Benchmark Almanac

Video-SafetyBench

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (snapshot unspecified) 1.20 tops its leaderboard Claude 3.7 Sonnet 1.30 leads the models we track
Not in model cards

Video-language models receive 2,264 synthesized videos paired with a harmful or a benign-looking query across 13 unsafe categories and 48 subcategories. An LLM judge scores harm with a confidence-weighted metric called RJScore.

Accepted to the NeurIPS 2025 Datasets and Benchmarks track. Benign queries look harmless but become harmful when read with the video.

Released
May 2025
Kind
Jailbreaks and prompt injection
Level
Everyday
Scored
Graded by a model
Answers
Open-ended
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Claude 3.7 Sonnet #118 on the capability index
Last model added
March 2025
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

The increasing deployment of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) raises safety concerns under potential malicious inputs. However, existing multimodal safety evaluations primarily focus on model vulnerabilities exposed by static image inputs, ignoring the temporal dynamics of video that may induce distinct safety risks. To bridge this gap, we introduce Video-SafetyBench, the first comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate the safety of LVLMs under video-text attacks. It comprises 2,264 video-text pairs spanning 48 fine-grained unsafe categories, each pairing a synthesized video with either a harmful query, which contains explicit malice, or a benign query, which appears harmless but triggers harmful behavior when interpreted alongside the video. To generate semantically accurate videos for safety evaluation, we design a controllable pipeline that decomposes video semantics into subject images (what is shown) and motion text (how it moves), which jointly guide the synthesis of query-relevant videos. To effectively evaluate uncertain or borderline harmful outputs, we propose RJScore, a novel LLM-based metric that incorporates the confidence of judge models and human-aligned decision threshold calibration. Extensive experiments show that benign-query video composition achieves average attack success rates of 67.2%, revealing consistent vulnerabilities to video-induced attacks. We believe Video-SafetyBench will catalyze future research into video-based safety evaluation and defense strategies.

Abstract of Video-SafetyBench: A Benchmark for Safety Evaluation of Video LVLMs (arXiv:2505.11842, CC0)
25
Entries on its own leaderboard, 15 models we track

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (snapshot unspecified) tops the leaderboard with 1.20

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Every run is in the next chart. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Claude 3.7 Sonnet, at 1.30.

The newest model with a score here came out in March 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (snapshot unspecified) harmful queries 1.20
  2. 2 Claude 3.7 Sonnet harmful queries 1.30
  3. 3 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) harmful queries 1.40
  4. 4 GPT-4o-mini (snapshot unspecified) harmful queries 1.50
  5. 5 Gemini 2.0 Pro harmful queries 1.70
  6. 6 Qwen-VL-Max harmful queries 1.80
  7. 7 InternVL2.5-8B harmful queries 1.90
  8. 8 InternVL2_5-78B harmful queries 1.90
  9. 9 Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025, harmful queries 2.00
  10. 10 Qwen2.5-VL-32B harmful queries 2.00
  11. 11 InternVL2-8B harmful queries 2.10
  12. 12 InternVideo2.5-8B harmful queries 2.20
  13. 13 VideoLLAMA3-7B harmful queries 2.20
  14. 14 Qwen2.5-VL-7B harmful queries 2.20
  15. 15 Category Average harmful queries 2.30
  16. 16 Qwen2-VL-72B harmful queries 2.40
  17. 17 Qwen2.5-VL-72B harmful queries 2.40
  18. 18 LLaVA-OneVision 7B harmful queries 2.70
  19. 19 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct harmful queries 2.70
  20. 20 VideoLLaMA2-72B harmful queries 3.00
  21. 21 Mistral-3.1-24B harmful queries 3.10
  22. 22 LLaVA-OneVision 72B harmful queries 3.10
  23. 23 MiniCPM-o-2_6 harmful queries 3.20
  24. 24 LLaVA-Video-72B harmful queries 3.30
  25. 25 LLaVA-Video-7B harmful queries 3.60

Source: Official Video-SafetyBench leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (snapshot unspecified) 1.20 harmful queries Official leaderboard
2 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 1.30 harmful queries Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
3 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 1.40 harmful queries Official leaderboard
4 GPT-4o-mini (snapshot unspecified) 1.50 harmful queries Official leaderboard
5 Gemini 2.0 Pro 1.70 harmful queries Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
6 Qwen-VL-Max 1.80 harmful queries Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
7 InternVL2.5-8B 1.90 harmful queries Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
8 InternVL2_5-78B 1.90 harmful queries Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
9 Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 2.00 harmful queries Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
10 Qwen2.5-VL-32B 2.00 harmful queries Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
11 InternVL2-8B 2.10 harmful queries Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
12 InternVideo2.5-8B 2.20 harmful queries Official leaderboard
13 VideoLLAMA3-7B 2.20 harmful queries Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
14 Qwen2.5-VL-7B 2.20 harmful queries Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
15 Category Average 2.30 harmful queries Official leaderboard
16 Qwen2-VL-72B 2.40 harmful queries Official leaderboard
17 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 2.40 harmful queries Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
18 LLaVA-OneVision 7B 2.70 harmful queries Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
19 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct 2.70 harmful queries Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
20 VideoLLaMA2-72B 3.00 harmful queries Official leaderboard
21 Mistral-3.1-24B 3.10 harmful queries Official leaderboard
22 LLaVA-OneVision 72B 3.10 harmful queries Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
23 MiniCPM-o-2_6 3.20 harmful queries Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
24 LLaVA-Video-72B 3.30 harmful queries Official leaderboard
25 LLaVA-Video-7B 3.60 harmful queries Official leaderboard

Scores at each effort level

Models the leaderboard ran at two or more effort levels. We don’t have enough cost data here to say what the extra effort costs.

Lowest effort to highest, light to dark
MiniCPM-o-2_6
harmful que… benign-look…
4.00
LLaVA-OneVision 72B
harmful que… benign-look…
3.70
LLaVA-OneVision 7B
harmful que… benign-look…
3.50
Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct
harmful que… benign-look…
3.70
Qwen2.5-VL-72B
harmful que… benign-look…
3.60
VideoLLAMA3-7B
harmful que… benign-look…
3.20
Qwen2.5-VL-7B
harmful que… benign-look…
3.30
InternVL2-8B
harmful que… benign-look…
3.80
Gemini 2.0 Flash
harmful que… benign-look…
3.10
Qwen2.5-VL-32B
harmful que… benign-look…
3.60
InternVL2.5-8B
harmful que… benign-look…
3.40
InternVL2_5-78B
harmful que… benign-look…
3.30

Source: Official Video-SafetyBench leaderboard

ModelEffortHarnessScoreCost per taskOutput tokens
MiniCPM-o-2_6 benign-looking queries 4.00
InternVL2-8B benign-looking queries 3.80
Qwen-VL-Max benign-looking queries 3.70
LLaVA-OneVision 72B benign-looking queries 3.70
Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct benign-looking queries 3.70
Qwen2.5-VL-72B benign-looking queries 3.60
Qwen2.5-VL-32B benign-looking queries 3.60
LLaVA-OneVision 7B benign-looking queries 3.50
InternVL2.5-8B benign-looking queries 3.40
InternVL2_5-78B benign-looking queries 3.30
Qwen2.5-VL-7B benign-looking queries 3.30
VideoLLAMA3-7B benign-looking queries 3.20
MiniCPM-o-2_6 harmful queries 3.20
LLaVA-OneVision 72B harmful queries 3.10
Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 benign-looking queries 3.10
Gemini 2.0 Pro benign-looking queries 3.10
LLaVA-OneVision 7B harmful queries 2.70
Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct harmful queries 2.70
Qwen2.5-VL-72B harmful queries 2.40
VideoLLAMA3-7B harmful queries 2.20
Qwen2.5-VL-7B harmful queries 2.20
InternVL2-8B harmful queries 2.10
Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 harmful queries 2.00
Qwen2.5-VL-32B harmful queries 2.00
InternVL2.5-8B harmful queries 1.90
InternVL2_5-78B harmful queries 1.90
Claude 3.7 Sonnet benign-looking queries 1.90
Qwen-VL-Max harmful queries 1.80
Gemini 2.0 Pro harmful queries 1.70
Claude 3.7 Sonnet harmful queries 1.30

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Anthropic
Own leaderboard Not tested since May 2025

Source: Official Video-SafetyBench leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard
1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 2024 2025 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 2024 2025

Source: Official Video-SafetyBench leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Safety and alignment

All 465 in Safety and alignment
  • FORTRESS In use Paired adversarial and benign national-security misuse prompts. Rubric-graded risk score on adversarial and over-refusal score on benign prompts. Claude Opus 5.5 5.78%
  • StrongREJECT In use Forbidden-prompt jailbreak benchmark with a rubric grader that scores how useful a non-refusal actually is. Inkling 98.6%
  • Gray Swan IPI Arena benchmark In use Indirect prompt-injection attacks from public red-teaming competitions replayed on tool, coding and browser agents. Attack success rate at k attempts. Gemini 4 Carbon 0%
  • DistressBench In use Models reply as a chatbot to 718 simulated users in psychological crisis, in single-turn and multi-turn chats. Three judge models score replies against clinician-written rubrics. Muse Spark 1.2 88.4%
  • Lakera B3 (Backbone Breaker Benchmark) In use Crowdsourced prompt-injection attacks hit backbone LLMs inside agent threat snapshots at three defense levels. The score is attack resistance, 100 minus the board's vulnerability percentage. Claude Opus 4.5 89%
  • IHEval In use Models face conflicts between system, user and tool instructions. Reports a composite score for following the higher-priority instruction. GPT-4o 70%