AndroidWorld
Agents complete 116 tasks across 20 real Android apps in an emulator. Each task checks the device's system state to judge success.
Tasks take random parameters, so each run can create new task variants. On November 18th, 2024 Google set each task step budget to about twice the human average time, so earlier scores used different limits.
- Made by
- Google Research
- Released
- May 2024
- Kind
- Phones
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Agent task
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- GPT-6 Astra #3 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- September 2026
- Last model added
- September 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Autonomous agents that execute human tasks by controlling computers can enhance human productivity and application accessibility. However, progress in this field will be driven by realistic and reproducible benchmarks. We present AndroidWorld, a fully functional Android environment that provides reward signals for 116 programmatic tasks across 20 real-world Android apps. Unlike existing interactive environments, which provide a static test set, AndroidWorld dynamically constructs tasks that are parameterized and expressed in natural language in unlimited ways, thus enabling testing on a much larger and more realistic suite of tasks. To ensure reproducibility, each task includes dedicated initialization, success-checking, and tear-down logic, which modifies and inspects the device's system state. We experiment with baseline agents to test AndroidWorld and provide initial results on the benchmark. Our best agent can complete 30.6% of AndroidWorld's tasks, leaving ample room for future work. Furthermore, we adapt a popular desktop web agent to work on Android, which we find to be less effective on mobile, suggesting future research is needed to achieve universal, cross-platform agents. Finally, we also conduct a robustness analysis, showing that task variations can significantly affect agent performance, demonstrating that without such testing, agent performance metrics may not fully reflect practical challenges. AndroidWorld and the experiments in this paper are available at github.com/google-research/android_world.
2 models share the top score of 100% among models released by September 2026
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
GPT-6 Astra leads with 100%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in September 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- GPT-6.1 Terra
- and 14 more
- 100.0 AGI-AW
- 100.0 gpt-4o / gpt-5.4
- 100.0 gpt-4o / gpt-5.6-sol
- 100.0 GPT-6 Astra
- 100.0 GPT-6 Sol
- 99.1 Gemini 3.7 Flash, Gemini Robotics ER 2
- 97.4 Seed1.8-GUI
- 97.4 Gemini 3 flash, Gemini 3 flash lite
- 94.8 askui AndroidVisionAgent, Claude 4.5 Sonnet + Claude 4.0 Sonnet
- 94.8 gemini 3 pro + sonnet 4.5
- 93.1
Gemini 3.5 Flash
- 91.4 Llama 4-scout, Gemini 2.5 pro, GPT-5 nano
- 88.8 -
- 87.1 o3 + holo1.5-72b
- 86.2 Sonnet 4.5 + Sonnet 4
- 80.2 AutoGLM-Mobile
- 79.3 LX-GUIAgent
- 78.0 Gemini-2.5-Pro+UI-TARS-1.5
- 76.7 Qwen2.5-VL-72B + Qwen2.5-VL-7B
- 76.7 MAI-UI-235B-A22B
- 75.0 Hammer-UI-32B
- 73.3
GUI-Owl-32B
- 73.3 MAI-UI-32B
- 70.7 MAI-UI-8B
- 69.7
Gemini 2.5 Computer Use
- 67.2 JT-GUIAgent-V2
- 66.4
GUI-Owl-7B
- 65.9 UI-Venus-Navi-72B
- 62.9
Qwen2.5-VL-72B
- 62.1
Seed1.5-VL
- 60.0 JT-GUIAgent-V1
- 59.5 V-Droid (Llama8B)
- 54.3 Agent S2
- 49.1 Venus-Navi-7B
- 49.1 MAI-UI-2B
- 47.4 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified)
- 46.6 UI-TARS
- 44.8 GPT-4o + Aria-UI
- 44.0 GPT-4o + UGround
- 44.0 ScaleTrack-7B
- 30.6 GPT-4 Turbo (snapshot unspecified)
- 27.6 GPT-4o, OS-Atlas-Pro 4B, Qwen2-VL-2B-Instruct
- 27.6
Qwen2.5-VL-7B
- 9.00 Qwen2-VL-2B (fine-tuned)
- 1 AGI-AW 100%
- 2 gpt-4o / gpt-5.4 100%
- 3 gpt-4o / gpt-5.6-sol 100%
- 4 GPT-6 Astra 100%
- 5 GPT-6 Sol 100%
- 6 Gemini 3.7 Flash, Gemini Robotics ER 2 99.1%
- 7 Seed1.8-GUI 97.4%
- 8 Gemini 3 flash, Gemini 3 flash lite 97.4%
- 9 askui AndroidVisionAgent, Claude 4.5 Sonnet + Claude 4.0 Sonnet 94.8%
- 10 gemini 3 pro + sonnet 4.5 94.8%
- 11
Gemini 3.5 Flash 93.1%
- 12 Llama 4-scout, Gemini 2.5 pro, GPT-5 nano 91.4%
- 13 - 88.8%
- 14 o3 + holo1.5-72b 87.1%
- 15 Sonnet 4.5 + Sonnet 4 86.2%
- 16 AutoGLM-Mobile 80.2%
- 17 LX-GUIAgent 79.3%
- 18 Gemini-2.5-Pro+UI-TARS-1.5 78%
- 19 Qwen2.5-VL-72B + Qwen2.5-VL-7B 76.7%
- 20 MAI-UI-235B-A22B 76.7%
- 21 Hammer-UI-32B 75%
- 22
GUI-Owl-32B 73.3%
- 23 MAI-UI-32B 73.3%
- 24 MAI-UI-8B 70.7%
- 25
Gemini 2.5 Computer Use 69.7%
- 26 JT-GUIAgent-V2 67.2%
- 27
GUI-Owl-7B 66.4%
- 28 UI-Venus-Navi-72B 65.9%
- 29
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 62.9%
- 30
Seed1.5-VL 62.1%
- 31 JT-GUIAgent-V1 60%
- 32 V-Droid (Llama8B) 59.5%
- 33 Agent S2 54.3%
- 34 Venus-Navi-7B 49.1%
- 35 MAI-UI-2B 49.1%
- 36 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 47.4%
- 37 UI-TARS 46.6%
- 38 GPT-4o + Aria-UI 44.8%
- 39 GPT-4o + UGround 44%
- 40 ScaleTrack-7B 44%
- 41 GPT-4 Turbo (snapshot unspecified) 30.6%
- 42 GPT-4o, OS-Atlas-Pro 4B, Qwen2-VL-2B-Instruct 27.6%
- 43
Qwen2.5-VL-7B 27.6%
- 44 Qwen2-VL-2B (fine-tuned) 9.00%
Source: Official AndroidWorld leaderboard
- 100.0 GPT-6 Astra
- 100.0 GPT-6 Sol
- 93.1
Gemini 3.5 Flash
- 87.1
Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash
- 85.3
Qwen 3.8 Max
- 84.5
Qwen3.8 Flash
- 81.9
Qwen 3.8 27B
- 81.0
Qwen3.7-Plus
- 75.7 GLM-5V-Turbo
- 73.3
GUI-Owl-32B
- 73.3
UI-TARS-2
- 71.1
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
- 70.7
Seed1.8
- 70.3
Qwen3.6 27B
- 69.7
Gemini 2.5 Computer Use
- 66.8
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B
- 66.4
GUI-Owl-7B
- 66.4
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- 64.2
UI-TARS-1.5
- 64.2
Qwen3.5-27B
- 62.9
Qwen2.5-VL-72B
- 62.1
Seed1.5-VL
- 62.0
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B
- 58.6
Qwen3.5-4B
- 57.8
Qwen3.5-9B
- 57.0 GLM-4.5V
- 57.0 GLM-4.6V
- 41.7 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking
- 27.6
Qwen2.5-VL-7B
- 1 GPT-6 Astra 100%
- 2 GPT-6 Sol 100%
- 3
Gemini 3.5 Flash 93.1%
- 4
Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 87.1%
- 5
Qwen 3.8 Max 85.3%
- 6
Qwen3.8 Flash 84.5%
- 7
Qwen 3.8 27B 81.9%
- 8
Qwen3.7-Plus 81%
- 9 GLM-5V-Turbo 75.7%
- 10
GUI-Owl-32B 73.3%
- 11
UI-TARS-2 73.3%
- 12
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 71.1%
- 13
Seed1.8 70.7%
- 14
Qwen3.6 27B 70.3%
- 15
Gemini 2.5 Computer Use 69.7%
- 16
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 66.8%
- 17
GUI-Owl-7B 66.4%
- 18
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 66.4%
- 19
UI-TARS-1.5 64.2%
- 20
Qwen3.5-27B 64.2%
- 21
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 62.9%
- 22
Seed1.5-VL 62.1%
- 23
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 62%
- 24
Qwen3.5-4B 58.6%
- 25
Qwen3.5-9B 57.8%
- 26 GLM-4.5V 57%
- 27 GLM-4.6V 57%
- 28 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 41.7%
- 29
Qwen2.5-VL-7B 27.6%
Sources: Official AndroidWorld leaderboard and labs’ model cards
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AGI-AW | 100% | AGI-0 | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | gpt-4o / gpt-5.4 | 100% | Kirk Engine | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | gpt-4o / gpt-5.6-sol | 100% | FluizAI | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | GPT-6 Astra | 100% | MobileRun | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | GPT-6 Sol | 100% | agent-qa by Vostride AI | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | Gemini 3.7 Flash, Gemini Robotics ER 2 | 99.1% | Artemis | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | Seed1.8-GUI | 97.4% | MobileUseAgent | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | Gemini 3 flash, Gemini 3 flash lite | 97.4% | Finalrun | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | askui AndroidVisionAgent, Claude 4.5 Sonnet + Claude 4.0 Sonnet | 94.8% | askui AndroidVisionAgent | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | gemini 3 pro + sonnet 4.5 | 94.8% | AutoDevice | Jan 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | | 93.1% | Midscene.js | May 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 12 | Llama 4-scout, Gemini 2.5 pro, GPT-5 nano | 91.4% | mobile-use | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 13 | - | 88.8% | Agent-Visco | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 14 | o3 + holo1.5-72b | 87.1% | Surfer 2 | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 15 | Sonnet 4.5 + Sonnet 4 | 86.2% | gbox.ai | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 16 | AutoGLM-Mobile | 80.2% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | LX-GUIAgent | 79.3% | LX-GUIAgent | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 18 | Gemini-2.5-Pro+UI-TARS-1.5 | 78% | AgentProg | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 19 | Qwen2.5-VL-72B + Qwen2.5-VL-7B | 76.7% | K²-Agent | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 20 | MAI-UI-235B-A22B | 76.7% | Jan 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 21 | Hammer-UI-32B | 75% | MobileUse-v2 | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 22 | | 73.3% | Mobile-Agent-v3 | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 23 | MAI-UI-32B | 73.3% | Jan 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 24 | MAI-UI-8B | 70.7% | Jan 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 25 | | 69.7% | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 26 | JT-GUIAgent-V2 | 67.2% | JT-GUIAgent-V2 | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 27 | | 66.4% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 28 | UI-Venus-Navi-72B | 65.9% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 29 | | 62.9% | MobileUse | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 30 | | 62.1% | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 31 | JT-GUIAgent-V1 | 60% | JT-GUIAgent-V1 | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 32 | V-Droid (Llama8B) | 59.5% | V-Droid Paper | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 33 | Agent S2 | 54.3% | Agent S2 | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 34 | Venus-Navi-7B | 49.1% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 35 | MAI-UI-2B | 49.1% | Jan 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 36 | GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) | 47.4% | GUI-Explorer | May 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 37 | UI-TARS | 46.6% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 38 | GPT-4o + Aria-UI | 44.8% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 39 | GPT-4o + UGround | 44% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 40 | ScaleTrack-7B | 44% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 41 | GPT-4 Turbo (snapshot unspecified) | 30.6% | AndroidWorld | May 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 42 | GPT-4o, OS-Atlas-Pro 4B, Qwen2-VL-2B-Instruct | 27.6% | EcoAgent | May 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 43 | | 27.6% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 44 | Qwen2-VL-2B (fine-tuned) | 9.00% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-6 Astra | 100% | MobileRun | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | GPT-6 Sol | 100% | agent-qa by Vostride AI | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | | 93.1% | Midscene.js | May 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | | 87.1% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | | 85.3% | Aug 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | | 84.5% | Aug 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | | 81.9% | Aug 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | | 81% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | GLM-5V-Turbo | 75.7% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 10 | | 73.3% | Mobile-Agent-v3 | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | | 73.3% | Sep 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 12 | | 71.1% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 13 | | 70.7% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 14 | | 70.3% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 15 | | 69.7% | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | | 66.8% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 17 | | 66.4% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | | 66.4% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 19 | | 64.2% | Apr 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 20 | | 64.2% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 21 | | 62.9% | MobileUse | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 22 | | 62.1% | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 23 | | 62% | Nov 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 24 | | 58.6% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 25 | | 57.8% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 26 | GLM-4.5V | 57% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 27 | GLM-4.6V | 57% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 28 | GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking | 41.7% | Jul 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 29 | | 27.6% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 23 models in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
4 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in May 2024 6 models have held number one with claims included since its release in May 2024
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
Sources: Official AndroidWorld leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Gemini 3.5 Flash on the official leaderboard passed 85% in May 2026
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official AndroidWorld leaderboard and labs’ model cards
One lab put it in a launch post in the last six months
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2026 | 87.1 | AndroidWorld | |
| Aug 26, 2026 | 84.5 | Mobile use AndroidWorld | |
| Aug 14, 2026 | 81.9 | Mobile use AndroidWorld | |
| Aug 3, 2026 | 85.3 | AndroidWorld | |
| Jun 1, 2026 | 81 | AndroidWorld | |
| Apr 22, 2026 | 70.3 | AndroidWorld | |
| Apr 1, 2026 | GLM-5V-Turbo | 75.7 | AndroidWorld 75.7 |
| Mar 2, 2026 | 58.6 | AndroidWorld | |
| Mar 2, 2026 | 57.8 | AndroidWorld | |
| Feb 24, 2026 | 71.1 | AndroidWorld | |
| Feb 24, 2026 | 64.2 | AndroidWorld | |
| Feb 24, 2026 | 66.4 | AndroidWorld | |
| Feb 16, 2026 | 66.8 | AndroidWorld | |
| Dec 18, 2025 | 70.7 | AndroidWorld | |
| Dec 8, 2025 | GLM-4.6V | 57 | AndroidWorld |
| Oct 7, 2025 | 69.7 | AndroidWorld, measured by Google DeepMind | |
| Sep 2, 2025 | 73.3 | AndroidWorld | |
| Aug 11, 2025 | GLM-4.5V | 57 | AndroidWorld |
| Jul 1, 2025 | GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking | 41.7 | AndroidWorld |
| May 12, 2025 | 62.1 | Android World | |
| Apr 16, 2025 | 64.2 | Android World | |
| Jan 28, 2025 | 35 | AndroidWorld_SR |
9 system cards report it, from 4 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2026 | | 87.1 | AndroidWorld (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| Mar 21, 2026 | | 70.7 | AndroidWorld (Table 5) | Capabilities |
| Jan 1, 2026 | GLM-4.6V technical report | 57 | AndroidWorld, GLM-4.6V thinking (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| Nov 26, 2025 | | 62 | AndroidWorld (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| Oct 7, 2025 | | 69.7 | Android World, Measured by Google DeepMind (results table, p.3) | Capabilities |
| Aug 13, 2025 | GLM-4.5V technical report | 57 | AndroidWorld, GLM-4.5V thinking (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| Jul 1, 2025 | GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking technical report | 41.7 | AndroidWorld, GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking thinking (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| May 11, 2025 | | 62.1 | Android World, thinking (Table 8) | Capabilities |
| Feb 19, 2025 | | 35 | AndroidWorld SR (Table 9) | Capabilities |
3 lab claims next to the leaderboard
Each score a lab reported for its own model, beside the same model's best score on the leaderboard. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. 2 of them match, which usually means one side copied the other. Every benchmark.
| Model | Lab says | Board says | Gap | What differs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| | 35% AndroidWorld_SR | 62.9% Leaderboard, MobileUse | −28 pts | The lab evaluates Qwen's visual agent, while the board pairs Qwen2.5-VL-72B with the MobileUse agent. |
| | 62.1% Android World | 62.1% Leaderboard | Same | |
| | 69.7% AndroidWorld, measured by Google DeepMind | 69.7% Leaderboard | Same |
One logged change that moves scores
Changes by the maintainers, so a score from before a change may not compare with one from after it. Newest first, each with the maintainers' own source. The list may be incomplete. What we log.
- Harness changed November 18th, 2024
The AndroidWorld maintainers changed task step budgets to approximately twice the human average completion time. Earlier runs used different action limits, so success rates should identify the budget settings. Source
More in Computer and browser use
- BrowseComp In use Hard-to-find facts that need persistent web browsing. Short verifiable answers graded for exact correctness. Claude Fable 5 93.3%
- ScreenSpot-Pro In use GUI grounding on high-resolution professional-software screenshots. The model must locate the target UI element. GPT-6 Astra 92.7%
- OSWorld 2.1 In use Agents complete 108 long-horizon workflows across 31 self-hosted websites and desktop apps, averaging 318 tool calls. Scored by binary completion and checkpoint partial credit. Claude Opus 5.5 81.8%
- WebArena-Verified In use Agents complete 812 audited WebArena tasks on self-hosted websites. Deterministic evaluators check the agent's answer and captured network traces.
Muse Spark 1.1 69%
- MobileWorld In use Agents complete 201 tasks across 20 mobile apps, including tasks that need user clarification or MCP tools. Backend checks verify success. GPT-5 55.3%
- RecreationBench In use Agents explore a running reference app and rebuild it, across 250 tasks on five platforms. Programmatic tests and a VLM judge score the result. GPT-6 Astra 58.1%