Benchmark Almanac

Llama 2-7B

Llama 2-7B places in the top three on DecodingTrust.

Meta Released July 18th, 2023 Compare with others
43
Benchmarks with a score
0
Ranked first, out of five or more models
1
In the top three
Meta Jul 2023

Llama 2-7B

Open weights

83.4 #237 of 256
Epoch Capabilities Index
Self-Reported Index 89.9 #401 of 404
  • MMLU-CF 41.9% #35 /37
  • SIQA 48.3% #23 /24
  • Natural Questions 25.7% #15 /20

Where it ranks

Its best score on each benchmark, and where that ranks among every model with a score there. We rank each model once, at its best setting.

Knowledge and language

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
OpenBookQA 58.6% #11 of 24 Lab model card
LAMBADA 73.3% #17 of 26 Claim in Qwen Technical Report, via Epoch AI
TriviaQA 72.1% #28 of 40 Lab model card
Natural Questions 25.7% #15 of 20 Lab model card
BoolQ 77.4% #22 of 28 Lab model card
HellaSwag 77.2% #43 of 53 Lab model card
CriticEval 4.30 #10 of 12 Official leaderboard
WinoGrande 69.2% #40 of 47 Lab model card
PIQA 78.8% #32 of 37 Lab model card
ARC-Easy 75.2% #20 of 23 Lab model card
Vectara Hallucination Leaderboard (HHEM) 11.3% #133 of 148 Official leaderboard
MMLU-Pro 20.3% #197 of 212 Official leaderboard
TruthfulQA 33.3% #28 of 30 Lab model card
AlpacaEval 2.0 5.35% #44 of 47 Official leaderboard
ARC-Challenge 45.9% #46 of 49 Lab model card
EQ-Bench v2 36.3 #80 of 85 Official leaderboard
MMLU-CF 41.9% #35 of 37 Official leaderboard
WildBench 15.2 #45 of 47 Official leaderboard
SIQA 48.3% #23 of 24 Lab model card
LMArena (Elo) 1,108 #324 of 335 Official leaderboard
MMLU 45.3% #127 of 131 Lab model card
BIG-Bench Hard 32.6% #71 of 73 Lab model card
AGIEval 29.3% #39 of 40 Lab model card
CommonSenseQA 57.8% #19 of 19 Lab model card
SQuAD v2 67.2% #8 of 8 Lab model card
L-Eval 36.8% #5 of 5 Official leaderboard

Math and science

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
MATH 2.50% #99 of 99 Lab model card
GSM8K 14.6% #92 of 92 Lab model card
SciBench 1.03% #2 of 2 Official leaderboard

Coding

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
HumanEval 12.8% #101 of 101 Lab model card
MBPP 20.8% #71 of 71 Lab model card

Agents and tools

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
T-Eval 27.4% #12 of 12 Official leaderboard
WebLINX 4.04 #3 of 3 Official leaderboard

Professional work

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
CFLUE Knowledge 18.8% #7 of 8 Official leaderboard
MedQA 39.2% #68 of 71 Official leaderboard
LegalBench 51.9% #135 of 138 Official leaderboard

Vision, audio and robotics

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
ScienceQA 43.1% #3 of 4 Official leaderboard

Safety and security

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
DecodingTrust 74.7 #2 of 5 Official leaderboard
OR-Bench 87.5% #21 of 28 Official leaderboard
TrustLLM JailbreakTrigger 94.5% #3 of 4 Official leaderboard
Situational Awareness Dataset (SAD) 32.9% #16 of 17 Official leaderboard

Other

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
HELM Classic 60.7 #9 of 17 Official leaderboard
HELM Lite 15.2 #70 of 71 Official leaderboard

Its lab's numbers put it at 89.9, 6.5 points above its ECI

The Self-Reported Index fits one score to the 19 capability results Meta reported for this model, on the scale of the Epoch Capabilities Index. Labs choose which benchmarks to show and how to run them, so read it as the lab's claim, not an independent measurement. The 90% interval runs from 86.5 to 93.3. How we compute it.

Meta's models over time

Meta's models in color, against every other model on the Epoch Capabilities Index, by release date.

50 100 150 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Muse Spark Open Llama 4 Maverick Llama 3.2 90B Llama 3.1-8B Llama 2-13B Llama 2-70B Llama 2-7B 50 100 150 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Muse Spark Open Llama 4 Maverick

Source: Epoch Capabilities Index, Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0)

Its system cards

Every result in the longer documents the lab published with it. 5 of them aren't in the launch post.