- MMStar 77.9
- MMVet 81.2
- MMBench V1.1 (en) 87.4
- MTVQA 39.3
- AI2D (w/ mask) 87.3
- OCRBench 90.7
- WildVision 82.8
- MME-RealWorld (en) 65.1
- HallusionBench 57.3
- MVBench 76.5
- VideoMME (w/o sub) 72.9
- MLVU 78.2
- LongVideoBench 67.1
- MMMU (val) 77.7
- MathVista 82.7
- MathVision 63.9
- MathVerse (vision-only) 68.5
- DynaMath 46.5
- WeMath 62.3
- OlympiadBench 68.7
- LogicVista 66.7
- MATH500 98
- AIME24 84.7
- AIME25 75.6
- GPQA 73.2
- MMLU-Pro 81.3
- C-Eval 90.9
- GAOKAO 94.5
- IFEval 83.7
- SGP-Bench 70.7
- ScreenSpot 89.8
- ScreenSpot-v2 92.9
- OSWorld-G 53.2
- VSI-Bench 69.5
- ERQA 46.8
- SpaCE-10 55
- OmniSpatial 51.9
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B ranks first on 9 of the 63 benchmarks with five or more models scored.
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B
Open weights Flagship
- ERQA 46.8% #31 /36
- HallusionBench 57.3% #26 /31
- MVBench 76.5% #5 /23
Where it ranks
Its best score on each benchmark, and where that ranks among every model with a score there. We rank each model once, at its best setting.
Knowledge and language
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HellaSwag | 97% | #1 of 53 | Lab model card | |
| WinoGrande | 91.7% | #1 of 47 | Lab model card | |
| Natural Questions | 50.4% | #2 of 20 | Lab model card | |
| RACE | 94.2% | #1 of 8 | Lab model card | |
| POPE | 90.7% | #1 of 7 | Lab model card | |
| MMLU | 89.1% | #20 of 131 | Lab model card | |
| C3 | 97.8% | #1 of 6 | Lab model card | |
| CMMLU | 90.2% | #4 of 17 | Lab model card | |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 86.5% | #18 of 73 | Lab model card | |
| C-Eval | 90.9% | #15 of 46 | Lab model card | |
| MMLU-Pro | 81.3% | #67 of 167 | Lab model card | |
| GAOKAO-Bench | 94.5% | #1 of 2 | Lab model card | |
| IFEval | 83.7% | #91 of 135 | Lab model card | |
| TriviaQA | 74.8% | #27 of 40 | Lab model card | |
| HallusionBench | 57.3% | #26 of 31 | Lab model card |
Math and science
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MATH | 94.5% | #5 of 99 | Lab model card | |
| MATH-500 | 98% | #9 of 70 | Lab model card | |
| AIME 2024 | 84.7% | #32 of 88 | Lab model card | |
| GSM8K | 91.6% | #37 of 92 | Lab model card | |
| GPQA Diamond | 73.2% | #159 of 302 | Lab model card | |
| OlympiadBench | 68.7% | #2 of 3 | Lab model card | |
| AIME 2025 | 75.6% | #101 of 143 | Lab model card |
Coding
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HumanEval | 98.2% | #2 of 101 | Lab model card |
Agents and tools
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ScreenSpot | 89.8% | #3 of 11 | Lab model card | |
| ScreenSpot-v2 | 92.9% | #6 of 14 | Lab model card | |
| OSWorld-G | 53.2% | #4 of 5 | Lab model card | |
| Windows Agent Arena | 18% | #5 of 5 | Lab model card |
Vision, audio and robotics
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SpaCE-10 | 55% | #1 of 36 | Official leaderboard | |
| TextVQA | 84.5% | #2 of 17 | Lab model card | |
| MM-Vet | 81.2% | #1 of 8 | Lab model card | |
| RefCOCO / RefCOCO+ / RefCOCOg | 92.4% | #4 of 29 | Lab model card | |
| VSI-Bench | 69.5% | #1 of 7 | Lab model card | |
| MME | 2525.9 | #1 of 6 | Lab model card | |
| OCRBench | 90.7% | #7 of 34 | Lab model card | |
| MVBench | 76.5% | #5 of 23 | Lab model card | |
| MME-RealWorld | 65.1% | #1 of 4 | Lab model card | |
| MMMU | 77.7% | #31 of 103 | Lab model card | |
| ChartQA | 88% | #12 of 37 | Lab model card | |
| DocVQA | 94.9% | #12 of 36 | Lab model card | |
| OVO-S-Bench | 50.9% | #5 of 15 | Official leaderboard | |
| VCR (Visual Caption Restoration) | 97% | #1 of 3 | Lab model card | |
| MathVista | 82.7% | #25 of 70 | Lab model card | |
| GSM8K-V | 27.9% | #9 of 24 | Official leaderboard | |
| InfographicVQA | 82% | #10 of 26 | Lab model card | |
| MMStar | 77.9% | #14 of 36 | Lab model card | |
| VideoMME v2 (with subtitles) | 23.1% | #15 of 31 | Official leaderboard | |
| LogicVista | 66.7% | #7 of 14 | Lab model card | |
| MTVQA-Test | 39.3% | #3 of 6 | Lab model card | |
| OmniSpatial | 51.9% | #3 of 6 | Lab model card | |
| CRPE | 78% | #2 of 4 | Lab model card | |
| MMT-Bench | 72.7% | #1 of 2 | Lab model card | |
| R-Bench (real-world robustness) | 75.4% | #1 of 2 | Lab model card | |
| RealWorldQA | 75.2% | #22 of 38 | Lab model card | |
| AI2D | 87.3% | #33 of 52 | Lab model card | |
| MMBench-EN v1.1 | 87.4% | #15 of 23 | Lab model card | |
| MathVerse | 68.5% | #8 of 12 | Lab model card | |
| SEED-Bench-2-Plus | 71.9% | #2 of 3 | Lab model card | |
| BLINK | 61.4% | #20 of 29 | Lab model card | |
| MATH-Vision (MathVision) | 63.9% | #36 of 51 | Lab model card | |
| MLVU | 78.2% | #16 of 22 | Lab model card | |
| BabyVision | 19.2% | #20 of 27 | Official leaderboard | |
| ViVerBench | 67.1% | #6 of 8 | Official leaderboard | |
| Video-MME | 72.9% | #40 of 51 | Lab model card | |
| LongVideoBench | 67.1% | #9 of 11 | Lab model card | |
| ERQA | 46.8% | #31 of 36 | Lab model card | |
| OmniDocBench v1.5 | 82.7 | #10 of 11 | Official leaderboard | |
| DynaMath | 46.5% | #21 of 23 | Lab model card | |
| MuirBench | 47.5% | #11 of 12 | Lab model card | |
| We-Math | 62.3% | #12 of 13 | Lab model card | |
| CharXiv | 48.3% | #72 of 75 | Lab model card | |
| OmniDocBench v1.6 | 83.8 | #8 of 8 | Official leaderboard | |
| Mantis-Eval | 77% | #2 of 2 | Lab model card | |
| MMBench-Video | 1.74 | #2 of 2 | Lab model card | |
| MIRB | 73% | #1 of 1 | Lab model card | |
| MMIU | 61.3% | #1 of 1 | Lab model card | |
| SGP-Bench | 70.7% | #1 of 1 | Lab model card |
Its lab's numbers put it at 134.2, number 235 of 404
The Self-Reported Index fits one score to the 45 capability results Shanghai AI Lab reported for this model, on the scale of the Epoch Capabilities Index. Labs choose which benchmarks to show and how to run them, so read it as the lab's claim, not an independent measurement. The 90% interval runs from 132.4 to 136.0. How we compute it.
- HumanEval 98.2
- MATH-500 98
- HellaSwag 97
- DocVQA 94.9
- MATH 94.5
- RACE 94.2
- ScreenSpot-v2 92.9
- RefCOCO / RefCOCO+ / RefCOCOg 92.4
- WinoGrande 91.7
- GSM8K 91.6
- C-Eval 90.9
- OCRBench 90.7
- CMMLU 90.2
- ScreenSpot 89.8
- MMLU 89.1
- ChartQA 88
- MMBench-EN v1.1 87.4
- AI2D 87.3
- BIG-Bench Hard 86.5
- AIME 2024 84.7
- TextVQA 84.5
- IFEval 83.7
- MathVista 82.7
- InfographicVQA 82
- MMLU-Pro 81.3
- MLVU 78.2
- MMStar 77.9
- MMMU 77.7
- MVBench 76.5
- AIME 2025 75.6
- RealWorldQA 75.2
- TriviaQA 74.8
- GPQA Diamond 73.2
- Video-MME 72.9
- MathVerse 68.5
- LongVideoBench 67.1
- LogicVista 66.7
- MATH-Vision (MathVision) 63.9
- We-Math 62.3
- BLINK 61.4
- HallusionBench 57.3
- Natural Questions 50.4
- CharXiv 48.3
- MuirBench 47.5
- DynaMath 46.5
Its lab's numbers next to 2 leaderboards
Where the benchmark's own leaderboard, or Epoch AI's run, also has this model. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. Every pair.
Its launch post
The benchmarks the lab chose to headline, with the scores it gave.
Its system card
Every result in the longer documents the lab published with it. 35 of them aren't in the launch post.
Capabilities
- MMStar 77.9
- MM-Vet 81.2
- MMBench-EN v1.1 87.4
- MME 2525.9
- MTVQA-Test 39.3
- MMMB
- AI2D 87.3
- ChartQA 88
- TextVQA 84.5
- DocVQA 94.9
- InfographicVQA 82
- OCRBench 90.7
- SEED-Bench-2-Plus 71.9
- CharXiv 48.3
- VCR (Visual Caption Restoration) 97
- WildVision 82.8
- MME-RealWorld 65.1
- RealWorldQA 75.2
- BLINK 61.4
- Mantis-Eval 77
- MMIU 61.3
- MuirBench 47.5
- MMT-Bench 72.7
- MIRB 73
- RefCOCO / RefCOCO+ / RefCOCOg 92.4
- MVBench 76.5
- Video-MME 72.9
- MMBench-Video 1.74
- MLVU 78.2
- LongVideoBench 67.1
- MMMU 77.7
- MathVista 82.7
- MATH-Vision (MathVision) 63.9
- MathVerse 68.5
- DynaMath 46.5
- We-Math 62.3
- OlympiadBench 68.7
- LogicVista 66.7
- MATH-500 98
- AIME 2024 84.7
- AIME 2025 75.6
- GPQA Diamond 73.2
- MMLU-Pro 81.3
- C-Eval 90.9
- GAOKAO-Bench 94.5
- IFEval 83.7
- MMLU 89.1
- CMMLU 90.2
- TriviaQA 74.8
- Natural Questions 50.4
- C3 97.8
- RACE 94.2
- WinoGrande 91.7
- HellaSwag 97
- BIG-Bench Hard 86.5
- GSM8K 91.6
- MATH 94.5
- HumanEval 98.2
- SGP-Bench 70.7
- SArena
- ScreenSpot 89.8
- ScreenSpot-v2 92.9
- OSWorld-G 53.2
- Windows Agent Arena 18
- VSI-Bench 69.5
- ERQA 46.8
- SpaCE-10 55
- OmniSpatial 51.9
Hallucination
- HallusionBench 57.3
- CRPE 78
- POPE 90.7