Benchmark Almanac

VisFactor

GPT-5.5 55.9% leads since April 2026
Qwen 3.8 Max 60.8% leads since August 2026
In use

Models take 20 vision-centric subtests adapted from a human cognitive psychology test battery, covering perception primitives and visual memory. Scored by accuracy.

Released
February 2025
Kind
Spatial reasoning and counting
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Short answer
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
GPT-5.5 #20 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
August 2026
Last model added
August 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Humans develop perception through a bottom-up hierarchy: from basic primitives and Gestalt principles to high-level semantics. Current Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are trained directly on complex downstream tasks. Does it guarantee their performance on these foundational visual capabilities? To systematically investigate this gap, we introduce VisFacor, a benchmark that digitizes 20 vision-centric subtests from FRCT, a well-established cognitive psychology assessment spanning four domains of human visual cognition. Furthermore, we design algorithms to automatically construct and validate unlimited test cases with controllable difficulty. Using VisFacor, we evaluate 39 frontier MLLMs, including both proprietary (e.g., GPT, Gemini) and open-source (e.g., LLaMA, Qwen) models. The best model achieves a score of only 55.9%. Analysis reveals good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.94) and construct validity (compared to existing vision benchmarks). Models consistently fail on tasks such as mental rotation, spatial relation inference, and figure-ground discrimination, regardless of model size or prompting strategy. These findings suggest that performance improvements on existing general benchmarks might represent castles in the air instead of a genuine mastery of human-like visual cognition.

Abstract of Human Cognitive Benchmarks Reveal Foundational Visual Gaps in MLLMs (arXiv:2502.16435, CC0)
39
Entries on its own leaderboard, 26 models we track
2
Launch posts list it, from 1 lab
2
System cards report it, from 1 lab

GPT-5.5 leads with 55.9% among models released by April 2026

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

Qwen 3.8 Max leads with 60.8%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in April 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 GPT-5.5 55.9%
  2. 2 Gemini 3.1 Pro 54%
  3. 3 Gemini 3 Pro 45.8%
  4. 4 Seed-2.0-Lite-0415 40.6%
  5. 5 Gemini 3 Flash 40.5%
  6. 6 Seed-2.0-Pro-0215 39.6%
  7. 7 Qwen3.5-Plus 39.1%
  8. 8 Qwen 3.6 Plus 38.2%
  9. 9 GPT-5.2 33.6%
  10. 10 GPT-5.1 30.2%
  11. 11 Kimi K2.5 27.3%
  12. 12 GLM-5V-Turbo 27.2%
  13. 13 Claude-Sonnet-3.7 25.2%
  14. 14 Claude Sonnet 4.6 24.7%
  15. 15 Claude Opus 4.5 24.5%
  16. 16 o3 24.3%
  17. 17 GPT-5 mini 24.3%
  18. 18 Seed1.5-VL 23.7%
  19. 19 o4-mini 23.2%
  20. 20 Qwen-VL-Plus (snapshot unspecified) 21.6%
  21. 21 Seed1.6-Thinking 21.5%
  22. 22 Claude Sonnet 4.5 21.5%
  23. 23 GPT-4o Nov 2024 21.4%
  24. 24 GPT-4.1 21.3%
  25. 25 Qwen-VL-Max (snapshot unspecified) 21.2%
  26. 26 o1 20.8%
  27. 27 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 20.4%
  28. 28 Claude-Sonnet-3.5 (snapshot unspecified) 20.1%
  29. 29 Seed-2.0-Mini-0202 19.8%
  30. 30 Gemini-2.5-Flash (snapshot unspecified) 17.6%
  31. 31 Gemini-2.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) 17.4%
  32. 32 Claude Sonnet 4 17.4%
  33. 33 Qwen-2-VL-72B 16.5%
  34. 34 GPT-4o mini 16.4%
  35. 35 Qwen2.5-VL-32B 13.3%
  36. 36 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 10.9%
  37. 37 Moonshot-V1-128K-Vision 9.50%
  38. 38 LLaMA-3.2-90B-Vision 4.10%
  39. 39 LLaMA-3.2-11B-Vision 2.40%

Source: Official VisFactor leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-5.5 55.9% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
2 Gemini 3.1 Pro 54% Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
3 Gemini 3 Pro 45.8% Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
4 Seed-2.0-Lite-0415 40.6% Official leaderboard
5 Gemini 3 Flash 40.5% Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
6 Seed-2.0-Pro-0215 39.6% Official leaderboard
7 Qwen3.5-Plus 39.1% Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
8 Qwen 3.6 Plus 38.2% Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
9 GPT-5.2 33.6% Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
10 GPT-5.1 30.2% Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
11 Kimi K2.5 27.3% Jan 2026 Official leaderboard
12 GLM-5V-Turbo 27.2% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
13 Claude-Sonnet-3.7 25.2% Official leaderboard
14 Claude Sonnet 4.6 24.7% Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
15 Claude Opus 4.5 24.5% Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
16 o3 24.3% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
17 GPT-5 mini 24.3% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
18 Seed1.5-VL 23.7% May 2025 Official leaderboard
19 o4-mini 23.2% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
20 Qwen-VL-Plus (snapshot unspecified) 21.6% Official leaderboard
21 Seed1.6-Thinking 21.5% Jun 2025 Official leaderboard
22 Claude Sonnet 4.5 21.5% Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
23 GPT-4o Nov 2024 21.4% Nov 2024 Official leaderboard
24 GPT-4.1 21.3% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
25 Qwen-VL-Max (snapshot unspecified) 21.2% Official leaderboard
26 o1 20.8% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
27 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 20.4% Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
28 Claude-Sonnet-3.5 (snapshot unspecified) 20.1% Official leaderboard
29 Seed-2.0-Mini-0202 19.8% Official leaderboard
30 Gemini-2.5-Flash (snapshot unspecified) 17.6% Official leaderboard
31 Gemini-2.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) 17.4% Official leaderboard
32 Claude Sonnet 4 17.4% May 2025 Official leaderboard
33 Qwen-2-VL-72B 16.5% Official leaderboard
34 GPT-4o mini 16.4% Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
35 Qwen2.5-VL-32B 13.3% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
36 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 10.9% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
37 Moonshot-V1-128K-Vision 9.50% Official leaderboard
38 LLaMA-3.2-90B-Vision 4.10% Official leaderboard
39 LLaMA-3.2-11B-Vision 2.40% Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen 3.8 Max 60.8% Aug 2026 Lab model card
2 GPT-5.5 55.9% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
3 Gemini 3.1 Pro 54% Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
4 Seed2.1 Pro 51.4% Jun 2026 Lab model card
5 Gemini 3 Pro 45.8% Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
6 Qwen3.7-Plus 42.8% Jun 2026 Lab model card
7 Gemini 3 Flash 40.5% Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
8 Qwen3.5-Plus 39.1% Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
9 Qwen 3.6 Plus 38.2% Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
10 Seed2.0 Pro 36.8% Feb 2026 Lab model card
11 GPT-5.2 33.6% Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
12 GPT-5.1 30.2% Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
13 Kimi K2.5 27.3% Jan 2026 Official leaderboard
14 GLM-5V-Turbo 27.2% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
15 Claude Sonnet 4.6 24.7% Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
16 Claude Opus 4.5 24.5% Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
17 o3 24.3% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
18 GPT-5 mini 24.3% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
19 Seed1.5-VL 23.7% May 2025 Official leaderboard
20 o4-mini 23.2% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
21 Seed1.6-Thinking 21.5% Jun 2025 Official leaderboard
22 Claude Sonnet 4.5 21.5% Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
23 GPT-4o Nov 2024 21.4% Nov 2024 Official leaderboard
24 GPT-4.1 21.3% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
25 o1 20.8% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
26 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 20.4% Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
27 Claude Sonnet 4 17.4% May 2025 Official leaderboard
28 GPT-4o mini 16.4% Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
29 Qwen2.5-VL-32B 13.3% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
30 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 10.9% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 4 models in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

6 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in February 2025 7 models have held number one with claims included since its release in February 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

OpenAI Google DeepMind ByteDance Seed Qwen
Own leaderboard Not tested since Apr 2026
GPT-5.5 55.9%
Lab claims Not tested since Aug 2026
Qwen 3.8 Max 60.8%

Sources: Official VisFactor leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen 3.8 Max GPT-5.5 Gemini 3 Pro GPT-5.1 o3 GPT-4o GPT-4o mini 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen 3.8 Max Gemini 3.1 Pro

Sources: Official VisFactor leaderboard and labs’ model cards

One lab put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Qwen
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Aug 3, 2026 Qwen 3.8 Max 60.8 VisFactor
Jun 1, 2026 Qwen3.7-Plus 42.8 VisFactor

2 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Jun 23, 2026 Seed2.1 Pro model card 51.4 VisFactor (Table 9) Capabilities
Feb 14, 2026 Seed2.0 Pro model card 36.8 VisFactor, macro average (Table 8) Capabilities

More in Vision

All 281 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%