Benchmark Almanac

MiniMax-M2.5

MiniMax-M2.5 places in the top three on 3 benchmarks.

MiniMax Released February 12th, 2026 Family MiniMax-M2 The lab's model card Compare with others
94
Benchmarks with a score
0
Ranked first, out of five or more models
3
In the top three
MiniMax Feb 2026

MiniMax-M2.5

Open weights Flagship

147.8 #110 of 404
Self-Reported Index, from the lab's own numbers. No Epoch Capabilities Index score yet.
  • IFBench 72% #35 /80
  • Terminal-Bench 2.0 42.7% #23 /43
  • SciCode 44.4% #21 /49

Where it ranks

Its best score on each benchmark, and where that ranks among every model with a score there. We rank each model once, at its best setting.

Knowledge and language

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
MMLU-Pro 85.2% #26 of 167 Lab model card
AA-LCR (Artificial Analysis Long Context Reasoning) 69.5% #9 of 38 Lab model card
LMArena (Elo) 1,391 #142 of 335 Official leaderboard
IFBench 72% #35 of 80 Lab model card
Vectara Hallucination Leaderboard (2025 dataset) 9.10% #46 of 104 Official leaderboard
Longform Creative Writing (EQ-Bench) 65.3 #54 of 119 Official leaderboard
KINA 30.3% #18 of 37 Official leaderboard
LOCA-Bench 6.70% #5 of 9 Official leaderboard
WideSearch 70.3% #11 of 19 Lab model card
Judgemark v2.1 64.5 #28 of 42 Official leaderboard
Creative Writing v3 60.2 #82 of 120 Official leaderboard
Humanity's Last Exam 19.4% #106 of 154 Lab model card
BullshitBench 16.4% #78 of 107 Official leaderboard
StudyArena Text 1,189 #69 of 85 Official leaderboard
Extended NYT Connections 16.8% #90 of 103 Official leaderboard
BullshitBench V2 9.00% #116 of 129 Official leaderboard
STALE 5.50% #9 of 10 Official leaderboard
CL-bench 11.4% #24 of 24 Official leaderboard
SkateBench v2 13.8% #21 of 21 Official leaderboard
CL-bench Life 6.30% #16 of 16 Official leaderboard

Math and science

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
GPQA Diamond 85.2% #77 of 302 Lab model card
AIME 2025 86.3% #67 of 143 Lab model card
ARC-AGI 63.7% #59 of 95 Official leaderboard
ARC-AGI-2 4.86% #71 of 98 Official leaderboard
AIME 2026 87.2% #31 of 38 Lab model card
Echo General AI Prediction Leaderboard 979 #14 of 17 Official leaderboard
ProofBench 4.00% #54 of 59 Official leaderboard
ChemBench 43.5% #23 of 24 Official leaderboard

Coding

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
SWE-bench Verified 75.8% #5 of 60 Official leaderboard
Multi-SWE-bench 51.3% #2 of 10 Lab model card
MLE-bench 51.5% #4 of 10 Lab model card
SciCode 44.4% #21 of 49 Lab model card
SWE-bench Multilingual 74.1% #32 of 73 Lab model card
DesignArena Website 1,215 #74 of 151 Official leaderboard
DesignArena Code 1,197 #74 of 143 Official leaderboard
DesignArena 3D Design 1,153 #74 of 136 Official leaderboard
DesignArena Game Dev 1,166 #79 of 143 Official leaderboard
ContextBench 23.6% #5 of 9 Official leaderboard
DesignArena UI Component 1,164 #82 of 139 Official leaderboard
SWE-Bench Pro 55.4% #49 of 81 Lab model card
DesignArena SVG 1,139 #63 of 103 Official leaderboard
OpenHands Index 45.2% #22 of 33 Official leaderboard
VIBE-Pro (MiniMax) 54.2% #2 of 3 Lab model card
DesignArena Data Visualization 1,169 #79 of 118 Official leaderboard
IOI (Vals) 6.67% #37 of 55 Official leaderboard
WebDev Arena 1,384 #73 of 105 arena.ai, via Epoch AI
Code Arena 1,386 #92 of 128 Official leaderboard
Vibe Code Bench 14.8% #95 of 120 Official leaderboard
ALE-Bench 1,033 #101 of 126 Official leaderboard
PostTrainBench 9.50% #19 of 23 Official leaderboard
FrontierCode 5.34% #11 of 12 Official leaderboard
SWE Atlas Refactoring 19.5% #16 of 17 Official leaderboard
SWE Atlas 10.3% #21 of 22 Official leaderboard
NL2Repo-Bench 26.6% #30 of 30 Lab model card
SWE Atlas Test Writing 18.6% #22 of 22 Official leaderboard
OJBench 41.4% #8 of 8 Official leaderboard
HyperTask 59.4% #2 of 2 Lab model card

Agents and tools

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
tau2-bench 97.8% #3 of 79 Lab model card
SnakeBench 27 #59 of 188 Official leaderboard
LisanBench 852.5 #58 of 133 Official leaderboard
Toolathlon 38.3% #22 of 50 Official leaderboard
BrowseComp 76.3% #39 of 81 Lab model card
Pencil Puzzle Bench 3.30% #28 of 53 Official leaderboard
Terminal-Bench 2.0 42.7% #23 of 43 Official leaderboard
PinchBench 67.2% #26 of 48 Official leaderboard
MM-BrowseComp 4.25% #7 of 11 Official leaderboard
ClawProBench 51.8% #40 of 49 Official leaderboard
Claw-Eval-Live 50.5% #10 of 12 Official leaderboard
AutoResearchBench 2.91% #11 of 13 Official leaderboard
WildClawBench 27.1% #30 of 31 Official leaderboard
ClawBench V2 1.50% #7 of 7 Official leaderboard
MM-ClawBench 57.6% #6 of 6 Official leaderboard
RISE 50.2% #2 of 2 Lab model card

Professional work

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
GDPval-MM 59% #3 of 6 Official leaderboard
CorpFin v2 59.6% #74 of 119 Official leaderboard
LegalBench 80% #87 of 138 Official leaderboard
TaxEval v2 68.2% #94 of 129 Official leaderboard
CaseLaw v2 53.5% #40 of 53 Official leaderboard
ProfBench 42.2% #57 of 72 Official leaderboard
Vals Finance Agent 38.6% #40 of 49 Official leaderboard
FoodTruck Bench $-317 #58 of 59 Official leaderboard
Vending-Bench 2 $-23 #66 of 67 Official leaderboard
SpreadsheetBench 2 7.17% #8 of 8 Official leaderboard
AlphaEval 40.9% #5 of 5 Official leaderboard
Finance Modeling Pro 33.8% #2 of 2 Lab model card
MEWC v2 49.8% #2 of 2 Lab model card
Finance Modeling 21.6% #1 of 1 Lab model card
MEWC 74.4% #1 of 1 Lab model card

Vision, audio and robotics

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
MineBench 1,068 #64 of 75 Official leaderboard

Safety and security

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
LiveSecBench 61.6 #12 of 34 Official leaderboard
nocot-bench (NCRI) 65.0 #122 of 185 Official leaderboard
SEC-bench Pro 0% #6 of 6 Official leaderboard
SEC-bench Pro 260617 0.60% #6 of 6 Official leaderboard

Other

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.0 42.0 #4 of 5 Lab model card

Its lab's numbers put it at 147.8, number 110 of 404

The Self-Reported Index fits one score to the 18 capability results MiniMax reported for this model, on the scale of the Epoch Capabilities Index. Labs choose which benchmarks to show and how to run them, so read it as the lab's claim, not an independent measurement. The 90% interval runs from 145.6 to 150.0. How we compute it.

Its lab's numbers next to 7 leaderboards

Where the benchmark's own leaderboard, or Epoch AI's run, also has this model. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. Every pair.

Benchmark Lab says Board says Gap
Terminal-Bench 2.0 51.7% Terminal Bench 2 42.7% Leaderboard, cchuter +9.0 pts
SWE-bench Multilingual 74.1% SWE-Bench Multilingual 68.3% Leaderboard, mini-SWE-agent +5.8 pts
MMLU-Pro 85.2% MMLU-Pro, AA Index v4.0 protocol (Table 4) 80.1% Leaderboard +5.1 pts
SWE-bench Verified 80.2% SWE-Bench Verified 75.8% Leaderboard, high, mini-SWE-agent +4.4 pts
GDPval-MM 59% GDPval-MM 59% Leaderboard Same
MM-ClawBench 57.6% MM Claw (Table 4) 57.6% Leaderboard Same
Toolathlon 38.3% Toolathlon (Table 4) 38.3% Leaderboard Same

Its launch post

The benchmarks the lab chose to headline, with the scores it gave.

Its system card

Every result in the longer documents the lab published with it. 11 of them aren't in the launch post.

AI R&D risk