- GPQA Diamond (± 0.83) 37.9
- MMLU-Pro (± 0.18) 49.6
- IFEval (± 0.35) 88.4
- IFBench (± 0.73) 44.9
- Multi-IF (± 0.09) 69.3
- GSM8K 85.6
- MATH-500 (± 0.72) 88
- AIME25 (± 1.81) 31.7
- BFCLv3 57
LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking
LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking.
9
Benchmarks with a score
0
Ranked first, out of five or more models
0
In the top three
Liquid AI Jan 2026
LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking
Open weights Small
119.0
#351 of 404
Self-Reported Index, from the lab's own numbers. No Epoch Capabilities Index score yet.
- IFBench 44.9% #68 /80
- MMLU-Pro 49.6% #155 /167
- AIME 2025 31.7% #138 /143
Where it ranks
Its best score on each benchmark, and where that ranks among every model with a score there. We rank each model once, at its best setting.
Knowledge and language
Math and science
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSM8K | 85.6% | #56 of 92 | Lab model card | |
| MATH-500 | 88% | #54 of 70 | Lab model card | |
| GPQA Diamond | 37.9% | #278 of 302 | Lab model card | |
| AIME 2025 | 31.7% | #138 of 143 | Lab model card |
Agents and tools
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) | 57% | #38 of 41 | Lab model card |
Its lab's numbers put it at 119.0, number 351 of 404
The Self-Reported Index fits one score to the 9 capability results Liquid AI reported for this model, on the scale of the Epoch Capabilities Index. Labs choose which benchmarks to show and how to run them, so read it as the lab's claim, not an independent measurement. The 90% interval runs from 116.4 to 121.7. How we compute it.
- IFEval 88.4
- MATH-500 88
- GSM8K 85.6
- Multi-IF 69.3
- Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) 57
- MMLU-Pro 49.6
- IFBench 44.9
- GPQA Diamond 37.9
- AIME 2025 31.7
Its launch post
The benchmarks the lab chose to headline, with the scores it gave.