Capabilities
- MMLU 45.3
- BIG-Bench Hard 32.6
- AGIEval 29.3
Safety
- TruthfulQA 33.3
- ToxiGen 21.3
Llama 2-7B places in the top three on DecodingTrust.
Open weights
Its best score on each benchmark, and where that ranks among every model with a score there. We rank each model once, at its best setting.
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OpenBookQA | 58.6% | #11 of 24 | Lab model card | |
| LAMBADA | 73.3% | #17 of 26 | Claim in Qwen Technical Report, via Epoch AI | |
| TriviaQA | 72.1% | #28 of 40 | Lab model card | |
| Natural Questions | 25.7% | #15 of 20 | Lab model card | |
| BoolQ | 77.4% | #22 of 28 | Lab model card | |
| HellaSwag | 77.2% | #43 of 53 | Lab model card | |
| CriticEval | 4.30 | #10 of 12 | Official leaderboard | |
| WinoGrande | 69.2% | #40 of 47 | Lab model card | |
| PIQA | 78.8% | #32 of 37 | Lab model card | |
| ARC-Easy | 75.2% | #20 of 23 | Lab model card | |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboard (HHEM) | 11.3% | #133 of 148 | Official leaderboard | |
| MMLU-Pro | 20.3% | #197 of 212 | Official leaderboard | |
| TruthfulQA | 33.3% | #28 of 30 | Lab model card | |
| AlpacaEval 2.0 | 5.35% | #44 of 47 | Official leaderboard | |
| ARC-Challenge | 45.9% | #46 of 49 | Lab model card | |
| EQ-Bench v2 | 36.3 | #80 of 85 | Official leaderboard | |
| MMLU-CF | 41.9% | #35 of 37 | Official leaderboard | |
| WildBench | 15.2 | #45 of 47 | Official leaderboard | |
| SIQA | 48.3% | #23 of 24 | Lab model card | |
| LMArena (Elo) | 1,108 | #324 of 335 | Official leaderboard | |
| MMLU | 45.3% | #127 of 131 | Lab model card | |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 32.6% | #71 of 73 | Lab model card | |
| AGIEval | 29.3% | #39 of 40 | Lab model card | |
| CommonSenseQA | 57.8% | #19 of 19 | Lab model card | |
| SQuAD v2 | 67.2% | #8 of 8 | Lab model card | |
| L-Eval | 36.8% | #5 of 5 | Official leaderboard |
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CFLUE Knowledge | 18.8% | #7 of 8 | Official leaderboard | |
| MedQA | 39.2% | #68 of 71 | Official leaderboard | |
| LegalBench | 51.9% | #135 of 138 | Official leaderboard |
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 43.1% | #3 of 4 | Official leaderboard |
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DecodingTrust | 74.7 | #2 of 5 | Official leaderboard | |
| OR-Bench | 87.5% | #21 of 28 | Official leaderboard | |
| TrustLLM JailbreakTrigger | 94.5% | #3 of 4 | Official leaderboard | |
| Situational Awareness Dataset (SAD) | 32.9% | #16 of 17 | Official leaderboard |
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HELM Classic | 60.7 | #9 of 17 | Official leaderboard | |
| HELM Lite | 15.2 | #70 of 71 | Official leaderboard |
The Self-Reported Index fits one score to the 19 capability results Meta reported for this model, on the scale of the Epoch Capabilities Index. Labs choose which benchmarks to show and how to run them, so read it as the lab's claim, not an independent measurement. The 90% interval runs from 86.5 to 93.3. How we compute it.
Meta's models in color, against every other model on the Epoch Capabilities Index, by release date.
Source: Epoch Capabilities Index, Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0)
Every result in the longer documents the lab published with it. 5 of them aren't in the launch post.