Benchmark Almanac

WebWalkerQA

Tongyi (paper system, backbone unspecified) 40.7% tops its leaderboard Qwen2.5-72B 33.3% leads the models we track
Not in model cards

Agents start from a website's home page and traverse its subpages to find the facts that answer a question. Answers are judged against references.

Tongyi deep research model reports cite it. 23 upvotes on Hugging Face papers.

Released
January 2025
Kind
Deep research
Level
Everyday
Scored
Graded by a model
Answers
Short answer
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
o1-preview #147 on the capability index
Last model added
September 2024
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) demonstrates remarkable performance across tasks in open-domain question-answering. However, traditional search engines may retrieve shallow content, limiting the ability of LLMs to handle complex, multi-layered information. To address it, we introduce WebWalkerQA, a benchmark designed to assess the ability of LLMs to perform web traversal. It evaluates the capacity of LLMs to traverse a website's subpages to extract high-quality data systematically. We propose WebWalker, which is a multi-agent framework that mimics human-like web navigation through an explore-critic paradigm. Extensive experimental results show that WebWalkerQA is challenging and demonstrates the effectiveness of RAG combined with WebWalker, through the horizontal and vertical integration in real-world scenarios.

Abstract of WebWalker: Benchmarking LLMs in Web Traversal (arXiv:2501.07572, CC0)
15
Entries on its own leaderboard, 5 models we track

Tongyi (paper system, backbone unspecified) tops the leaderboard with 40.7%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Qwen2.5-72B, at 33.3%.

The newest model with a score here came out in September 2024, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Tongyi (paper system, backbone unspecified) retrieval system 40.7%
  2. 2 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 37.5%
  3. 3 Kimi (paper system, backbone unspecified) retrieval system 37.4%
  4. 4 Qwen-Plus (snapshot unspecified) 33.8%
  5. 5 Qwen2.5-72B 33.3%
  6. 6 ERNIE-4.0-8K retrieval system 29%
  7. 7 Gemini-Search (paper system, backbone unspecified) retrieval system 27.9%
  8. 8 Qwen2.5-14B 27.5%
  9. 9 Qwen2.5-32B 26%
  10. 10 Naive RAG (paper system, backbone unspecified) retrieval system 20.7%
  11. 11 Qwen2.5-7B 19.9%
  12. 12 Doubao (paper system, backbone unspecified) retrieval system 16.8%
  13. 13 MindSearch (paper system, backbone unspecified) retrieval system 11.3%
  14. 14 o1-preview closed book 9.85%
  15. 15 Gemini-1.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) closed book 8.08%

Source: Official WebWalkerQA leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Tongyi (paper system, backbone unspecified) 40.7% retrieval system Official leaderboard
2 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 37.5% WebWalker Official leaderboard
3 Kimi (paper system, backbone unspecified) 37.4% retrieval system Official leaderboard
4 Qwen-Plus (snapshot unspecified) 33.8% WebWalker Official leaderboard
5 Qwen2.5-72B 33.3% WebWalker Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
6 ERNIE-4.0-8K 29% retrieval system Official leaderboard
7 Gemini-Search (paper system, backbone unspecified) 27.9% retrieval system Official leaderboard
8 Qwen2.5-14B 27.5% WebWalker Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
9 Qwen2.5-32B 26% WebWalker Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
10 Naive RAG (paper system, backbone unspecified) 20.7% retrieval system Official leaderboard
11 Qwen2.5-7B 19.9% WebWalker Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
12 Doubao (paper system, backbone unspecified) 16.8% retrieval system Official leaderboard
13 MindSearch (paper system, backbone unspecified) 11.3% retrieval system Official leaderboard
14 o1-preview 9.85% closed book Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
15 Gemini-1.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) 8.08% closed book Official leaderboard

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Qwen
Own leaderboard Not tested since Jan 2025
Qwen2.5-72B 33.3%

Source: Official WebWalkerQA leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen2.5-72B Qwen2.5-32B o1-preview 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen2.5-72B Qwen2.5-32B

Source: Official WebWalkerQA leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Tool use

All 144 in Tool use
  • AutomationBench In use Agent completes end-to-end business workflows inside a simulated company exposing dozens of REST APIs. Graded on resulting state. Gemini 4 Carbon 53.9%
  • MCP Atlas In use Multi-step workflows over real MCP servers. Scores tool-use competency on realistic tasks. Gemini 4 Argon 90.7%
  • BFCL V4 In use Models call functions and tools, including multi-turn agentic tasks with web search and memory. Checked against expected calls and outcomes. Qwen3.7-Max 75%
  • τ³-bench Banking In use Agents act as banking customer-service reps over many turns with a simulated user, following policy. Pass^1 on the final database state. Qwen 3.8 Max 55.1%
  • Toolathlon-Verified In use 108 long-horizon tasks across 32 apps through about 600 MCP tools. Execution-based checkers inspect final environment state. GLM-5.3-Flash 78.4%
  • DeepSearchQA In use Questions that need multi-step search and synthesis. Final answers graded against references. Kimi K3 95%