Benchmark Almanac

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B places in the top three on 10 benchmarks.

Qwen Released February 24th, 2026 Compare with others
103
Benchmarks with a score
0
Ranked first, out of five or more models
10
In the top three
Qwen Feb 2026

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Open weights

146.7 #119 of 404
Self-Reported Index, from the lab's own numbers. No Epoch Capabilities Index score yet.
  • MMMU-Pro 76.9% #31 /90
  • IFBench 76.1% #20 /80
  • AA-LCR (Artificial Analysis Long Context Reasoning) 66.9% #14 /38

Where it ranks

Its best score on each benchmark, and where that ranks among every model with a score there. We rank each model once, at its best setting.

Knowledge and language

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
MMLU-Pro 86.7% #13 of 167 Lab model card
IFEval 93.4% #14 of 135 Lab model card
QIMMA 66.3% #3 of 25 Official leaderboard
MMLU-Redux 94% #7 of 45 Lab model card
C-Eval 91.9% #8 of 46 Lab model card
SEA-HELM 74.7 #15 of 71 Official leaderboard
IFBench 76.1% #20 of 80 Lab model card
SuperGPQA 67.1% #9 of 35 Lab model card
MMLU-ProX 82.2% #6 of 23 Lab model card
HallusionBench 67.6% #9 of 31 Lab model card
INCLUDE 82.8% #9 of 31 Lab model card
MMMLU 86.7% #21 of 71 Lab model card
KINA 38.9% #11 of 37 Official leaderboard
LMArena (Elo) 1,416 #109 of 335 Official leaderboard
Humanity's Last Exam 47.5% #51 of 154 Lab model card
Judgemark v2.1 81.0 #14 of 42 Official leaderboard
NOVA-63 58.6% #4 of 11 Lab model card
AA-LCR (Artificial Analysis Long Context Reasoning) 66.9% #14 of 38 Lab model card
MultiChallenge 61.5% #17 of 42 Lab model card
LongBench v2 60.2% #15 of 35 Lab model card
MAXIFE 87.9% #6 of 11 Lab model card
Global PIQA 88.4% #8 of 14 Lab model card
SimpleVQA 61.7% #18 of 30 Lab model card
Longform Creative Writing (EQ-Bench) 54.3 #78 of 119 Official leaderboard
Extended NYT Connections 51.7% #71 of 103 Official leaderboard
Vectara Hallucination Leaderboard (2025 dataset) 11.2% #73 of 104 Official leaderboard
Seal-0 44.1% #6 of 7 Lab model card
WideSearch 60.5% #17 of 19 Lab model card

Math and science

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
GPQA Diamond 86.6% #63 of 302 Lab model card
PolyMath 68.9% #7 of 24 Lab model card
HMMT 2025 91.4% #21 of 54 Lab model card
DTBench 84.3% #73 of 180 Official leaderboard
PHYSICS-Verified 80.7% #8 of 19 Official leaderboard
HMMT Nov 2025 90.3% #14 of 28 Lab model card

Coding

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
Codeforces rating 2,100 #18 of 47 Lab model card
LiveCodeBench v6 78.9% #35 of 90 Lab model card
SWE-bench Verified 72% #67 of 155 Lab model card
OJBench 39.5% #8 of 16 Lab model card
FullStackBench 60.7% #4 of 8 Lab model card
Code Arena 1,360 #97 of 128 Official leaderboard

Agents and tools

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
SnakeBench 33 #22 of 188 Official leaderboard
BFCL V4 72.2% #5 of 30 Lab model card
GameWorld 45.2% #5 of 22 Official leaderboard
BrowseComp-ZH 69.9% #7 of 19 Lab model card
ScreenSpot-Pro 70.4% #13 of 32 Lab model card
tau2-bench 79.5% #40 of 79 Lab model card
LisanBench 392.7 #73 of 133 Official leaderboard
VITA-Bench 33.6% #9 of 16 Lab model card
AndroidWorld 66.4% #13 of 23 Lab model card
DeepPlanning 24.1% #6 of 10 Lab model card
Terminal-Bench 2.0 49.4% #39 of 63 Lab model card
BrowseComp 63.8% #54 of 81 Lab model card
AutoResearchBench 3.88% #9 of 13 Official leaderboard
Mystery Game Puzzles 17% #60 of 84 Epoch AI run
OSWorld-Verified 58% #32 of 41 Lab model card
MobileWorld 29.3% #15 of 18 Official leaderboard

Professional work

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
MedXpertQA-MM 67.3% #6 of 21 Lab model card
PMC-VQA 63.3% #3 of 10 Lab model card
SLAKE 81.6% #3 of 10 Lab model card

Vision, audio and robotics

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
MMMU 83.9% #7 of 103 Lab model card
MMBench-EN v1.1 92.8% #2 of 23 Lab model card
MathVista 87.4% #7 of 70 Lab model card
RefAdv-S 67.2% #2 of 19 Official leaderboard
OCRBench 92.1% #4 of 34 Lab model card
GSM8K-V 42.1% #3 of 24 Official leaderboard
MLVU 87.3% #3 of 22 Lab model card
MMStar 82.9% #5 of 36 Lab model card
DynaMath 85.9% #4 of 23 Lab model card
MVBench 76.6% #4 of 23 Lab model card
ZeroBench 36.2% #6 of 31 Lab model card
GeoGuesser environment (FineEnvs) 0.44 #3 of 14 Official leaderboard
AI2D 93.3% #12 of 52 Lab model card
CountBench 97% #7 of 28 Lab model card
Nuscene 15.4 #2 of 8 Lab model card
Video-MME 87.3% #13 of 51 Lab model card
RealWorldQA 85.1% #10 of 38 Lab model card
MATH-Vision (MathVision) 86.2% #15 of 51 Lab model card
MMVU 74.7% #8 of 26 Lab model card
RefSpatial-Bench 69.3% #5 of 16 Lab model card
SUNRGBD 36.2 #3 of 9 Lab model card
MMMU-Pro 76.9% #31 of 90 Lab model card
CC-OCR 81.8% #5 of 14 Lab model card
VLMs Are Blind 96.7% #5 of 14 Lab model card
MMLongBench-Doc 59% #7 of 19 Lab model card
RefCOCO / RefCOCO+ / RefCOCOg 91.3% #11 of 29 Lab model card
VideoMME v2 (with subtitles) 26.7% #12 of 31 Official leaderboard
V* 93.2% #7 of 17 Lab model card
EmbSpatialBench 83.9% #7 of 16 Lab model card
Hypersim 12.7 #4 of 9 Lab model card
LVBench 74.4% #14 of 31 Lab model card
ODinW-13 44.5% #6 of 13 Lab model card
Vision Arena 1,226 #63 of 136 Official leaderboard
ERQA 62% #18 of 36 Lab model card
LingoQA 80.8% #5 of 10 Lab model card
Video-MMMU 82% #19 of 36 Lab model card
CharXiv 77.2% #45 of 75 Lab model card
TIR-Bench 53.2% #4 of 6 Lab model card
BabyVision 40.2% #19 of 26 Lab model card
CiteVQA 14.8% #12 of 16 Official leaderboard

Safety and security

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
nocot-bench (NCRI) 69.4 #103 of 185 Official leaderboard

Other

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
Conceptual Reasoning Index 45.7 #85 of 151 Official leaderboard
LMCA 32.2% #86 of 147 Official leaderboard
ACCoRD 58.0 #96 of 152 Official leaderboard

Its lab's numbers put it at 146.7, number 119 of 404

The Self-Reported Index fits one score to the 68 capability results Qwen reported for this model, on the scale of the Epoch Capabilities Index. Labs choose which benchmarks to show and how to run them, so read it as the lab's claim, not an independent measurement. The 90% interval runs from 145.7 to 147.6. How we compute it.

Its lab's numbers next to 2 leaderboards

Where the benchmark's own leaderboard, or Epoch AI's run, also has this model. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. Every pair.

Benchmark Lab says Board says Gap
MATH-Vision (MathVision) 86.2% MathVision 86.2% Leaderboard Same
MMLU-Pro 86.7% MMLU-Pro 86.7% Leaderboard Same

Its launch post

The benchmarks the lab chose to headline, with the scores it gave.