CaP-X (CaP-Bench)
Coding agents write perception and control code for 100+ sim manipulation tasks across 8 abstraction and interaction tiers. Scored by task success.
Scores depend on the harness: every model improves with human-made high-level primitives and drops as they are removed. Best frontier models average just over 30%, with a 56-point gap to humans. ICML 2026.
- Made by
- NVIDIA + UC Berkeley + CMU + Stanford
- Released
- March 2026
- Kind
- Simulated robots
- Level
- University
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Code
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- GPT-5.2 #50 on the capability index
- Last model added
- December 2025
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
"Code-as-Policy" considers how executable code can complement data-intensive Vision-Language-Action (VLA) methods, yet their effectiveness as autonomous controllers for embodied manipulation remains underexplored. We present CaP-X, an open-access framework for systematically studying Code-as-Policy agents in robot manipulation. At its core is CaP-Gym, an interactive environment in which agents control robots by synthesizing and executing programs that compose perception and control primitives. Building on this foundation, CaP-Bench evaluates frontier language and vision-language models across varying levels of abstraction, interaction, and perceptual grounding. Across 12 models, CaP-Bench reveals a consistent trend: performance improves with human-crafted abstractions but degrades as these priors are removed, exposing a dependence on designer scaffolding. At the same time, we observe that this gap can be mitigated through scaling agentic test-time computation–through multi-turn interaction, structured execution feedback, visual differencing, automatic skill synthesis, and ensembled reasoning–substantially improves robustness even when agents operate over low-level primitives. These findings allow us to derive CaP-Agent0, a training-free framework that recovers human-level reliability on several manipulation tasks in simulation and on real embodiments. We further introduce CaP-RL, showing reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards improves success rates and transfers from sim2real with minimal gap. Together, CaP-X provides a principled, open-access platform for advancing embodied coding agents.
Gemini 3 Pro leads with 32.3% among models released by December 2025
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
The newest model with a score here came out in December 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 1
Gemini 3 Pro 32.3%
- 2 Claude Opus 4.5 23.8%
- 3 GPT-5.2 22%
- 4 gpt-oss-120b 19.8%
- 5 o4-mini 15.3%
- 6 Claude Haiku 4.5 15.2%
- 7 DeepSeek 3.1 12.8%
- 8 GPT-5.1 10%
- 9 o1 8.67%
- 10 gpt-oss-20b 7.50%
- 11 Kimi K2 Sep 2025 5.17%
- 12 Qwen3-235B 4.00%
Source: Official CaP-X (CaP-Bench) leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 32.3% | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | Claude Opus 4.5 | 23.8% | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | GPT-5.2 | 22% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | gpt-oss-120b | 19.8% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | o4-mini | 15.3% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | Claude Haiku 4.5 | 15.2% | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | DeepSeek 3.1 | 12.8% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 8 | GPT-5.1 | 10% | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | o1 | 8.67% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | gpt-oss-20b | 7.50% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | Kimi K2 Sep 2025 | 5.17% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | Qwen3-235B | 4.00% | Official leaderboard |
Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official CaP-X (CaP-Bench) leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official CaP-X (CaP-Bench) leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Robotics
- ERQA In use 400 multiple-choice visual questions from robot and egocentric footage on spatial, trajectory, action and state reasoning. Accuracy.
Gemini Robotics ER 2 78.5%
- RoboDojo In use Generalist manipulation policies run 42 Isaac Sim tasks and 18 remote real-robot tasks. Scored by task score and success rate. GPT-6 Astra 29%
- RoboLab In use Zero-shot DROID Franka policies in Isaac Lab on 120 tabletop tasks at three instruction levels, 10 episodes each. Success rate. FLUX 3 Action 42.9%
- Progress classification (Google DeepMind) In use Models assign each frame of a robot video to one of five task-progress bands from 0 to 100 percent. Scored by accuracy.
Gemini Robotics ER 2 57.4%
- Human proximity (Google DeepMind robotics) In use Models judge from robot camera views whether a human is within 1 meter, a spatial awareness check for safe robot behavior. Scored by accuracy.
Gemini Robotics ER 2 93%
- Moment finding (Google DeepMind) In use Models find the moment in a robot video when an event happens. Scored by accuracy and mean absolute time distance in seconds.
Gemini Robotics ER 2 91.3%