Benchmark Almanac

RBench

WEAVE-0.5 64.2% tops its leaderboard Wan 2.6 60.7% leads the models we track
Only in system cards

650 image+text prompts for robot video generation (tasks and embodiments). MLLM judge scores task completion, physical plausibility, stability.

MLLM-judged. GPT and Qwen judges give different scores and orders. Best GPT-judged 0.642. Later rows (e.g. Cosmos 3) were supplied by model authors.

Released
January 2026
Kind
Video world models
Scored
Graded by a model
Answers
Open-ended
Tasks
All public
Last in a system card
May 2026
Last model added
July 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Video generation models have significantly advanced embodied intelligence, unlocking new possibilities for generating diverse robot data that capture perception, reasoning, and action in the physical world. However, synthesizing high-quality videos that accurately reflect real-world robotic interactions remains challenging, and the lack of a standardized benchmark limits fair comparisons and progress. To address this gap, we introduce a comprehensive robotics benchmark, RBench, designed to evaluate robot-oriented video generation across five task domains and four distinct embodiments. It assesses both task-level correctness and visual fidelity through reproducible sub-metrics, including structural consistency, physical plausibility, and action completeness. Evaluation of 25 representative models highlights significant deficiencies in generating physically realistic robot behaviors. Furthermore, the benchmark achieves a Spearman correlation coefficient of 0.96 with human evaluations, validating its effectiveness. While RBench provides the necessary lens to identify these deficiencies, achieving physical realism requires moving beyond evaluation to address the critical shortage of high-quality training data. Driven by these insights, we introduce a refined four-stage data pipeline, resulting in RoVid-X, the largest open-source robotic dataset for video generation with 4 million annotated video clips, covering thousands of tasks and enriched with comprehensive physical property annotations. Collectively, this synergistic ecosystem of evaluation and data establishes a robust foundation for rigorous assessment and scalable training of video models, accelerating the evolution of embodied AI toward general intelligence.

Abstract of Rethinking Video Generation Model for the Embodied World (arXiv:2601.15282, CC0)
30
Entries on its own leaderboard, 12 models we track
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

WEAVE-0.5 tops the leaderboard with 64.2%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Wan 2.6, at 60.7%.

The newest model with a score here came out in July 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 WEAVE-0.5 GPT judge 64.2%
  2. 2 LingBot-Video GPT judge 62%
  3. 3 Wan 2.6 GPT judge 60.7%
  4. 4 Seedance v1.5 Pro GPT judge 58.4%
  5. 5 Cosmos3-Nano GPT judge 58.4%
  6. 6 Cosmos3-Super GPT judge 58.1%
  7. 7 Wan 2.5 Preview GPT judge 57%
  8. 8 Hailuo v2 GPT judge 56.5%
  9. 9 Veo 3 GPT judge 56.3%
  10. 10 Seedance 1.0 GPT judge 55.1%
  11. 11 Cosmos3-Edge GPT judge 55.1%
  12. 12 Kling 2.6 Pro GPT judge 53.4%
  13. 13 Wan 2.2 A14B GPT judge 50.7%
  14. 14 Cosmos 2.5 GPT judge 46.4%
  15. 15 HunyuanVideo 1.5 GPT judge 46%
  16. 16 LongCat-Video GPT judge 43.7%
  17. 17 DreamGen(gr1) GPT judge 42%
  18. 18 DreamGen(droid) GPT judge 40.5%
  19. 19 Wan2.1_14B GPT judge 39.9%
  20. 20 LTX-2 19B GPT judge 38.1%
  21. 21 Wan2.2_5B GPT judge 38%
  22. 22 Sora 2 Pro GPT judge 36.2%
  23. 23 SkyReels GPT judge 36.1%
  24. 24 LTX-Video GPT judge 34.4%
  25. 25 FramePack GPT judge 33.9%
  26. 26 HunyuanVideo GPT judge 30.3%
  27. 27 Sora GPT judge 26.6%
  28. 28 CogVideoX_5B GPT judge 25.6%
  29. 29 Vidar GPT judge 20.6%
  30. 30 UnifoLM-WMA-0 GPT judge 12.3%

Source: Official RBench leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 WEAVE-0.5 64.2% GPT judge Official leaderboard
2 LingBot-Video 62% GPT judge Official leaderboard
3 Wan 2.6 60.7% GPT judge Official leaderboard
4 Seedance v1.5 Pro 58.4% GPT judge Official leaderboard
5 Cosmos3-Nano 58.4% GPT judge May 2026 Official leaderboard
6 Cosmos3-Super 58.1% GPT judge Official leaderboard
7 Wan 2.5 Preview 57% GPT judge Official leaderboard
8 Hailuo v2 56.5% GPT judge Official leaderboard
9 Veo 3 56.3% GPT judge Official leaderboard
10 Seedance 1.0 55.1% GPT judge Official leaderboard
11 Cosmos3-Edge 55.1% GPT judge Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
12 Kling 2.6 Pro 53.4% GPT judge Official leaderboard
13 Wan 2.2 A14B 50.7% GPT judge Official leaderboard
14 Cosmos 2.5 46.4% GPT judge Official leaderboard
15 HunyuanVideo 1.5 46% GPT judge Official leaderboard
16 LongCat-Video 43.7% GPT judge Official leaderboard
17 DreamGen(gr1) 42% GPT judge Official leaderboard
18 DreamGen(droid) 40.5% GPT judge Official leaderboard
19 Wan2.1_14B 39.9% GPT judge Official leaderboard
20 LTX-2 19B 38.1% GPT judge Official leaderboard
21 Wan2.2_5B 38% GPT judge Official leaderboard
22 Sora 2 Pro 36.2% GPT judge Official leaderboard
23 SkyReels 36.1% GPT judge Official leaderboard
24 LTX-Video 34.4% GPT judge Official leaderboard
25 FramePack 33.9% GPT judge Official leaderboard
26 HunyuanVideo 30.3% GPT judge Official leaderboard
27 Sora 26.6% GPT judge Official leaderboard
28 CogVideoX_5B 25.6% GPT judge Official leaderboard
29 Vidar 20.6% GPT judge Official leaderboard
30 UnifoLM-WMA-0 12.3% GPT judge Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. We plot every source in the charts below.

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Cosmos3-Nano 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Cosmos3-Nano

Sources: Official RBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
May 31, 2026 Cosmos3-Nano technical report 58.4 Cosmos3-Nano image-to-video RBench score, Table 12 Capabilities

One lab claim next to the leaderboard

Each score a lab reported for its own model, beside the same model's best score on the leaderboard. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. 1 of them match, which usually means one side copied the other. Every benchmark.

Model Lab says Board says Gap
Cosmos3-Nano 58.4% Cosmos3-Nano image-to-video RBench score, Table 12 58.4% Leaderboard, GPT judge Same

More in World models

All 39 in World models
  • AgentWorldBench In use Language world models predict the next environment observation after an agent action, in 7 domains from MCP and search to Android and desktop OS. A judge model scores each prediction against the real observation on five dimensions. GPT-5.4 58.3
  • IntPhys 2 In use Models watch simulated videos and judge whether each event is physically possible, testing object permanence, immutability, continuity and solidity. Scored by accuracy. Muse Spark Open 68.3%
  • QwenWorldBench Fading Models act as world models that simulate agent environments in 7 domains, such as terminal, web, and Android. A rubric judge scores five dimensions. Qwen3.7-Plus 62.1%
  • VPCT Fading Models view an image of a ball, ramps, and three buckets and predict which bucket the ball falls into. Scored by accuracy on 100 problems. Gemini 3 Pro 91%
  • ContPhy Fading Models infer physical properties such as mass and density of fluids and soft bodies from videos and predict their dynamics. Seed2.0 Pro 67.4%
  • PAI-Bench Only in system cards Physical-AI video generation from 1,044 prompts in six domains, VLM-QA plus quality metrics. Companion control and understanding tracks. Cosmos3-Nano 83.7%