Benchmark Almanac

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL ranks first on 3 of the 85 benchmarks with five or more models scored.

NVIDIA Released October 15th, 2026 Family Nemotron 3.5 The lab's model card Compare with others
101
Benchmarks with a score
3
Ranked first, out of five or more models
5
In the top three
NVIDIA Oct 2026

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

Open weights Flagship

144.1 #141 of 404
Self-Reported Index, from the lab's own numbers. No Epoch Capabilities Index score yet.
  • IFBench 70.9% #42 /80
  • SciCode 47.1% #16 /49
  • Terminal-Bench 4.0 0.30% #39 /40

Where it ranks

Its best score on each benchmark, and where that ranks among every model with a score there. We rank each model once, at its best setting.

Knowledge and language

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
GraphWalks 89.7% #8 of 27 Lab model card
LMArena (Elo) 1,415 #111 of 335 Official leaderboard
WMT24++ 84.8% #6 of 15 Lab model card
Humanity's Last Exam 31.8% #76 of 154 Lab model card
NV Chat Benchmark 52.7 #1 of 2 Lab model card
IFBench 70.9% #42 of 80 Lab model card
MMLU-ProX 76.9% #14 of 23 Lab model card
AA-LCR 1.1 68.6% #5 of 6 Lab model card

Math and science

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
GPQA Diamond 89.5% #37 of 302 Lab model card
MathArena Apex Shortlist 88.4% #2 of 4 Lab model card
CritPt 10.9% #9 of 13 Lab model card
ARC-AGI-2 1.94% #78 of 98 Official leaderboard
ARC-AGI 22.7% #79 of 95 Official leaderboard

Coding

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
LiveCodeBench v6 88.2% #10 of 90 Lab model card
Bird-SQL 59.6% #2 of 13 Lab model card
SciCode 47.1% #16 of 49 Lab model card
SWE-bench Verified 71.1% #70 of 155 Lab model card
ALE-Bench 1,352 #69 of 126 Official leaderboard
DesignArena 3D Design 1,117 #85 of 136 Official leaderboard
SWE-bench Multilingual 67.7% #46 of 73 Lab model card
DesignArena UI Component 1,154 #89 of 139 Official leaderboard
DesignArena Website 1,160 #97 of 151 Official leaderboard
Code Arena 1,401 #84 of 128 Official leaderboard
DesignArena Code 1,140 #99 of 143 Official leaderboard
DesignArena Game Dev 1,077 #108 of 143 Official leaderboard
SWE-Bench Pro 51.8% #63 of 81 Lab model card
Vibe Code Bench 3.71% #108 of 120 Official leaderboard
DesignArena Data Visualization 1,085 #108 of 118 Official leaderboard
APEX-SWE 22.3% #60 of 65 Official leaderboard
Image-to-WebDev Arena 1,392 #51 of 55 Official leaderboard
SWE Atlas v1.1 24.8% #26 of 28 Official leaderboard
Code Migration v1.1 16.4% #28 of 30 Official leaderboard
DeepSWE 24.6% #56 of 56 Lab model card
DesignArena Image to HTML 1,044 #51 of 51 Official leaderboard
DesignArena Video to Website 1,005 #19 of 19 Official leaderboard

Agents and tools

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
BrowseComp 78.9% #31 of 81 Lab model card
AutomationBench 32.4% #29 of 47 Lab model card
RuneBench 4.36 #48 of 76 Official leaderboard
tau2-bench 73% #52 of 79 Lab model card
τ³-bench Banking 18.9% #16 of 22 Lab model card
Terminal-Bench 2.1 60.7% #45 of 56 Lab model card
WebVoyager 77.7% #10 of 12 Lab model card
OSWorld-Verified 52.1% #35 of 41 Lab model card
DuelLab GameBench 2 11.2 #53 of 57 Official leaderboard
Agent Arena -15.99% #53 of 56 Official leaderboard
ScreenSpot-Pro 43.5% #31 of 32 Lab model card
Terminal-Bench 4.0 0.30% #39 of 40 Official leaderboard
Terminal-Bench 4.1 0.30% #42 of 43 Official leaderboard

Professional work

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
Tax Agent Bench 11.6% #67 of 84 Official leaderboard
APEX-1 57.6% #57 of 71 Official leaderboard
GDPval-AA v2 1,211 #23 of 27 Lab model card
AA-Briefcase 1,137 #6 of 7 Lab model card
Legal Research Bench 10.1% #84 of 93 Official leaderboard
APEX-Accounting 38.1% #45 of 49 Official leaderboard
APEX-Agents 1.1 45.9% #61 of 65 Official leaderboard
Vals Index v2.2 29.8% #35 of 37 Official leaderboard
Harvey LAB v1.1 (HLAB-Vals-1.1) 3.75% #36 of 38 Official leaderboard
Vals Finance Index 41% #38 of 40 Official leaderboard
Excel Modeling Benchmark v1.1 52.8% #40 of 42 Official leaderboard
Vals Legal Index 55.4% #37 of 38 Official leaderboard
Vals Finance Agent v2.1 47.7% #39 of 40 Official leaderboard
RWE-bench 0% #15 of 15 Official leaderboard

Vision, audio and robotics

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
MMLongBench-Doc 66.6% #1 of 17 Official leaderboard
OCRBench v2 67.4% #2 of 14 Official leaderboard
MMSI-Bench 43.1% #1 of 6 Lab model card
OmniSpatial 58.6% #1 of 6 Lab model card
BLINK 71.3% #6 of 29 Lab model card
OCR-Reasoning 65.1% #1 of 3 Lab model card
CharXiv 80.8% #31 of 75 Lab model card
MATH-Vision (MathVision) 78.2% #24 of 51 Lab model card
Vision Arena 1,212 #72 of 136 Official leaderboard
ERQA 57.5% #21 of 36 Lab model card
ViewSpatial-Bench 52% #2 of 3 Lab model card
Video-MME 74.4% #38 of 51 Lab model card
MindCube 62.2% #3 of 4 Lab model card
V* 85.6% #13 of 17 Lab model card
Humanity's Sixth Sense 24.7% #29 of 34 Official leaderboard
VSI-Bench 48.1% #6 of 7 Lab model card
BabyVision 29.6% #23 of 26 Lab model card
BVB 52.1 #43 of 45 Official leaderboard
GDP.pdf 6.60% #17 of 17 Lab model card
CVBench 69.6% #15 of 15 Lab model card
VideoMME v2 (with subtitles) 32.9% #6 of 6 Lab model card
PAI-Bench 63.8% #2 of 2 Lab model card
DSI-Bench 61.4% #1 of 1 Lab model card
MMSI-Video-Bench 34.5% #1 of 1 Lab model card
Omni3D 53.4% #1 of 1 Lab model card
OSI-Bench 30.6% #1 of 1 Lab model card
PerceptionComp 39.4% #1 of 1 Lab model card
SPAR-Bench 64.2% #1 of 1 Lab model card
SpatialTree 58.1% #1 of 1 Lab model card
SPBench 63.8% #1 of 1 Lab model card
VSTI-Bench 67.3% #1 of 1 Lab model card

Safety and security

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
BioTIER Permit 99.9% #11 of 69 Official leaderboard
Molecular Biology Capabilities Test 52.5% #30 of 90 Official leaderboard
Human Pathogen Capabilities Test 52.4% #43 of 86 Official leaderboard
World-Class Bio 43.4% #44 of 74 Official leaderboard
BioTIER Refuse 32.1% #46 of 69 Official leaderboard
VCT-v2 26% #24 of 25 Official leaderboard

Other

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
LiveBench 47% #28 of 31 Official leaderboard
SPEED-Bench 4.72 #2 of 2 Lab model card

Its lab's numbers put it at 144.1, number 141 of 404

The Self-Reported Index fits one score to the 32 capability results NVIDIA reported for this model, on the scale of the Epoch Capabilities Index. Labs choose which benchmarks to show and how to run them, so read it as the lab's claim, not an independent measurement. The 90% interval runs from 141.8 to 146.3. How we compute it.

Its lab's numbers next to 4 leaderboards

Where the benchmark's own leaderboard, or Epoch AI's run, also has this model. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. Every pair.

Benchmark Lab says Board says Gap What differs
MMLongBench-Doc 62.8% MMLongBench-Doc 66.6% Leaderboard, VL; 12B activated (120B total) −3.8 pts
OCRBench v2 68.1% OCRBench v2, EN 68.12 / ZH 59.15 67.4% Leaderboard +0.7 pts
Terminal-Bench 4.0 1.00% Terminal Bench 4 [offline] 0.30% Leaderboard, none, mini-swe-agent +0.7 pts
LMArena (Elo) 1,420 Text Arena, Overall, With Style Control, 1420 +/- 12, 2,328 votes, preliminary NVFP4 (Table 11) 1,415 Leaderboard, nvfp4 +5 NVIDIA reports a preliminary Arena rating from 2,328 votes, while the board reports a later rating.

Its launch post

The benchmarks the lab chose to headline, with the scores it gave.

Its system card

Every result in the longer documents the lab published with it. 23 of them aren't in the launch post.

Hallucination