WellnessBench
Models answer young people asking about eating, sexual safety, substances and self harm, in clinician-written single-turn and pushback dialogues. A pass must be both safe and helpful.
12 models with three repeats. Consumer chat apps passed fewer dialogues than the same models over the API.
- Made by
- micro1
- Released
- October 2026
- Kind
- Wellbeing and sycophancy
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Graded by a model
- Answers
- Open-ended
- Strongest model tested
- GPT-6 Astra #3 on the capability index
- Last model added
- October 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
GPT-6.1 Sol leads with 66%
Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.
- 1 GPT-6.1 Sol 66%
- 2 GPT-6 Astra 64%
- 3
Muse Spark 1.3 61%
- 4 GPT-5.6 Sol 57%
- 5 Claude Sonnet 5.5 57%
- 6 GPT-6 Sol 56%
- 7
Muse Wonder 55%
- 8 Claude Opus 5.5 53%
- 9 Claude Fable 5.1 51%
- 10 Grok 4.7 48%
- 11
Gemini 3.8 Flash 47%
- 12 Grok 4.6 43%
Source: Official WellnessBench leaderboard
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-6.1 Sol | 66% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | GPT-6 Astra | 64% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | | 61% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | GPT-5.6 Sol | 57% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 57% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | GPT-6 Sol | 56% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | | 55% | Oct 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | Claude Opus 5.5 | 53% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | Claude Fable 5.1 | 51% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | Grok 4.7 | 48% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | | 47% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | Grok 4.6 | 43% | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official WellnessBench leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official WellnessBench leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Safety and alignment
- FORTRESS In use Paired adversarial and benign national-security misuse prompts. Rubric-graded risk score on adversarial and over-refusal score on benign prompts. Claude Opus 5.5 5.78%
- StrongREJECT In use Forbidden-prompt jailbreak benchmark with a rubric grader that scores how useful a non-refusal actually is.
Inkling 98.6%
- Gray Swan IPI Arena benchmark In use Indirect prompt-injection attacks from public red-teaming competitions replayed on tool, coding and browser agents. Attack success rate at k attempts.
Gemini 4 Carbon 0%
- DistressBench In use Models reply as a chatbot to 718 simulated users in psychological crisis, in single-turn and multi-turn chats. Three judge models score replies against clinician-written rubrics.
Muse Spark 1.2 88.4%
- Lakera B3 (Backbone Breaker Benchmark) In use Crowdsourced prompt-injection attacks hit backbone LLMs inside agent threat snapshots at three defense levels. The score is attack resistance, 100 minus the board's vulnerability percentage. Claude Opus 4.5 89%
- IHEval In use Models face conflicts between system, user and tool instructions. Reports a composite score for following the higher-priority instruction. GPT-4o 70%