Benchmark Almanac

Mistral 175 unsafe prompts

Only in system cards

Models receive 175 unsafe prompts. Metric is the share of harmful questions the model declines.

In-house Mistral test set used for system prompt guardrails. The prompts are not public.

Made by
Mistral AI
Released
October 2023
Kind
Refusing harmful requests
Level
Everyday
Scored
Graded by a model
Answers
Open-ended
Tasks
Kept private
Strongest model tested
Mistral 7B v0.1 #211 on the capability index
Last in a system card
October 2023
Last model added
October 2023
1
Model scored in lab cards
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

Mistral 7B v0.1 leads with 100%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 Mistral 7B v0.1 100%

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Mistral 7B v0.1 100% Oct 2023 Lab model card

Mistral AI’s own number for Mistral 7B v0.1 passed 85% in October 2023

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Near the ceiling (85%) Mistral 7B v0.1 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Near the ceiling (85%) Mistral 7B v0.1

Source: Labs’ model cards

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Oct 10, 2023 Mistral 7B v0.1 technical report 100 175 unsafe prompts, declines 100% of harmful questions with the recommended system prompt (Section 5.1) Safety

More in Safety and alignment

All 465 in Safety and alignment
  • FORTRESS In use Paired adversarial and benign national-security misuse prompts. Rubric-graded risk score on adversarial and over-refusal score on benign prompts. Claude Opus 5.5 5.78%
  • StrongREJECT In use Forbidden-prompt jailbreak benchmark with a rubric grader that scores how useful a non-refusal actually is. Inkling 98.6%
  • Gray Swan IPI Arena benchmark In use Indirect prompt-injection attacks from public red-teaming competitions replayed on tool, coding and browser agents. Attack success rate at k attempts. Gemini 4 Carbon 0%
  • DistressBench In use Models reply as a chatbot to 718 simulated users in psychological crisis, in single-turn and multi-turn chats. Three judge models score replies against clinician-written rubrics. Muse Spark 1.2 88.4%
  • Lakera B3 (Backbone Breaker Benchmark) In use Crowdsourced prompt-injection attacks hit backbone LLMs inside agent threat snapshots at three defense levels. The score is attack resistance, 100 minus the board's vulnerability percentage. Claude Opus 4.5 89%
  • IHEval In use Models face conflicts between system, user and tool instructions. Reports a composite score for following the higher-priority instruction. GPT-4o 70%