BrowseSafe-Bench
Detectors and browser agents face prompt injections hidden in realistic HTML pages, across 11 attack types, nine placements and three writing styles. 3,680 test samples.
14,719 samples in all, 11,039 for training. Released with the BrowseSafe detection model.
- Made by
- Perplexity
- Released
- November 2025
- Kind
- Jailbreaks and prompt injection
- Level
- University
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Multiple choice
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- GPT-5 #70 on the capability index
- Last model added
- October 2025
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) agents into web browsers introduces security challenges that go beyond traditional web application threat models. Prior work has identified prompt injection as a new attack vector for web agents, yet the resulting impact within real-world environments remains insufficiently understood. In this work, we examine the landscape of prompt injection attacks and synthesize a benchmark of attacks embedded in realistic HTML payloads. Our benchmark goes beyond prior work by emphasizing injections that can influence real-world actions rather than mere text outputs, and by presenting attack payloads with complexity and distractor frequency similar to what real-world agents encounter. We leverage this benchmark to conduct a comprehensive empirical evaluation of existing defenses, assessing their effectiveness across a suite of frontier AI models. We propose a multi-layered defense strategy comprising both architectural and model-based defenses to protect against evolving prompt injection attacks. Our work offers a blueprint for designing practical, secure web agents through a defense-in-depth approach.
BrowseSafe tops the leaderboard with 90.4%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Every run is in the next chart. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Claude Sonnet 4.5, at 86.3%.
The newest model with a score here came out in October 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 1 BrowseSafe 90.4%
- 2 Claude Sonnet 4.5 8K 86.3%
- 3 GPT-5 Medium 85.5%
- 4 GPT-5 mini Low 85.4%
- 5 Claude Haiku 4.5 No Thinking 81%
- 6 gpt-oss-safeguard-20B Medium 79.6%
- 7 gpt-oss-safeguard-120B Medium 74.1%
- 8 PromptGuard-2-86M 36%
- 9 PromptGuard-2-22M 35%
Source: Official BrowseSafe-Bench leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BrowseSafe | 90.4% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 2 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | 86.3% | 8K | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | GPT-5 | 85.5% | Medium | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | GPT-5 mini | 85.4% | Low | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | Claude Haiku 4.5 | 81% | No Thinking | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | gpt-oss-safeguard-20B | 79.6% | Medium | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | gpt-oss-safeguard-120B | 74.1% | Medium | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | PromptGuard-2-86M | 36% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 9 | PromptGuard-2-22M | 35% | Official leaderboard |
More effort adds a median 10 points
Models the leaderboard ran at two or more effort levels. We don’t have enough cost data here to say what the extra effort costs.
Source: Official BrowseSafe-Bench leaderboard
| Model | Effort | Harness | Score | Cost per task | Output tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 4.5 | 8K | 86.3% | |||
| Claude Sonnet 4.5 | 32K | 86.3% | |||
| Claude Sonnet 4.5 | 1K | 86.2% | |||
| GPT-5 | Medium | 85.5% | |||
| GPT-5 | Low | 85.4% | |||
| GPT-5 mini | Low | 85.4% | |||
| GPT-5 mini | Medium | 85.3% | |||
| GPT-5 mini | High | 85.2% | |||
| GPT-5 | Minimal | 84.9% | |||
| GPT-5 | High | 84% | |||
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | No Thinking | 81% | |||
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1K | 80.9% | |||
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 32K | 80.8% | |||
| Claude Sonnet 4.5 | No Thinking | 80.7% | |||
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 8K | 80.5% | |||
| GPT-5 mini | Minimal | 75% |
Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official BrowseSafe-Bench leaderboard
GPT-5 on the official leaderboard passed 85% in August 2025
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official BrowseSafe-Bench leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
Versions
We switch the top row to each new version when it comes out. Open it for one row per version. An old version stays in play while people still test it, so whoever first takes it past 85% gets credit for closing it out.
Source: Official leaderboards
More in Safety and alignment
- FORTRESS In use Paired adversarial and benign national-security misuse prompts. Rubric-graded risk score on adversarial and over-refusal score on benign prompts. Claude Opus 5.5 5.78%
- StrongREJECT In use Forbidden-prompt jailbreak benchmark with a rubric grader that scores how useful a non-refusal actually is.
Inkling 98.6%
- Gray Swan IPI Arena benchmark In use Indirect prompt-injection attacks from public red-teaming competitions replayed on tool, coding and browser agents. Attack success rate at k attempts.
Gemini 4 Carbon 0%
- DistressBench In use Models reply as a chatbot to 718 simulated users in psychological crisis, in single-turn and multi-turn chats. Three judge models score replies against clinician-written rubrics.
Muse Spark 1.2 88.4%
- Lakera B3 (Backbone Breaker Benchmark) In use Crowdsourced prompt-injection attacks hit backbone LLMs inside agent threat snapshots at three defense levels. The score is attack resistance, 100 minus the board's vulnerability percentage. Claude Opus 4.5 89%
- IHEval In use Models face conflicts between system, user and tool instructions. Reports a composite score for following the higher-priority instruction. GPT-4o 70%