Benchmark Almanac

AssetOpsBench

GPT-4.1 65% leads since June 2025
Not in model cards

Agents automate industrial asset work, such as condition monitoring, maintenance planning and intervention scheduling, using sensor data, failure models and work orders.

Accepted at KDD 2026 Datasets and Benchmarks. About 2,400 GitHub stars. Ran as the CODS 2025 challenge.

Made by
IBM Research
Released
June 2025
Kind
Other professions
Level
Expert
Scored
Graded by a model
Answers
Agent task
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
GPT-4.1 #137 on the capability index
Last model added
April 2025
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

AI for Industrial Asset Lifecycle Management aims to automate complex operational workflows, such as condition monitoring and maintenance scheduling, to minimize system downtime. While traditional AI/ML approaches solve narrow tasks in isolation, Large Language Model (LLM) agents offer a next-generation opportunity for end-to-end automation. In this paper, we introduce AssetOpsBench, a unified framework for orchestrating and evaluating domain-specific agents for Industry 4.0. AssetOpsBench provides a multimodal ecosystem comprising a catalog of four domain-specific agents, a curated dataset of 140+ human-authored natural-language queries grounded in real industrial scenarios, and a simulated, CouchDB-backed IoT environment. We introduce an automated evaluation framework that uses three key metrics to analyze architectural trade-offs between the Tool-As-Agent and Plan-Executor paradigms, along with a systematic procedure for the automated discovery of emerging failure modes. The practical relevance of AssetOpsBench is demonstrated by its broad community adoption, with 250+ users and over 500 agents submitted to our public benchmarking platform, supporting reproducible and scalable research for real-world industrial operations. The code is accesible at https://github.com/IBM/AssetOpsBench .

Abstract of AssetOpsBench: Benchmarking AI Agents for Task Automation in Industrial Asset Operations and Maintenance (arXiv:2506.03828, CC0)
7
Entries on its own leaderboard, 3 models we track

GPT-4.1 leads with 65% among models released by April 2025

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

The newest model with a score here came out in April 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 GPT-4.1 65%
  2. 2 llama4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct-fp8 59%
  3. 3 llama4-scout-17b-16e-instruct 48%
  4. 4 llama-3-405b-instruct 44%
  5. 5 mistral-large [snapshot unspecified] 40%
  6. 6 Llama 3.3 70B Instruct 40%
  7. 7 Granite 3.3 8B Instruct 35%

Source: Official AssetOpsBench leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-4.1 65% MetaAgent Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
2 llama4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct-fp8 59% MetaAgent Official leaderboard
3 llama4-scout-17b-16e-instruct 48% MetaAgent Official leaderboard
4 llama-3-405b-instruct 44% MetaAgent Official leaderboard
5 mistral-large [snapshot unspecified] 40% MetaAgent Official leaderboard
6 Llama 3.3 70B Instruct 40% MetaAgent Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
7 Granite 3.3 8B Instruct 35% MetaAgent Apr 2025 Official leaderboard

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

OpenAI
Own leaderboard Not tested since Jun 2025
GPT-4.1 65%

Source: Official AssetOpsBench leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-4.1 Llama 3.3 70B Instruct 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-4.1 Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Source: Official AssetOpsBench leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Law, finance and medicine

All 179 in Law, finance and medicine
  • MedXpertQA-MM In use Models answer expert-level medical exam questions that combine images with clinical records and test results. Scoring is accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 80.4%
  • HealthBench Professional In use 525 physician-authored tasks from real clinician chats (care consult, documentation, research) with physician-adjudicated rubrics. Claude Sonnet 5.5 69.2%
  • HealthBench In use 5,000 realistic health conversations graded against physician-written rubrics. A length-adjusted variant penalizes verbosity. GPT-5 67.2%
  • FinSearchComp In use Agents search the web to fetch live financial data, look up history, and run multi-step investigations, across 635 expert-written questions. Scored by answer accuracy. Ling-3.1-flash 81.7%
  • KBL In use Models answer Korean legal knowledge and reasoning tasks and Korean bar exam questions. It has 7 knowledge tasks, 4 reasoning tasks and 2,510 bar exam items. Solar Pro 4 77.5%
  • KorMedMCQA In use Models answer 7,469 multiple-choice questions from Korean licensing exams for doctors, nurses, pharmacists and dentists, held from 2012 to 2024. Solar Pro 4 93.2%