24.3%
  2. 2 Phi-3.5-MoE 24.1%
  3. 3 Phi-4 Mini 22.8%

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Phi-3.5-mini 24.3% Aug 2024 Lab model card
2 Phi-3.5-MoE 24.1% Aug 2024 Lab model card
3 Phi-4 Mini 22.8% Mar 2025 Lab model card

2 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since 2023

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Microsoft
Lab claims Not tested since Mar 2025
Phi-3.5-mini 24.3%

Source: Labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Phi-3.5-mini 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Phi-3.5-mini

Source: Labs’ model cards

No launch post has listed it since August 2024

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Microsoft
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Aug 20, 2024 Phi-3.5-MoE 24.1 SQuALITY

6 system cards report it, from 2 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Mar 3, 2025 Phi-4 Mini technical report 22.8 SQuALITY (0-shot) (Table 7) Capabilities
Nov 23, 2024 Llama 3.1-8B technical report 15.3 ZeroSCROLLS/SQuALITY, ROUGE-L, validation set, post-trained (Table 21) Capabilities
Nov 23, 2024 Llama 3.1-70B technical report 16.4 ZeroSCROLLS/SQuALITY, ROUGE-L, validation set, post-trained (Table 21) Capabilities
Nov 23, 2024 Llama 3.1-405B technical report 15.4 ZeroSCROLLS/SQuALITY, ROUGE-L, validation set, post-trained (Table 21) Capabilities
Aug 30, 2024 Phi-3.5-MoE technical report 24.1 SQuALITY (Table 3) Capabilities
Aug 30, 2024 Phi-3.5-mini technical report 24.3 SQuALITY (Table 3) Capabilities

More in Long context

All 79 in Long context
  • MRCR v2 In use Multi-round coreference: retrieve the n-th of several similar requests hidden in a long synthetic conversation, up to 1M tokens. Muse Spark 1.3 98.5%
  • LongBench v2 In use 503 multiple-choice questions over 8K-2M-word contexts (QA, dialogue, code repos, structured data). Accuracy. Inkling 2 Small 70.6%
  • GraphWalks In use A graph is given as an edge list in long context. The model answers BFS or parent queries, scored by F1. Claude Fable 5 99.96%
  • OpenAI MRCR v2 In use Models read a long synthetic chat that hides 2, 4 or 8 identical writing requests and must reproduce the response to the i-th one. Scored by mean string match ratio per context bin. Gemini 3.7 Flash 89%
  • CL-bench In use Model must learn new knowledge from a supplied long context (rules, procedures, data) and solve tasks. Strict LLM-verified rubrics. GPT-5.4 27.9%
  • AA-LCR 1.1 In use Models answer 100 questions that need reasoning across sets of real documents of about 100K tokens. An LLM equality checker with a fixed system prompt compares each answer with the key. Step 5 Preview 88.3%