TurkishMMLU
Models answer over 10,000 multiple choice questions that Turkish curriculum experts wrote for nine high-school subjects. Scoring is accuracy.
- Made by
- Arda Yüksel et al.
- Released
- July 2024
- Kind
- Knowledge in many languages
- Level
- School
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Multiple choice
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
-
Qwen2.5-72B #165 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- September 2024, dropped before it saturated
- Last model added
- December 2024
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Multiple choice question answering tasks evaluate the reasoning, comprehension, and mathematical abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). While existing benchmarks employ automatic translation for multilingual evaluation, this approach is error-prone and potentially introduces culturally biased questions, especially in social sciences. We introduce the first multitask, multiple-choice Turkish QA benchmark, TurkishMMLU, to evaluate LLMs' understanding of the Turkish language. TurkishMMLU includes over 10,000 questions, covering 9 different subjects from Turkish high-school education curricula. These questions are written by curriculum experts, suitable for the high-school curricula in Turkey, covering subjects ranging from natural sciences and math questions to more culturally representative topics such as Turkish Literature and the history of the Turkish Republic. We evaluate over 20 LLMs, including multilingual open-source (e.g., Gemma, Llama, MT5), closed-source (GPT 4o, Claude, Gemini), and Turkish-adapted (e.g., Trendyol) models. We provide an extensive evaluation, including zero-shot and few-shot evaluation of LLMs, chain-of-thought reasoning, and question difficulty analysis along with model performance. We provide an in-depth analysis of the Turkish capabilities and limitations of current LLMs to provide insights for future LLMs for the Turkish language. We publicly release our code for the dataset and evaluation: https://github.com/ArdaYueksel/TurkishMMLU.
GPT 4o [snapshot unspecified] tops the leaderboard with 83.1%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Claude 3 Opus, at 79.1%.
Claude 3 Opus leads with 79.1%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in April 2024, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 83.1 GPT 4o [snapshot unspecified]
- 79.1 Claude 3 Opus
- 75.7 GPT 4-turbo [snapshot unspecified]
- 67.3 Claude 3 Sonnet
- 67.3
Llama 3-70B
- 66.1 Llama-3 70B [base]
- 65.4 Claude 3 Haiku
- 63.2
Gemini 1.0 Pro
- 60.6 C4AI Command-r+
- 55.6 Aya-23 35B
- 54.9 C4AI Command-r
- 54.8
Mixtral 8x22B
- 51.0 GPT 3.5-turbo [snapshot unspecified]
- 46.4
Llama 3-8B
- 46.2 Llama-3 8B [base]
- 45.2 Mixtral 8x7B-IT
- 45.0 Aya-23 8B
- 43.6
Gemma 7B
- 40.7 Aya-101
- 34.1 Trendyol-LLM 7B-C-D
- 33.9 mT0-xxl
- 32.0 Mistral 7B-IT
- 22.3 Llama-2 7B [base]
- 18.1 mT5-xxl
- 1 GPT 4o [snapshot unspecified] 83.1%
- 2 Claude 3 Opus 79.1%
- 3 GPT 4-turbo [snapshot unspecified] 75.7%
- 4 Claude 3 Sonnet 67.3%
- 5
Llama 3-70B 67.3%
- 6 Llama-3 70B [base] 66.1%
- 7 Claude 3 Haiku 65.4%
- 8
Gemini 1.0 Pro 63.2%
- 9 C4AI Command-r+ 60.6%
- 10 Aya-23 35B 55.6%
- 11 C4AI Command-r 54.9%
- 12
Mixtral 8x22B 54.8%
- 13 GPT 3.5-turbo [snapshot unspecified] 51%
- 14
Llama 3-8B 46.4%
- 15 Llama-3 8B [base] 46.2%
- 16 Mixtral 8x7B-IT 45.2%
- 17 Aya-23 8B 45%
- 18
Gemma 7B 43.6%
- 19 Aya-101 40.7%
- 20 Trendyol-LLM 7B-C-D 34.1%
- 21 mT0-xxl 33.9%
- 22 Mistral 7B-IT 32%
- 23 Llama-2 7B [base] 22.3%
- 24 mT5-xxl 18.1%
Source: Official TurkishMMLU leaderboard
- 1 Claude 3 Opus 79.1%
- 2
Qwen2.5-72B 76.1%
- 3
Qwen2.5-32B 72.4%
- 4 Claude 3 Sonnet 67.3%
- 5
Llama 3-70B 67.3%
- 6
Qwen2.5-14B 66.8%
- 7 Claude 3 Haiku 65.4%
- 8
Gemini 1.0 Pro 63.2%
- 9
Mixtral 8x22B 54.8%
- 10
Qwen2.5-7B 54.3%
- 11
Llama 3-8B 46.4%
- 12
Gemma 7B 43.6%
Sources: Official TurkishMMLU leaderboard and labs’ model cards
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT 4o [snapshot unspecified] | 83.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 2 | Claude 3 Opus | 79.1% | Feb 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | GPT 4-turbo [snapshot unspecified] | 75.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 4 | Claude 3 Sonnet | 67.3% | Feb 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | | 67.3% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | Llama-3 70B [base] | 66.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 7 | Claude 3 Haiku | 65.4% | Mar 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | | 63.2% | Dec 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | C4AI Command-r+ | 60.6% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 10 | Aya-23 35B | 55.6% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 11 | C4AI Command-r | 54.9% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 12 | | 54.8% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | GPT 3.5-turbo [snapshot unspecified] | 51% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 14 | | 46.4% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | Llama-3 8B [base] | 46.2% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 16 | Mixtral 8x7B-IT | 45.2% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 17 | Aya-23 8B | 45% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 18 | | 43.6% | Feb 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | Aya-101 | 40.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 20 | Trendyol-LLM 7B-C-D | 34.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 21 | mT0-xxl | 33.9% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 22 | Mistral 7B-IT | 32% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 23 | Llama-2 7B [base] | 22.3% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 24 | mT5-xxl | 18.1% | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude 3 Opus | 79.1% | Feb 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | | 76.1% | Sep 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 72.4% | Dec 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | Claude 3 Sonnet | 67.3% | Feb 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | | 67.3% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | | 66.8% | Dec 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | Claude 3 Haiku | 65.4% | Mar 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | | 63.2% | Dec 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | | 54.8% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | | 54.3% | Dec 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 11 | | 46.4% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | | 43.6% | Feb 2024 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 4 models in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
Number one over time Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
Sources: Official TurkishMMLU leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official TurkishMMLU leaderboard and labs’ model cards
No launch post has listed it since September 2024
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2024 | 76.1 | TurkishMMLU (Turkish) |
4 system cards report it, from 1 lab
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2024 | | 54.3 | TurkishMMLU (Turkish), Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct (Table 14) | Capabilities |
| Dec 19, 2024 | | 76.1 | TurkishMMLU (Turkish), Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct (Table 13) | Capabilities |
| Dec 19, 2024 | | 72.4 | TurkishMMLU (Turkish), Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct (Table 13) | Capabilities |
| Dec 19, 2024 | | 66.8 | TurkishMMLU (Turkish), Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct (Table 14) | Capabilities |
More in Multilingual
- MMMLU In use MMLU professionally translated into 14 languages. Multiple-choice accuracy. Claude Mythos Preview 92.7%
- WMT24++ In use English-to-55-language translation of WMT24 test data. Scored with automatic metrics such as MetricX or xCOMET.
K-EXAONE 90.5%
- MMLU-ProX In use MMLU-Pro translated into up to 29 languages with expert review. Multiple-choice accuracy per language.
Qwen3.7-Max 87%
- CLIcK In use Models answer 1,995 multiple-choice questions on Korean language and culture. Questions come from official Korean exams and textbooks in eleven categories.
Solar Open 2 90.7%
- Global MMLU Lite 3.0 In use Models answer 400 human-translated MMLU questions per language in 23 languages. Version 3.0 adds Czech, Hungarian, Oriya, Slovak and Tajik and updates Italian. Accuracy.
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B-A55B Base 90.1%
- MMMB In use Models answer multiple-choice questions about images in six languages across 15 categories. The set has about 12,000 questions. LFM2.5-VL-3B 83%