AndroidDaily
Agents complete 350 daily tasks in 94 real closed-source Android apps. A process-aware reviewer model checks each trajectory against written guidelines.
The dataset appeared in 2025-11 with the GELab-Zero release. The paper followed on May 26th, 2026 and reports 87.37 percent agreement between the reviewer and humans.
- Made by
- StepFun
- Released
- November 2025
- Kind
- Phones
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Graded by a model
- Answers
- Agent task
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
-
Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 #96 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- May 2026, dropped before it saturated
- Last model added
- May 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
The rapid development of GUI foundation models and mobile GUI agents has spurred numerous evaluation benchmarks, yet most rely on simulated environments or open-source applications, leaving real-world closed-source applications largely unevaluated. The core difficulty is that closed-source applications do not expose internal states, making traditional automatic verification inapplicable. To bridge this gap, we introduce AndroidDaily, a large-scale benchmark comprising 350 realistic daily-use tasks across 94 high-frequency Android applications spanning transportation, shopping, local services, entertainment, content creation, social media, and everyday utilities. To enable automatic and verifiable assessment in these opaque environments, we propose Guideline-grounded Reviewer for Automatic Diagnostic Evaluation (GRADE), a process-aware evaluator built on a three-tiered system of observable external guidelines: operational obligations, output quality, and negative constraints. GRADE tracks the agent's visual trajectory against these criteria and produces step-level diagnostic judgments, turning long-horizon, open-ended mobile interactions into verifiable evaluation without relying on hidden internal states. Experiments show that GRADE achieves 87.37% agreement with human evaluators. The strongest model reaches a 62.0% success rate on AndroidDaily, highlighting a substantial gap between current reasoning capabilities and practical execution in realistic mobile workflows.
Step 3.7 Flash leads with 61.9%
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
UI-TARS-1.5 leads with 47% across all independent runs
Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.
Step 3.7 Flash leads with 61.9%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
- 1
Step 3.7 Flash 61.9%
- 2
Step 3.5 Flash 57%
Source: Labs’ model cards
- 1
UI-TARS-1.5 static 47%
- 2
Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025, static 36.6%
Source: Official AndroidDaily leaderboard
- 1
Step 3.7 Flash 61.9%
- 2
Step 3.5 Flash 57%
- 3
UI-TARS-1.5 static 47%
- 4
Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025, static 36.6%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official AndroidDaily leaderboard
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 61.9% | May 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 57% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 47% | static | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | | 36.6% | static | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 61.9% | May 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 57% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 47% | static | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | | 36.6% | static | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard |
The benchmark's own leaderboard has 4 entries, 2 of them models we track. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official AndroidDaily leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Labs headline it less often now, last in May 2026
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2026 | 61.9 | Score of Android Daily Benchmark |
One system card reports it
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2026 | | 57 | AndroidDaily Hard success rate, Step 3.5 Flash as cloud planner over the on-device Step-GUI agent (E.3.3 text). Step-GUI alone 40.0 | Capabilities |
More in Computer and browser use
- BrowseComp In use Hard-to-find facts that need persistent web browsing. Short verifiable answers graded for exact correctness. Claude Fable 5 93.3%
- ScreenSpot-Pro In use GUI grounding on high-resolution professional-software screenshots. The model must locate the target UI element. GPT-6 Astra 92.7%
- AndroidWorld In use Agents complete 116 tasks across 20 real Android apps in an emulator. Each task checks the device's system state to judge success. GPT-6 Astra 100%
- OSWorld 2.1 In use Agents complete 108 long-horizon workflows across 31 self-hosted websites and desktop apps, averaging 318 tool calls. Scored by binary completion and checkpoint partial credit. Claude Opus 5.5 81.8%
- WebArena-Verified In use Agents complete 812 audited WebArena tasks on self-hosted websites. Deterministic evaluators check the agent's answer and captured network traces.
Muse Spark 1.1 69%
- MobileWorld In use Agents complete 201 tasks across 20 mobile apps, including tasks that need user clarification or MCP tools. Backend checks verify success. GPT-5 55.3%