- MMLU-Pro 86.7
- MMLU-Redux 94
- C-Eval 91.9
- SuperGPQA 67.1
- IFEval 93.4
- IFBench 76.1
- MultiChallenge 61.5
- AA-LCR 66.9
- LongBench v2 60.2
- Best of HLE w/ CoT 25.3 / HLE w/ tool 47.5 47.5
- GPQA Diamond 86.6
- HMMT Feb 25 91.4
- HMMT Nov 25 90.3
- SWE-bench Verified 72
- Terminal Bench 2 49.4
- LiveCodeBench v6 78.9
- CodeForces (Qwen query set) 2100
- OJBench 39.5
- Mean of FullStackBench en 62.6 / FullStackBench zh 58.7 60.7
- BFCL-V4 72.2
- TAU2-Bench (airline fixes from Claude Opus 4.5 system card) 79.5
- VITA-Bench 33.6
- DeepPlanning 24.1
- Browsecomp (context folding) 63.8
- Browsecomp-zh 69.9
- WideSearch 60.5
- Seal-0 44.1
- MMMLU 86.7
- MMLU-ProX (29 languages) 82.2
- NOVA-63 58.6
- INCLUDE 82.8
- Global PIQA 88.4
- PolyMATH 68.9
- WMT24++ (XCOMET-XXL, 55 languages) 78.3
- MAXIFE 87.9
- MMMU 83.9
- MMMU-Pro 76.9
- MathVision 86.2
- Mathvista(mini) 87.4
- DynaMath 85.9
- Best of ZEROBench 9 / ZEROBench_sub 36.2 36.2
- VlmsAreBlind 96.7
- BabyVision 40.2 / 34.5 (with CI / without CI) 40.2
- RealWorldQA 85.1
- MMStar 82.9
- MMBenchEN-DEV-v1.1 92.8
- SimpleVQA 61.7
- HallusionBench 67.6
- OmniDocBench1.5 89.8
- CharXiv(RQ) 77.2
- MMLongBench-Doc 59
- CC-OCR 81.8
- AI2D_TEST 93.3
- OCRBench 92.1
- ERQA 62
- CountBench 97
- RefCOCO(avg) 91.3
- ODInW13 44.5
- EmbSpatialBench 83.9
- RefSpatialBench 69.3
- LingoQA 80.8
- Hypersim 12.7
- SUNRGBD 36.2
- Nuscene 15.4
- Best of VideoMME(w sub.) 87.3 / VideoMME(w/o sub.) 83.9 87.3
- VideoMMMU 82
- MLVU 87.3
- MVBench 76.6
- LVBench 74.4
- MMVU 74.7
- ScreenSpot Pro 70.4
- OSWorld-Verified 58
- AndroidWorld 66.4
- TIR-Bench 53.2 / 42.5 (with CI / without CI) 53.2
- V* 93.2 / 90.1 (with CI / without CI) 93.2
- SLAKE 81.6
- PMC-VQA 63.3
- MedXpertQA-MM 67.3
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B places in the top three on 10 benchmarks.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Open weights
- MMMU-Pro 76.9% #31 /90
- IFBench 76.1% #20 /80
- AA-LCR (Artificial Analysis Long Context Reasoning) 66.9% #14 /38
Where it ranks
Its best score on each benchmark, and where that ranks among every model with a score there. We rank each model once, at its best setting.
Knowledge and language
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 86.7% | #13 of 167 | Lab model card | |
| IFEval | 93.4% | #14 of 135 | Lab model card | |
| QIMMA | 66.3% | #3 of 25 | Official leaderboard | |
| MMLU-Redux | 94% | #7 of 45 | Lab model card | |
| C-Eval | 91.9% | #8 of 46 | Lab model card | |
| SEA-HELM | 74.7 | #15 of 71 | Official leaderboard | |
| IFBench | 76.1% | #20 of 80 | Lab model card | |
| SuperGPQA | 67.1% | #9 of 35 | Lab model card | |
| MMLU-ProX | 82.2% | #6 of 23 | Lab model card | |
| HallusionBench | 67.6% | #9 of 31 | Lab model card | |
| INCLUDE | 82.8% | #9 of 31 | Lab model card | |
| MMMLU | 86.7% | #21 of 71 | Lab model card | |
| KINA | 38.9% | #11 of 37 | Official leaderboard | |
| LMArena (Elo) | 1,416 | #109 of 335 | Official leaderboard | |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 47.5% | #51 of 154 | Lab model card | |
| Judgemark v2.1 | 81.0 | #14 of 42 | Official leaderboard | |
| NOVA-63 | 58.6% | #4 of 11 | Lab model card | |
| AA-LCR (Artificial Analysis Long Context Reasoning) | 66.9% | #14 of 38 | Lab model card | |
| MultiChallenge | 61.5% | #17 of 42 | Lab model card | |
| LongBench v2 | 60.2% | #15 of 35 | Lab model card | |
| MAXIFE | 87.9% | #6 of 11 | Lab model card | |
| Global PIQA | 88.4% | #8 of 14 | Lab model card | |
| SimpleVQA | 61.7% | #18 of 30 | Lab model card | |
| Longform Creative Writing (EQ-Bench) | 54.3 | #78 of 119 | Official leaderboard | |
| Extended NYT Connections | 51.7% | #71 of 103 | Official leaderboard | |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboard (2025 dataset) | 11.2% | #73 of 104 | Official leaderboard | |
| Seal-0 | 44.1% | #6 of 7 | Lab model card | |
| WideSearch | 60.5% | #17 of 19 | Lab model card |
Math and science
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 86.6% | #63 of 302 | Lab model card | |
| PolyMath | 68.9% | #7 of 24 | Lab model card | |
| HMMT 2025 | 91.4% | #21 of 54 | Lab model card | |
| DTBench | 84.3% | #73 of 180 | Official leaderboard | |
| PHYSICS-Verified | 80.7% | #8 of 19 | Official leaderboard | |
| HMMT Nov 2025 | 90.3% | #14 of 28 | Lab model card |
Coding
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Codeforces rating | 2,100 | #18 of 47 | Lab model card | |
| LiveCodeBench v6 | 78.9% | #35 of 90 | Lab model card | |
| SWE-bench Verified | 72% | #67 of 155 | Lab model card | |
| OJBench | 39.5% | #8 of 16 | Lab model card | |
| FullStackBench | 60.7% | #4 of 8 | Lab model card | |
| Code Arena | 1,360 | #97 of 128 | Official leaderboard |
Agents and tools
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SnakeBench | 33 | #22 of 188 | Official leaderboard | |
| BFCL V4 | 72.2% | #5 of 30 | Lab model card | |
| GameWorld | 45.2% | #5 of 22 | Official leaderboard | |
| BrowseComp-ZH | 69.9% | #7 of 19 | Lab model card | |
| ScreenSpot-Pro | 70.4% | #13 of 32 | Lab model card | |
| tau2-bench | 79.5% | #40 of 79 | Lab model card | |
| LisanBench | 392.7 | #73 of 133 | Official leaderboard | |
| VITA-Bench | 33.6% | #9 of 16 | Lab model card | |
| AndroidWorld | 66.4% | #13 of 23 | Lab model card | |
| DeepPlanning | 24.1% | #6 of 10 | Lab model card | |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 49.4% | #39 of 63 | Lab model card | |
| BrowseComp | 63.8% | #54 of 81 | Lab model card | |
| AutoResearchBench | 3.88% | #9 of 13 | Official leaderboard | |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 17% | #60 of 84 | Epoch AI run | |
| OSWorld-Verified | 58% | #32 of 41 | Lab model card | |
| MobileWorld | 29.3% | #15 of 18 | Official leaderboard |
Professional work
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MedXpertQA-MM | 67.3% | #6 of 21 | Lab model card | |
| PMC-VQA | 63.3% | #3 of 10 | Lab model card | |
| SLAKE | 81.6% | #3 of 10 | Lab model card |
Vision, audio and robotics
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMMU | 83.9% | #7 of 103 | Lab model card | |
| MMBench-EN v1.1 | 92.8% | #2 of 23 | Lab model card | |
| MathVista | 87.4% | #7 of 70 | Lab model card | |
| RefAdv-S | 67.2% | #2 of 19 | Official leaderboard | |
| OCRBench | 92.1% | #4 of 34 | Lab model card | |
| GSM8K-V | 42.1% | #3 of 24 | Official leaderboard | |
| MLVU | 87.3% | #3 of 22 | Lab model card | |
| MMStar | 82.9% | #5 of 36 | Lab model card | |
| DynaMath | 85.9% | #4 of 23 | Lab model card | |
| MVBench | 76.6% | #4 of 23 | Lab model card | |
| ZeroBench | 36.2% | #6 of 31 | Lab model card | |
| GeoGuesser environment (FineEnvs) | 0.44 | #3 of 14 | Official leaderboard | |
| AI2D | 93.3% | #12 of 52 | Lab model card | |
| CountBench | 97% | #7 of 28 | Lab model card | |
| Nuscene | 15.4 | #2 of 8 | Lab model card | |
| Video-MME | 87.3% | #13 of 51 | Lab model card | |
| RealWorldQA | 85.1% | #10 of 38 | Lab model card | |
| MATH-Vision (MathVision) | 86.2% | #15 of 51 | Lab model card | |
| MMVU | 74.7% | #8 of 26 | Lab model card | |
| RefSpatial-Bench | 69.3% | #5 of 16 | Lab model card | |
| SUNRGBD | 36.2 | #3 of 9 | Lab model card | |
| MMMU-Pro | 76.9% | #31 of 90 | Lab model card | |
| CC-OCR | 81.8% | #5 of 14 | Lab model card | |
| VLMs Are Blind | 96.7% | #5 of 14 | Lab model card | |
| MMLongBench-Doc | 59% | #7 of 19 | Lab model card | |
| RefCOCO / RefCOCO+ / RefCOCOg | 91.3% | #11 of 29 | Lab model card | |
| VideoMME v2 (with subtitles) | 26.7% | #12 of 31 | Official leaderboard | |
| V* | 93.2% | #7 of 17 | Lab model card | |
| EmbSpatialBench | 83.9% | #7 of 16 | Lab model card | |
| Hypersim | 12.7 | #4 of 9 | Lab model card | |
| LVBench | 74.4% | #14 of 31 | Lab model card | |
| ODinW-13 | 44.5% | #6 of 13 | Lab model card | |
| Vision Arena | 1,226 | #63 of 136 | Official leaderboard | |
| ERQA | 62% | #18 of 36 | Lab model card | |
| LingoQA | 80.8% | #5 of 10 | Lab model card | |
| Video-MMMU | 82% | #19 of 36 | Lab model card | |
| CharXiv | 77.2% | #45 of 75 | Lab model card | |
| TIR-Bench | 53.2% | #4 of 6 | Lab model card | |
| BabyVision | 40.2% | #19 of 26 | Lab model card | |
| CiteVQA | 14.8% | #12 of 16 | Official leaderboard |
Safety and security
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| nocot-bench (NCRI) | 69.4 | #103 of 185 | Official leaderboard |
Other
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conceptual Reasoning Index | 45.7 | #85 of 151 | Official leaderboard | |
| LMCA | 32.2% | #86 of 147 | Official leaderboard | |
| ACCoRD | 58.0 | #96 of 152 | Official leaderboard |
Its lab's numbers put it at 146.7, number 119 of 404
The Self-Reported Index fits one score to the 68 capability results Qwen reported for this model, on the scale of the Epoch Capabilities Index. Labs choose which benchmarks to show and how to run them, so read it as the lab's claim, not an independent measurement. The 90% interval runs from 145.7 to 147.6. How we compute it.
- CountBench 97
- VLMs Are Blind 96.7
- MMLU-Redux 94
- IFEval 93.4
- AI2D 93.3
- V* 93.2
- MMBench-EN v1.1 92.8
- OCRBench 92.1
- C-Eval 91.9
- HMMT 2025 91.4
- RefCOCO / RefCOCO+ / RefCOCOg 91.3
- HMMT Nov 2025 90.3
- Global PIQA 88.4
- MAXIFE 87.9
- MathVista 87.4
- Video-MME 87.3
- MLVU 87.3
- MMLU-Pro 86.7
- MMMLU 86.7
- GPQA Diamond 86.6
- MATH-Vision (MathVision) 86.2
- DynaMath 85.9
- RealWorldQA 85.1
- MMMU 83.9
- EmbSpatialBench 83.9
- MMStar 82.9
- INCLUDE 82.8
- MMLU-ProX 82.2
- Video-MMMU 82
- CC-OCR 81.8
- SLAKE 81.6
- LingoQA 80.8
- tau2-bench 79.5
- LiveCodeBench v6 78.9
- CharXiv 77.2
- MMMU-Pro 76.9
- MVBench 76.6
- IFBench 76.1
- MMVU 74.7
- LVBench 74.4
- BFCL V4 72.2
- SWE-bench Verified 72
- ScreenSpot-Pro 70.4
- BrowseComp-ZH 69.9
- PolyMath 68.9
- HallusionBench 67.6
- MedXpertQA-MM 67.3
- SuperGPQA 67.1
- AA-LCR (Artificial Analysis Long Context Reasoning) 66.9
- AndroidWorld 66.4
- BrowseComp 63.8
- PMC-VQA 63.3
- SimpleVQA 61.7
- MultiChallenge 61.5
- FullStackBench 60.7
- WideSearch 60.5
- LongBench v2 60.2
- MMLongBench-Doc 59
- NOVA-63 58.6
- OSWorld-Verified 58
- Terminal-Bench 2.0 49.4
- Humanity's Last Exam 47.5
- ODinW-13 44.5
- BabyVision 40.2
- OJBench 39.5
- ZeroBench 36.2
- VITA-Bench 33.6
- DeepPlanning 24.1
Its lab's numbers next to 2 leaderboards
Where the benchmark's own leaderboard, or Epoch AI's run, also has this model. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. Every pair.
Its launch post
The benchmarks the lab chose to headline, with the scores it gave.