T-Eval
Models use tools step by step, and each sub-process is scored separately: instruction following, planning, reasoning, retrieval, understanding, and review.
- Released
- December 2023
- Kind
- Function calling
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Short answer
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- GPT-4 Turbo Nov 2023 #175 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- March 2025, dropped after it saturated
- Last model added
- March 2025
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Large language models (LLM) have achieved remarkable performance on various NLP tasks and are augmented by tools for broader applications. Yet, how to evaluate and analyze the tool-utilization capability of LLMs is still under-explored. In contrast to previous works that evaluate models holistically, we comprehensively decompose the tool utilization into multiple sub-processes, including instruction following, planning, reasoning, retrieval, understanding, and review. Based on that, we further introduce T-Eval to evaluate the tool utilization capability step by step. T-Eval disentangles the tool utilization evaluation into several sub-domains along model capabilities, facilitating the inner understanding of both holistic and isolated competency of LLMs. We conduct extensive experiments on T-Eval and in-depth analysis of various LLMs. T-Eval not only exhibits consistency with the outcome-oriented evaluation but also provides a more fine-grained analysis of the capabilities of LLMs, providing a new perspective in LLM evaluation on tool-utilization ability. The benchmark will be available at https://github.com/open-compass/T-Eval.
GPT-4 Turbo leads with 86.4% among models released by November 2023
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
GPT-4 Turbo leads with 86.4%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in November 2023, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 86.4 GPT-4 Turbo
- 84.0 GPT-3.5 Turbo
- 78.8 Claude-2.1 (Nov 2023)
- 76.2 Nanbeige-Agent-32B
- 71.4 Qwen-72B
- 66.3
Qwen-14B
- 59.5
Qwen-7B
- 56.5
Baichuan 2-7B
- 56.0
Mistral 7B v0.1
- 53.0
Llama 2-70B
- 51.4 ChatGLM3-6B
- 50.3
Baichuan2-13B
- 49.0 WizardLM-13B
- 48.1 Vicuna-13B
- 45.8 internlm-7b
- 44.8 Vicuna-7B
- 44.2 WizardLM-70B
- 41.4 AgentLM-7B
- 37.3
Llama 2-13B
- 28.6 CodeLLaMA-7B
- 27.4
Llama 2-7B
- 1 GPT-4 Turbo Nov 2023 86.4%
- 2 GPT-3.5 Turbo Nov 2023 84%
- 3 Claude-2.1 (Nov 2023) 78.8%
- 4 Nanbeige-Agent-32B 76.2%
- 5 Qwen-72B 71.4%
- 6
Qwen-14B 66.3%
- 7
Qwen-7B 59.5%
- 8
Baichuan 2-7B 56.5%
- 9
Mistral 7B v0.1 56%
- 10
Llama 2-70B 53%
- 11 ChatGLM3-6B 51.4%
- 12
Baichuan2-13B 50.3%
- 13 WizardLM-13B 49%
- 14 Vicuna-13B 48.1%
- 15 internlm-7b 45.8%
- 16 Vicuna-7B 44.8%
- 17 WizardLM-70B 44.2%
- 18 AgentLM-7B 41.4%
- 19
Llama 2-13B 37.3%
- 20 CodeLLaMA-7B 28.6%
- 21
Llama 2-7B 27.4%
Source: Official T-Eval leaderboard
- 1 GPT-4 Turbo Nov 2023 86.4%
- 2 GPT-3.5 Turbo Nov 2023 84%
- 3
Qwen1.5-72B 76.7%
- 4
Hunyuan-T1 68.8%
- 5
Qwen-14B 66.3%
- 6
Qwen-7B 59.5%
- 7
Baichuan 2-7B 56.5%
- 8
Mistral 7B v0.1 56%
- 9
Llama 2-70B 53%
- 10 ChatGLM3-6B 51.4%
- 11
Baichuan2-13B 50.3%
- 12 internlm-7b 45.8%
- 13
Llama 2-13B 37.3%
- 14
Llama 2-7B 27.4%
Sources: Official T-Eval leaderboard and labs’ model cards
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-4 Turbo Nov 2023 | 86.4% | Nov 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | GPT-3.5 Turbo Nov 2023 | 84% | Nov 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | Claude-2.1 (Nov 2023) | 78.8% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 4 | Nanbeige-Agent-32B | 76.2% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 5 | Qwen-72B | 71.4% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 6 | | 66.3% | Sep 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | | 59.5% | Sep 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | | 56.5% | Sep 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | | 56% | Sep 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | | 53% | Jul 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | ChatGLM3-6B | 51.4% | Oct 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | | 50.3% | Sep 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | WizardLM-13B | 49% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 14 | Vicuna-13B | 48.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 15 | internlm-7b | 45.8% | Jul 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | Vicuna-7B | 44.8% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 17 | WizardLM-70B | 44.2% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 18 | AgentLM-7B | 41.4% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 19 | | 37.3% | Jul 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | CodeLLaMA-7B | 28.6% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 21 | | 27.4% | Jul 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-4 Turbo Nov 2023 | 86.4% | Nov 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | GPT-3.5 Turbo Nov 2023 | 84% | Nov 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | | 76.7% | Feb 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 68.8% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | | 66.3% | Sep 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | | 59.5% | Sep 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | | 56.5% | Sep 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | | 56% | Sep 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | | 53% | Jul 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | ChatGLM3-6B | 51.4% | Oct 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | | 50.3% | Sep 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | internlm-7b | 45.8% | Jul 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | | 37.3% | Jul 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | | 27.4% | Jul 2023 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 2 models in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
Number one over time Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official T-Eval leaderboard
GPT-4 Turbo on the official leaderboard passed 85% in November 2023
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official T-Eval leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Labs dropped it from launch posts once the best score passed 85%
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2025 | 68.8 | T-Eval | |
| Feb 5, 2024 | 76.7 | T-Eval English (Overall) |
More in Tool use
- AutomationBench In use Agent completes end-to-end business workflows inside a simulated company exposing dozens of REST APIs. Graded on resulting state.
Gemini 4 Carbon 53.9%
- MCP Atlas In use Multi-step workflows over real MCP servers. Scores tool-use competency on realistic tasks.
Gemini 4 Argon 90.7%
- BFCL V4 In use Models call functions and tools, including multi-turn agentic tasks with web search and memory. Checked against expected calls and outcomes.
Qwen3.7-Max 75%
- τ³-bench Banking In use Agents act as banking customer-service reps over many turns with a simulated user, following policy. Pass^1 on the final database state.
Qwen 3.8 Max 55.1%
- Toolathlon-Verified In use 108 long-horizon tasks across 32 apps through about 600 MCP tools. Execution-based checkers inspect final environment state. GLM-5.3-Flash 78.4%
- DeepSearchQA In use Questions that need multi-step search and synthesis. Final answers graded against references. Kimi K3 95%