RoboLab
Zero-shot DROID Franka policies in Isaac Lab on 120 tabletop tasks at three instruction levels, 10 episodes each. Success rate.
Best entries on November 1st, 2026: agentic LM harness AMP1 at 86.0% success, then SenseNova-RoboRSI 57.1%. Best VLA or world model is Lakeside at 51.0%. NVIDIA runs internal rows, including its own models.
- Made by
- NVIDIA
- Released
- April 2026
- Kind
- Simulated robots
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Agent task
- Tasks
- All public
- Last in a launch post
- July 2026
- Last model added
- September 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
The pursuit of general-purpose robotics has yielded impressive foundation models, yet simulation-based benchmarking remains a bottleneck due to rapid performance saturation and a lack of true generalization testing. Existing benchmarks often exhibit significant domain overlap between training and evaluation, trivializing success rates and obscuring insights into robustness. We introduce RoboLab, a simulation benchmarking framework designed to address these challenges. Concretely, our framework is designed to answer two questions: (1) to what extent can we understand the performance of a real-world policy by analyzing its behavior in simulation, and (2) which factor most strongly affect policy behavior. First, RoboLab enables human-authored and LLM-enabled generation of scenes and tasks in a robot- and policy-agnostic manner within a high-fidelity simulation environment. We introduce an accompanying RoboLab-120 benchmark, consisting of 120 tasks categorized into three competency axes: visual, procedural, relational, across three difficulty levels. Second, we introduce a systematic analysis of real-world policies that quantify both their performance and the sensitivity of their behavior to controlled perturbations, exposing significant performance gap in current state-of-the-art models. By providing granular metrics and a scalable toolset, RoboLab offers a scalable framework for evaluating the true generalization capabilities of task-generalist robotic policies. Project website: https://research.nvidia.com/labs/srl/projects/robolab/.
AMP1 tops the leaderboard with 87%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Every run is in the next chart. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is FLUX 3 Action, at 42.9%.
FLUX 3 Action leads with 42.9%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in September 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- GPT-6.1 Terra
- and 16 more
- 87.0 AMP1
- 57.1 SenseNova-RoboRSI
- 51.0 Lakeside
- 49.2 BiMind v0.5
- 46.2 Praxis-1
- 42.9 FLUX 3 Action
- 42.3 Cosmic
- 39.9 HiDream-O1-Embodied
- 39.7 Cosmos3-Nano-Policy
- 39.6 Atomic-WAM
- 39.0 OASIS WAM
- 34.4 Phoenix
- 33.3 BiMind v0.1
- 31.4 VoLo
- 28.8 Cosmos3-Edge-Policy
- 28.1 π0.5
- 25.7 DreamZero
- 15.5 π0-FAST
- 7.20
GR00T N1.6
- 5.50 paligemma-binning
- 5.00 π0
- 1 AMP1 specific instructions 87%
- 2 SenseNova-RoboRSI 57.1%
- 3 Lakeside 51%
- 4 BiMind v0.5 49.2%
- 5 Praxis-1 46.2%
- 6 FLUX 3 Action 42.9%
- 7 Cosmic 42.3%
- 8 HiDream-O1-Embodied 39.9%
- 9 Cosmos3-Nano-Policy specific instructions 39.7%
- 10 Atomic-WAM 39.6%
- 11 OASIS WAM 39%
- 12 Phoenix 34.4%
- 13 BiMind v0.1 33.3%
- 14 VoLo specific instructions 31.4%
- 15 Cosmos3-Edge-Policy specific instructions 28.8%
- 16 π0.5 specific instructions 28.1%
- 17 DreamZero 25.7%
- 18 π0-FAST 15.5%
- 19
GR00T N1.6 7.20%
- 20 paligemma-binning specific instructions 5.50%
- 21 π0 5.00%
Source: Official RoboLab leaderboard
- 1 FLUX 3 Action 42.9%
- 2
Cosmos3-Nano-Policy-DROID 39.7%
- 3 π0.5 specific instructions 28.1%
- 4 π0-FAST 15.5%
- 5
GR00T N1.7 8.58%
- 6
GR00T N1.6 7.20%
- 7 π0 5.00%
Sources: Official RoboLab leaderboard and labs’ model cards
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AMP1 | 87% | specific instructions, Agentic LM | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | SenseNova-RoboRSI | 57.1% | Agentic LM | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | Lakeside | 51% | LWM | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | BiMind v0.5 | 49.2% | VLA | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | Praxis-1 | 46.2% | WAM | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | FLUX 3 Action | 42.9% | WAM | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | Cosmic | 42.3% | TAMP+FM | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | HiDream-O1-Embodied | 39.9% | VLA | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | Cosmos3-Nano-Policy | 39.7% | specific instructions, WAM | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | Atomic-WAM | 39.6% | VLM+WAM | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | OASIS WAM | 39% | VLM+WAM | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | Phoenix | 34.4% | TAMP+FM | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | BiMind v0.1 | 33.3% | VLA | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | VoLo | 31.4% | specific instructions, Agentic VLA | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | Cosmos3-Edge-Policy | 28.8% | specific instructions, WAM | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | π0.5 | 28.1% | specific instructions, VLA | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 17 | DreamZero | 25.7% | WAM | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | π0-FAST | 15.5% | VLA | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 19 | | 7.20% | VLA | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 20 | paligemma-binning | 5.50% | specific instructions, VLA | Official leaderboard | |
| 21 | π0 | 5.00% | VLA | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FLUX 3 Action | 42.9% | WAM | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | | 39.7% | May 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | π0.5 | 28.1% | specific instructions, VLA | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | π0-FAST | 15.5% | VLA | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | | 8.58% | Jul 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | | 7.20% | VLA | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | π0 | 5.00% | VLA | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 2 models in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
Scores at each effort level
Models the leaderboard ran at two or more effort levels. We don’t have enough cost data here to say what the extra effort costs.
Source: Official RoboLab leaderboard
| Model | Effort | Harness | Score | Cost per task | Output tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLUX 3 Action | WAM | 42.9% | |||
| π0.5 | specific instructions | VLA | 28.1% | ||
| π0.5 | VLA | 28% | |||
| π0-FAST | VLA | 15.5% | |||
| π0.5 | vague instructions | VLA | 15.2% | ||
| π0-FAST | specific instructions | VLA | 14.9% | ||
| π0-FAST | vague instructions | VLA | 9.20% | ||
| | VLA | 7.20% | |||
| | vague instructions | VLA | 5.40% | ||
| | specific instructions | VLA | 5.30% | ||
| π0 | VLA | 5.00% | |||
| π0 | specific instructions | VLA | 3.50% | ||
| π0 | vague instructions | VLA | 2.80% |
2 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in April 2026 3 models have held number one with claims included since its release in April 2026
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official RoboLab leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official RoboLab leaderboard and labs’ model cards
One lab put it in a launch post in the last six months
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2026 | 8.58 | RoboLab, zero-shot nvidia/GR00T-N1.7-DROID, 120 tasks, 40 episodes each, 412 of 4,800 successes. N1.6 reference 7.25% (examples/RoboLab README) |
One system card reports it
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2026 | | 39.7 | RoboLab-120 overall, specific language level, Cosmos3-Nano-Policy-DROID, Table 19 | Capabilities |
More in Robotics
- ERQA In use 400 multiple-choice visual questions from robot and egocentric footage on spatial, trajectory, action and state reasoning. Accuracy.
Gemini Robotics ER 2 78.5%
- RoboDojo In use Generalist manipulation policies run 42 Isaac Sim tasks and 18 remote real-robot tasks. Scored by task score and success rate. GPT-6 Astra 29%
- Progress classification (Google DeepMind) In use Models assign each frame of a robot video to one of five task-progress bands from 0 to 100 percent. Scored by accuracy.
Gemini Robotics ER 2 57.4%
- Human proximity (Google DeepMind robotics) In use Models judge from robot camera views whether a human is within 1 meter, a spatial awareness check for safe robot behavior. Scored by accuracy.
Gemini Robotics ER 2 93%
- Moment finding (Google DeepMind) In use Models find the moment in a robot video when an event happens. Scored by accuracy and mean absolute time distance in seconds.
Gemini Robotics ER 2 91.3%
- LIBERO Fading Simulated Franka tabletop tasks in four 10-task suites. Policies fine-tuned on 50 demos per task. Success rate over ~50 trials.
MolmoAct 2 97.2%