Benchmark Almanac

AutoResearchBench

GPT Deep Research 22% tops its leaderboard Claude Opus 4.6 9.39% leads the models we track
Not in model cards

Agents search the scientific literature, either tracking down one target paper through multi-step probing or collecting every paper that meets given conditions.

The dataset is an obfuscated bundle to limit contamination. 31 HF paper upvotes.

Released
April 2026
Kind
Deep research
Level
Expert
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Agent task
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
GPT-5.4 #27 on the capability index
Last model added
March 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Autonomous scientific research is significantly advanced thanks to the development of AI agents. One key step in this process is finding the right scientific literature, whether to explore existing knowledge for a research problem, or to acquire evidence for verifying assumptions and supporting claims. To assess AI agents' capability in driving this process, we present AutoResearchBench, a dedicated benchmark for autonomous scientific literature discovery. AutoResearchBench consists of two complementary task types: (1) Deep Research, which requires tracking down a specific target paper through a progressive, multi-step probing process, and (2) Wide Research, which requires comprehensively collecting a set of papers satisfying given conditions. Compared to previous benchmarks on agentic web browsing, AutoResearchBench is distinguished along three dimensions: it is research-oriented, calling for in-depth comprehension of scientific concepts; literature-focused, demanding fine-grained utilization of detailed information; and open-ended, involving an unknown number of qualified papers and thus requiring deliberate reasoning and search throughout. These properties make AutoResearchBench uniquely suited for evaluating autonomous research capabilities, and extraordinarily challenging. Even the most powerful LLMs, despite having largely conquered general agentic web-browsing benchmarks such as BrowseComp, achieve only 9.39% accuracy on Deep Research and 9.31% IoU on Wide Research, while many other strong baselines fall below 5%. We publicly release the dataset and evaluation pipeline to facilitate future research in this direction. We publicly release the dataset, evaluation pipeline, and code at https://github.com/CherYou/AutoResearchBench.

Abstract of AutoResearchBench: Benchmarking AI Agents on Complex Scientific Literature Discovery (arXiv:2604.25256, CC0)
16
Entries on its own leaderboard, 13 models we track

GPT Deep Research tops the leaderboard with 22%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Claude Opus 4.6, at 9.39%.

The newest model with a score here came out in March 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 GPT Deep Research 22%
  2. 2 AI-studio Gemini-3.1-pro 14%
  3. 3 Claude Opus 4.6 9.39%
  4. 4 Gemini 3.1 Pro 7.93%
  5. 5 GPT-5.4 7.44%
  6. 6 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 6.97%
  7. 7 Claude Sonnet 4.6 6.96%
  8. 8 Seed2.0 Pro 6.80%
  9. 9 Kimi K2.5 4.69%
  10. 10 DeepSeek-V3.2 4.21%
  11. 11 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 3.88%
  12. 12 Qwen3-Max 3.24%
  13. 13 MiniMax-M2.5 2.91%
  14. 14 Gemini 3 Flash 2.75%
  15. 15 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 1.94%
  16. 16 Alphaxiv 0%

Source: Official AutoResearchBench leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT Deep Research 22% Official leaderboard
2 AI-studio Gemini-3.1-pro 14% Official leaderboard
3 Claude Opus 4.6 9.39% ReAct / DeepXiv Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
4 Gemini 3.1 Pro 7.93% ReAct / DeepXiv Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
5 GPT-5.4 7.44% ReAct / DeepXiv Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
6 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 6.97% ReAct / DeepXiv Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
7 Claude Sonnet 4.6 6.96% ReAct / DeepXiv Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
8 Seed2.0 Pro 6.80% ReAct / DeepXiv Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
9 Kimi K2.5 4.69% ReAct / DeepXiv Jan 2026 Official leaderboard
10 DeepSeek-V3.2 4.21% ReAct / DeepXiv Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
11 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 3.88% ReAct / DeepXiv Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
12 Qwen3-Max 3.24% ReAct / DeepXiv Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
13 MiniMax-M2.5 2.91% ReAct / DeepXiv Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
14 Gemini 3 Flash 2.75% ReAct / DeepXiv Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
15 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 1.94% ReAct / DeepXiv Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
16 Alphaxiv 0% Official leaderboard

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Anthropic
Own leaderboard Not tested since Apr 2026

Source: Official AutoResearchBench leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude Opus 4.6 Kimi K2.5 DeepSeek-V3.2 Qwen3-Max 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude Opus 4.6

Source: Official AutoResearchBench leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Tool use

All 144 in Tool use
  • AutomationBench In use Agent completes end-to-end business workflows inside a simulated company exposing dozens of REST APIs. Graded on resulting state. Gemini 4 Carbon 53.9%
  • MCP Atlas In use Multi-step workflows over real MCP servers. Scores tool-use competency on realistic tasks. Gemini 4 Argon 90.7%
  • BFCL V4 In use Models call functions and tools, including multi-turn agentic tasks with web search and memory. Checked against expected calls and outcomes. Qwen3.7-Max 75%
  • τ³-bench Banking In use Agents act as banking customer-service reps over many turns with a simulated user, following policy. Pass^1 on the final database state. Qwen 3.8 Max 55.1%
  • Toolathlon-Verified In use 108 long-horizon tasks across 32 apps through about 600 MCP tools. Execution-based checkers inspect final environment state. GLM-5.3-Flash 78.4%
  • DeepSearchQA In use Questions that need multi-step search and synthesis. Final answers graded against references. Kimi K3 95%