Butter-Bench
A language model controls a real robot to find and deliver a pack of butter in an office. It is scored on completing each step of the task.
The best models scored 40%, against 95% for people. Models struggled most with multi-step spatial planning and social cues.
- Made by
- Andon Labs
- Released
- October 2025
- Kind
- Real robots
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Agent task
- Tasks
- Kept private
- Strongest model tested
- GPT-5 #70 on the capability index
- Last model added
- August 2025
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
We present Butter-Bench, a benchmark evaluating large language model (LLM) controlled robots for practical intelligence, defined as the ability to navigate the messiness of the physical world. Current state-of-the-art robotic systems use a hierarchical architecture with LLMs in charge of high-level reasoning, and a Vision Language Action (VLA) model for low-level control. Butter-Bench evaluates the LLM part in isolation from the VLA. Although LLMs have repeatedly surpassed humans in evaluations requiring analytical intelligence, we find humans still outperform LLMs on Butter-Bench. The best LLMs score 40% on Butter-Bench, while the mean human score is 95%. LLMs struggled the most with multi-step spatial planning and social understanding. We also evaluate LLMs that are fine-tuned for embodied reasoning and conclude that this training does not improve their score on Butter-Bench.
Human tops the leaderboard with 95%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Claude Opus 4.1, at 37%.
The newest model with a score here came out in August 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 1 Human 95%
- 2 Gemini 2.5 Pro (snapshot unspecified) 40%
- 3 Claude Opus 4.1 37%
- 4 GPT-5 30%
- 5 Gemini ER 1.5 27%
- 6 Grok 4 23%
- 7
Llama 4 Maverick 7.00%
Source: Official Butter-Bench leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Human | 95% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 2 | Gemini 2.5 Pro (snapshot unspecified) | 40% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 3 | Claude Opus 4.1 | 37% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | GPT-5 | 30% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | Gemini ER 1.5 | 27% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 6 | Grok 4 | 23% | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | | 7.00% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official Butter-Bench leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official Butter-Bench leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Robotics
- ERQA In use 400 multiple-choice visual questions from robot and egocentric footage on spatial, trajectory, action and state reasoning. Accuracy.
Gemini Robotics ER 2 78.5%
- RoboDojo In use Generalist manipulation policies run 42 Isaac Sim tasks and 18 remote real-robot tasks. Scored by task score and success rate. GPT-6 Astra 29%
- RoboLab In use Zero-shot DROID Franka policies in Isaac Lab on 120 tabletop tasks at three instruction levels, 10 episodes each. Success rate. FLUX 3 Action 42.9%
- Progress classification (Google DeepMind) In use Models assign each frame of a robot video to one of five task-progress bands from 0 to 100 percent. Scored by accuracy.
Gemini Robotics ER 2 57.4%
- Human proximity (Google DeepMind robotics) In use Models judge from robot camera views whether a human is within 1 meter, a spatial awareness check for safe robot behavior. Scored by accuracy.
Gemini Robotics ER 2 93%
- Moment finding (Google DeepMind) In use Models find the moment in a robot video when an event happens. Scored by accuracy and mean absolute time distance in seconds.
Gemini Robotics ER 2 91.3%