APEX-SWE
Software-engineering productivity tasks spanning integration work and observability, such as diagnosing failures from telemetry.
The leaderboard uses 200 held-out cases. Mercor open-sourced 50 in-distribution cases with labels. Tasks are graded by unit tests plus human-written rubrics.
- Made by
- Mercor
- Released
- January 2026
- Kind
- Fixing real repositories
- Level
- Expert
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Agent task
- Tasks
- Public, plus a private test set
- Strongest model tested
- GPT-6 Astra #3 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- August 2026
- Last model added
- November 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
We introduce the AI Productivity Index for Software Engineering (APEX-SWE), a benchmark for assessing whether frontier AI models can execute economically valuable software engineering work. Unlike existing evaluations that focus on narrow, well-defined tasks, APEX-SWE assesses two novel task types that reflect real-world software engineering: (1) Integration tasks (n=100), which require constructing end-to-end systems across heterogeneous cloud primitives, business applications, and infrastructure-as-code services, and (2) Observability tasks (n=100), which require debugging production failures using telemetry signals such as logs and dashboards, as well as unstructured context. We evaluated eleven frontier models for the APEX-SWE leaderboard. Claude Opus 4.6 leads the APEX-SWE leaderboard with 40.5% Pass@1, followed by Claude Opus 4.5 at 38.7%. Our analysis shows that strong performance is primarily driven by epistemic discipline, defined as the capacity to distinguish between assumptions and verified facts. It is often combined with systematic verification prior to acting. We open-source the APEX-SWE evaluation harness and a dev set (n=50).
Claude Opus 5.5 leads with 67.6%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Every run is in the next chart. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
- 67.6 Claude Opus 5.5
- 66.4 Claude Sonnet 5.5
- 63.7 Claude Opus 5
- 63.6 Claude Fable 5.1
- 58.9 Claude Fable 5
- 57.7 Grok 4.6
- 55.1 Claude Haiku 5.5
- 54.6 Muse Wonder 1.0
- 54.2 MiMo-V2.6 Pro
- 53.6 Grok 4.5
- 53.4 Grok 4.7
- 52.9
Muse Ember
- 52.3
Qwen 3.8 Max
- 51.9
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- 50.7
Qwen 3.8 27B
- 49.2
Gemini 4 Argon
- 49.1
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
- 48.6 GPT-6 Astra
- 48.0 GPT-5.6 Sol
- 48.0 Kimi K3
- 47.6 Claude Opus 4.7
- 47.3 Claude Opus 4.8
- 46.9 GPT-6.1 Sol
- 46.7
DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- 46.4 Claude Sonnet 5
- 46.1 GLM-5.3-Flash
- 45.9
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
- 45.6 GLM-5.3
- 45.0 GPT-6 Sol
- 43.1 Mercury 3
- 42.0
Gemini 3.7 Flash
- 41.8 Claude Opus 4.6
- 41.6 Beam
- 41.5 GPT-5.3 Codex
- 40.8 GPT-5.5
- 40.5
Muse Spark 1.2
- 40.3 Kimi K2.7 Code
- 39.7
Gemini 3.6 Flash
- 39.1
Muse Spark 1.3
- 38.9
Muse Spark 1.1
- 38.8 GPT-6 Luna
- 37.4 GLM-5.2
- 37.0
Mistral Large 4
- 36.4
Gemini 3.8 Flash
- 36.1
Gemini 3.5 Flash
- 34.6
MiniMax-M3
- 34.5 Claude Sonnet 4.6
- 34.5 GLM-5.1
- 34.3 GPT-5.4
- 33.9
Gemini 3.1 Pro
- 33.8
DeepSeek-V4-Pro
- 32.5 Kimi K2.7
- 32.1 GPT-5.6 Luna
- 31.7 Cognition SWE-1.6 Preview
- 31.2
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
- 31.1 GPT-5.6 Terra
- 31.0 Claude Sonnet 4.5
- 30.8 GPT-5.2 Codex
- 30.3 Kimi K2.5
- 29.0 GPT-5.1-Codex
- 27.9 Qwen3.5
- 26.8
Gemini 3 Pro
- 26.1
Inkling
- 25.6
DeepSeek-V3.2
- 22.3
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
- 21.5
MiniMax-M2.7
- 21.0 Grok 4
- 17.4 Kimi K2
- 15.2
Nemotron 3 Ultra
- 3.30 gpt-oss-120b
- 1 Claude Opus 5.5 max 67.6%
- 2 Claude Sonnet 5.5 max 66.4%
- 3 Claude Opus 5 max 63.7%
- 4 Claude Fable 5.1 max 63.6%
- 5 Claude Fable 5 max 58.9%
- 6 Grok 4.6 xhigh 57.7%
- 7 Claude Haiku 5.5 max 55.1%
- 8 Muse Wonder 1.0 max 54.6%
- 9 MiMo-V2.6 Pro auto 54.2%
- 10 Grok 4.5 high 53.6%
- 11 Grok 4.7 xhigh 53.4%
- 12
Muse Ember max 52.9%
- 13
Qwen 3.8 Max xhigh 52.3%
- 14
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash max 51.9%
- 15
Qwen 3.8 27B xhigh 50.7%
- 16
Gemini 4 Argon high 49.2%
- 17
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 max 49.1%
- 18 GPT-6 Astra max 48.6%
- 19 GPT-5.6 Sol max 48%
- 20 Kimi K3 max 48%
- 21 Claude Opus 4.7 max 47.6%
- 22 Claude Opus 4.8 high 47.3%
- 23 GPT-6.1 Sol max 46.9%
- 24
DeepSeek-V4-Flash max 46.7%
- 25 Claude Sonnet 5 max 46.4%
- 26 GLM-5.3-Flash max 46.1%
- 27
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 max 45.9%
- 28 GLM-5.3 max 45.6%
- 29 GPT-6 Sol max 45%
- 30 Mercury 3 high 43.1%
- 31
Gemini 3.7 Flash high 42%
- 32 Claude Opus 4.6 max 41.8%
- 33 Beam max 41.6%
- 34 GPT-5.3 Codex high 41.5%
- 35 GPT-5.5 xhigh 40.8%
- 36
Muse Spark 1.2 xhigh 40.5%
- 37 Kimi K2.7 Code high 40.3%
- 38
Gemini 3.6 Flash high 39.7%
- 39
Muse Spark 1.3 max 39.1%
- 40
Muse Spark 1.1 xhigh 38.9%
- 41 GPT-6 Luna max 38.8%
- 42 GLM-5.2 max 37.4%
- 43
Mistral Large 4 high 37%
- 44
Gemini 3.8 Flash high 36.4%
- 45
Gemini 3.5 Flash high 36.1%
- 46
MiniMax-M3 high 34.6%
- 47 Claude Sonnet 4.6 high 34.5%
- 48 GLM-5.1 34.5%
- 49 GPT-5.4 xhigh 34.3%
- 50
Gemini 3.1 Pro high 33.9%
- 51
DeepSeek-V4-Pro max 33.8%
- 52 Kimi K2.7 32.5%
- 53 GPT-5.6 Luna max 32.1%
- 54 Cognition SWE-1.6 Preview 31.7%
- 55
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite high 31.2%
- 56 GPT-5.6 Terra max 31.1%
- 57 Claude Sonnet 4.5 high 31%
- 58 GPT-5.2 Codex high 30.8%
- 59 Kimi K2.5 30.3%
- 60 GPT-5.1-Codex high 29%
- 61 Qwen3.5 27.9%
- 62
Gemini 3 Pro high 26.8%
- 63
Inkling high 26.1%
- 64
DeepSeek-V3.2 25.6%
- 65
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL high 22.3%
- 66
MiniMax-M2.7 high 21.5%
- 67 Grok 4 21%
- 68 Kimi K2 Sep 2025, high 17.4%
- 69
Nemotron 3 Ultra high 15.2%
- 70 gpt-oss-120b high 3.30%
Source: Official APEX-SWE leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Opus 5.5 | 67.6% | max, terminus-2 | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 66.4% | max, terminus-2 | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | Claude Opus 5 | 63.7% | max, terminus-2 | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | Claude Fable 5.1 | 63.6% | max, terminus-2 | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | Claude Fable 5 | 58.9% | max, terminus-2 | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | Grok 4.6 | 57.7% | xhigh, terminus-2 | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | Claude Haiku 5.5 | 55.1% | max, terminus-2 | Oct 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | Muse Wonder 1.0 | 54.6% | max, terminus-2 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | MiMo-V2.6 Pro | 54.2% | auto, terminus-2 | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | Grok 4.5 | 53.6% | high, terminus-2 | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | Grok 4.7 | 53.4% | xhigh, terminus-2 | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 12 | | 52.9% | max, terminus-2 | Nov 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 13 | | 52.3% | xhigh, terminus-2 | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 14 | | 51.9% | max, terminus-2 | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 15 | | 50.7% | xhigh, terminus-2 | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 16 | | 49.2% | high, terminus-2 | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 17 | | 49.1% | max, terminus-2 | Oct 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 18 | GPT-6 Astra | 48.6% | max, terminus-2 | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 19 | GPT-5.6 Sol | 48% | max, terminus-2 | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 20 | Kimi K3 | 48% | max, terminus-2 | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 21 | Claude Opus 4.7 | 47.6% | max, terminus-2 | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 22 | Claude Opus 4.8 | 47.3% | high, inspect | May 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 23 | GPT-6.1 Sol | 46.9% | max, terminus-2 | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 24 | | 46.7% | max, terminus-2 | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 25 | Claude Sonnet 5 | 46.4% | max, terminus-2 | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 26 | GLM-5.3-Flash | 46.1% | max, terminus-2 | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 27 | | 45.9% | max, terminus-2 | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 28 | GLM-5.3 | 45.6% | max, terminus-2 | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 29 | GPT-6 Sol | 45% | max, terminus-2 | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 30 | Mercury 3 | 43.1% | high, terminus-2 | Oct 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 31 | | 42% | high, terminus-2 | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 32 | Claude Opus 4.6 | 41.8% | max, terminus-2 | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 33 | Beam | 41.6% | max, terminus-2 | Official leaderboard | |
| 34 | GPT-5.3 Codex | 41.5% | high, inspect | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 35 | GPT-5.5 | 40.8% | xhigh, inspect | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 36 | | 40.5% | xhigh, terminus-2 | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 37 | Kimi K2.7 Code | 40.3% | high, terminus-2 | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 38 | | 39.7% | high, inspect | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 39 | | 39.1% | max, terminus-2 | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 40 | | 38.9% | xhigh, terminus-2 | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 41 | GPT-6 Luna | 38.8% | max, terminus-2 | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 42 | GLM-5.2 | 37.4% | max, terminus-2 | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 43 | | 37% | high, terminus-2 | Oct 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 44 | | 36.4% | high, terminus-2 | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 45 | | 36.1% | high, terminus-2 | May 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 46 | | 34.6% | high, terminus-2 | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 47 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 34.5% | high, terminus-2 | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 48 | GLM-5.1 | 34.5% | terminus-2 | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 49 | GPT-5.4 | 34.3% | xhigh, terminus-2 | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 50 | | 33.9% | high, terminus-2 | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 51 | | 33.8% | max, terminus-2 | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 52 | Kimi K2.7 | 32.5% | inspect | Official leaderboard | |
| 53 | GPT-5.6 Luna | 32.1% | max, terminus-2 | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 54 | Cognition SWE-1.6 Preview | 31.7% | inspect | Official leaderboard | |
| 55 | | 31.2% | high, terminus-2 | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 56 | GPT-5.6 Terra | 31.1% | max, terminus-2 | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 57 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | 31% | high, inspect | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 58 | GPT-5.2 Codex | 30.8% | high, inspect | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 59 | Kimi K2.5 | 30.3% | inspect | Jan 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 60 | GPT-5.1-Codex | 29% | high, inspect | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 61 | Qwen3.5 | 27.9% | terminus-2 | Official leaderboard | |
| 62 | | 26.8% | high, inspect | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 63 | | 26.1% | high, terminus-2 | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 64 | | 25.6% | terminus-2 | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 65 | | 22.3% | high, terminus-2 | Oct 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 66 | | 21.5% | high, terminus-2 | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 67 | Grok 4 | 21% | inspect | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 68 | Kimi K2 Sep 2025 | 17.4% | high, terminus-2 | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 69 | | 15.2% | high, terminus-2 | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 70 | gpt-oss-120b | 3.30% | high, terminus-2 | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 2 models in their cards. We plot every source in the charts below.
More effort adds a median 3 points
Models the leaderboard ran at two or more effort levels. We don’t have enough cost data here to say what the extra effort costs.
Source: Official APEX-SWE leaderboard
| Model | Effort | Harness | Score | Cost per task | Output tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5.5 | max | terminus-2 | 67.6% | ||
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | max | terminus-2 | 66.4% | ||
| Claude Opus 5 | max | terminus-2 | 63.7% | ||
| Claude Fable 5.1 | max | terminus-2 | 63.6% | ||
| Claude Fable 5 | max | terminus-2 | 58.9% | ||
| Grok 4.6 | xhigh | terminus-2 | 57.7% | ||
| Grok 4.6 | high | terminus-2 | 56.4% | ||
| Claude Opus 5.5 | medium | terminus-2 | 55.9% | ||
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | max | terminus-2 | 55.1% | ||
| Claude Fable 5 | max | inspect | 54.8% | ||
| Claude Opus 5 | max | inspect | 54.7% | ||
| MiMo-V2.6 Pro | auto | terminus-2 | 54.2% | ||
| Grok 4.5 | high | terminus-2 | 53.6% | ||
| Grok 4.7 | xhigh | terminus-2 | 53.4% | ||
| | max | terminus-2 | 52.9% | ||
| | xhigh | terminus-2 | 52.3% | ||
| | max | terminus-2 | 51.9% | ||
| Grok 4.5 | high | inspect | 51.2% | ||
| | xhigh | terminus-2 | 50.7% | ||
| | high | terminus-2 | 49.2% | ||
| | max | terminus-2 | 49.1% | ||
| GPT-6 Astra | max | terminus-2 | 48.6% | ||
| GPT-5.6 Sol | max | terminus-2 | 48% | ||
| Kimi K3 | max | terminus-2 | 48% | ||
| Claude Opus 4.7 | max | terminus-2 | 47.6% | ||
| Claude Opus 4.8 | high | inspect | 47.3% | ||
| GPT-6.1 Sol | max | terminus-2 | 46.9% | ||
| | max | terminus-2 | 46.7% | ||
| Claude Sonnet 5 | max | terminus-2 | 46.4% | ||
| GLM-5.3-Flash | max | terminus-2 | 46.1% | ||
| | max | terminus-2 | 45.9% | ||
| GPT-5.6 Sol | xhigh | terminus-2 | 45.8% | ||
| GLM-5.3 | max | terminus-2 | 45.6% | ||
| GPT-6 Sol | max | terminus-2 | 45% | ||
| Kimi K3 | max | inspect | 44.7% | ||
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | medium | terminus-2 | 44% | ||
| Claude Opus 4.8 | max | terminus-2 | 43.9% | ||
| Claude Sonnet 5 | high | inspect | 43.6% | ||
| Mercury 3 | high | terminus-2 | 43.1% | ||
| | high | terminus-2 | 42% | ||
| Claude Opus 4.6 | max | terminus-2 | 41.8% | ||
| GPT-5.3 Codex | high | inspect | 41.5% | ||
| Claude Opus 4.7 | high | inspect | 41.3% | ||
| GPT-5.5 | xhigh | inspect | 40.8% | ||
| | xhigh | terminus-2 | 40.5% | ||
| Kimi K2.7 Code | high | terminus-2 | 40.3% | ||
| GPT-5.6 Sol | xhigh | inspect | 39.7% | ||
| | high | inspect | 39.7% | ||
| | high | terminus-2 | 39.4% | ||
| | max | terminus-2 | 39.1% | ||
| | xhigh | terminus-2 | 38.9% | ||
| GPT-6 Luna | max | terminus-2 | 38.8% | ||
| GLM-5.2 | max | terminus-2 | 37.4% | ||
| GLM-5.2 | inspect | 37.3% | |||
| | high | terminus-2 | 37% | ||
| GPT-5.5 | xhigh | terminus-2 | 36.6% | ||
| | high | terminus-2 | 36.4% | ||
| | xhigh | terminus-2 | 36.4% | ||
| | high | terminus-2 | 36.1% | ||
| | high | terminus-2 | 34.6% | ||
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | high | terminus-2 | 34.5% | ||
| GLM-5.1 | terminus-2 | 34.5% | |||
| GPT-5.4 | xhigh | terminus-2 | 34.3% | ||
| | high | terminus-2 | 33.9% | ||
| | max | terminus-2 | 33.8% | ||
| | high | inspect | 32.5% | ||
| GPT-5.6 Luna | max | terminus-2 | 32.1% | ||
| | high | terminus-2 | 31.2% | ||
| GPT-5.6 Terra | max | terminus-2 | 31.1% | ||
| Claude Sonnet 4.5 | high | inspect | 31% | ||
| GPT-5.2 Codex | high | inspect | 30.8% | ||
| Kimi K2.5 | inspect | 30.3% | |||
| GPT-5.1-Codex | high | inspect | 29% | ||
| | high | inspect | 28.8% | ||
| | high | inspect | 26.8% | ||
| | high | terminus-2 | 26.1% | ||
| | terminus-2 | 25.6% | |||
| | high | terminus-2 | 22.3% | ||
| | high | terminus-2 | 21.5% | ||
| Grok 4 | inspect | 21% | |||
| Kimi K2 Sep 2025 | high | terminus-2 | 17.4% | ||
| | inspect | 15.8% | |||
| | high | terminus-2 | 15.2% | ||
| Kimi K2 Sep 2025 | inspect | 11.2% | |||
| gpt-oss-120b | high | terminus-2 | 3.30% |
6 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in January 2026
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
Sources: Official APEX-SWE leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official APEX-SWE leaderboard and labs’ model cards
One lab put it in a launch post in the last six months
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2026 | Grok 4.6 | 56.4 | APEX-SWE |
2 system cards report it, from 1 lab
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
The lab's number comes out ahead in 0 of 2 pairs that differ
Each score a lab reported for its own model, beside the same model's best score on the leaderboard. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. Every benchmark.
More in Coding
- SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
- LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5%
- SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Fable 5.2 96.6%
- DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
- SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases.
Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
- Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471