Benchmark Almanac

1X World Model Challenge

1x-technologies/GENIE_138M 8.79 tops its leaderboard
Not in model cards

Predict future egocentric frames of 1X's EVE humanoid from video and state. Compression scored by token cross-entropy, Sampling by PSNR on private tests.

Prize-based phases. 1X scores submissions on a held-out set and warns that nearest-neighbor retrieval gets good validation scores. The Evaluation (policy-ranking) challenge was announced but not released. Paper is the winning team's report. Competition spaces on HF.

Made by
1X Technologies
Released
June 2024
Kind
Video world models
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Open-ended
Tasks
Public, plus a private test set

In the authors’ words

World models are a powerful paradigm in AI and robotics, enabling agents to reason about the future by predicting visual observations or compact latent states. The 1X World Model Challenge introduces an open-source benchmark of real-world humanoid interaction, with two complementary tracks: sampling, focused on forecasting future image frames, and compression, focused on predicting future discrete latent codes. For the sampling track, we adapt the video generation foundation model Wan-2.2 TI2V-5B to video-state-conditioned future frame prediction. We condition the video generation on robot states using AdaLN-Zero, and further post-train the model using LoRA. For the compression track, we train a Spatio-Temporal Transformer model from scratch. Our models achieve 23.0 dB PSNR in the sampling task and a Top-500 CE of 6.6386 in the compression task, securing 1st place in both challenges.

Abstract of Generative World Modelling for Humanoids: 1X World Model Challenge Technical Report (arXiv:2510.07092, CC0)
2
Entries on its own leaderboard, 0 models we track

1x-technologies/GENIE_138M tops the leaderboard with 8.79

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

  1. 1 1x-technologies/GENIE_138M maskgit_steps 2 8.79
  2. 2 1x-technologies/GENIE_35M maskgit_steps 2 8.99

Source: Official 1X World Model Challenge leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 1x-technologies/GENIE_138M 8.79 maskgit_steps 2 Official leaderboard
2 1x-technologies/GENIE_35M 8.99 maskgit_steps 2 Official leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in World models

All 39 in World models
  • AgentWorldBench In use Language world models predict the next environment observation after an agent action, in 7 domains from MCP and search to Android and desktop OS. A judge model scores each prediction against the real observation on five dimensions. GPT-5.4 58.3
  • IntPhys 2 In use Models watch simulated videos and judge whether each event is physically possible, testing object permanence, immutability, continuity and solidity. Scored by accuracy. Muse Spark Open 68.3%
  • QwenWorldBench Fading Models act as world models that simulate agent environments in 7 domains, such as terminal, web, and Android. A rubric judge scores five dimensions. Qwen3.7-Plus 62.1%
  • VPCT Fading Models view an image of a ball, ramps, and three buckets and predict which bucket the ball falls into. Scored by accuracy on 100 problems. Gemini 3 Pro 91%
  • ContPhy Fading Models infer physical properties such as mass and density of fluids and soft bodies from videos and predict their dynamics. Seed2.0 Pro 67.4%
  • RBench Only in system cards 650 image+text prompts for robot video generation (tasks and embodiments). MLLM judge scores task completion, physical plausibility, stability. Wan 2.6 60.7%