Benchmark Almanac

SAFE-Teen Relationship boundaries

GPT-6.1 Sol 19% leads since October 2026
Not in model cards

Models respond to simulated teens in relationship boundary scenarios. The score is the published conversation failure rate.

One track of SAFE-Teen. The SAFE-Teen record keeps lab scores that combine tracks.

Made by
Vals AI
Released
October 2026
Kind
Wellbeing and sycophancy
Level
Everyday
Scored
Graded by a model
Answers
Open-ended
Tasks
Kept private
Strongest model tested
Claude Opus 5.5 #4 on the capability index
Last model added
October 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026
17
Models scored on its own leaderboard

2 models share the top score of 19%

Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.

  1. 1 GPT-6.1 Sol 19%
  2. 2 Mistral Large 4 Preview 19%
  3. 3 Claude Opus 5.5 25%
  4. 4 GPT-5.6 Luna 35%
  5. 5 Claude Sonnet 5.5 37%
  6. 6 Grok 4.7 48%
  7. 7 Qwen 3.8 Max 51%
  8. 8 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 51%
  9. 9 MiniMax-M3 53%
  10. 10 Muse Spark 1.3 Extra High 56%
  11. 11 MiMo-V2.6 Pro 56%
  12. 12 Kimi K3 63%
  13. 13 Gemini 3.8 Flash 63%
  14. 14 GLM-5.3 64%
  15. 15 Grok 4.5 65%
  16. 16 Gemini 4 Argon 66%
  17. 17 Gemini 3.6 Flash 70%

Source: Official SAFE-Teen Relationship boundaries leaderboard

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-6.1 Sol 19% Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
2 Mistral Large 4 Preview 19% Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
3 Claude Opus 5.5 25% Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
4 GPT-5.6 Luna 35% Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
5 Claude Sonnet 5.5 37% Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
6 Grok 4.7 48% Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
7 Qwen 3.8 Max 51% Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
8 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 51% Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
9 MiniMax-M3 53% Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
10 Muse Spark 1.3 56% Extra High Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
11 MiMo-V2.6 Pro 56% Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
12 Kimi K3 63% Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
13 Gemini 3.8 Flash 63% Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
14 GLM-5.3 64% Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
15 Grok 4.5 65% Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
16 Gemini 4 Argon 66% Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
17 Gemini 3.6 Flash 70% Jul 2026 Official leaderboard

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

OpenAI
Own leaderboard 1 leader

Source: Official SAFE-Teen Relationship boundaries leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 GPT-6.1 Sol Claude Opus 5.5 GPT-5.6 Luna MiniMax-M3 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 GPT-6.1 Sol GPT-5.6 Luna

Source: Official SAFE-Teen Relationship boundaries leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Safety and alignment

All 465 in Safety and alignment
  • FORTRESS In use Paired adversarial and benign national-security misuse prompts. Rubric-graded risk score on adversarial and over-refusal score on benign prompts. Claude Opus 5.5 5.78%
  • StrongREJECT In use Forbidden-prompt jailbreak benchmark with a rubric grader that scores how useful a non-refusal actually is. Inkling 98.6%
  • Gray Swan IPI Arena benchmark In use Indirect prompt-injection attacks from public red-teaming competitions replayed on tool, coding and browser agents. Attack success rate at k attempts. Gemini 4 Carbon 0%
  • DistressBench In use Models reply as a chatbot to 718 simulated users in psychological crisis, in single-turn and multi-turn chats. Three judge models score replies against clinician-written rubrics. Muse Spark 1.2 88.4%
  • Lakera B3 (Backbone Breaker Benchmark) In use Crowdsourced prompt-injection attacks hit backbone LLMs inside agent threat snapshots at three defense levels. The score is attack resistance, 100 minus the board's vulnerability percentage. Claude Opus 4.5 89%
  • IHEval In use Models face conflicts between system, user and tool instructions. Reports a composite score for following the higher-priority instruction. GPT-4o 70%