AssetOpsBench
Agents automate industrial asset work, such as condition monitoring, maintenance planning and intervention scheduling, using sensor data, failure models and work orders.
Accepted at KDD 2026 Datasets and Benchmarks. About 2,400 GitHub stars. Ran as the CODS 2025 challenge.
- Made by
- IBM Research
- Released
- June 2025
- Kind
- Other professions
- Level
- Expert
- Scored
- Graded by a model
- Answers
- Agent task
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- GPT-4.1 #137 on the capability index
- Last model added
- April 2025
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
AI for Industrial Asset Lifecycle Management aims to automate complex operational workflows, such as condition monitoring and maintenance scheduling, to minimize system downtime. While traditional AI/ML approaches solve narrow tasks in isolation, Large Language Model (LLM) agents offer a next-generation opportunity for end-to-end automation. In this paper, we introduce AssetOpsBench, a unified framework for orchestrating and evaluating domain-specific agents for Industry 4.0. AssetOpsBench provides a multimodal ecosystem comprising a catalog of four domain-specific agents, a curated dataset of 140+ human-authored natural-language queries grounded in real industrial scenarios, and a simulated, CouchDB-backed IoT environment. We introduce an automated evaluation framework that uses three key metrics to analyze architectural trade-offs between the Tool-As-Agent and Plan-Executor paradigms, along with a systematic procedure for the automated discovery of emerging failure modes. The practical relevance of AssetOpsBench is demonstrated by its broad community adoption, with 250+ users and over 500 agents submitted to our public benchmarking platform, supporting reproducible and scalable research for real-world industrial operations. The code is accesible at https://github.com/IBM/AssetOpsBench .
GPT-4.1 leads with 65% among models released by April 2025
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
The newest model with a score here came out in April 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 1 GPT-4.1 65%
- 2 llama4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct-fp8 59%
- 3 llama4-scout-17b-16e-instruct 48%
- 4 llama-3-405b-instruct 44%
- 5 mistral-large [snapshot unspecified] 40%
- 6
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct 40%
- 7 Granite 3.3 8B Instruct 35%
Source: Official AssetOpsBench leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-4.1 | 65% | MetaAgent | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | llama4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct-fp8 | 59% | MetaAgent | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | llama4-scout-17b-16e-instruct | 48% | MetaAgent | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | llama-3-405b-instruct | 44% | MetaAgent | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | mistral-large [snapshot unspecified] | 40% | MetaAgent | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | | 40% | MetaAgent | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | Granite 3.3 8B Instruct | 35% | MetaAgent | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official AssetOpsBench leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official AssetOpsBench leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Law, finance and medicine
- MedXpertQA-MM In use Models answer expert-level medical exam questions that combine images with clinical records and test results. Scoring is accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 80.4%
- HealthBench Professional In use 525 physician-authored tasks from real clinician chats (care consult, documentation, research) with physician-adjudicated rubrics. Claude Sonnet 5.5 69.2%
- HealthBench In use 5,000 realistic health conversations graded against physician-written rubrics. A length-adjusted variant penalizes verbosity. GPT-5 67.2%
- FinSearchComp In use Agents search the web to fetch live financial data, look up history, and run multi-step investigations, across 635 expert-written questions. Scored by answer accuracy.
Ling-3.1-flash 81.7%
- KBL In use Models answer Korean legal knowledge and reasoning tasks and Korean bar exam questions. It has 7 knowledge tasks, 4 reasoning tasks and 2,510 bar exam items.
Solar Pro 4 77.5%
- KorMedMCQA In use Models answer 7,469 multiple-choice questions from Korean licensing exams for doctors, nurses, pharmacists and dentists, held from 2012 to 2024.
Solar Pro 4 93.2%