RoboDojo
Generalist manipulation policies run 42 Isaac Sim tasks and 18 remote real-robot tasks. Scored by task score and success rate.
The sim board reports average score and success. It is far from saturated. Models self-reporting 97-99% on LIBERO score far lower here. Team also evaluated GPT-6 Astra as an embodied agent.
- Made by
- MMLab@HKU + UC Berkeley + Tsinghua + others (RoboDojo team)
- Released
- July 2026
- Kind
- Simulated robots
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Agent task
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- Claude Fable 5.2 #1 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- November 2026
- Last model added
- November 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Generalist robot manipulation policies have advanced rapidly, yet existing benchmarks remain limited in systematically evaluating their capabilities. Many rely on simple, short-horizon, or skill-narrow tasks with limited capability coverage, and are often conducted only in simulation or only in the real world. Simulation enables scalable feedback but misses physical deployment challenges, while real-world evaluation is costly, time-consuming, and difficult to reproduce. We introduce RoboDojo, a unified sim-and-real benchmark for comprehensive evaluation of generalist robot manipulation policies. RoboDojo includes 42 simulation tasks and 18 real-world tasks covering diverse and complementary manipulation capabilities. The simulation benchmark evaluates five dimensions: generalization, memory, precision, long-horizon execution, and open-vocabulary instruction following, while the real-world benchmark exposes policies to challenging physical-world deployment conditions. RoboDojo supports scalable evaluation through heterogeneous parallel simulation in Isaac Sim and provides RoboDojo-RealEval, a reproducible real-world evaluation system with remote cloud access, standardized hardware, scene reset, evaluation protocol, and deployment interface. Together with XPolicyLab, policies can be integrated once and evaluated across simulation and real-world settings with minimal adaptation. We integrate 30 policies into XPolicyLab and evaluate them on RoboDojo, establishing a public leaderboard and systematic analysis of current policy performance. The website is available at http://robodojo-benchmark.com/.
Q0-Preview tops the leaderboard with 74.2%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is GPT-6 Astra, at 29%.
Claude Fable 5.2 leads with 64.9%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in September 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- and 14 more
- 74.2 Q0-Preview
- 61.9 GO-3 Nano Preview
- 55.3 PyRUA-Lean
- 53.2 HexaShell-Preview
- 46.6 WorldScape-R²SI
- 45.1 EmbodiedEvo
- 42.6 WALL-OSS-1.0-lite
- 39.3 VPP2
- 36.3 PhysicalRSI
- 35.3 Awomo-0.5
- 34.0 Simate-beta
- 33.8 Rex-M1 Preview
- 32.8 HWM-0 Preview
- 31.4 VPP2-Preview
- 30.8 InternW0-Δ
- 30.7 Liber-0 Preview
- 29.2 Liber-0 Lite
- 29.0 GPT-6 Astra
- 24.9 DM0.5
- 21.7 ME-Brain-1.0
- 20.2 GalaxeaVLA (G0.5)
- 20.1 Xiaomi-Robotics-1
- 17.8 MachEmbodied-U0
- 17.2 OpenWAM-α
- 15.2 EWAM
- 14.9 Meituan-Robotics-0
- 14.3 HWM-CogWAM
- 13.1 Hy-Embodied-0.5-VLA
- 13.0 KinRT
- 12.6 SimpleMemVLA
- 12.4 Spatial Forcing
- 11.4 π0.5
- 11.2 InternVLA-A1.5
- 10.8 StarVLA-PI_v3
- 10.7 VLAct
- 10.1 X-VLA
- 8.99
MolmoAct 2
- 8.25 StarVLA-GR00T
- 8.18 StarVLA-OFT
- 7.69 X-WAM
- 6.93 Xiaomi-Robotics-0
- 6.40 StarVLA
- 6.20 GigaWorld-Policy-0
- 5.82 GalaxeaVLA (G0)
- 5.50 LingBot-VLA
- 4.97 EventVLA
- 4.82 AHA-WAM
- 3.67 ABot-M0
- 3.48 Fast-WAM
- 3.48 π0
- 2.99 DeepSeek-Flash
- 2.85 GROOT-N1.7
- 2.48 InternVLA-A1
- 1.82 SmolVLA (Single Task)
- 1.66 LDA-1B
- 1.13 GPT-5.5
- 1.08 ACT (Single Task)
- 0.99 GO-1
- 0.67 H-RDT
- 0.51 RDT
- 0.45 DM0
- 0.38 Dexora-1B
- 0.28 A1
- 0.23 Spirit v1.5
- 0.22 TinyVLA
- 0.21
OpenVLA-OFT
- 1 Q0-Preview 74.2%
- 2 GO-3 Nano Preview 61.9%
- 3 PyRUA-Lean 55.3%
- 4 HexaShell-Preview 53.2%
- 5 WorldScape-R²SI 46.6%
- 6 EmbodiedEvo 45.1%
- 7 WALL-OSS-1.0-lite 42.6%
- 8 VPP2 39.3%
- 9 PhysicalRSI 36.3%
- 10 Awomo-0.5 35.3%
- 11 Simate-beta 34%
- 12 Rex-M1 Preview 33.8%
- 13 HWM-0 Preview 32.8%
- 14 VPP2-Preview 31.4%
- 15 InternW0-Δ 30.8%
- 16 Liber-0 Preview 30.7%
- 17 Liber-0 Lite 29.2%
- 18 GPT-6 Astra 29%
- 19 DM0.5 24.9%
- 20 ME-Brain-1.0 21.7%
- 21 GalaxeaVLA (G0.5) 20.2%
- 22 Xiaomi-Robotics-1 20.1%
- 23 MachEmbodied-U0 17.8%
- 24 OpenWAM-α 17.2%
- 25 EWAM 15.2%
- 26 Meituan-Robotics-0 14.9%
- 27 HWM-CogWAM 14.3%
- 28 Hy-Embodied-0.5-VLA 13.1%
- 29 KinRT 13%
- 30 SimpleMemVLA 12.6%
- 31 Spatial Forcing 12.4%
- 32 π0.5 11.4%
- 33 InternVLA-A1.5 11.2%
- 34 StarVLA-PI_v3 10.8%
- 35 VLAct 10.7%
- 36 X-VLA 10.1%
- 37
MolmoAct 2 8.99%
- 38 StarVLA-GR00T 8.25%
- 39 StarVLA-OFT 8.18%
- 40 X-WAM 7.69%
- 41 Xiaomi-Robotics-0 6.93%
- 42 StarVLA 6.40%
- 43 GigaWorld-Policy-0 6.20%
- 44 GalaxeaVLA (G0) 5.82%
- 45 LingBot-VLA 5.50%
- 46 EventVLA 4.97%
- 47 AHA-WAM 4.82%
- 48 ABot-M0 3.67%
- 49 Fast-WAM 3.48%
- 50 π0 3.48%
- 51 DeepSeek-Flash 2.99%
- 52 GROOT-N1.7 2.85%
- 53 InternVLA-A1 2.48%
- 54 SmolVLA (Single Task) 1.82%
- 55 LDA-1B 1.66%
- 56 GPT-5.5 1.13%
- 57 ACT (Single Task) 1.08%
- 58 GO-1 0.99%
- 59 H-RDT 0.67%
- 60 RDT 0.51%
- 61 DM0 0.45%
- 62 Dexora-1B 0.38%
- 63 A1 0.28%
- 64 Spirit v1.5 0.23%
- 65 TinyVLA 0.22%
- 66
OpenVLA-OFT 0.21%
Source: Official RoboDojo leaderboard
- 1 Claude Fable 5.2 64.9%
- 2 GPT-6 Astra 29%
- 3 π0.5 11.4%
- 4
MolmoAct 2 8.99%
- 5 π0 3.48%
- 6 GPT-5.5 1.13%
- 7
OpenVLA-OFT 0.21%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official RoboDojo leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q0-Preview | 74.2% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 2 | GO-3 Nano Preview | 61.9% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 3 | PyRUA-Lean | 55.3% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 4 | HexaShell-Preview | 53.2% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 5 | WorldScape-R²SI | 46.6% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 6 | EmbodiedEvo | 45.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 7 | WALL-OSS-1.0-lite | 42.6% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 8 | VPP2 | 39.3% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 9 | PhysicalRSI | 36.3% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 10 | Awomo-0.5 | 35.3% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 11 | Simate-beta | 34% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 12 | Rex-M1 Preview | 33.8% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 13 | HWM-0 Preview | 32.8% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 14 | VPP2-Preview | 31.4% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 15 | InternW0-Δ | 30.8% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 16 | Liber-0 Preview | 30.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 17 | Liber-0 Lite | 29.2% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 18 | GPT-6 Astra | 29% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | DM0.5 | 24.9% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 20 | ME-Brain-1.0 | 21.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 21 | GalaxeaVLA (G0.5) | 20.2% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 22 | Xiaomi-Robotics-1 | 20.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 23 | MachEmbodied-U0 | 17.8% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 24 | OpenWAM-α | 17.2% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 25 | EWAM | 15.2% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 26 | Meituan-Robotics-0 | 14.9% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 27 | HWM-CogWAM | 14.3% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 28 | Hy-Embodied-0.5-VLA | 13.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 29 | KinRT | 13% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 30 | SimpleMemVLA | 12.6% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 31 | Spatial Forcing | 12.4% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 32 | π0.5 | 11.4% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 33 | InternVLA-A1.5 | 11.2% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 34 | StarVLA-PI_v3 | 10.8% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 35 | VLAct | 10.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 36 | X-VLA | 10.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 37 | | 8.99% | May 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 38 | StarVLA-GR00T | 8.25% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 39 | StarVLA-OFT | 8.18% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 40 | X-WAM | 7.69% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 41 | Xiaomi-Robotics-0 | 6.93% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 42 | StarVLA | 6.40% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 43 | GigaWorld-Policy-0 | 6.20% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 44 | GalaxeaVLA (G0) | 5.82% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 45 | LingBot-VLA | 5.50% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 46 | EventVLA | 4.97% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 47 | AHA-WAM | 4.82% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 48 | ABot-M0 | 3.67% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 49 | Fast-WAM | 3.48% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 50 | π0 | 3.48% | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 51 | DeepSeek-Flash | 2.99% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 52 | GROOT-N1.7 | 2.85% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 53 | InternVLA-A1 | 2.48% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 54 | SmolVLA (Single Task) | 1.82% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 55 | LDA-1B | 1.66% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 56 | GPT-5.5 | 1.13% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 57 | ACT (Single Task) | 1.08% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 58 | GO-1 | 0.99% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 59 | H-RDT | 0.67% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 60 | RDT | 0.51% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 61 | DM0 | 0.45% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 62 | Dexora-1B | 0.38% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 63 | A1 | 0.28% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 64 | Spirit v1.5 | 0.23% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 65 | TinyVLA | 0.22% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 66 | | 0.21% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Fable 5.2 | 64.9% | Nov 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | GPT-6 Astra | 29% | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | π0.5 | 11.4% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | | 8.99% | May 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | π0 | 3.48% | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | GPT-5.5 | 1.13% | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | | 0.21% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
2 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in July 2026 3 models have held number one with claims included since its release in July 2026
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official RoboDojo leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official RoboDojo leaderboard and labs’ model cards
One lab put it in a launch post in the last six months
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2026 | Claude Fable 5.2 | 64.9 | Robotics RoboDojo Sim, internally run, Max effort (launch table and robotics text) |
More in Robotics
- ERQA In use 400 multiple-choice visual questions from robot and egocentric footage on spatial, trajectory, action and state reasoning. Accuracy.
Gemini Robotics ER 2 78.5%
- RoboLab In use Zero-shot DROID Franka policies in Isaac Lab on 120 tabletop tasks at three instruction levels, 10 episodes each. Success rate. FLUX 3 Action 42.9%
- Progress classification (Google DeepMind) In use Models assign each frame of a robot video to one of five task-progress bands from 0 to 100 percent. Scored by accuracy.
Gemini Robotics ER 2 57.4%
- Human proximity (Google DeepMind robotics) In use Models judge from robot camera views whether a human is within 1 meter, a spatial awareness check for safe robot behavior. Scored by accuracy.
Gemini Robotics ER 2 93%
- Moment finding (Google DeepMind) In use Models find the moment in a robot video when an event happens. Scored by accuracy and mean absolute time distance in seconds.
Gemini Robotics ER 2 91.3%
- LIBERO Fading Simulated Franka tabletop tasks in four 10-task suites. Policies fine-tuned on 50 demos per task. Success rate over ~50 trials.
MolmoAct 2 97.2%