Benchmark Almanac

ANLI

PaLM 2-L 73.1% leads since May 2023
PaLM 2-L 73.1% leads since May 2023
Dropped

Models label premise and hypothesis pairs as entailment, neutral, or contradiction. People wrote the pairs over three rounds to fool strong models.

Model cards report the rounds R1, R2, and R3 separately or as an average.

Released
October 2019
Kind
Language reasoning
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Multiple choice
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
phi-3-small 7.4B #192 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
April 2024, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
August 2024
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

We introduce a new large-scale NLI benchmark dataset, collected via an iterative, adversarial human-and-model-in-the-loop procedure. We show that training models on this new dataset leads to state-of-the-art performance on a variety of popular NLI benchmarks, while posing a more difficult challenge with its new test set. Our analysis sheds light on the shortcomings of current state-of-the-art models, and shows that non-expert annotators are successful at finding their weaknesses. The data collection method can be applied in a never-ending learning scenario, becoming a moving target for NLU, rather than a static benchmark that will quickly saturate.

Abstract of Adversarial NLI: A New Benchmark for Natural Language Understanding (arXiv:1910.14599, CC0)
4
Models scored in lab cards
2
Launch posts list it, from 2 labs
3
System cards report it, from 1 lab

PaLM 2-L leads with 73.1% among models released by April 2024

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

PaLM 2-L leads with 73.1%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in April 2024, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 PaLM 2-L 73.1%
  2. 2 phi-3-medium 14B 58.7%
  3. 3 phi-3-small 7.4B 58.1%
  4. 4 phi-3-mini 3.8B 52.8%

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 PaLM 2-L 73.1% May 2023 Lab model card
2 phi-3-medium 14B 58.7% Apr 2024 Lab model card
3 phi-3-small 7.4B 58.1% Aug 2024 Lab model card
4 phi-3-mini 3.8B 52.8% Aug 2024 Lab model card
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 PaLM 2-L 73.1% May 2023 Lab model card
2 phi-3-medium 14B 58.7% Apr 2024 Lab model card
3 GPT-3.5 Turbo Nov 2023 58.1% Nov 2023 Claim in Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model L…, via Epoch AI
4 phi-3-small 7.4B 58.1% Aug 2024 Lab model card
5 Llama 3-8B 57.3% Apr 2024 Claim in Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model L…, via Epoch AI
6 Mixtral 8x7B 55.2% Dec 2023 Claim in Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model L…, via Epoch AI
7 phi-3-mini 3.8B 52.8% Aug 2024 Lab model card
8 Gemma 7B 48.7% Feb 2024 Claim in Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model L…, via Epoch AI
9 Mistral 7B v0.1 47.1% Sep 2023 Claim in Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model L…, via Epoch AI
10 Phi-2 42.5% Dec 2023 Claim in Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model L…, via Epoch AI
11 Megatron-Turing NLG 530B 39.7% Oct 2021 Claim in Using DeepSpeed and Megatron to Train Megatron-Turing NLG…, via Epoch AI
12 InstructGPT 175B 35.4% Jan 2022 Claim in Using DeepSpeed and Megatron to Train Megatron-Turing NLG…, via Epoch AI

Epoch AI collected claims for 11 models from labs’ reports and papers. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

Number one over time 2 models have held number one with claims included since 2023

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Other labs
Lab claims Not tested since Aug 2024
PaLM 2-L 73.1%

Source: Labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card A claim Epoch AI collected from a report or paper Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2022 2023 2024 Near the ceiling (85%) Random guessing PaLM 2-L Megatron-Turing NLG 530B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2022 2023 2024 Near the ceiling (85%) Random guessing PaLM 2-L Megatron-Turing NLG 530B

Sources: Labs’ model cards and claims collected by Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0)

No launch post has listed it since April 2024

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Google DeepMind
Microsoft
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Apr 22, 2024 phi-3-medium 14B 58.7 ANLI (7-Shot)
May 10, 2023 PaLM 2-L 73.1 Best of ANLI-R1, 1-shot / ANLI-R2, 1-shot / ANLI-R3, 1-shot

3 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Aug 30, 2024 phi-3-small 7.4B technical report 58.1 ANLI (7-Shot) (Section 3 table) Capabilities
Aug 30, 2024 phi-3-mini 3.8B technical report 52.8 ANLI (7-Shot) (Section 3 table) Capabilities
Aug 30, 2024 phi-3-medium 14B technical report 55.8 ANLI (7-Shot) (Section 3 table) Capabilities

More in Knowledge

All 121 in Knowledge
  • MMLU-Pro In use Harder 10-option version of MMLU with reasoning-focused questions across 14 subjects. Intern-S2-397B 89.8%
  • SuperGPQA In use 26,529 graduate-level multiple-choice questions across 285 disciplines. Accuracy. Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview) 73.9%
  • WideSearch In use 200 bilingual broad info-seeking tasks: agent collects many atomic facts into a table. Scored by success rate and row/item F1. Tencent Hy4 preview 83.9%
  • BBEH micro average In use Models solve harder replacements for each of the 23 BIG-Bench Hard tasks, 4,520 examples in total. The score is the share of all examples answered correctly. Gemma 4 31B IT 74.4%
  • KMMLU-Pro In use Models answer multiple-choice questions taken from Korean National Professional Licensure exams. It tests professional knowledge used in Korean industry. Solar Pro 4 79.2%
  • HLE-Verified In use Verified and revised version of Humanity's Last Exam (1,811 items) with uncertain items removed. Seed2.0 Pro 73.6%