Benchmark Almanac

RoboDojo

Q0-Preview 74.2% tops its leaderboard GPT-6 Astra 29% leads the models we track
Claude Fable 5.2 64.9% leads since November 2026
In use

Generalist manipulation policies run 42 Isaac Sim tasks and 18 remote real-robot tasks. Scored by task score and success rate.

The sim board reports average score and success. It is far from saturated. Models self-reporting 97-99% on LIBERO score far lower here. Team also evaluated GPT-6 Astra as an embodied agent.

Released
July 2026
Kind
Simulated robots
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Agent task
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Claude Fable 5.2 #1 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
November 2026
Last model added
November 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Generalist robot manipulation policies have advanced rapidly, yet existing benchmarks remain limited in systematically evaluating their capabilities. Many rely on simple, short-horizon, or skill-narrow tasks with limited capability coverage, and are often conducted only in simulation or only in the real world. Simulation enables scalable feedback but misses physical deployment challenges, while real-world evaluation is costly, time-consuming, and difficult to reproduce. We introduce RoboDojo, a unified sim-and-real benchmark for comprehensive evaluation of generalist robot manipulation policies. RoboDojo includes 42 simulation tasks and 18 real-world tasks covering diverse and complementary manipulation capabilities. The simulation benchmark evaluates five dimensions: generalization, memory, precision, long-horizon execution, and open-vocabulary instruction following, while the real-world benchmark exposes policies to challenging physical-world deployment conditions. RoboDojo supports scalable evaluation through heterogeneous parallel simulation in Isaac Sim and provides RoboDojo-RealEval, a reproducible real-world evaluation system with remote cloud access, standardized hardware, scene reset, evaluation protocol, and deployment interface. Together with XPolicyLab, policies can be integrated once and evaluated across simulation and real-world settings with minimal adaptation. We integrate 30 policies into XPolicyLab and evaluate them on RoboDojo, establishing a public leaderboard and systematic analysis of current policy performance. The website is available at http://robodojo-benchmark.com/.

Abstract of RoboDojo: A Unified Sim-and-Real Benchmark for Comprehensive Evaluation of Generalist Robot Manipulation Policies (arXiv:2607.04434, CC0)
66
Entries on its own leaderboard, 6 models we track
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab

Q0-Preview tops the leaderboard with 74.2%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is GPT-6 Astra, at 29%.

Claude Fable 5.2 leads with 64.9%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in September 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Q0-Preview 74.2%
  2. 2 GO-3 Nano Preview 61.9%
  3. 3 PyRUA-Lean 55.3%
  4. 4 HexaShell-Preview 53.2%
  5. 5 WorldScape-R²SI 46.6%
  6. 6 EmbodiedEvo 45.1%
  7. 7 WALL-OSS-1.0-lite 42.6%
  8. 8 VPP2 39.3%
  9. 9 PhysicalRSI 36.3%
  10. 10 Awomo-0.5 35.3%
  11. 11 Simate-beta 34%
  12. 12 Rex-M1 Preview 33.8%
  13. 13 HWM-0 Preview 32.8%
  14. 14 VPP2-Preview 31.4%
  15. 15 InternW0-Δ 30.8%
  16. 16 Liber-0 Preview 30.7%
  17. 17 Liber-0 Lite 29.2%
  18. 18 GPT-6 Astra 29%
  19. 19 DM0.5 24.9%
  20. 20 ME-Brain-1.0 21.7%
  21. 21 GalaxeaVLA (G0.5) 20.2%
  22. 22 Xiaomi-Robotics-1 20.1%
  23. 23 MachEmbodied-U0 17.8%
  24. 24 OpenWAM-α 17.2%
  25. 25 EWAM 15.2%
  26. 26 Meituan-Robotics-0 14.9%
  27. 27 HWM-CogWAM 14.3%
  28. 28 Hy-Embodied-0.5-VLA 13.1%
  29. 29 KinRT 13%
  30. 30 SimpleMemVLA 12.6%
  31. 31 Spatial Forcing 12.4%
  32. 32 π0.5 11.4%
  33. 33 InternVLA-A1.5 11.2%
  34. 34 StarVLA-PI_v3 10.8%
  35. 35 VLAct 10.7%
  36. 36 X-VLA 10.1%
  37. 37 MolmoAct 2 8.99%
  38. 38 StarVLA-GR00T 8.25%
  39. 39 StarVLA-OFT 8.18%
  40. 40 X-WAM 7.69%
  41. 41 Xiaomi-Robotics-0 6.93%
  42. 42 StarVLA 6.40%
  43. 43 GigaWorld-Policy-0 6.20%
  44. 44 GalaxeaVLA (G0) 5.82%
  45. 45 LingBot-VLA 5.50%
  46. 46 EventVLA 4.97%
  47. 47 AHA-WAM 4.82%
  48. 48 ABot-M0 3.67%
  49. 49 Fast-WAM 3.48%
  50. 50 π0 3.48%
  51. 51 DeepSeek-Flash 2.99%
  52. 52 GROOT-N1.7 2.85%
  53. 53 InternVLA-A1 2.48%
  54. 54 SmolVLA (Single Task) 1.82%
  55. 55 LDA-1B 1.66%
  56. 56 GPT-5.5 1.13%
  57. 57 ACT (Single Task) 1.08%
  58. 58 GO-1 0.99%
  59. 59 H-RDT 0.67%
  60. 60 RDT 0.51%
  61. 61 DM0 0.45%
  62. 62 Dexora-1B 0.38%
  63. 63 A1 0.28%
  64. 64 Spirit v1.5 0.23%
  65. 65 TinyVLA 0.22%
  66. 66 OpenVLA-OFT 0.21%

Source: Official RoboDojo leaderboard

Sources: Labs’ model cards and official RoboDojo leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Q0-Preview 74.2% Official leaderboard
2 GO-3 Nano Preview 61.9% Official leaderboard
3 PyRUA-Lean 55.3% Official leaderboard
4 HexaShell-Preview 53.2% Official leaderboard
5 WorldScape-R²SI 46.6% Official leaderboard
6 EmbodiedEvo 45.1% Official leaderboard
7 WALL-OSS-1.0-lite 42.6% Official leaderboard
8 VPP2 39.3% Official leaderboard
9 PhysicalRSI 36.3% Official leaderboard
10 Awomo-0.5 35.3% Official leaderboard
11 Simate-beta 34% Official leaderboard
12 Rex-M1 Preview 33.8% Official leaderboard
13 HWM-0 Preview 32.8% Official leaderboard
14 VPP2-Preview 31.4% Official leaderboard
15 InternW0-Δ 30.8% Official leaderboard
16 Liber-0 Preview 30.7% Official leaderboard
17 Liber-0 Lite 29.2% Official leaderboard
18 GPT-6 Astra 29% Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
19 DM0.5 24.9% Official leaderboard
20 ME-Brain-1.0 21.7% Official leaderboard
21 GalaxeaVLA (G0.5) 20.2% Official leaderboard
22 Xiaomi-Robotics-1 20.1% Official leaderboard
23 MachEmbodied-U0 17.8% Official leaderboard
24 OpenWAM-α 17.2% Official leaderboard
25 EWAM 15.2% Official leaderboard
26 Meituan-Robotics-0 14.9% Official leaderboard
27 HWM-CogWAM 14.3% Official leaderboard
28 Hy-Embodied-0.5-VLA 13.1% Official leaderboard
29 KinRT 13% Official leaderboard
30 SimpleMemVLA 12.6% Official leaderboard
31 Spatial Forcing 12.4% Official leaderboard
32 π0.5 11.4% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
33 InternVLA-A1.5 11.2% Official leaderboard
34 StarVLA-PI_v3 10.8% Official leaderboard
35 VLAct 10.7% Official leaderboard
36 X-VLA 10.1% Official leaderboard
37 MolmoAct 2 8.99% May 2026 Official leaderboard
38 StarVLA-GR00T 8.25% Official leaderboard
39 StarVLA-OFT 8.18% Official leaderboard
40 X-WAM 7.69% Official leaderboard
41 Xiaomi-Robotics-0 6.93% Official leaderboard
42 StarVLA 6.40% Official leaderboard
43 GigaWorld-Policy-0 6.20% Official leaderboard
44 GalaxeaVLA (G0) 5.82% Official leaderboard
45 LingBot-VLA 5.50% Official leaderboard
46 EventVLA 4.97% Official leaderboard
47 AHA-WAM 4.82% Official leaderboard
48 ABot-M0 3.67% Official leaderboard
49 Fast-WAM 3.48% Official leaderboard
50 π0 3.48% Oct 2024 Official leaderboard
51 DeepSeek-Flash 2.99% Official leaderboard
52 GROOT-N1.7 2.85% Official leaderboard
53 InternVLA-A1 2.48% Official leaderboard
54 SmolVLA (Single Task) 1.82% Official leaderboard
55 LDA-1B 1.66% Official leaderboard
56 GPT-5.5 1.13% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
57 ACT (Single Task) 1.08% Official leaderboard
58 GO-1 0.99% Official leaderboard
59 H-RDT 0.67% Official leaderboard
60 RDT 0.51% Official leaderboard
61 DM0 0.45% Official leaderboard
62 Dexora-1B 0.38% Official leaderboard
63 A1 0.28% Official leaderboard
64 Spirit v1.5 0.23% Official leaderboard
65 TinyVLA 0.22% Official leaderboard
66 OpenVLA-OFT 0.21% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Claude Fable 5.2 64.9% Nov 2026 Lab model card
2 GPT-6 Astra 29% Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
3 π0.5 11.4% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
4 MolmoAct 2 8.99% May 2026 Official leaderboard
5 π0 3.48% Oct 2024 Official leaderboard
6 GPT-5.5 1.13% Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
7 OpenVLA-OFT 0.21% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

2 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in July 2026 3 models have held number one with claims included since its release in July 2026

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Physical Intelligence OpenAI
Own leaderboard Not tested since Sep 2026

Source: Official RoboDojo leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude Fable 5.2 GPT-6 Astra π0.5 π0 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude Fable 5.2 GPT-6 Astra

Sources: Official RoboDojo leaderboard and labs’ model cards

One lab put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Anthropic
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Nov 9, 2026 Claude Fable 5.2 64.9 Robotics RoboDojo Sim, internally run, Max effort (launch table and robotics text)

More in Robotics

All 103 in Robotics
  • ERQA In use 400 multiple-choice visual questions from robot and egocentric footage on spatial, trajectory, action and state reasoning. Accuracy. Gemini Robotics ER 2 78.5%
  • RoboLab In use Zero-shot DROID Franka policies in Isaac Lab on 120 tabletop tasks at three instruction levels, 10 episodes each. Success rate. FLUX 3 Action 42.9%
  • Progress classification (Google DeepMind) In use Models assign each frame of a robot video to one of five task-progress bands from 0 to 100 percent. Scored by accuracy. Gemini Robotics ER 2 57.4%
  • Human proximity (Google DeepMind robotics) In use Models judge from robot camera views whether a human is within 1 meter, a spatial awareness check for safe robot behavior. Scored by accuracy. Gemini Robotics ER 2 93%
  • Moment finding (Google DeepMind) In use Models find the moment in a robot video when an event happens. Scored by accuracy and mean absolute time distance in seconds. Gemini Robotics ER 2 91.3%
  • LIBERO Fading Simulated Franka tabletop tasks in four 10-task suites. Policies fine-tuned on 50 demos per task. Success rate over ~50 trials. MolmoAct 2 97.2%