Benchmark Almanac

CaP-X (CaP-Bench)

Gemini 3 Pro 32.3% leads since March 2026
Not in model cards

Coding agents write perception and control code for 100+ sim manipulation tasks across 8 abstraction and interaction tiers. Scored by task success.

Scores depend on the harness: every model improves with human-made high-level primitives and drops as they are removed. Best frontier models average just over 30%, with a 56-point gap to humans. ICML 2026.

Made by
NVIDIA + UC Berkeley + CMU + Stanford
Released
March 2026
Kind
Simulated robots
Level
University
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Code
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
GPT-5.2 #50 on the capability index
Last model added
December 2025
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

"Code-as-Policy" considers how executable code can complement data-intensive Vision-Language-Action (VLA) methods, yet their effectiveness as autonomous controllers for embodied manipulation remains underexplored. We present CaP-X, an open-access framework for systematically studying Code-as-Policy agents in robot manipulation. At its core is CaP-Gym, an interactive environment in which agents control robots by synthesizing and executing programs that compose perception and control primitives. Building on this foundation, CaP-Bench evaluates frontier language and vision-language models across varying levels of abstraction, interaction, and perceptual grounding. Across 12 models, CaP-Bench reveals a consistent trend: performance improves with human-crafted abstractions but degrades as these priors are removed, exposing a dependence on designer scaffolding. At the same time, we observe that this gap can be mitigated through scaling agentic test-time computation–through multi-turn interaction, structured execution feedback, visual differencing, automatic skill synthesis, and ensembled reasoning–substantially improves robustness even when agents operate over low-level primitives. These findings allow us to derive CaP-Agent0, a training-free framework that recovers human-level reliability on several manipulation tasks in simulation and on real embodiments. We further introduce CaP-RL, showing reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards improves success rates and transfers from sim2real with minimal gap. Together, CaP-X provides a principled, open-access platform for advancing embodied coding agents.

Abstract of CaP-X: A Framework for Benchmarking and Improving Coding Agents for Robot Manipulation (arXiv:2603.22435, CC0)
12
Entries on its own leaderboard, 10 models we track

Gemini 3 Pro leads with 32.3% among models released by December 2025

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

The newest model with a score here came out in December 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Gemini 3 Pro 32.3%
  2. 2 Claude Opus 4.5 23.8%
  3. 3 GPT-5.2 22%
  4. 4 gpt-oss-120b 19.8%
  5. 5 o4-mini 15.3%
  6. 6 Claude Haiku 4.5 15.2%
  7. 7 DeepSeek 3.1 12.8%
  8. 8 GPT-5.1 10%
  9. 9 o1 8.67%
  10. 10 gpt-oss-20b 7.50%
  11. 11 Kimi K2 Sep 2025 5.17%
  12. 12 Qwen3-235B 4.00%

Source: Official CaP-X (CaP-Bench) leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Gemini 3 Pro 32.3% Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
2 Claude Opus 4.5 23.8% Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
3 GPT-5.2 22% Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
4 gpt-oss-120b 19.8% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
5 o4-mini 15.3% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
6 Claude Haiku 4.5 15.2% Oct 2025 Official leaderboard
7 DeepSeek 3.1 12.8% Official leaderboard
8 GPT-5.1 10% Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
9 o1 8.67% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
10 gpt-oss-20b 7.50% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
11 Kimi K2 Sep 2025 5.17% Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
12 Qwen3-235B 4.00% Official leaderboard

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Google DeepMind
Own leaderboard Not tested since Mar 2026
Gemini 3 Pro 32.3%

Source: Official CaP-X (CaP-Bench) leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Gemini 3 Pro gpt-oss-120b o4-mini o1 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Gemini 3 Pro gpt-oss-120b

Source: Official CaP-X (CaP-Bench) leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Robotics

All 104 in Robotics
  • ERQA In use 400 multiple-choice visual questions from robot and egocentric footage on spatial, trajectory, action and state reasoning. Accuracy. Gemini Robotics ER 2 78.5%
  • RoboDojo In use Generalist manipulation policies run 42 Isaac Sim tasks and 18 remote real-robot tasks. Scored by task score and success rate. GPT-6 Astra 29%
  • RoboLab In use Zero-shot DROID Franka policies in Isaac Lab on 120 tabletop tasks at three instruction levels, 10 episodes each. Success rate. FLUX 3 Action 42.9%
  • Progress classification (Google DeepMind) In use Models assign each frame of a robot video to one of five task-progress bands from 0 to 100 percent. Scored by accuracy. Gemini Robotics ER 2 57.4%
  • Human proximity (Google DeepMind robotics) In use Models judge from robot camera views whether a human is within 1 meter, a spatial awareness check for safe robot behavior. Scored by accuracy. Gemini Robotics ER 2 93%
  • Moment finding (Google DeepMind) In use Models find the moment in a robot video when an event happens. Scored by accuracy and mean absolute time distance in seconds. Gemini Robotics ER 2 91.3%