Benchmark Almanac

CFBench

DeepSeek-R1 (snapshot unspecified) 78.3% tops its leaderboard o1-preview 71.8% leads the models we track
Hunyuan-T1 81% leads since March 2025
Dropped

Models follow 1,000 real-world instructions with embedded constraints, across more than 200 scenarios and 50 NLP tasks. A judge checks each constraint and the overall requirement.

Constraints fall into 10 primary types and over 25 subtypes.

Released
August 2024
Kind
Following precise instructions
Level
Everyday
Scored
Graded by a model
Answers
Open-ended
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
o1-preview #147 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
August 2025, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
September 2025
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

The adeptness of Large Language Models (LLMs) in comprehending and following natural language instructions is critical for their deployment in sophisticated real-world applications. Existing evaluations mainly focus on fragmented constraints or narrow scenarios, but they overlook the comprehensiveness and authenticity of constraints from the user's perspective. To bridge this gap, we propose CFBench, a large-scale Comprehensive Constraints Following Benchmark for LLMs, featuring 1,000 curated samples that cover more than 200 real-life scenarios and over 50 NLP tasks. CFBench meticulously compiles constraints from real-world instructions and constructs an innovative systematic framework for constraint types, which includes 10 primary categories and over 25 subcategories, and ensures each constraint is seamlessly integrated within the instructions. To make certain that the evaluation of LLM outputs aligns with user perceptions, we propose an advanced methodology that integrates multi-dimensional assessment criteria with requirement prioritization, covering various perspectives of constraints, instructions, and requirement fulfillment. Evaluating current leading LLMs on CFBench reveals substantial room for improvement in constraints following, and we further investigate influencing factors and enhancement strategies. The data and code are publicly available at https://github.com/PKU-Baichuan-MLSystemLab/CFBench

Abstract of CFBench: A Comprehensive Constraints-Following Benchmark for LLMs (arXiv:2408.01122, CC0)
51
Entries on its own leaderboard, 19 models we track
2
Launch posts list it, from 2 labs
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

DeepSeek-R1 (snapshot unspecified) tops the leaderboard with 78.3%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is o1-preview, at 71.8%.

Hunyuan-T1 leads with 81%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in September 2024, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 DeepSeek-R1 (snapshot unspecified) 78.3%
  2. 2 DeepSeek-V3 (snapshot unspecified) 74%
  3. 3 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 73.5%
  4. 4 Claude-3.5-Sonnet (snapshot unspecified) 72.3%
  5. 5 o1-preview 71.8%
  6. 6 Qwen2-72B 70.5%
  7. 7 DeepSeek-V2-0628 69.6%
  8. 8 GLM-4-0520 69.4%
  9. 9 ERNIE-4-Turbo-0628 69%
  10. 10 ERNIE-4-Bot-0613 67.5%
  11. 11 GPT-4 Turbo Apr 2024 67.2%
  12. 12 GPT-4 Turbo (Jan 2024) 64.7%
  13. 13 MoonShot-V1-8k 63.8%
  14. 14 ERNIE-3.5-0613 62.7%
  15. 15 Yi-Large 62.3%
  16. 16 Qwen1.5-110B-Chat 61.5%
  17. 17 abab6.5-chat 60.9%
  18. 18 YI-1.5-34B-Chat 60.7%
  19. 19 Qwen1.5-72B 60.6%
  20. 20 GLM-4-9B-Chat 59.6%
  21. 21 Qwen1.5-32B-Chat 57.8%
  22. 22 Qwen2-7B-Instruct 50.2%
  23. 23 Qwen1.5-14B-Chat 49.8%
  24. 24 Qwen1.5-7B-Chat 46.5%
  25. 25 DeepSeek-67B-Chat 46.4%
  26. 26 GPT-3.5-Turbo-1106 46.4%
  27. 27 InternLM2-Chat-7B 42.9%
  28. 28 Llama-3-70B-Instruct-CN 42.9%
  29. 29 Llama-3-70B-Instruct 41.4%
  30. 30 Llama-3-8B-Instruct-CN 41.2%
  31. 31 DeepSeek-7B-Chat 35.6%
  32. 32 DeepSeek-V2-Lite-Chat 35.5%
  33. 33 Baichuan2-13B-Chat 32.2%
  34. 34 Qwen1.5-32B 31.6%
  35. 35 Llama-3-8B-Instruct 29.7%
  36. 36 BaiChuan-13B-Chat 28.1%
  37. 37 Qwen1.5-4B-Chat 28%
  38. 38 Vicuna-33B-V13 27.4%
  39. 39 Qwen2-7B 25.4%
  40. 40 Qwen2-1.5B-Instruct 24.2%
  41. 41 Vicuna-13B-v1.3 24%
  42. 42 Llama-2-13B-Chat 22.9%
  43. 43 Qwen1.5-14B 22.8%
  44. 44 Vicuna-7B-V13 21.5%
  45. 45 Conifer-Test 20.6%
  46. 46 Llama-2-7B-Chat 20.1%
  47. 47 Qwen1.5-7B 17.7%
  48. 48 Qwen1.5-4B 15.7%
  49. 49 Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct 14.1%
  50. 50 Conifer-Base 14%
  51. 51 Mistral-7B-Instruct-V03 5.40%

Source: Official CFBench leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 DeepSeek-R1 (snapshot unspecified) 78.3% Official leaderboard
2 DeepSeek-V3 (snapshot unspecified) 74% Official leaderboard
3 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 73.5% Official leaderboard
4 Claude-3.5-Sonnet (snapshot unspecified) 72.3% Official leaderboard
5 o1-preview 71.8% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
6 Qwen2-72B 70.5% Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
7 DeepSeek-V2-0628 69.6% Official leaderboard
8 GLM-4-0520 69.4% Official leaderboard
9 ERNIE-4-Turbo-0628 69% Official leaderboard
10 ERNIE-4-Bot-0613 67.5% Official leaderboard
11 GPT-4 Turbo Apr 2024 67.2% Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
12 GPT-4 Turbo (Jan 2024) 64.7% Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
13 MoonShot-V1-8k 63.8% Official leaderboard
14 ERNIE-3.5-0613 62.7% Official leaderboard
15 Yi-Large 62.3% May 2024 Official leaderboard
16 Qwen1.5-110B-Chat 61.5% Official leaderboard
17 abab6.5-chat 60.9% Official leaderboard
18 YI-1.5-34B-Chat 60.7% Official leaderboard
19 Qwen1.5-72B 60.6% Feb 2024 Official leaderboard
20 GLM-4-9B-Chat 59.6% Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
21 Qwen1.5-32B-Chat 57.8% Official leaderboard
22 Qwen2-7B-Instruct 50.2% Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
23 Qwen1.5-14B-Chat 49.8% Feb 2024 Official leaderboard
24 Qwen1.5-7B-Chat 46.5% Feb 2024 Official leaderboard
25 DeepSeek-67B-Chat 46.4% Official leaderboard
26 GPT-3.5-Turbo-1106 46.4% Official leaderboard
27 InternLM2-Chat-7B 42.9% Official leaderboard
28 Llama-3-70B-Instruct-CN 42.9% Official leaderboard
29 Llama-3-70B-Instruct 41.4% Official leaderboard
30 Llama-3-8B-Instruct-CN 41.2% Official leaderboard
31 DeepSeek-7B-Chat 35.6% Official leaderboard
32 DeepSeek-V2-Lite-Chat 35.5% Official leaderboard
33 Baichuan2-13B-Chat 32.2% Sep 2023 Official leaderboard
34 Qwen1.5-32B 31.6% Feb 2024 Official leaderboard
35 Llama-3-8B-Instruct 29.7% Official leaderboard
36 BaiChuan-13B-Chat 28.1% Official leaderboard
37 Qwen1.5-4B-Chat 28% Feb 2024 Official leaderboard
38 Vicuna-33B-V13 27.4% Official leaderboard
39 Qwen2-7B 25.4% Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
40 Qwen2-1.5B-Instruct 24.2% Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
41 Vicuna-13B-v1.3 24% Jun 2023 Official leaderboard
42 Llama-2-13B-Chat 22.9% Official leaderboard
43 Qwen1.5-14B 22.8% Feb 2024 Official leaderboard
44 Vicuna-7B-V13 21.5% Official leaderboard
45 Conifer-Test 20.6% Official leaderboard
46 Llama-2-7B-Chat 20.1% Official leaderboard
47 Qwen1.5-7B 17.7% Feb 2024 Official leaderboard
48 Qwen1.5-4B 15.7% Official leaderboard
49 Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct 14.1% Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
50 Conifer-Base 14% Official leaderboard
51 Mistral-7B-Instruct-V03 5.40% Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Hunyuan-T1 81% Mar 2025 Lab model card
2 Baichuan-M2-32B 77.6% Aug 2025 Lab model card
3 o1-preview 71.8% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
4 Qwen2-72B 70.5% Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
5 GPT-4 Turbo Apr 2024 67.2% Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
6 GPT-4 Turbo (Jan 2024) 64.7% Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
7 Yi-Large 62.3% May 2024 Official leaderboard
8 Qwen1.5-72B 60.6% Feb 2024 Official leaderboard
9 GLM-4-9B-Chat 59.6% Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
10 Qwen2-7B-Instruct 50.2% Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
11 Qwen1.5-14B-Chat 49.8% Feb 2024 Official leaderboard
12 Qwen1.5-7B-Chat 46.5% Feb 2024 Official leaderboard
13 Baichuan2-13B-Chat 32.2% Sep 2023 Official leaderboard
14 Qwen1.5-32B 31.6% Feb 2024 Official leaderboard
15 Qwen1.5-4B-Chat 28% Feb 2024 Official leaderboard
16 Qwen2-7B 25.4% Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
17 Qwen2-1.5B-Instruct 24.2% Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
18 Vicuna-13B-v1.3 24% Jun 2023 Official leaderboard
19 Qwen1.5-14B 22.8% Feb 2024 Official leaderboard
20 Qwen1.5-7B 17.7% Feb 2024 Official leaderboard
21 Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct 14.1% Jun 2024 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 2 models in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

2 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in August 2024 3 models have held number one with claims included since its release in August 2024

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

Qwen OpenAI Tencent
Own leaderboard Not tested since Sep 2024
o1-preview 71.8%
Lab claims Not tested since Sep 2025

Sources: Official CFBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2023 2024 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Hunyuan-T1 o1-preview GPT-4 Turbo Baichuan2-13B-Chat Vicuna-13B-v1.3 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2023 2024 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Hunyuan-T1 o1-preview

Sources: Official CFBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards

No launch post has listed it since August 2025

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Tencent
Baichuan
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Aug 10, 2025 Baichuan-M2-32B 77.6 CFBench
Mar 21, 2025 Hunyuan-T1 81 CFBench

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Sep 2, 2025 Baichuan-M2-32B technical report 77.6 CF-Bench (Table 1) Capabilities

More in Instructions and chat

All 81 in Instructions and chat
  • IFEval In use Models answer about 500 prompts containing verifiable instructions such as word limits or required keywords. Code checks each instruction for strict and loose accuracy. Gemma 4 31B IT 98.9%
  • IFBench In use 58 new out-of-domain verifiable output constraints. Scored by programmatic constraint checks (strict or loose). Nemotron-Cascade 2 30B-A3B 82.9%
  • MultiChallenge In use Multi-turn conversations testing instruction retention, inference memory, versioned editing and self-coherence. Graded by LLM judge with rubrics. GPT-6.1 Sol 82%
  • Multi-IF In use Models follow verifiable instructions over three-turn conversations in eight languages, extending IFEval. Scored by instruction accuracy at each turn. LFM3-1.7B 89.1%
  • AdvancedIF In use Models respond to over 1,600 prompts with complex, multi-turn, and system-level instructions. A judge model checks each response against expert-written rubrics. MAI-Thinking-1 85%
  • IFStruct In use Models generate JSON or YAML that must follow a requested schema and phrasing constraints, without constrained decoding. A response passes only if every structural constraint holds. Gemma 4 31B IT 95.9%