Benchmark Almanac

AfriMed-QA

Gpt 4o [snapshot unspecified] 85% tops its leaderboard Phi-3-medium-128k-instruct 75.2% leads the models we track
Not in model cards

Models answer about 15,000 open and multiple-choice medical questions from over 60 medical schools in 16 African countries. Questions span 32 specialties.

Google's MedGemma cards report accuracy on a 25-question multiple-choice test set only. That score is not comparable with the full set.

Released
November 2024
Kind
Medicine
Level
University
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Multiple choice
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
phi-3-mini 3.8B #203 on the capability index
Last model added
May 2024
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Recent advancements in large language model(LLM) performance on medical multiple choice question (MCQ) benchmarks have stimulated interest from healthcare providers and patients globally. Particularly in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) facing acute physician shortages and lack of specialists, LLMs offer a potentially scalable pathway to enhance healthcare access and reduce costs. However, their effectiveness in the Global South, especially across the African continent, remains to be established. In this work, we introduce AfriMed-QA, the first large scale Pan-African English multi-specialty medical Question-Answering (QA) dataset, 15,000 questions (open and closed-ended) sourced from over 60 medical schools across 16 countries, covering 32 medical specialties. We further evaluate 30 LLMs across multiple axes including correctness and demographic bias. Our findings show significant performance variation across specialties and geographies, MCQ performance clearly lags USMLE (MedQA). We find that biomedical LLMs underperform general models and smaller edge-friendly LLMs struggle to achieve a passing score. Interestingly, human evaluations show a consistent consumer preference for LLM answers and explanations when compared with clinician answers.

Abstract of AfriMed-QA: A Pan-African, Multi-Specialty, Medical Question-Answering Benchmark Dataset (arXiv:2411.15640, CC0)
24
Entries on its own leaderboard, 4 models we track

Gpt 4o [snapshot unspecified] tops the leaderboard with 85%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Phi-3-medium-128k-instruct, at 75.2%.

The newest model with a score here came out in May 2024, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Gpt 4o [snapshot unspecified] AfriMed-QA v1; no explanation 85%
  2. 2 Claude 3.5 sonnet [snapshot unspecified] AfriMed-QA v1; no explanation 84.2%
  3. 3 Gpt 4 [snapshot unspecified] AfriMed-QA v1; no explanation 82.5%
  4. 4 Meta-Llama-3.1-405B [base or instruct unspecified] AfriMed-QA v1; no explanation 82.1%
  5. 5 Claude 3 Opus [snapshot unspecified] AfriMed-QA v1; no explanation 81.1%
  6. 6 Meta-Llama-3-70B [base or instruct unspecified] AfriMed-QA v1; no explanation 80.4%
  7. 7 Gpt 4o mini [snapshot unspecified] AfriMed-QA v1; no explanation 78.8%
  8. 8 Phi-3-medium-128k-instruct AfriMed-QA v1; no explanation 75.2%
  9. 9 Claude 3 Haiku [snapshot unspecified] AfriMed-QA v1; no explanation 74.3%
  10. 10 Claude 3 sonnet [snapshot unspecified] AfriMed-QA v1; no explanation 73.3%
  11. 11 Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct-v0.1 AfriMed-QA v1; no explanation 70.2%
  12. 12 Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct AfriMed-QA v1; no explanation 69.3%
  13. 13 Gpt 3.5 Turbo 1106 AfriMed-QA v1; no explanation 68.9%
  14. 14 OpenBioLLM-70B AfriMed-QA v1; no explanation 68.6%
  15. 15 Phi-3-mini-128k-instruct AfriMed-QA v1; no explanation 68.1%
  16. 16 phi-3-mini 3.8B AfriMed-QA v1; no explanation 68%
  17. 17 JSL-MedLlama-3-8B-v2.0 AfriMed-QA v1; no explanation 67.2%
  18. 18 Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3 AfriMed-QA v1; no explanation 61%
  19. 19 Meta-Llama-3-8B [base or instruct unspecified] AfriMed-QA v1; no explanation 60%
  20. 20 Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.2 AfriMed-QA v1; no explanation 58.4%
  21. 21 Meditron-7B AfriMed-QA v1; no explanation 58.1%
  22. 22 PMC-Llama-7B AfriMed-QA v1; no explanation 54.3%
  23. 23 BioMistral-7B AfriMed-QA v1; no explanation 53.5%
  24. 24 OpenBioLLM-8B AfriMed-QA v1; no explanation 53.3%

Source: Official AfriMed-QA leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Gpt 4o [snapshot unspecified] 85% AfriMed-QA v1; no explanation Official leaderboard
2 Claude 3.5 sonnet [snapshot unspecified] 84.2% AfriMed-QA v1; no explanation Official leaderboard
3 Gpt 4 [snapshot unspecified] 82.5% AfriMed-QA v1; no explanation Official leaderboard
4 Meta-Llama-3.1-405B [base or instruct unspecified] 82.1% AfriMed-QA v1; no explanation Official leaderboard
5 Claude 3 Opus [snapshot unspecified] 81.1% AfriMed-QA v1; no explanation Official leaderboard
6 Meta-Llama-3-70B [base or instruct unspecified] 80.4% AfriMed-QA v1; no explanation Official leaderboard
7 Gpt 4o mini [snapshot unspecified] 78.8% AfriMed-QA v1; no explanation Official leaderboard
8 Phi-3-medium-128k-instruct 75.2% AfriMed-QA v1; no explanation May 2024 Official leaderboard
9 Claude 3 Haiku [snapshot unspecified] 74.3% AfriMed-QA v1; no explanation Official leaderboard
10 Claude 3 sonnet [snapshot unspecified] 73.3% AfriMed-QA v1; no explanation Official leaderboard
11 Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct-v0.1 70.2% AfriMed-QA v1; no explanation Official leaderboard
12 Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 69.3% AfriMed-QA v1; no explanation Official leaderboard
13 Gpt 3.5 Turbo 1106 68.9% AfriMed-QA v1; no explanation Official leaderboard
14 OpenBioLLM-70B 68.6% AfriMed-QA v1; no explanation Official leaderboard
15 Phi-3-mini-128k-instruct 68.1% AfriMed-QA v1; no explanation Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
16 phi-3-mini 3.8B 68% AfriMed-QA v1; no explanation Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
17 JSL-MedLlama-3-8B-v2.0 67.2% AfriMed-QA v1; no explanation Official leaderboard
18 Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3 61% AfriMed-QA v1; no explanation Official leaderboard
19 Meta-Llama-3-8B [base or instruct unspecified] 60% AfriMed-QA v1; no explanation Official leaderboard
20 Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.2 58.4% AfriMed-QA v1; no explanation Dec 2023 Official leaderboard
21 Meditron-7B 58.1% AfriMed-QA v1; no explanation Official leaderboard
22 PMC-Llama-7B 54.3% AfriMed-QA v1; no explanation Official leaderboard
23 BioMistral-7B 53.5% AfriMed-QA v1; no explanation Official leaderboard
24 OpenBioLLM-8B 53.3% AfriMed-QA v1; no explanation Official leaderboard

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Microsoft
Own leaderboard Not tested since Nov 2024

Source: Official AfriMed-QA leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 Near the ceiling (85%) Phi-3-medium-128k-instruct Phi-3-mini-128k-instruct Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.2 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 Near the ceiling (85%) Phi-3-medium-128k-instruct Phi-3-mini-128k-instruct

Source: Official AfriMed-QA leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Law, finance and medicine

All 179 in Law, finance and medicine
  • MedXpertQA-MM In use Models answer expert-level medical exam questions that combine images with clinical records and test results. Scoring is accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 80.4%
  • HealthBench Professional In use 525 physician-authored tasks from real clinician chats (care consult, documentation, research) with physician-adjudicated rubrics. Claude Sonnet 5.5 69.2%
  • HealthBench In use 5,000 realistic health conversations graded against physician-written rubrics. A length-adjusted variant penalizes verbosity. GPT-5 67.2%
  • FinSearchComp In use Agents search the web to fetch live financial data, look up history, and run multi-step investigations, across 635 expert-written questions. Scored by answer accuracy. Ling-3.1-flash 81.7%
  • KBL In use Models answer Korean legal knowledge and reasoning tasks and Korean bar exam questions. It has 7 knowledge tasks, 4 reasoning tasks and 2,510 bar exam items. Solar Pro 4 77.5%
  • KorMedMCQA In use Models answer 7,469 multiple-choice questions from Korean licensing exams for doctors, nurses, pharmacists and dentists, held from 2012 to 2024. Solar Pro 4 93.2%