Suicide Memory Bench
AI systems, each a model in its own app or coding harness, talk with 128 fictional personas over 29 chats. Five chats carry suicidal statements or warning signs of Suicide Crisis Syndrome, and a final request follows, such as a farewell note. Four sub-benchmarks cross explicit statements and warning signs with one chat or separate chats joined only by memory. A model judge rates each reply on a 0 to 4 safety scale.
Version 01.1, with 2,048 cases for each system. Built with 22 licensed clinicians. Scores run from 0 to 4. Across separate chats, few systems connect a later request to earlier disclosures. The data is licensed, not public.
- Made by
- Prosaic Intelligence
- Released
- November 2026
- Kind
- Wellbeing and sycophancy
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Graded by a model
- Answers
- Open-ended
- Tasks
- Kept private
- Strongest model tested
- GPT-6 Astra #3 on the capability index
- Last model added
- October 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
Gemini 4 Argon leads with 1.41
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
- 1
Gemini 4 Argon 1.41
- 2 GPT-6.1 Sol 1.21
- 3 GPT-6 Astra 1.15
- 4 Claude Opus 5.5 1.04
- 5 Claude Haiku 5.5 1.03
- 6
Gemini 3.8 Flash 0.80
- 7 GPT-6 Luna 0.66
- 8 Claude Sonnet 5.5 0.65
- 9 Claude Fable 5.1 0.63
- 10 GPT-5.6 Terra 0.53
- 11
Gemini 3.1 Pro 0.43
- 12
Muse Spark 1.3 0.30
- 13 Muse Wonder 1.0 0.17
Source: Official Suicide Memory Bench leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 1.41 | Gemini CLI | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | GPT-6.1 Sol | 1.21 | Codex | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | GPT-6 Astra | 1.15 | Codex | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | Claude Opus 5.5 | 1.04 | Claude.ai | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | Claude Haiku 5.5 | 1.03 | Claude Code | Oct 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | | 0.80 | Gemini CLI | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | GPT-6 Luna | 0.66 | Codex | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 0.65 | Claude Code | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | Claude Fable 5.1 | 0.63 | Claude Code | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | GPT-5.6 Terra | 0.53 | Codex | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | | 0.43 | Gemini CLI | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 12 | | 0.30 | Muse Code | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 13 | Muse Wonder 1.0 | 0.17 | Muse Code | Official leaderboard |
Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official Suicide Memory Bench leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official Suicide Memory Bench leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Safety and alignment
- FORTRESS In use Paired adversarial and benign national-security misuse prompts. Rubric-graded risk score on adversarial and over-refusal score on benign prompts. Claude Opus 5.5 5.78%
- StrongREJECT In use Forbidden-prompt jailbreak benchmark with a rubric grader that scores how useful a non-refusal actually is.
Inkling 98.6%
- Gray Swan IPI Arena benchmark In use Indirect prompt-injection attacks from public red-teaming competitions replayed on tool, coding and browser agents. Attack success rate at k attempts.
Gemini 4 Carbon 0%
- DistressBench In use Models reply as a chatbot to 718 simulated users in psychological crisis, in single-turn and multi-turn chats. Three judge models score replies against clinician-written rubrics.
Muse Spark 1.2 88.4%
- Lakera B3 (Backbone Breaker Benchmark) In use Crowdsourced prompt-injection attacks hit backbone LLMs inside agent threat snapshots at three defense levels. The score is attack resistance, 100 minus the board's vulnerability percentage. Claude Opus 4.5 89%
- IHEval In use Models face conflicts between system, user and tool instructions. Reports a composite score for following the higher-priority instruction. GPT-4o 70%