SuperGPQA
26,529 graduate-level multiple-choice questions across 285 disciplines. Accuracy.
- Made by
- ByteDance Seed + M-A-P
- Released
- February 2025
- Kind
- Expert-written questions
- Level
- Expert
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Multiple choice
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- GPT-5.2 Pro #31 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- September 2026
- Last model added
- October 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in mainstream academic disciplines such as mathematics, physics, and computer science. However, human knowledge encompasses over 200 specialized disciplines, far exceeding the scope of existing benchmarks. The capabilities of LLMs in many of these specialized fields-particularly in light industry, agriculture, and service-oriented disciplines-remain inadequately evaluated. To address this gap, we present SuperGPQA, a comprehensive benchmark that evaluates graduate-level knowledge and reasoning capabilities across 285 disciplines. Our benchmark employs a novel Human-LLM collaborative filtering mechanism to eliminate trivial or ambiguous questions through iterative refinement based on both LLM responses and expert feedback. Our experimental results reveal significant room for improvement in the performance of current state-of-the-art LLMs across diverse knowledge domains (e.g., the reasoning-focused model DeepSeek-R1 achieved the highest accuracy of 61.82% on SuperGPQA), highlighting the considerable gap between current model capabilities and artificial general intelligence. Additionally, we present comprehensive insights from our management of a large-scale annotation process, involving over 80 expert annotators and an interactive Human-LLM collaborative system, offering valuable methodological guidance for future research initiatives of comparable scope.
Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview) leads with 73.9%
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
Gemini 3 Pro leads with 73.8% across all independent runs
Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.
Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview) leads with 73.9%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
- 73.9
Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview)
- 73.6
Qwen3.7-Max
- 71.6
Qwen 3.6 Plus
- 71.4
Qwen3.7-Plus
- 70.8
Seed2.1 Pro
- 70.4
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B
- 69.6
Seed2.0 Lite (0428)
- 68.7
Seed2.0 Pro
- 67.1
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- 66.4
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus
- 66.0
Qwen3.6 27B
- 65.6
Qwen3.5-27B
- 64.9
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking
- 64.8
Seed1.8
- 64.7
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B
- 64.3
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B
- 63.4
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
- 62.1
Seed-Thinking-v1.5
- 60.8
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B
- 58.3
Ling-2.6-1T
- 58.2
Qwen3.5-9B
- 57.5
Qwen3-Coder-Next
- 57.2 Kimi K2
- 55.7
seed-oss-36b-instruct
- 53.9
DeepSeek-V4-Pro
- 53.1
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- 53.1
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash Base
- 52.9
Qwen3.5-4B
- 52.6 GLM-Z1-32B-0414
- 50.4
STEP3-VL-10B
- 47.6
Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B-A12B Base
- 40.5 MiMo-7B-RL
- 37.5
Qwen3.5-2B
- 33.2
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B Base
- 21.3
Qwen3.5-0.8B
- 1
Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview) 73.9%
- 2
Qwen3.7-Max 73.6%
- 3
Qwen 3.6 Plus 71.6%
- 4
Qwen3.7-Plus 71.4%
- 5
Seed2.1 Pro 70.8%
- 6
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 70.4%
- 7
Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 69.6%
- 8
Seed2.0 Pro 68.7%
- 9
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 67.1%
- 10
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 66.4%
- 11
Qwen3.6 27B 66%
- 12
Qwen3.5-27B 65.6%
- 13
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking Jul 2025 64.9%
- 14
Seed1.8 64.8%
- 15
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B 64.7%
- 16
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 64.3%
- 17
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 63.4%
- 18
Seed-Thinking-v1.5 62.1%
- 19
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B 60.8%
- 20
Ling-2.6-1T 58.3%
- 21
Qwen3.5-9B 58.2%
- 22
Qwen3-Coder-Next 57.5%
- 23 Kimi K2 Jul 2025 57.2%
- 24
seed-oss-36b-instruct 55.7%
- 25
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 53.9%
- 26
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 53.1%
- 27
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash Base 53.1%
- 28
Qwen3.5-4B 52.9%
- 29 GLM-Z1-32B-0414 52.6%
- 30
STEP3-VL-10B 50.4%
- 31
Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B-A12B Base 47.6%
- 32 MiMo-7B-RL 40.5%
- 33
Qwen3.5-2B 37.5%
- 34
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B Base 33.2%
- 35
Qwen3.5-0.8B 21.3%
Source: Labs’ model cards
- 73.8
Gemini 3 Pro
- 67.1 GPT-5.2 Pro
- 66.3 GPT-5.1
- 66.0
Gemini 2.5 Pro
- 65.6 GPT-5
- 63.0 Grok 4
- 61.8
DeepSeek-R1
- 61.4 Claude Opus 4
- 61.3 GPT-5.2
- 60.2 o1
- 60.2
DeepSeek-R1-Zero
- 59.3
DeepSeek-V3.1
- 59.2
Gemini 2.5 Flash
- 58.8 GPT-5 mini
- 58.1 Kimi K2
- 57.4 GPT-5 Chat
- 57.0 Claude Sonnet 4
- 56.4 GPT-5.2 Instant
- 55.2 o3-mini
- 51.9 gpt-oss-120b
- 50.9
Doubao-1.5-pro
- 50.1
Qwen2.5-Max
- 49.4
Qwen3-235B-A22B
- 48.9 GPT-5 nano
- 48.2 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024)
- 47.7
Gemini 2.0 Flash
- 47.4
DeepSeek-V3
- 45.2 o1-mini
- 45.1
MiniMax-Text-01
- 44.9 gpt-oss-20b
- 44.4 GPT-4o
- 43.6
QwQ-32B-Preview
- 43.1
Llama 3.1-405B
- 41.6 GPT-4o
- 40.8
Qwen2.5-72B
- 40.6
Mistral Large 2
- 39.8 GPT-4o
- 38.8
Qwen2.5-32B
- 37.7
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
- 37.6
Phi-4
- 35.1
Qwen2.5-14B
- 34.9
Llama 3.1-70B
- 29.2
Mixtral 8x22B
- 28.8
Qwen2.5-7B
- 27.4
Gemma 2 27B
- 26.0
Yi-1.5-34B
- 25.9
Mistral Small v24.09
- 24.0
Gemma 2 9B
- 23.3
Qwen2.5-3B
- 23.2
Yi-1.5-9B-Chat
- 22.1
Mixtral 8x7B
- 20.8 Granite-3.1-8B-Instruct
- 20.5
Llama 3.1-8B
- 19.2
Yi-1.5-6B-Chat
- 18.8
Qwen2.5-1.5B
- 18.6
Gemma 2 2B IT
- 17.9 Granite-3.1-2B-Instruct
- 17.8
Mistral 7B v0.3
- 10.8
Qwen2.5-0.5B
- 1
Gemini 3 Pro 73.8%
- 2 GPT-5.2 Pro 67.1%
- 3 GPT-5.1 thinking 66.3%
- 4
Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025, five-shot 66%
- 5 GPT-5 65.6%
- 6 Grok 4 63%
- 7
DeepSeek-R1 61.8%
- 8 Claude Opus 4 61.4%
- 9 GPT-5.2 61.3%
- 10 o1 60.2%
- 11
DeepSeek-R1-Zero 60.2%
- 12
DeepSeek-V3.1 59.3%
- 13
Gemini 2.5 Flash Jun 2025, five-shot 59.2%
- 14 GPT-5 mini 58.8%
- 15 Kimi K2 Jul 2025 58.1%
- 16 GPT-5 Chat 57.4%
- 17 Claude Sonnet 4 57%
- 18 GPT-5.2 Instant 56.4%
- 19 o3-mini high 55.2%
- 20 gpt-oss-120b 51.9%
- 21
Doubao-1.5-pro 50.9%
- 22
Qwen2.5-Max 50.1%
- 23
Qwen3-235B-A22B 49.4%
- 24 GPT-5 nano 48.9%
- 25 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) 48.2%
- 26
Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 47.7%
- 27
DeepSeek-V3 47.4%
- 28 o1-mini 45.2%
- 29
MiniMax-Text-01 45.1%
- 30 gpt-oss-20b 44.9%
- 31 GPT-4o Nov 2024 44.4%
- 32
QwQ-32B-Preview 43.6%
- 33
Llama 3.1-405B 43.1%
- 34 GPT-4o Aug 2024 41.6%
- 35
Qwen2.5-72B 40.8%
- 36
Mistral Large 2 Nov 2024 40.6%
- 37 GPT-4o May 2024 39.8%
- 38
Qwen2.5-32B 38.8%
- 39
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct 37.7%
- 40
Phi-4 37.6%
- 41
Qwen2.5-14B 35.1%
- 42
Llama 3.1-70B 34.9%
- 43
Mixtral 8x22B 29.2%
- 44
Qwen2.5-7B 28.8%
- 45
Gemma 2 27B 27.4%
- 46
Yi-1.5-34B 26%
- 47
Mistral Small v24.09 25.9%
- 48
Gemma 2 9B 24%
- 49
Qwen2.5-3B 23.3%
- 50
Yi-1.5-9B-Chat 23.2%
- 51
Mixtral 8x7B 22.1%
- 52 Granite-3.1-8B-Instruct 20.8%
- 53
Llama 3.1-8B 20.5%
- 54
Yi-1.5-6B-Chat 19.2%
- 55
Qwen2.5-1.5B 18.8%
- 56
Gemma 2 2B IT 18.6%
- 57 Granite-3.1-2B-Instruct 17.9%
- 58
Mistral 7B v0.3 17.8%
- 59
Qwen2.5-0.5B 10.8%
Source: Official SuperGPQA leaderboard
- 73.9
Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview)
- 73.8
Gemini 3 Pro
- 73.6
Qwen3.7-Max
- 71.6
Qwen 3.6 Plus
- 71.4
Qwen3.7-Plus
- 70.8
Seed2.1 Pro
- 70.4
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B
- 69.6
Seed2.0 Lite (0428)
- 68.7
Seed2.0 Pro
- 67.1 GPT-5.2 Pro
- 67.1
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- 66.4
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus
- 66.3 GPT-5.1
- 66.0
Qwen3.6 27B
- 66.0
Gemini 2.5 Pro
- 65.6 GPT-5
- 65.6
Qwen3.5-27B
- 64.9
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking
- 64.8
Seed1.8
- 64.7
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B
- 64.3
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B
- 63.4
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
- 63.0 Grok 4
- 62.1
Seed-Thinking-v1.5
- 61.8
DeepSeek-R1
- 61.4 Claude Opus 4
- 61.3 GPT-5.2
- 60.8
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B
- 60.2 o1
- 60.2
DeepSeek-R1-Zero
- 59.3
DeepSeek-V3.1
- 59.2
Gemini 2.5 Flash
- 58.8 GPT-5 mini
- 58.3
Ling-2.6-1T
- 58.2
Qwen3.5-9B
- 58.1 Kimi K2
- 57.5
Qwen3-Coder-Next
- 57.4 GPT-5 Chat
- 57.0 Claude Sonnet 4
- 56.4 GPT-5.2 Instant
- 55.7
seed-oss-36b-instruct
- 55.2 o3-mini
- 53.9
DeepSeek-V4-Pro
- 53.1
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- 53.1
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash Base
- 52.9
Qwen3.5-4B
- 52.6 GLM-Z1-32B-0414
- 51.9 gpt-oss-120b
- 50.9
Doubao-1.5-pro
- 50.4
STEP3-VL-10B
- 50.1
Qwen2.5-Max
- 49.4
Qwen3-235B-A22B
- 48.9 GPT-5 nano
- 48.2 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024)
- 47.7
Gemini 2.0 Flash
- 47.6
Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B-A12B Base
- 47.4
DeepSeek-V3
- 45.2 o1-mini
- 45.1
MiniMax-Text-01
- 44.9 gpt-oss-20b
- 44.4 GPT-4o
- 43.6
QwQ-32B-Preview
- 43.1
Llama 3.1-405B
- 41.6 GPT-4o
- 40.8
Qwen2.5-72B
- 40.6
Mistral Large 2
- 40.5 MiMo-7B-RL
- 39.8 GPT-4o
- 38.8
Qwen2.5-32B
- 37.7
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
- 37.6
Phi-4
- 37.5
Qwen3.5-2B
- 35.1
Qwen2.5-14B
- 34.9
Llama 3.1-70B
- 33.2
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B Base
- 29.2
Mixtral 8x22B
- 28.8
Qwen2.5-7B
- 27.4
Gemma 2 27B
- 26.0
Yi-1.5-34B
- 25.9
Mistral Small v24.09
- 24.0
Gemma 2 9B
- 23.3
Qwen2.5-3B
- 23.2
Yi-1.5-9B-Chat
- 22.1
Mixtral 8x7B
- 21.3
Qwen3.5-0.8B
- 20.8 Granite-3.1-8B-Instruct
- 20.5
Llama 3.1-8B
- 19.2
Yi-1.5-6B-Chat
- 18.8
Qwen2.5-1.5B
- 18.6
Gemma 2 2B IT
- 17.9 Granite-3.1-2B-Instruct
- 17.8
Mistral 7B v0.3
- 10.8
Qwen2.5-0.5B
- 1
Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview) 73.9%
- 2
Gemini 3 Pro 73.8%
- 3
Qwen3.7-Max 73.6%
- 4
Qwen 3.6 Plus 71.6%
- 5
Qwen3.7-Plus 71.4%
- 6
Seed2.1 Pro 70.8%
- 7
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 70.4%
- 8
Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 69.6%
- 9
Seed2.0 Pro 68.7%
- 10 GPT-5.2 Pro 67.1%
- 11
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 67.1%
- 12
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 66.4%
- 13 GPT-5.1 thinking 66.3%
- 14
Qwen3.6 27B 66%
- 15
Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025, five-shot 66%
- 16 GPT-5 65.6%
- 17
Qwen3.5-27B 65.6%
- 18
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking Jul 2025 64.9%
- 19
Seed1.8 64.8%
- 20
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B 64.7%
- 21
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 64.3%
- 22
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 63.4%
- 23 Grok 4 63%
- 24
Seed-Thinking-v1.5 62.1%
- 25
DeepSeek-R1 61.8%
- 26 Claude Opus 4 61.4%
- 27 GPT-5.2 61.3%
- 28
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B 60.8%
- 29 o1 60.2%
- 30
DeepSeek-R1-Zero 60.2%
- 31
DeepSeek-V3.1 59.3%
- 32
Gemini 2.5 Flash Jun 2025, five-shot 59.2%
- 33 GPT-5 mini 58.8%
- 34
Ling-2.6-1T 58.3%
- 35
Qwen3.5-9B 58.2%
- 36 Kimi K2 Jul 2025 58.1%
- 37
Qwen3-Coder-Next 57.5%
- 38 GPT-5 Chat 57.4%
- 39 Claude Sonnet 4 57%
- 40 GPT-5.2 Instant 56.4%
- 41
seed-oss-36b-instruct 55.7%
- 42 o3-mini high 55.2%
- 43
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 53.9%
- 44
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 53.1%
- 45
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash Base 53.1%
- 46
Qwen3.5-4B 52.9%
- 47 GLM-Z1-32B-0414 52.6%
- 48 gpt-oss-120b 51.9%
- 49
Doubao-1.5-pro 50.9%
- 50
STEP3-VL-10B 50.4%
- 51
Qwen2.5-Max 50.1%
- 52
Qwen3-235B-A22B 49.4%
- 53 GPT-5 nano 48.9%
- 54 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) 48.2%
- 55
Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 47.7%
- 56
Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B-A12B Base 47.6%
- 57
DeepSeek-V3 47.4%
- 58 o1-mini 45.2%
- 59
MiniMax-Text-01 45.1%
- 60 gpt-oss-20b 44.9%
- 61 GPT-4o Nov 2024 44.4%
- 62
QwQ-32B-Preview 43.6%
- 63
Llama 3.1-405B 43.1%
- 64 GPT-4o Aug 2024 41.6%
- 65
Qwen2.5-72B 40.8%
- 66
Mistral Large 2 Nov 2024 40.6%
- 67 MiMo-7B-RL 40.5%
- 68 GPT-4o May 2024 39.8%
- 69
Qwen2.5-32B 38.8%
- 70
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct 37.7%
- 71
Phi-4 37.6%
- 72
Qwen3.5-2B 37.5%
- 73
Qwen2.5-14B 35.1%
- 74
Llama 3.1-70B 34.9%
- 75
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B Base 33.2%
- 76
Mixtral 8x22B 29.2%
- 77
Qwen2.5-7B 28.8%
- 78
Gemma 2 27B 27.4%
- 79
Yi-1.5-34B 26%
- 80
Mistral Small v24.09 25.9%
- 81
Gemma 2 9B 24%
- 82
Qwen2.5-3B 23.3%
- 83
Yi-1.5-9B-Chat 23.2%
- 84
Mixtral 8x7B 22.1%
- 85
Qwen3.5-0.8B 21.3%
- 86 Granite-3.1-8B-Instruct 20.8%
- 87
Llama 3.1-8B 20.5%
- 88
Yi-1.5-6B-Chat 19.2%
- 89
Qwen2.5-1.5B 18.8%
- 90
Gemma 2 2B IT 18.6%
- 91 Granite-3.1-2B-Instruct 17.9%
- 92
Mistral 7B v0.3 17.8%
- 93
Qwen2.5-0.5B 10.8%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official SuperGPQA leaderboard
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 73.9% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 73.6% | May 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 71.6% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 71.4% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | | 70.8% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | | 70.4% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | | 69.6% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | | 68.7% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | | 67.1% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 10 | | 66.4% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 11 | | 66% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 12 | | 65.6% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 13 | | 64.9% | Jul 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 14 | | 64.8% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 15 | | 64.7% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 16 | | 64.3% | Sep 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 17 | | 63.4% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 18 | | 62.1% | Apr 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 19 | | 60.8% | Sep 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 20 | | 58.3% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 21 | | 58.2% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 22 | | 57.5% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 23 | Kimi K2 Jul 2025 | 57.2% | Jul 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 24 | | 55.7% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 25 | | 53.9% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 26 | | 53.1% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 27 | | 53.1% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 28 | | 52.9% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 29 | GLM-Z1-32B-0414 | 52.6% | Apr 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 30 | | 50.4% | Jan 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 31 | | 47.6% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 32 | MiMo-7B-RL | 40.5% | Apr 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 33 | | 37.5% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 34 | | 33.2% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 35 | | 21.3% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 73.8% | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | GPT-5.2 Pro | 67.1% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | GPT-5.1 | 66.3% | thinking | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | | 66% | five-shot | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | GPT-5 | 65.6% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | Grok 4 | 63% | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | | 61.8% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | Claude Opus 4 | 61.4% | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | GPT-5.2 | 61.3% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | o1 | 60.2% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | | 60.2% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | | 59.3% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | | 59.2% | five-shot | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 14 | GPT-5 mini | 58.8% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | Kimi K2 Jul 2025 | 58.1% | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | GPT-5 Chat | 57.4% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | Claude Sonnet 4 | 57% | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | GPT-5.2 Instant | 56.4% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | o3-mini | 55.2% | high | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 20 | gpt-oss-120b | 51.9% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 21 | | 50.9% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 22 | | 50.1% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 23 | | 49.4% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 24 | GPT-5 nano | 48.9% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 25 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) | 48.2% | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 26 | | 47.7% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 27 | | 47.4% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 28 | o1-mini | 45.2% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 29 | | 45.1% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 30 | gpt-oss-20b | 44.9% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 31 | GPT-4o Nov 2024 | 44.4% | Nov 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 32 | | 43.6% | Nov 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 33 | | 43.1% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 34 | GPT-4o Aug 2024 | 41.6% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 35 | | 40.8% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 36 | | 40.6% | Nov 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 37 | GPT-4o May 2024 | 39.8% | May 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 38 | | 38.8% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 39 | | 37.7% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 40 | | 37.6% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 41 | | 35.1% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 42 | | 34.9% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 43 | | 29.2% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 44 | | 28.8% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 45 | | 27.4% | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 46 | | 26% | May 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 47 | | 25.9% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 48 | | 24% | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 49 | | 23.3% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 50 | | 23.2% | May 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 51 | | 22.1% | Dec 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 52 | Granite-3.1-8B-Instruct | 20.8% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 53 | | 20.5% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 54 | | 19.2% | May 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 55 | | 18.8% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 56 | | 18.6% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 57 | Granite-3.1-2B-Instruct | 17.9% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 58 | | 17.8% | Sep 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 59 | | 10.8% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 73.9% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 73.8% | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | | 73.6% | May 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 71.6% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | | 71.4% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | | 70.8% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | | 70.4% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | | 69.6% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | | 68.7% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 10 | GPT-5.2 Pro | 67.1% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | | 67.1% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 12 | | 66.4% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 13 | GPT-5.1 | 66.3% | thinking | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 14 | | 66% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 15 | | 66% | five-shot | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 16 | GPT-5 | 65.6% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | | 65.6% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 18 | | 64.9% | Jul 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 19 | | 64.8% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 20 | | 64.7% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 21 | | 64.3% | Sep 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 22 | | 63.4% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 23 | Grok 4 | 63% | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 24 | | 62.1% | Apr 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 25 | | 61.8% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 26 | Claude Opus 4 | 61.4% | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 27 | GPT-5.2 | 61.3% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 28 | | 60.8% | Sep 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 29 | o1 | 60.2% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 30 | | 60.2% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 31 | | 59.3% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 32 | | 59.2% | five-shot | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 33 | GPT-5 mini | 58.8% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 34 | | 58.3% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 35 | | 58.2% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 36 | Kimi K2 Jul 2025 | 58.1% | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 37 | | 57.5% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 38 | GPT-5 Chat | 57.4% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 39 | Claude Sonnet 4 | 57% | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 40 | GPT-5.2 Instant | 56.4% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 41 | | 55.7% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 42 | o3-mini | 55.2% | high | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 43 | | 53.9% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 44 | | 53.1% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 45 | | 53.1% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 46 | | 52.9% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 47 | GLM-Z1-32B-0414 | 52.6% | Apr 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 48 | gpt-oss-120b | 51.9% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 49 | | 50.9% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 50 | | 50.4% | Jan 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 51 | | 50.1% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 52 | | 49.4% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 53 | GPT-5 nano | 48.9% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 54 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) | 48.2% | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 55 | | 47.7% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 56 | | 47.6% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 57 | | 47.4% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 58 | o1-mini | 45.2% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 59 | | 45.1% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 60 | gpt-oss-20b | 44.9% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 61 | GPT-4o Nov 2024 | 44.4% | Nov 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 62 | | 43.6% | Nov 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 63 | | 43.1% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 64 | GPT-4o Aug 2024 | 41.6% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 65 | | 40.8% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 66 | | 40.6% | Nov 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 67 | MiMo-7B-RL | 40.5% | Apr 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 68 | GPT-4o May 2024 | 39.8% | May 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 69 | | 38.8% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 70 | | 37.7% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 71 | | 37.6% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 72 | | 37.5% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 73 | | 35.1% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 74 | | 34.9% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 75 | | 33.2% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 76 | | 29.2% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 77 | | 28.8% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 78 | | 27.4% | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 79 | | 26% | May 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 80 | | 25.9% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 81 | | 24% | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 82 | | 23.3% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 83 | | 23.2% | May 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 84 | | 22.1% | Dec 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 85 | | 21.3% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 86 | Granite-3.1-8B-Instruct | 20.8% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 87 | | 20.5% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 88 | | 19.2% | May 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 89 | | 18.8% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 90 | | 18.6% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 91 | Granite-3.1-2B-Instruct | 17.9% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 92 | | 17.8% | Sep 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 93 | | 10.8% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard |
The benchmark's own leaderboard has 90 entries, 59 of them models we track. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
Scores at each effort level
Models the leaderboard ran at two or more effort levels. We don’t have enough cost data here to say what the extra effort costs.
Source: Official SuperGPQA leaderboard
6 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in February 2025 4 models have held number one across all independent runs since its release in February 2025 6 models have held number one with claims included since its release in February 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
Sources: Official SuperGPQA leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official SuperGPQA leaderboard and labs’ model cards
3 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2026 | 53.1 | SuperGPQA (EM) | |
| Jun 23, 2026 | 70.8 | SuperGPQA | |
| Jun 1, 2026 | 71.4 | SuperGPQA | |
| May 20, 2026 | 73.6 | SuperGPQA | |
| Apr 28, 2026 | 69.6 | SuperGPQA | |
| Apr 24, 2026 | 53.9 | SuperGPQA (EM) | |
| Apr 22, 2026 | 66 | SuperGPQA | |
| Apr 20, 2026 | 73.9 | SuperGPQA Graduate-Level Knowledge | |
| Apr 15, 2026 | 64.7 | SuperGPQA | |
| Apr 2, 2026 | 71.6 | SuperGPQA | |
| Mar 30, 2026 | 66.4 | SuperGPQA | |
| Mar 2, 2026 | 21.3 | SuperGPQA (Thinking) | |
| Mar 2, 2026 | 37.5 | SuperGPQA (Thinking) | |
| Mar 2, 2026 | 52.9 | SuperGPQA | |
| Mar 2, 2026 | 58.2 | SuperGPQA | |
| Feb 24, 2026 | 63.4 | SuperGPQA | |
| Feb 24, 2026 | 65.6 | SuperGPQA | |
| Feb 24, 2026 | 67.1 | SuperGPQA | |
| Feb 16, 2026 | 70.4 | SuperGPQA | |
| Feb 14, 2026 | 68.7 | SuperGPQA | |
| Dec 18, 2025 | 64.8 | SuperGPQA | |
| Sep 24, 2025 | SuperGPQA | ||
| Sep 23, 2025 | 64.3 | SuperGPQA | |
| Sep 11, 2025 | 60.8 | SuperGPQA | |
| Aug 20, 2025 | 55.7 | SuperGPQA | |
| Jul 25, 2025 | 64.9 | SuperGPQA | |
| Jul 11, 2025 | Kimi K2 | 57.2 | SuperGPQA, Acc |
| Apr 29, 2025 | MiMo-7B-RL | 40.5 | SuperGPQA (Pass@1) |
| Apr 14, 2025 | GLM-Z1-32B-0414 | 52.6 | SuperGPQA |
| Apr 10, 2025 | 62.1 | SuperGPQA |
14 system cards report it, from 8 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2026 | | 47.6 | SuperGPQA, CoT, Table 6 | Capabilities |
| Oct 15, 2026 | | 33.2 | SuperGPQA, CoT, Table 6 | Capabilities |
| Sep 10, 2026 | | 53.1 | SuperGPQA, EM, 5-shot | Capabilities |
| Jun 23, 2026 | | 70.8 | SuperGPQA (Table 11) | Capabilities |
| Jun 13, 2026 | | 58.3 | SuperGPQA, EM, CoT (Table 5) | Capabilities |
| Apr 17, 2026 | | 66.4 | SuperGPQA (Table 4) | Capabilities |
| Mar 21, 2026 | | 64.8 | SuperGPQA (Table 1) | Capabilities |
| Feb 28, 2026 | | 57.5 | SuperGPQA (Table 8) | Capabilities |
| Feb 14, 2026 | | 68.7 | SuperGPQA (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| Jan 14, 2026 | | 50.4 | SuperGPQA, SeRe (Tables 2 and 3). PaCoRe 53.15 | Capabilities |
| Nov 26, 2025 | | 64.3 | SuperGPQA (Table 6) | Capabilities |
| Jul 21, 2025 | Kimi K2 technical report | 57.2 | SuperGPQA (Acc.) (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| May 12, 2025 | MiMo-7B-RL technical report | 40.5 | SuperGPQA (Pass@1) (Table 4) | Capabilities |
| Apr 10, 2025 | | 62.1 | SuperGPQA (Table 2) | Capabilities |
One lab claim next to the leaderboard
Each score a lab reported for its own model, beside the same model's best score on the leaderboard. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. Every benchmark.
| Model | Lab says | Board says | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kimi K2 Jul 2025 | 57.2% SuperGPQA, Acc | 58.1% Leaderboard | −0.9 pts |
More in Knowledge
- MMLU-Pro In use Harder 10-option version of MMLU with reasoning-focused questions across 14 subjects.
Intern-S2-397B 89.8%
- WideSearch In use 200 bilingual broad info-seeking tasks: agent collects many atomic facts into a table. Scored by success rate and row/item F1.
Tencent Hy4 preview 83.9%
- BBEH micro average In use Models solve harder replacements for each of the 23 BIG-Bench Hard tasks, 4,520 examples in total. The score is the share of all examples answered correctly.
Gemma 4 31B IT 74.4%
- KMMLU-Pro In use Models answer multiple-choice questions taken from Korean National Professional Licensure exams. It tests professional knowledge used in Korean industry.
Solar Pro 4 79.2%
- HLE-Verified In use Verified and revised version of Humanity's Last Exam (1,811 items) with uncertain items removed.
Seed2.0 Pro 73.6%
- HLE-Diamond In use Models answer 1,000 cleaned expert questions from Humanity's Last Exam, 500 on reasoning and 500 on knowledge, closed book. Graded on exact answers. Claude Fable 5.2 77.9%