Benchmark Almanac

C3

InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 97.8% leads since August 2025
Dropped

Models answer 19,577 multiple-choice questions on Chinese dialogues and texts from Chinese-as-a-second-language exams. Scoring is accuracy.

Released
April 2019
Kind
Reading in many languages
Level
School
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Multiple choice
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
GLM-5 #88 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
December 2024, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
February 2026

In the authors’ words

Machine reading comprehension tasks require a machine reader to answer questions relevant to the given document. In this paper, we present the first free-form multiple-Choice Chinese machine reading Comprehension dataset (C^3), containing 13,369 documents (dialogues or more formally written mixed-genre texts) and their associated 19,577 multiple-choice free-form questions collected from Chinese-as-a-second-language examinations. We present a comprehensive analysis of the prior knowledge (i.e., linguistic, domain-specific, and general world knowledge) needed for these real-world problems. We implement rule-based and popular neural methods and find that there is still a significant performance gap between the best performing model (68.5%) and human readers (96.0%), especially on problems that require prior knowledge. We further study the effects of distractor plausibility and data augmentation based on translated relevant datasets for English on model performance. We expect C^3 to present great challenges to existing systems as answering 86.8% of questions requires both knowledge within and beyond the accompanying document, and we hope that C^3 can serve as a platform to study how to leverage various kinds of prior knowledge to better understand a given written or orally oriented text. C^3 is available at https://dataset.org/c3/.

Abstract of Investigating Prior Knowledge for Challenging Chinese Machine Reading Comprehension (arXiv:1904.09679, CC0)
6
Models scored in lab cards
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab
5
System cards report it, from 3 labs

InternVL3.5-241B-A28B leads with 97.8% among models released by February 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in February 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 97.8%
  2. 2 GLM-4.5 83.1%
  3. 3 GLM-5 80.3%
  4. 4 DeepSeek-V3 78.6%
  5. 5 DeepSeek LLM 67B 77%
  6. 6 ChatGLM3-6B 73.9%

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 97.8% Aug 2025 Lab model card
2 GLM-4.5 83.1% Aug 2025 Lab model card
3 GLM-5 80.3% Feb 2026 Lab model card
4 DeepSeek-V3 78.6% Dec 2024 Lab model card
5 DeepSeek LLM 67B 77% Jan 2024 Lab model card
6 ChatGLM3-6B 73.9% Jun 2024 Lab model card

4 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since 2023

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

DeepSeek Z.ai Shanghai AI Lab
Lab claims Passed 85% in Aug 2025, by InternVL3.5-241B-A28B

Source: Labs’ model cards

Shanghai AI Lab’s own number for InternVL3.5-241B-A28B passed 85% in August 2025

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) InternVL3.5-241B-A28B GLM-4.5 DeepSeek-V3 DeepSeek LLM 67B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) InternVL3.5-241B-A28B GLM-4.5

Source: Labs’ model cards

No launch post has listed it since December 2024

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

DeepSeek
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Dec 26, 2024 DeepSeek-V3 78.6 C3 (Acc.)

5 system cards report it, from 3 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Feb 17, 2026 GLM-5 technical report 80.3 GLM-5-Base, C3 (EM) (Table 11) Capabilities
Aug 25, 2025 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B technical report 97.8 C3, OpenCompass (Table 14) Capabilities
Aug 8, 2025 GLM-4.5 technical report 83.1 GLM-4.5-Base, C3 (EM) (Table 2) Capabilities
Jun 18, 2024 ChatGLM3-6B technical report 73.9 ChatGLM3-6B-Base, C3 (Table 1) Capabilities
Jan 5, 2024 DeepSeek LLM 67B technical report 77 C3, DeepSeek 67B Chat (Table 6) Capabilities

More in Multilingual

All 120 in Multilingual
  • MMMLU In use MMLU professionally translated into 14 languages. Multiple-choice accuracy. Claude Mythos Preview 92.7%
  • WMT24++ In use English-to-55-language translation of WMT24 test data. Scored with automatic metrics such as MetricX or xCOMET. K-EXAONE 90.5%
  • MMLU-ProX In use MMLU-Pro translated into up to 29 languages with expert review. Multiple-choice accuracy per language. Qwen3.7-Max 87%
  • CLIcK In use Models answer 1,995 multiple-choice questions on Korean language and culture. Questions come from official Korean exams and textbooks in eleven categories. Solar Open 2 90.7%
  • Global MMLU Lite 3.0 In use Models answer 400 human-translated MMLU questions per language in 23 languages. Version 3.0 adds Czech, Hungarian, Oriya, Slovak and Tajik and updates Italian. Accuracy. Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B-A55B Base 90.1%
  • MMMB In use Models answer multiple-choice questions about images in six languages across 15 categories. The set has about 12,000 questions. LFM2.5-VL-3B 83%