Benchmark Almanac

TurkishMMLU

GPT 4o [snapshot unspecified] 83.1% tops its leaderboard Claude 3 Opus 79.1% leads the models we track
Claude 3 Opus 79.1% leads since July 2024
Dropped

Models answer over 10,000 multiple choice questions that Turkish curriculum experts wrote for nine high-school subjects. Scoring is accuracy.

Released
July 2024
Kind
Knowledge in many languages
Level
School
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Multiple choice
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Qwen2.5-72B #165 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
September 2024, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
December 2024
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Multiple choice question answering tasks evaluate the reasoning, comprehension, and mathematical abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). While existing benchmarks employ automatic translation for multilingual evaluation, this approach is error-prone and potentially introduces culturally biased questions, especially in social sciences. We introduce the first multitask, multiple-choice Turkish QA benchmark, TurkishMMLU, to evaluate LLMs' understanding of the Turkish language. TurkishMMLU includes over 10,000 questions, covering 9 different subjects from Turkish high-school education curricula. These questions are written by curriculum experts, suitable for the high-school curricula in Turkey, covering subjects ranging from natural sciences and math questions to more culturally representative topics such as Turkish Literature and the history of the Turkish Republic. We evaluate over 20 LLMs, including multilingual open-source (e.g., Gemma, Llama, MT5), closed-source (GPT 4o, Claude, Gemini), and Turkish-adapted (e.g., Trendyol) models. We provide an extensive evaluation, including zero-shot and few-shot evaluation of LLMs, chain-of-thought reasoning, and question difficulty analysis along with model performance. We provide an in-depth analysis of the Turkish capabilities and limitations of current LLMs to provide insights for future LLMs for the Turkish language. We publicly release our code for the dataset and evaluation: https://github.com/ArdaYueksel/TurkishMMLU.

Abstract of TurkishMMLU: Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding in Turkish (arXiv:2407.12402, CC0)
24
Entries on its own leaderboard, 8 models we track
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab
4
System cards report it, from 1 lab

GPT 4o [snapshot unspecified] tops the leaderboard with 83.1%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Claude 3 Opus, at 79.1%.

Claude 3 Opus leads with 79.1%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in April 2024, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 GPT 4o [snapshot unspecified] 83.1%
  2. 2 Claude 3 Opus 79.1%
  3. 3 GPT 4-turbo [snapshot unspecified] 75.7%
  4. 4 Claude 3 Sonnet 67.3%
  5. 5 Llama 3-70B 67.3%
  6. 6 Llama-3 70B [base] 66.1%
  7. 7 Claude 3 Haiku 65.4%
  8. 8 Gemini 1.0 Pro 63.2%
  9. 9 C4AI Command-r+ 60.6%
  10. 10 Aya-23 35B 55.6%
  11. 11 C4AI Command-r 54.9%
  12. 12 Mixtral 8x22B 54.8%
  13. 13 GPT 3.5-turbo [snapshot unspecified] 51%
  14. 14 Llama 3-8B 46.4%
  15. 15 Llama-3 8B [base] 46.2%
  16. 16 Mixtral 8x7B-IT 45.2%
  17. 17 Aya-23 8B 45%
  18. 18 Gemma 7B 43.6%
  19. 19 Aya-101 40.7%
  20. 20 Trendyol-LLM 7B-C-D 34.1%
  21. 21 mT0-xxl 33.9%
  22. 22 Mistral 7B-IT 32%
  23. 23 Llama-2 7B [base] 22.3%
  24. 24 mT5-xxl 18.1%

Source: Official TurkishMMLU leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT 4o [snapshot unspecified] 83.1% Official leaderboard
2 Claude 3 Opus 79.1% Feb 2024 Official leaderboard
3 GPT 4-turbo [snapshot unspecified] 75.7% Official leaderboard
4 Claude 3 Sonnet 67.3% Feb 2024 Official leaderboard
5 Llama 3-70B 67.3% Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
6 Llama-3 70B [base] 66.1% Official leaderboard
7 Claude 3 Haiku 65.4% Mar 2024 Official leaderboard
8 Gemini 1.0 Pro 63.2% Dec 2023 Official leaderboard
9 C4AI Command-r+ 60.6% Official leaderboard
10 Aya-23 35B 55.6% Official leaderboard
11 C4AI Command-r 54.9% Official leaderboard
12 Mixtral 8x22B 54.8% Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
13 GPT 3.5-turbo [snapshot unspecified] 51% Official leaderboard
14 Llama 3-8B 46.4% Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
15 Llama-3 8B [base] 46.2% Official leaderboard
16 Mixtral 8x7B-IT 45.2% Official leaderboard
17 Aya-23 8B 45% Official leaderboard
18 Gemma 7B 43.6% Feb 2024 Official leaderboard
19 Aya-101 40.7% Official leaderboard
20 Trendyol-LLM 7B-C-D 34.1% Official leaderboard
21 mT0-xxl 33.9% Official leaderboard
22 Mistral 7B-IT 32% Official leaderboard
23 Llama-2 7B [base] 22.3% Official leaderboard
24 mT5-xxl 18.1% Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Claude 3 Opus 79.1% Feb 2024 Official leaderboard
2 Qwen2.5-72B 76.1% Sep 2024 Lab model card
3 Qwen2.5-32B 72.4% Dec 2024 Lab model card
4 Claude 3 Sonnet 67.3% Feb 2024 Official leaderboard
5 Llama 3-70B 67.3% Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
6 Qwen2.5-14B 66.8% Dec 2024 Lab model card
7 Claude 3 Haiku 65.4% Mar 2024 Official leaderboard
8 Gemini 1.0 Pro 63.2% Dec 2023 Official leaderboard
9 Mixtral 8x22B 54.8% Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
10 Qwen2.5-7B 54.3% Dec 2024 Lab model card
11 Llama 3-8B 46.4% Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
12 Gemma 7B 43.6% Feb 2024 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 4 models in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

Number one over time Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

Anthropic Qwen
Own leaderboard Not tested since Jul 2024
Lab claims Not tested since Dec 2024
Qwen2.5-72B 76.1%

Sources: Official TurkishMMLU leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude 3 Opus Gemini 1.0 Pro 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude 3 Opus Gemini 1.0 Pro

Sources: Official TurkishMMLU leaderboard and labs’ model cards

No launch post has listed it since September 2024

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Qwen
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Sep 19, 2024 Qwen2.5-72B 76.1 TurkishMMLU (Turkish)

4 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Dec 19, 2024 Qwen2.5-7B technical report 54.3 TurkishMMLU (Turkish), Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct (Table 14) Capabilities
Dec 19, 2024 Qwen2.5-72B technical report 76.1 TurkishMMLU (Turkish), Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct (Table 13) Capabilities
Dec 19, 2024 Qwen2.5-32B technical report 72.4 TurkishMMLU (Turkish), Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct (Table 13) Capabilities
Dec 19, 2024 Qwen2.5-14B technical report 66.8 TurkishMMLU (Turkish), Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct (Table 14) Capabilities

More in Multilingual

All 120 in Multilingual
  • MMMLU In use MMLU professionally translated into 14 languages. Multiple-choice accuracy. Claude Mythos Preview 92.7%
  • WMT24++ In use English-to-55-language translation of WMT24 test data. Scored with automatic metrics such as MetricX or xCOMET. K-EXAONE 90.5%
  • MMLU-ProX In use MMLU-Pro translated into up to 29 languages with expert review. Multiple-choice accuracy per language. Qwen3.7-Max 87%
  • CLIcK In use Models answer 1,995 multiple-choice questions on Korean language and culture. Questions come from official Korean exams and textbooks in eleven categories. Solar Open 2 90.7%
  • Global MMLU Lite 3.0 In use Models answer 400 human-translated MMLU questions per language in 23 languages. Version 3.0 adds Czech, Hungarian, Oriya, Slovak and Tajik and updates Italian. Accuracy. Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B-A55B Base 90.1%
  • MMMB In use Models answer multiple-choice questions about images in six languages across 15 categories. The set has about 12,000 questions. LFM2.5-VL-3B 83%