Benchmark Almanac

APEX-SWE

Claude Opus 5.5 67.6% leads since September 2026
In use

Software-engineering productivity tasks spanning integration work and observability, such as diagnosing failures from telemetry.

The leaderboard uses 200 held-out cases. Mercor open-sourced 50 in-distribution cases with labels. Tasks are graded by unit tests plus human-written rubrics.

Made by
Mercor
Released
January 2026
Kind
Fixing real repositories
Level
Expert
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Agent task
Tasks
Public, plus a private test set
Strongest model tested
GPT-6 Astra #3 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
August 2026
Last model added
November 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

We introduce the AI Productivity Index for Software Engineering (APEX-SWE), a benchmark for assessing whether frontier AI models can execute economically valuable software engineering work. Unlike existing evaluations that focus on narrow, well-defined tasks, APEX-SWE assesses two novel task types that reflect real-world software engineering: (1) Integration tasks (n=100), which require constructing end-to-end systems across heterogeneous cloud primitives, business applications, and infrastructure-as-code services, and (2) Observability tasks (n=100), which require debugging production failures using telemetry signals such as logs and dashboards, as well as unstructured context. We evaluated eleven frontier models for the APEX-SWE leaderboard. Claude Opus 4.6 leads the APEX-SWE leaderboard with 40.5% Pass@1, followed by Claude Opus 4.5 at 38.7%. Our analysis shows that strong performance is primarily driven by epistemic discipline, defined as the capacity to distinguish between assumptions and verified facts. It is often combined with systematic verification prior to acting. We open-source the APEX-SWE evaluation harness and a dev set (n=50).

Abstract of APEX-SWE (arXiv:2601.08806, CC0)
70
Entries on its own leaderboard, 65 models we track
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab
2
System cards report it, from 1 lab

Claude Opus 5.5 leads with 67.6%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Every run is in the next chart. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

  1. 1 Claude Opus 5.5 max 67.6%
  2. 2 Claude Sonnet 5.5 max 66.4%
  3. 3 Claude Opus 5 max 63.7%
  4. 4 Claude Fable 5.1 max 63.6%
  5. 5 Claude Fable 5 max 58.9%
  6. 6 Grok 4.6 xhigh 57.7%
  7. 7 Claude Haiku 5.5 max 55.1%
  8. 8 Muse Wonder 1.0 max 54.6%
  9. 9 MiMo-V2.6 Pro auto 54.2%
  10. 10 Grok 4.5 high 53.6%
  11. 11 Grok 4.7 xhigh 53.4%
  12. 12 Muse Ember max 52.9%
  13. 13 Qwen 3.8 Max xhigh 52.3%
  14. 14 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash max 51.9%
  15. 15 Qwen 3.8 27B xhigh 50.7%
  16. 16 Gemini 4 Argon high 49.2%
  17. 17 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 max 49.1%
  18. 18 GPT-6 Astra max 48.6%
  19. 19 GPT-5.6 Sol max 48%
  20. 20 Kimi K3 max 48%
  21. 21 Claude Opus 4.7 max 47.6%
  22. 22 Claude Opus 4.8 high 47.3%
  23. 23 GPT-6.1 Sol max 46.9%
  24. 24 DeepSeek-V4-Flash max 46.7%
  25. 25 Claude Sonnet 5 max 46.4%
  26. 26 GLM-5.3-Flash max 46.1%
  27. 27 DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 max 45.9%
  28. 28 GLM-5.3 max 45.6%
  29. 29 GPT-6 Sol max 45%
  30. 30 Mercury 3 high 43.1%
  31. 31 Gemini 3.7 Flash high 42%
  32. 32 Claude Opus 4.6 max 41.8%
  33. 33 Beam max 41.6%
  34. 34 GPT-5.3 Codex high 41.5%
  35. 35 GPT-5.5 xhigh 40.8%
  36. 36 Muse Spark 1.2 xhigh 40.5%
  37. 37 Kimi K2.7 Code high 40.3%
  38. 38 Gemini 3.6 Flash high 39.7%
  39. 39 Muse Spark 1.3 max 39.1%
  40. 40 Muse Spark 1.1 xhigh 38.9%
  41. 41 GPT-6 Luna max 38.8%
  42. 42 GLM-5.2 max 37.4%
  43. 43 Mistral Large 4 high 37%
  44. 44 Gemini 3.8 Flash high 36.4%
  45. 45 Gemini 3.5 Flash high 36.1%
  46. 46 MiniMax-M3 high 34.6%
  47. 47 Claude Sonnet 4.6 high 34.5%
  48. 48 GLM-5.1 34.5%
  49. 49 GPT-5.4 xhigh 34.3%
  50. 50 Gemini 3.1 Pro high 33.9%
  51. 51 DeepSeek-V4-Pro max 33.8%
  52. 52 Kimi K2.7 32.5%
  53. 53 GPT-5.6 Luna max 32.1%
  54. 54 Cognition SWE-1.6 Preview 31.7%
  55. 55 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite high 31.2%
  56. 56 GPT-5.6 Terra max 31.1%
  57. 57 Claude Sonnet 4.5 high 31%
  58. 58 GPT-5.2 Codex high 30.8%
  59. 59 Kimi K2.5 30.3%
  60. 60 GPT-5.1-Codex high 29%
  61. 61 Qwen3.5 27.9%
  62. 62 Gemini 3 Pro high 26.8%
  63. 63 Inkling high 26.1%
  64. 64 DeepSeek-V3.2 25.6%
  65. 65 Nemotron 3.5 Super VL high 22.3%
  66. 66 MiniMax-M2.7 high 21.5%
  67. 67 Grok 4 21%
  68. 68 Kimi K2 Sep 2025, high 17.4%
  69. 69 Nemotron 3 Ultra high 15.2%
  70. 70 gpt-oss-120b high 3.30%

Source: Official APEX-SWE leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Claude Opus 5.5 67.6% max, terminus-2 Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
2 Claude Sonnet 5.5 66.4% max, terminus-2 Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
3 Claude Opus 5 63.7% max, terminus-2 Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
4 Claude Fable 5.1 63.6% max, terminus-2 Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
5 Claude Fable 5 58.9% max, terminus-2 Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
6 Grok 4.6 57.7% xhigh, terminus-2 Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
7 Claude Haiku 5.5 55.1% max, terminus-2 Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
8 Muse Wonder 1.0 54.6% max, terminus-2 Official leaderboard
9 MiMo-V2.6 Pro 54.2% auto, terminus-2 Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
10 Grok 4.5 53.6% high, terminus-2 Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
11 Grok 4.7 53.4% xhigh, terminus-2 Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
12 Muse Ember 52.9% max, terminus-2 Nov 2026 Official leaderboard
13 Qwen 3.8 Max 52.3% xhigh, terminus-2 Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
14 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 51.9% max, terminus-2 Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
15 Qwen 3.8 27B 50.7% xhigh, terminus-2 Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
16 Gemini 4 Argon 49.2% high, terminus-2 Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
17 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 49.1% max, terminus-2 Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
18 GPT-6 Astra 48.6% max, terminus-2 Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
19 GPT-5.6 Sol 48% max, terminus-2 Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
20 Kimi K3 48% max, terminus-2 Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
21 Claude Opus 4.7 47.6% max, terminus-2 Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
22 Claude Opus 4.8 47.3% high, inspect May 2026 Official leaderboard
23 GPT-6.1 Sol 46.9% max, terminus-2 Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
24 DeepSeek-V4-Flash 46.7% max, terminus-2 Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
25 Claude Sonnet 5 46.4% max, terminus-2 Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
26 GLM-5.3-Flash 46.1% max, terminus-2 Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
27 DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 45.9% max, terminus-2 Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
28 GLM-5.3 45.6% max, terminus-2 Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
29 GPT-6 Sol 45% max, terminus-2 Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
30 Mercury 3 43.1% high, terminus-2 Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
31 Gemini 3.7 Flash 42% high, terminus-2 Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
32 Claude Opus 4.6 41.8% max, terminus-2 Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
33 Beam 41.6% max, terminus-2 Official leaderboard
34 GPT-5.3 Codex 41.5% high, inspect Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
35 GPT-5.5 40.8% xhigh, inspect Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
36 Muse Spark 1.2 40.5% xhigh, terminus-2 Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
37 Kimi K2.7 Code 40.3% high, terminus-2 Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
38 Gemini 3.6 Flash 39.7% high, inspect Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
39 Muse Spark 1.3 39.1% max, terminus-2 Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
40 Muse Spark 1.1 38.9% xhigh, terminus-2 Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
41 GPT-6 Luna 38.8% max, terminus-2 Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
42 GLM-5.2 37.4% max, terminus-2 Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
43 Mistral Large 4 37% high, terminus-2 Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
44 Gemini 3.8 Flash 36.4% high, terminus-2 Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
45 Gemini 3.5 Flash 36.1% high, terminus-2 May 2026 Official leaderboard
46 MiniMax-M3 34.6% high, terminus-2 Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
47 Claude Sonnet 4.6 34.5% high, terminus-2 Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
48 GLM-5.1 34.5% terminus-2 Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
49 GPT-5.4 34.3% xhigh, terminus-2 Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
50 Gemini 3.1 Pro 33.9% high, terminus-2 Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
51 DeepSeek-V4-Pro 33.8% max, terminus-2 Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
52 Kimi K2.7 32.5% inspect Official leaderboard
53 GPT-5.6 Luna 32.1% max, terminus-2 Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
54 Cognition SWE-1.6 Preview 31.7% inspect Official leaderboard
55 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 31.2% high, terminus-2 Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
56 GPT-5.6 Terra 31.1% max, terminus-2 Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
57 Claude Sonnet 4.5 31% high, inspect Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
58 GPT-5.2 Codex 30.8% high, inspect Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
59 Kimi K2.5 30.3% inspect Jan 2026 Official leaderboard
60 GPT-5.1-Codex 29% high, inspect Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
61 Qwen3.5 27.9% terminus-2 Official leaderboard
62 Gemini 3 Pro 26.8% high, inspect Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
63 Inkling 26.1% high, terminus-2 Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
64 DeepSeek-V3.2 25.6% terminus-2 Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
65 Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 22.3% high, terminus-2 Oct 2026 Official leaderboard
66 MiniMax-M2.7 21.5% high, terminus-2 Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
67 Grok 4 21% inspect Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
68 Kimi K2 Sep 2025 17.4% high, terminus-2 Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
69 Nemotron 3 Ultra 15.2% high, terminus-2 Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
70 gpt-oss-120b 3.30% high, terminus-2 Aug 2025 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 2 models in their cards. We plot every source in the charts below.

More effort adds a median 3 points

Models the leaderboard ran at two or more effort levels. We don’t have enough cost data here to say what the extra effort costs.

Lowest effort to highest, light to dark
Claude Opus 5.5 terminus-2
medium max
67.6%
Claude Sonnet 5.5 terminus-2
medium max
66.4%
Grok 4.6 terminus-2
high
57.7%
GPT-5.6 Sol terminus-2
xhigh
48%
Muse Spark 1.3 terminus-2
xhigh
39.1%

Source: Official APEX-SWE leaderboard

ModelEffortHarnessScoreCost per taskOutput tokens
Claude Opus 5.5 max terminus-2 67.6%
Claude Sonnet 5.5 max terminus-2 66.4%
Claude Opus 5 max terminus-2 63.7%
Claude Fable 5.1 max terminus-2 63.6%
Claude Fable 5 max terminus-2 58.9%
Grok 4.6 xhigh terminus-2 57.7%
Grok 4.6 high terminus-2 56.4%
Claude Opus 5.5 medium terminus-2 55.9%
Claude Haiku 5.5 max terminus-2 55.1%
Claude Fable 5 max inspect 54.8%
Claude Opus 5 max inspect 54.7%
MiMo-V2.6 Pro auto terminus-2 54.2%
Grok 4.5 high terminus-2 53.6%
Grok 4.7 xhigh terminus-2 53.4%
Muse Ember max terminus-2 52.9%
Qwen 3.8 Max xhigh terminus-2 52.3%
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash max terminus-2 51.9%
Grok 4.5 high inspect 51.2%
Qwen 3.8 27B xhigh terminus-2 50.7%
Gemini 4 Argon high terminus-2 49.2%
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 max terminus-2 49.1%
GPT-6 Astra max terminus-2 48.6%
GPT-5.6 Sol max terminus-2 48%
Kimi K3 max terminus-2 48%
Claude Opus 4.7 max terminus-2 47.6%
Claude Opus 4.8 high inspect 47.3%
GPT-6.1 Sol max terminus-2 46.9%
DeepSeek-V4-Flash max terminus-2 46.7%
Claude Sonnet 5 max terminus-2 46.4%
GLM-5.3-Flash max terminus-2 46.1%
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 max terminus-2 45.9%
GPT-5.6 Sol xhigh terminus-2 45.8%
GLM-5.3 max terminus-2 45.6%
GPT-6 Sol max terminus-2 45%
Kimi K3 max inspect 44.7%
Claude Sonnet 5.5 medium terminus-2 44%
Claude Opus 4.8 max terminus-2 43.9%
Claude Sonnet 5 high inspect 43.6%
Mercury 3 high terminus-2 43.1%
Gemini 3.7 Flash high terminus-2 42%
Claude Opus 4.6 max terminus-2 41.8%
GPT-5.3 Codex high inspect 41.5%
Claude Opus 4.7 high inspect 41.3%
GPT-5.5 xhigh inspect 40.8%
Muse Spark 1.2 xhigh terminus-2 40.5%
Kimi K2.7 Code high terminus-2 40.3%
GPT-5.6 Sol xhigh inspect 39.7%
Gemini 3.6 Flash high inspect 39.7%
Gemini 3.6 Flash high terminus-2 39.4%
Muse Spark 1.3 max terminus-2 39.1%
Muse Spark 1.1 xhigh terminus-2 38.9%
GPT-6 Luna max terminus-2 38.8%
GLM-5.2 max terminus-2 37.4%
GLM-5.2 inspect 37.3%
Mistral Large 4 high terminus-2 37%
GPT-5.5 xhigh terminus-2 36.6%
Gemini 3.8 Flash high terminus-2 36.4%
Muse Spark 1.3 xhigh terminus-2 36.4%
Gemini 3.5 Flash high terminus-2 36.1%
MiniMax-M3 high terminus-2 34.6%
Claude Sonnet 4.6 high terminus-2 34.5%
GLM-5.1 terminus-2 34.5%
GPT-5.4 xhigh terminus-2 34.3%
Gemini 3.1 Pro high terminus-2 33.9%
DeepSeek-V4-Pro max terminus-2 33.8%
Gemini 3.5 Flash high inspect 32.5%
GPT-5.6 Luna max terminus-2 32.1%
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite high terminus-2 31.2%
GPT-5.6 Terra max terminus-2 31.1%
Claude Sonnet 4.5 high inspect 31%
GPT-5.2 Codex high inspect 30.8%
Kimi K2.5 inspect 30.3%
GPT-5.1-Codex high inspect 29%
Gemini 3.1 Pro high inspect 28.8%
Gemini 3 Pro high inspect 26.8%
Inkling high terminus-2 26.1%
DeepSeek-V3.2 terminus-2 25.6%
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL high terminus-2 22.3%
MiniMax-M2.7 high terminus-2 21.5%
Grok 4 inspect 21%
Kimi K2 Sep 2025 high terminus-2 17.4%
DeepSeek-V3.2 inspect 15.8%
Nemotron 3 Ultra high terminus-2 15.2%
Kimi K2 Sep 2025 inspect 11.2%
gpt-oss-120b high terminus-2 3.30%

6 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in January 2026

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

Anthropic xAI
Own leaderboard 6 leaders
Lab claims Not tested since Aug 2026
Grok 4.6 56.4%

Sources: Official APEX-SWE leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude Opus 5.5 Claude Fable 5 Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Grok 4 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude Opus 5.5 Claude Fable 5

Sources: Official APEX-SWE leaderboard and labs’ model cards

One lab put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

xAI
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Aug 12, 2026 Grok 4.6 56.4 APEX-SWE

2 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Aug 12, 2026 Grok 4.6 model card 56.4 APEX-SWE, Pass@1, high, Terminus-2 harness, run by Mercor (2.2) Capabilities
Jul 14, 2026 Grok 4.5 model card 51.2 APEX-SWE, Pass@1, high, run by Mercor (2.3) Capabilities

The lab's number comes out ahead in 0 of 2 pairs that differ

Each score a lab reported for its own model, beside the same model's best score on the leaderboard. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. Every benchmark.

Model Lab says Board says Gap
Grok 4.5 51.2% APEX-SWE, Pass@1, high, run by Mercor (2.3) 53.6% Leaderboard, high, terminus-2 −2.4 pts
Grok 4.6 56.4% APEX-SWE 57.7% Leaderboard, xhigh, terminus-2 −1.3 pts

More in Coding

All 282 in Coding
  • SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
  • LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests. DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5%
  • SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Fable 5.2 96.6%
  • DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
  • SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases. Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
  • Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471