CheXpert
Models read chest radiographs and label up to 14 observations. The test labels come from board-certified radiologists.
The full set has 224,316 radiographs of 65,240 patients. Google's MedGemma cards report average F1 over 5 conditions.
- Released
- January 2019
- Kind
- Medicine
- Level
- Expert
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Short answer
- Tasks
- Public, plus a private test set
In the authors’ words
Large, labeled datasets have driven deep learning methods to achieve expert-level performance on a variety of medical imaging tasks. We present CheXpert, a large dataset that contains 224,316 chest radiographs of 65,240 patients. We design a labeler to automatically detect the presence of 14 observations in radiology reports, capturing uncertainties inherent in radiograph interpretation. We investigate different approaches to using the uncertainty labels for training convolutional neural networks that output the probability of these observations given the available frontal and lateral radiographs. On a validation set of 200 chest radiographic studies which were manually annotated by 3 board-certified radiologists, we find that different uncertainty approaches are useful for different pathologies. We then evaluate our best model on a test set composed of 500 chest radiographic studies annotated by a consensus of 5 board-certified radiologists, and compare the performance of our model to that of 3 additional radiologists in the detection of 5 selected pathologies. On Cardiomegaly, Edema, and Pleural Effusion, the model ROC and PR curves lie above all 3 radiologist operating points. We release the dataset to the public as a standard benchmark to evaluate performance of chest radiograph interpretation models. The dataset is freely available at https://stanfordmlgroup.github.io/competitions/chexpert .
Hierarchical-Learning-V1 (ensemble) Vingroup Big Data Institute tops the leaderboard with 93%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
- 93.0 Hierarchical-Learning-V1 (ensemble) Vingroup Big Data Institute
- 93.0 DeepAUC-v1 ensemble
- 92.9 YWW(ensemble) JF&NNU
- 92.9 Conditional-Training-LSR ensemble
- 92.9 Conditional-Training-LSR-V1 ensemble
- 92.9 Hierarchical-Learning-V0 (ensemble) Vingroup Big Data Institute
- 92.9 Hierarchical-Learning-V4 (ensemble) Vingroup Big Data Institute
- 92.8 Multi-Stage-Learning-CNN-V3 (ensemble) VINBDI Medical Imaging Team
- 92.8 DeepCNNsGM(ensemble) HUST
- 92.7 ihil (ensemble) UESTC
- 92.7 SenseXDR ensemble
- 92.7 desmond https://github.com/inisis/chexpert
- 92.7 inisis https://github.com/inisis/chexpert
- 92.7 DeepCNNs(ensemble) HUST
- 92.6 JF aboy ensemble_V2 JF HEALTHCARE
- 92.6 yww
- 92.6 DRNet (ensemble) UESTC and SenseTime
- 92.6 Anatomy-XNet-V1 ensemble
- 92.5 hoanganh_VB_ensemble35
- 92.5 hoanganh_VB_ensemble37
- 92.5 alimebkovkz
- 92.4 uestc
- 92.4 Hierarchical-CNN-Ensemble-V1 (ensemble) Vingroup Big Data Institute
- 92.4 as-hust-v3 ensemble
- 92.4 Hoang_VB_ensemble31_v2
- 92.4 Hoang_VB_ensemble31_v1
- 92.4 tedtta
- 92.4 hoanganh_VB_VN3
- 92.3 YJ&&YWW :
- 92.3 Multi-Stage-Learning-CNN-V2 (ensemble) VINBDI Medical Imaging Team
- 92.3 as-hust-v1 ensemble
- 92.3 hoanganhcnu_ensemble27_v1
- 92.3 hoanganhcnu_ensemble27_v2
- 92.3 Weighted-CNN(ensemble) HUST
- 92.3 DE_APR ensemble ltts
- 92.3 DE_APR_N ensemble ltts
- 92.3 Maxium (ensemble) Macao Polytechnic University
- 92.2 null
- 92.2 as-hust-v2 ensemble
- 92.2 Average-CNN(ensemble) HUST
- 92.2 MaxAUC ensemble
- 92.1 hyc ensemble
- 92.1 zjr(ensembel) CSU
- 92.1 hoangnguyenkcv17
- 92.1 SuperCNNv3 ensemble
- 92.0 HOANG_VB_VN_2 ensemble
- 91.9 JF Coolver ensemble ensemble model
- 91.9 JF aboy ensemble_V1 JF HEALTHCARE
- 91.9 BDNB ensemble
- 91.9 brian-baseline-v2 ensemble
- 91.9 hoangnn9 ensemble VBVN
- 91.9 thang ensemble coloa
- 91.8 Mehdi_You (ensemble) IPM_HPC
- 91.8 DE_JUN4_RS_EN ensemble LTTS
- 91.8 A Good Model (single model) Macao Polytechnic University
- 91.7 Ensemble_v2 Ian, Wingspan
- 91.7 Deep-CNNs-V1 ensemble
- 91.7 thangbk(ensemble) SNU
- 91.7 vdn6 ensemble ltts
- 91.7 Overfit ensemble OTH-AW
- 91.7 Anatomy-XNet (ensemble) mHealth-BUET
- 91.6 Multi-Stage-Learning-CNN-V0 ensemble
- 91.6 ATT-AW-v1 ensemble
- 91.6 DE_JUN1_RS_EN ensemble LTTS
- 91.6 DE_JUN3_RS_EN ensemble LTTS
- 91.5 Deadpoppy Ensemble ensemble model
- 91.5 zhangjingyang
- 91.5 TGNB ensemble
- 91.5 hoangnguyenkcv-ensemble28 ensemble
- 91.5 ensemble SNU
- 91.4 Deep-CNNs (ensemble) Vingroup Big Data Institute
- 91.4 GRNB ensemble
- 91.4 DE_JUN2_RS_EN ensemble LTTS
- 91.3 JF Deadpoppy ensemble
- 91.3 YWW-YJ:
- 91.3 Sky-Model ensemble
- 91.2 zjy ensemble
- 91.2 WL_Baseline (ensemble) WL
- 91.1 songtao
- 91.1 brian-baseline ensemble
- 91.1 bhtrung
- 91.1 KCV-CNN-ensemble-CNU
- 91.1 DS_APR single model LTTS
- 91.1 DS_APR_N single model ltts
- 91.1 anatomy_xnet_v1 (single model) BUET
- 91.0 ensemble SNU3
- 90.9 HinaNetV2 (ensemble) VietAI
- 90.9 G_Mans_ensemble
- 90.9 KD-Prune10 (Single model) MPU
- 90.8 guran_rib
- 90.8 vdnnn (ensemble) LTTS
- 90.8 BAAZT Ensemble
- 90.7 Stanford Baseline (ensemble) Stanford University
- 90.7 muti_base (ensemble) SCU_MILAB
- 90.7 vbn (single model) LTTS
- 90.7 Z_Ensemble_V1
- 90.6 {ForwardModelEnsembleCorrected} (ensemble) Stanford
- 90.6 LBC-v2 (ensemble) Macao Polytechnic University
- 90.5 Multi-CNN ensemble
- 90.5 hyc
- 90.5 ForwardMECorrectedFull (ensemble) Institution
- 90.4 JustAnotherDensenet single model
- 90.3 Orlando (single model) Macao Polytechnic University
- 90.2 DeepLungsEnsemble Alimbekov R. & Vassilenko I.
- 90.2 Max (single model) Macao Polytechnic University
- 90.1 Ensemble_v1 Ian, Wingspan
- 90.1 Nakajima_ayase
- 90.0 MLC11 NotDense (single-model) Leibniz University Hannover
- 90.0 vn_2 single_model ltts
- 89.9 {AVG_MAX}(ensemble) NNU
- 89.9 adoudou
- 89.9 llllldz single model
- 89.9 DiseaseNet Samg2003 single model, DPS RKP,
- 89.9 LBC-v0 (ensemble) Macao Polytechnic University
- 89.9 Z_Ensemble_2
- 89.8 BUAA
- 89.8 ljc2266
- 89.8 G_Mans_v2 (single model): LibAUC + coat_mini timm lib
- 89.7 ForwardModelEnsemble (ensemble) Stanford
- 89.7 NewTrickTest (ensemble) XBSJ
- 89.7 AccidentNet v1 (single model) Macao Polytechnic Institute
- 89.6 ldz single model
- 89.6 ylz-v01 single model
- 89.6 Densenet single
- 89.6 Stellarium-CheXpert-Local single model
- 89.5 Deadpoppy Single single model
- 89.5 hust(single model) HUST
- 89.5 {koala-large} (single model) SJTU
- 89.5 MVD121 single model
- 89.4 U-Random-Ind (single) BHSB
- 89.4 hycNB
- 89.4 zhujieru
- 89.4 MM1 ensemble
- 89.2 HybridModelEnsemble (ensemble) Stanford
- 89.1 ylz-v02 single model
- 89.1 MVD121-320 single model
- 89.0 Haruka_Hamasaki
- 89.0 pause single model
- 88.9 DenseNet169 at 320x320 (single model) Lafayette
- 88.9 LR-baseline (ensemble) IITB
- 88.8 DataAugFTW (single model) University Hannover
- 88.8 {koala} (single model) SJTU
- 88.7 Stellarium single model
- 88.7 pm_rn50_0.15ppl
- 88.6 baseline3 single model
- 88.6 MVR50 single model
- 88.6 PrateekMunjal
- 88.4 Coolver XH single model
- 88.4 MNet-Fix (Single Model) MPU
- 88.3 Naive Densenet single model
- 88.3 mhealth_buet (single model) BUET
- 88.2 DearBrave (single model) Macao Polytechnic Institute
- 88.2 Aoitori (single model) Macao Polytechnic Institute
- 88.2 {chexpert-classifier}(single model) G42
- 88.1 AccidentNet V2 (single model) Macao Polytechnic Institute
- 88.0 {densenet} (single model) Microsoft
- 87.9 Yoake (single model) Macao Polytechnic Institute
- 87.8 MLC11 Baseline (single-model) Leibniz University Hannover
- 87.6 DenseNet single
- 87.6 HCL1 (single model) LTTS
- 87.5 MLGCN (single model) sensetime
- 87.5 GCN_densenet121-single model
- 87.3 Multi-CNN (ensemble) VinGroup Big Data Institute
- 87.3 GreenTeaCalpis (single model) Macao Polytechnic Institute
- 87.1 BASELINE ResNet50 ensemble
- 86.8 baseline1 (single model) Endimension
- 86.8 Baseline DenseNet161 single model
- 86.5 DSENet single model
- 86.3 Densenet-Basic Single NUST
- 86.2 KD_Mobilenet (single model) IPM
- 86.1 {GoDense} (single model) UPenn
- 86.1 inceptionv3_single_NNU
- 86.0 BASELINE Acorn single model
- 86.0 MLKD (Single model) IPM
- 85.9 ErrorNet (single model) IPM
- 85.9 SleepNet (single model) MPI
- 85.8 baseline2 single model
- 85.8 UMLS_CLIP (single model) SJTU
- 85.4 haw02 (single model) IPM
- 85.3 CombinedTrainDenseNet121 (single model) University of Westminster, Silva R.
- 85.1 rayOfLightSingle (Single Model) GeorgiaTech CSE6250 Team58
- 85.0 Model_Team_34 (single model) Gatech
- 85.0 Test model habbes
- 84.8 Baseline Ensemble
- 84.8 model2_DenseNet121 single
- 84.4 HinaNet (single model) VietAI
- 84.2 singlehead_models (single model combined) Gatech CSE6250 Team30
- 84.0 mwowra-conditional (single) AGH UST
- 83.8 multihead_model (one model for all pathologies) Gatech CSE6250 Team30
- 83.7 mobilenet (single model) ipm
- 83.5 Grp12BigCNN ensemble
- 83.4 MLC9_Densenet (single model) Leibniz University Hannover
- 83.0 Grp12v2USup2OSamp (ensemble) AITD
- 82.2 DNET121-single Ian,Wingspan
- 76.9 12ASLv2(single) AITD
- 76.0 DenseNet121 (single model) hemil10
- 73.6 12ASLv1(single) AITD
- 72.7 rayOfLight (ensemble) GeorgiaTech CSE6250 Team58
- 72.4 BASELINE DenseNet121 single model
- 1 Hierarchical-Learning-V1 (ensemble) Vingroup Big Data Institute 93%
- 2 DeepAUC-v1 ensemble 93%
- 3 YWW(ensemble) JF&NNU 92.9%
- 4 Conditional-Training-LSR ensemble 92.9%
- 5 Conditional-Training-LSR-V1 ensemble 92.9%
- 6 Hierarchical-Learning-V0 (ensemble) Vingroup Big Data Institute 92.9%
- 7 Hierarchical-Learning-V4 (ensemble) Vingroup Big Data Institute 92.9%
- 8 Multi-Stage-Learning-CNN-V3 (ensemble) VINBDI Medical Imaging Team 92.8%
- 9 DeepCNNsGM(ensemble) HUST 92.8%
- 10 ihil (ensemble) UESTC 92.7%
- 11 SenseXDR ensemble 92.7%
- 12 desmond https://github.com/inisis/chexpert 92.7%
- 13 inisis https://github.com/inisis/chexpert 92.7%
- 14 DeepCNNs(ensemble) HUST 92.7%
- 15 JF aboy ensemble_V2 JF HEALTHCARE 92.6%
- 16 yww 92.6%
- 17 DRNet (ensemble) UESTC and SenseTime 92.6%
- 18 Anatomy-XNet-V1 ensemble 92.6%
- 19 hoanganh_VB_ensemble35 92.5%
- 20 hoanganh_VB_ensemble37 92.5%
- 21 alimebkovkz 92.5%
- 22 uestc 92.4%
- 23 Hierarchical-CNN-Ensemble-V1 (ensemble) Vingroup Big Data Institute 92.4%
- 24 as-hust-v3 ensemble 92.4%
- 25 Hoang_VB_ensemble31_v2 92.4%
- 26 Hoang_VB_ensemble31_v1 92.4%
- 27 tedtta 92.4%
- 28 hoanganh_VB_VN3 92.4%
- 29 YJ&&YWW : 92.3%
- 30 Multi-Stage-Learning-CNN-V2 (ensemble) VINBDI Medical Imaging Team 92.3%
- 31 as-hust-v1 ensemble 92.3%
- 32 hoanganhcnu_ensemble27_v1 92.3%
- 33 hoanganhcnu_ensemble27_v2 92.3%
- 34 Weighted-CNN(ensemble) HUST 92.3%
- 35 DE_APR ensemble ltts 92.3%
- 36 DE_APR_N ensemble ltts 92.3%
- 37 Maxium (ensemble) Macao Polytechnic University 92.3%
- 38 null 92.2%
- 39 as-hust-v2 ensemble 92.2%
- 40 Average-CNN(ensemble) HUST 92.2%
- 41 MaxAUC ensemble 92.2%
- 42 hyc ensemble 92.1%
- 43 zjr(ensembel) CSU 92.1%
- 44 hoangnguyenkcv17 92.1%
- 45 SuperCNNv3 ensemble 92.1%
- 46 HOANG_VB_VN_2 ensemble 92%
- 47 JF Coolver ensemble ensemble model 91.9%
- 48 JF aboy ensemble_V1 JF HEALTHCARE 91.9%
- 49 BDNB ensemble 91.9%
- 50 brian-baseline-v2 ensemble 91.9%
- 51 hoangnn9 ensemble VBVN 91.9%
- 52 thang ensemble coloa 91.9%
- 53 Mehdi_You (ensemble) IPM_HPC 91.8%
- 54 DE_JUN4_RS_EN ensemble LTTS 91.8%
- 55 A Good Model (single model) Macao Polytechnic University 91.8%
- 56 Ensemble_v2 Ian, Wingspan 91.7%
- 57 Deep-CNNs-V1 ensemble 91.7%
- 58 thangbk(ensemble) SNU 91.7%
- 59 vdn6 ensemble ltts 91.7%
- 60 Overfit ensemble OTH-AW 91.7%
- 61 Anatomy-XNet (ensemble) mHealth-BUET 91.7%
- 62 Multi-Stage-Learning-CNN-V0 ensemble 91.6%
- 63 ATT-AW-v1 ensemble 91.6%
- 64 DE_JUN1_RS_EN ensemble LTTS 91.6%
- 65 DE_JUN3_RS_EN ensemble LTTS 91.6%
- 66 Deadpoppy Ensemble ensemble model 91.5%
- 67 zhangjingyang 91.5%
- 68 TGNB ensemble 91.5%
- 69 hoangnguyenkcv-ensemble28 ensemble 91.5%
- 70 ensemble SNU 91.5%
- 71 Deep-CNNs (ensemble) Vingroup Big Data Institute 91.4%
- 72 GRNB ensemble 91.4%
- 73 DE_JUN2_RS_EN ensemble LTTS 91.4%
- 74 JF Deadpoppy ensemble 91.3%
- 75 YWW-YJ: 91.3%
- 76 Sky-Model ensemble 91.3%
- 77 zjy ensemble 91.2%
- 78 WL_Baseline (ensemble) WL 91.2%
- 79 songtao 91.1%
- 80 brian-baseline ensemble 91.1%
- 81 bhtrung 91.1%
- 82 KCV-CNN-ensemble-CNU 91.1%
- 83 DS_APR single model LTTS 91.1%
- 84 DS_APR_N single model ltts 91.1%
- 85 anatomy_xnet_v1 (single model) BUET 91.1%
- 86 ensemble SNU3 91%
- 87 HinaNetV2 (ensemble) VietAI 90.9%
- 88 G_Mans_ensemble 90.9%
- 89 KD-Prune10 (Single model) MPU 90.9%
- 90 guran_rib 90.8%
- 91 vdnnn (ensemble) LTTS 90.8%
- 92 BAAZT Ensemble 90.8%
- 93 Stanford Baseline (ensemble) Stanford University 90.7%
- 94 muti_base (ensemble) SCU_MILAB 90.7%
- 95 vbn (single model) LTTS 90.7%
- 96 Z_Ensemble_V1 90.7%
- 97 {ForwardModelEnsembleCorrected} (ensemble) Stanford 90.6%
- 98 LBC-v2 (ensemble) Macao Polytechnic University 90.6%
- 99 Multi-CNN ensemble 90.5%
- 100 hyc 90.5%
- 101 ForwardMECorrectedFull (ensemble) Institution 90.5%
- 102 JustAnotherDensenet single model 90.4%
- 103 Orlando (single model) Macao Polytechnic University 90.3%
- 104 DeepLungsEnsemble Alimbekov R. & Vassilenko I. 90.2%
- 105 Max (single model) Macao Polytechnic University 90.2%
- 106 Ensemble_v1 Ian, Wingspan 90.1%
- 107 Nakajima_ayase 90.1%
- 108 MLC11 NotDense (single-model) Leibniz University Hannover 90%
- 109 vn_2 single_model ltts 90%
- 110 {AVG_MAX}(ensemble) NNU 89.9%
- 111 adoudou 89.9%
- 112 llllldz single model 89.9%
- 113 DiseaseNet Samg2003 single model, DPS RKP, 89.9%
- 114 LBC-v0 (ensemble) Macao Polytechnic University 89.9%
- 115 Z_Ensemble_2 89.9%
- 116 BUAA 89.8%
- 117 ljc2266 89.8%
- 118 G_Mans_v2 (single model): LibAUC + coat_mini timm lib 89.8%
- 119 ForwardModelEnsemble (ensemble) Stanford 89.7%
- 120 NewTrickTest (ensemble) XBSJ 89.7%
- 121 AccidentNet v1 (single model) Macao Polytechnic Institute 89.7%
- 122 ldz single model 89.6%
- 123 ylz-v01 single model 89.6%
- 124 Densenet single 89.6%
- 125 Stellarium-CheXpert-Local single model 89.6%
- 126 Deadpoppy Single single model 89.5%
- 127 hust(single model) HUST 89.5%
- 128 {koala-large} (single model) SJTU 89.5%
- 129 MVD121 single model 89.5%
- 130 U-Random-Ind (single) BHSB 89.4%
- 131 hycNB 89.4%
- 132 zhujieru 89.4%
- 133 MM1 ensemble 89.4%
- 134 HybridModelEnsemble (ensemble) Stanford 89.2%
- 135 ylz-v02 single model 89.1%
- 136 MVD121-320 single model 89.1%
- 137 Haruka_Hamasaki 89%
- 138 pause single model 89%
- 139 DenseNet169 at 320x320 (single model) Lafayette 88.9%
- 140 LR-baseline (ensemble) IITB 88.9%
- 141 DataAugFTW (single model) University Hannover 88.8%
- 142 {koala} (single model) SJTU 88.8%
- 143 Stellarium single model 88.7%
- 144 pm_rn50_0.15ppl 88.7%
- 145 baseline3 single model 88.6%
- 146 MVR50 single model 88.6%
- 147 PrateekMunjal 88.6%
- 148 Coolver XH single model 88.4%
- 149 MNet-Fix (Single Model) MPU 88.4%
- 150 Naive Densenet single model 88.3%
- 151 mhealth_buet (single model) BUET 88.3%
- 152 DearBrave (single model) Macao Polytechnic Institute 88.2%
- 153 Aoitori (single model) Macao Polytechnic Institute 88.2%
- 154 {chexpert-classifier}(single model) G42 88.2%
- 155 AccidentNet V2 (single model) Macao Polytechnic Institute 88.1%
- 156 {densenet} (single model) Microsoft 88%
- 157 Yoake (single model) Macao Polytechnic Institute 87.9%
- 158 MLC11 Baseline (single-model) Leibniz University Hannover 87.8%
- 159 DenseNet single 87.6%
- 160 HCL1 (single model) LTTS 87.6%
- 161 MLGCN (single model) sensetime 87.5%
- 162 GCN_densenet121-single model 87.5%
- 163 Multi-CNN (ensemble) VinGroup Big Data Institute 87.3%
- 164 GreenTeaCalpis (single model) Macao Polytechnic Institute 87.3%
- 165 BASELINE ResNet50 ensemble 87.1%
- 166 baseline1 (single model) Endimension 86.8%
- 167 Baseline DenseNet161 single model 86.8%
- 168 DSENet single model 86.5%
- 169 Densenet-Basic Single NUST 86.3%
- 170 KD_Mobilenet (single model) IPM 86.2%
- 171 {GoDense} (single model) UPenn 86.1%
- 172 inceptionv3_single_NNU 86.1%
- 173 BASELINE Acorn single model 86%
- 174 MLKD (Single model) IPM 86%
- 175 ErrorNet (single model) IPM 85.9%
- 176 SleepNet (single model) MPI 85.9%
- 177 baseline2 single model 85.8%
- 178 UMLS_CLIP (single model) SJTU 85.8%
- 179 haw02 (single model) IPM 85.4%
- 180 CombinedTrainDenseNet121 (single model) University of Westminster, Silva R. 85.3%
- 181 rayOfLightSingle (Single Model) GeorgiaTech CSE6250 Team58 85.1%
- 182 Model_Team_34 (single model) Gatech 85%
- 183 Test model habbes 85%
- 184 Baseline Ensemble 84.8%
- 185 model2_DenseNet121 single 84.8%
- 186 HinaNet (single model) VietAI 84.4%
- 187 singlehead_models (single model combined) Gatech CSE6250 Team30 84.2%
- 188 mwowra-conditional (single) AGH UST 84%
- 189 multihead_model (one model for all pathologies) Gatech CSE6250 Team30 83.8%
- 190 mobilenet (single model) ipm 83.7%
- 191 Grp12BigCNN ensemble 83.5%
- 192 MLC9_Densenet (single model) Leibniz University Hannover 83.4%
- 193 Grp12v2USup2OSamp (ensemble) AITD 83%
- 194 DNET121-single Ian,Wingspan 82.2%
- 195 12ASLv2(single) AITD 76.9%
- 196 DenseNet121 (single model) hemil10 76%
- 197 12ASLv1(single) AITD 73.6%
- 198 rayOfLight (ensemble) GeorgiaTech CSE6250 Team58 72.7%
- 199 BASELINE DenseNet121 single model 72.4%
Source: Official CheXpert leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hierarchical-Learning-V1 (ensemble) Vingroup Big Data Institute | 93% | Sep 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | DeepAUC-v1 ensemble | 93% | Aug 2020 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | YWW(ensemble) JF&NNU | 92.9% | Oct 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | Conditional-Training-LSR ensemble | 92.9% | Oct 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | Conditional-Training-LSR-V1 ensemble | 92.9% | Oct 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | Hierarchical-Learning-V0 (ensemble) Vingroup Big Data Institute | 92.9% | Nov 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | Hierarchical-Learning-V4 (ensemble) Vingroup Big Data Institute | 92.9% | Dec 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | Multi-Stage-Learning-CNN-V3 (ensemble) VINBDI Medical Imaging Team | 92.8% | Sep 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | DeepCNNsGM(ensemble) HUST | 92.8% | Dec 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | ihil (ensemble) UESTC | 92.7% | Sep 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | SenseXDR ensemble | 92.7% | Sep 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | desmond https://github.com/inisis/chexpert | 92.7% | Dec 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | inisis https://github.com/inisis/chexpert | 92.7% | Dec 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | DeepCNNs(ensemble) HUST | 92.7% | Dec 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | JF aboy ensemble_V2 JF HEALTHCARE | 92.6% | Jul 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | yww | 92.6% | Sep 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | DRNet (ensemble) UESTC and SenseTime | 92.6% | Sep 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | Anatomy-XNet-V1 ensemble | 92.6% | Jul 2022 | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | hoanganh_VB_ensemble35 | 92.5% | Dec 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | hoanganh_VB_ensemble37 | 92.5% | Dec 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 21 | alimebkovkz | 92.5% | Feb 2020 | Official leaderboard | |
| 22 | uestc | 92.4% | Sep 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 23 | Hierarchical-CNN-Ensemble-V1 (ensemble) Vingroup Big Data Institute | 92.4% | Sep 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 24 | as-hust-v3 ensemble | 92.4% | Dec 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 25 | Hoang_VB_ensemble31_v2 | 92.4% | Dec 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 26 | Hoang_VB_ensemble31_v1 | 92.4% | Dec 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 27 | tedtta | 92.4% | Dec 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 28 | hoanganh_VB_VN3 | 92.4% | Jan 2020 | Official leaderboard | |
| 29 | YJ&&YWW : | 92.3% | Aug 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 30 | Multi-Stage-Learning-CNN-V2 (ensemble) VINBDI Medical Imaging Team | 92.3% | Aug 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 31 | as-hust-v1 ensemble | 92.3% | Dec 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 32 | hoanganhcnu_ensemble27_v1 | 92.3% | Dec 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 33 | hoanganhcnu_ensemble27_v2 | 92.3% | Dec 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 34 | Weighted-CNN(ensemble) HUST | 92.3% | Dec 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 35 | DE_APR ensemble ltts | 92.3% | Apr 2020 | Official leaderboard | |
| 36 | DE_APR_N ensemble ltts | 92.3% | Apr 2020 | Official leaderboard | |
| 37 | Maxium (ensemble) Macao Polytechnic University | 92.3% | Sep 2022 | Official leaderboard | |
| 38 | null | 92.2% | Sep 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 39 | as-hust-v2 ensemble | 92.2% | Dec 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 40 | Average-CNN(ensemble) HUST | 92.2% | Dec 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 41 | MaxAUC ensemble | 92.2% | Aug 2020 | Official leaderboard | |
| 42 | hyc ensemble | 92.1% | Aug 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 43 | zjr(ensembel) CSU | 92.1% | Aug 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 44 | hoangnguyenkcv17 | 92.1% | Nov 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 45 | SuperCNNv3 ensemble | 92.1% | Sep 2020 | Official leaderboard | |
| 46 | HOANG_VB_VN_2 ensemble | 92% | Jan 2020 | Official leaderboard | |
| 47 | JF Coolver ensemble ensemble model | 91.9% | Jul 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 48 | JF aboy ensemble_V1 JF HEALTHCARE | 91.9% | Jul 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 49 | BDNB ensemble | 91.9% | Aug 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 50 | brian-baseline-v2 ensemble | 91.9% | Nov 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 51 | hoangnn9 ensemble VBVN | 91.9% | Nov 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 52 | thang ensemble coloa | 91.9% | Dec 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 53 | Mehdi_You (ensemble) IPM_HPC | 91.8% | Jun 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 54 | DE_JUN4_RS_EN ensemble LTTS | 91.8% | Jun 2020 | Official leaderboard | |
| 55 | A Good Model (single model) Macao Polytechnic University | 91.8% | Sep 2022 | Official leaderboard | |
| 56 | Ensemble_v2 Ian, Wingspan | 91.7% | Jul 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 57 | Deep-CNNs-V1 ensemble | 91.7% | Aug 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 58 | thangbk(ensemble) SNU | 91.7% | Nov 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 59 | vdn6 ensemble ltts | 91.7% | Jan 2020 | Official leaderboard | |
| 60 | Overfit ensemble OTH-AW | 91.7% | Oct 2021 | Official leaderboard | |
| 61 | Anatomy-XNet (ensemble) mHealth-BUET | 91.7% | Apr 2022 | Official leaderboard | |
| 62 | Multi-Stage-Learning-CNN-V0 ensemble | 91.6% | Aug 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 63 | ATT-AW-v1 ensemble | 91.6% | Nov 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 64 | DE_JUN1_RS_EN ensemble LTTS | 91.6% | Jun 2020 | Official leaderboard | |
| 65 | DE_JUN3_RS_EN ensemble LTTS | 91.6% | Jun 2020 | Official leaderboard | |
| 66 | Deadpoppy Ensemble ensemble model | 91.5% | Jul 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 67 | zhangjingyang | 91.5% | Aug 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 68 | TGNB ensemble | 91.5% | Aug 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 69 | hoangnguyenkcv-ensemble28 ensemble | 91.5% | Nov 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 70 | ensemble SNU | 91.5% | Dec 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 71 | Deep-CNNs (ensemble) Vingroup Big Data Institute | 91.4% | Jul 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 72 | GRNB ensemble | 91.4% | Aug 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 73 | DE_JUN2_RS_EN ensemble LTTS | 91.4% | Jun 2020 | Official leaderboard | |
| 74 | JF Deadpoppy ensemble | 91.3% | Jul 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 75 | YWW-YJ: | 91.3% | Aug 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 76 | Sky-Model ensemble | 91.3% | Dec 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 77 | zjy ensemble | 91.2% | Aug 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 78 | WL_Baseline (ensemble) WL | 91.2% | Jun 2020 | Official leaderboard | |
| 79 | songtao | 91.1% | Aug 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 80 | brian-baseline ensemble | 91.1% | Oct 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 81 | bhtrung | 91.1% | Oct 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 82 | KCV-CNN-ensemble-CNU | 91.1% | Oct 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 83 | DS_APR single model LTTS | 91.1% | Apr 2020 | Official leaderboard | |
| 84 | DS_APR_N single model ltts | 91.1% | Apr 2020 | Official leaderboard | |
| 85 | anatomy_xnet_v1 (single model) BUET | 91.1% | Oct 2021 | Official leaderboard | |
| 86 | ensemble SNU3 | 91% | Dec 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 87 | HinaNetV2 (ensemble) VietAI | 90.9% | Dec 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 88 | G_Mans_ensemble | 90.9% | Jun 2022 | Official leaderboard | |
| 89 | KD-Prune10 (Single model) MPU | 90.9% | Oct 2022 | Official leaderboard | |
| 90 | guran_rib | 90.8% | Jul 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 91 | vdnnn (ensemble) LTTS | 90.8% | Jan 2020 | Official leaderboard | |
| 92 | BAAZT Ensemble | 90.8% | May 2022 | Official leaderboard | |
| 93 | Stanford Baseline (ensemble) Stanford University | 90.7% | Jan 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 94 | muti_base (ensemble) SCU_MILAB | 90.7% | Apr 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 95 | vbn (single model) LTTS | 90.7% | Jan 2020 | Official leaderboard | |
| 96 | Z_Ensemble_V1 | 90.7% | Mar 2022 | Official leaderboard | |
| 97 | {ForwardModelEnsembleCorrected} (ensemble) Stanford | 90.6% | Sep 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 98 | LBC-v2 (ensemble) Macao Polytechnic University | 90.6% | Oct 2021 | Official leaderboard | |
| 99 | Multi-CNN ensemble | 90.5% | Jun 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 100 | hyc | 90.5% | Jul 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 101 | ForwardMECorrectedFull (ensemble) Institution | 90.5% | Oct 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 102 | JustAnotherDensenet single model | 90.4% | Jun 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 103 | Orlando (single model) Macao Polytechnic University | 90.3% | May 2022 | Official leaderboard | |
| 104 | DeepLungsEnsemble Alimbekov R. & Vassilenko I. | 90.2% | Mar 2020 | Official leaderboard | |
| 105 | Max (single model) Macao Polytechnic University | 90.2% | May 2022 | Official leaderboard | |
| 106 | Ensemble_v1 Ian, Wingspan | 90.1% | Jul 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 107 | Nakajima_ayase | 90.1% | Sep 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 108 | MLC11 NotDense (single-model) Leibniz University Hannover | 90% | May 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 109 | vn_2 single_model ltts | 90% | Jan 2020 | Official leaderboard | |
| 110 | {AVG_MAX}(ensemble) NNU | 89.9% | Jul 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 111 | adoudou | 89.9% | Jul 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 112 | llllldz single model | 89.9% | Jul 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 113 | DiseaseNet Samg2003 single model, DPS RKP, | 89.9% | Aug 2020 | Official leaderboard | |
| 114 | LBC-v0 (ensemble) Macao Polytechnic University | 89.9% | Sep 2021 | Official leaderboard | |
| 115 | Z_Ensemble_2 | 89.9% | Apr 2022 | Official leaderboard | |
| 116 | BUAA | 89.8% | Nov 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 117 | ljc2266 | 89.8% | May 2021 | Official leaderboard | |
| 118 | G_Mans_v2 (single model): LibAUC + coat_mini timm lib | 89.8% | Jan 2022 | Official leaderboard | |
| 119 | ForwardModelEnsemble (ensemble) Stanford | 89.7% | Jun 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 120 | NewTrickTest (ensemble) XBSJ | 89.7% | Aug 2020 | Official leaderboard | |
| 121 | AccidentNet v1 (single model) Macao Polytechnic Institute | 89.7% | May 2021 | Official leaderboard | |
| 122 | ldz single model | 89.6% | Jun 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 123 | ylz-v01 single model | 89.6% | Feb 2020 | Official leaderboard | |
| 124 | Densenet single | 89.6% | Feb 2020 | Official leaderboard | |
| 125 | Stellarium-CheXpert-Local single model | 89.6% | Aug 2021 | Official leaderboard | |
| 126 | Deadpoppy Single single model | 89.5% | Jul 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 127 | hust(single model) HUST | 89.5% | Jul 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 128 | {koala-large} (single model) SJTU | 89.5% | Sep 2020 | Official leaderboard | |
| 129 | MVD121 single model | 89.5% | May 2021 | Official leaderboard | |
| 130 | U-Random-Ind (single) BHSB | 89.4% | Jul 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 131 | hycNB | 89.4% | Jul 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 132 | zhujieru | 89.4% | Jul 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 133 | MM1 ensemble | 89.4% | Dec 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 134 | HybridModelEnsemble (ensemble) Stanford | 89.2% | Jun 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 135 | ylz-v02 single model | 89.1% | Feb 2020 | Official leaderboard | |
| 136 | MVD121-320 single model | 89.1% | May 2021 | Official leaderboard | |
| 137 | Haruka_Hamasaki | 89% | Jul 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 138 | pause single model | 89% | Jul 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 139 | DenseNet169 at 320x320 (single model) Lafayette | 88.9% | Aug 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 140 | LR-baseline (ensemble) IITB | 88.9% | Apr 2020 | Official leaderboard | |
| 141 | DataAugFTW (single model) University Hannover | 88.8% | Jul 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 142 | {koala} (single model) SJTU | 88.8% | Aug 2020 | Official leaderboard | |
| 143 | Stellarium single model | 88.7% | May 2021 | Official leaderboard | |
| 144 | pm_rn50_0.15ppl | 88.7% | Nov 2022 | Official leaderboard | |
| 145 | baseline3 single model | 88.6% | Oct 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 146 | MVR50 single model | 88.6% | May 2021 | Official leaderboard | |
| 147 | PrateekMunjal | 88.6% | Nov 2022 | Official leaderboard | |
| 148 | Coolver XH single model | 88.4% | Jun 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 149 | MNet-Fix (Single Model) MPU | 88.4% | Aug 2022 | Official leaderboard | |
| 150 | Naive Densenet single model | 88.3% | Mar 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 151 | mhealth_buet (single model) BUET | 88.3% | Mar 2021 | Official leaderboard | |
| 152 | DearBrave (single model) Macao Polytechnic Institute | 88.2% | Mar 2021 | Official leaderboard | |
| 153 | Aoitori (single model) Macao Polytechnic Institute | 88.2% | Apr 2021 | Official leaderboard | |
| 154 | {chexpert-classifier}(single model) G42 | 88.2% | Feb 2022 | Official leaderboard | |
| 155 | AccidentNet V2 (single model) Macao Polytechnic Institute | 88.1% | Jun 2021 | Official leaderboard | |
| 156 | {densenet} (single model) Microsoft | 88% | May 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 157 | Yoake (single model) Macao Polytechnic Institute | 87.9% | Mar 2021 | Official leaderboard | |
| 158 | MLC11 Baseline (single-model) Leibniz University Hannover | 87.8% | May 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 159 | DenseNet single | 87.6% | Jul 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 160 | HCL1 (single model) LTTS | 87.6% | Nov 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 161 | MLGCN (single model) sensetime | 87.5% | Jul 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 162 | GCN_densenet121-single model | 87.5% | Oct 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 163 | Multi-CNN (ensemble) VinGroup Big Data Institute | 87.3% | Jun 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 164 | GreenTeaCalpis (single model) Macao Polytechnic Institute | 87.3% | Feb 2021 | Official leaderboard | |
| 165 | BASELINE ResNet50 ensemble | 87.1% | Oct 2021 | Official leaderboard | |
| 166 | baseline1 (single model) Endimension | 86.8% | Oct 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 167 | Baseline DenseNet161 single model | 86.8% | Aug 2021 | Official leaderboard | |
| 168 | DSENet single model | 86.5% | May 2020 | Official leaderboard | |
| 169 | Densenet-Basic Single NUST | 86.3% | Apr 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 170 | KD_Mobilenet (single model) IPM | 86.2% | Aug 2022 | Official leaderboard | |
| 171 | {GoDense} (single model) UPenn | 86.1% | Apr 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 172 | inceptionv3_single_NNU | 86.1% | May 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 173 | BASELINE Acorn single model | 86% | Jun 2020 | Official leaderboard | |
| 174 | MLKD (Single model) IPM | 86% | Aug 2022 | Official leaderboard | |
| 175 | ErrorNet (single model) IPM | 85.9% | Mar 2022 | Official leaderboard | |
| 176 | SleepNet (single model) MPI | 85.9% | Mar 2022 | Official leaderboard | |
| 177 | baseline2 single model | 85.8% | Oct 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 178 | UMLS_CLIP (single model) SJTU | 85.8% | Oct 2022 | Official leaderboard | |
| 179 | haw02 (single model) IPM | 85.4% | Feb 2022 | Official leaderboard | |
| 180 | CombinedTrainDenseNet121 (single model) University of Westminster, Silva R. | 85.3% | Jul 2020 | Official leaderboard | |
| 181 | rayOfLightSingle (Single Model) GeorgiaTech CSE6250 Team58 | 85.1% | Apr 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 182 | Model_Team_34 (single model) Gatech | 85% | Apr 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 183 | Test model habbes | 85% | Apr 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 184 | Baseline Ensemble | 84.8% | Apr 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 185 | model2_DenseNet121 single | 84.8% | Feb 2021 | Official leaderboard | |
| 186 | HinaNet (single model) VietAI | 84.4% | Nov 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 187 | singlehead_models (single model combined) Gatech CSE6250 Team30 | 84.2% | Apr 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 188 | mwowra-conditional (single) AGH UST | 84% | Jan 2021 | Official leaderboard | |
| 189 | multihead_model (one model for all pathologies) Gatech CSE6250 Team30 | 83.8% | Apr 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 190 | mobilenet (single model) ipm | 83.7% | Aug 2022 | Official leaderboard | |
| 191 | Grp12BigCNN ensemble | 83.5% | Sep 2020 | Official leaderboard | |
| 192 | MLC9_Densenet (single model) Leibniz University Hannover | 83.4% | Jun 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 193 | Grp12v2USup2OSamp (ensemble) AITD | 83% | Feb 2020 | Official leaderboard | |
| 194 | DNET121-single Ian,Wingspan | 82.2% | May 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 195 | 12ASLv2(single) AITD | 76.9% | Jul 2020 | Official leaderboard | |
| 196 | DenseNet121 (single model) hemil10 | 76% | May 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 197 | 12ASLv1(single) AITD | 73.6% | Jul 2020 | Official leaderboard | |
| 198 | rayOfLight (ensemble) GeorgiaTech CSE6250 Team58 | 72.7% | Apr 2019 | Official leaderboard | |
| 199 | BASELINE DenseNet121 single model | 72.4% | Nov 2019 | Official leaderboard |
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Law, finance and medicine
- MedXpertQA-MM In use Models answer expert-level medical exam questions that combine images with clinical records and test results. Scoring is accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 80.4%
- HealthBench Professional In use 525 physician-authored tasks from real clinician chats (care consult, documentation, research) with physician-adjudicated rubrics. Claude Sonnet 5.5 69.2%
- HealthBench In use 5,000 realistic health conversations graded against physician-written rubrics. A length-adjusted variant penalizes verbosity. GPT-5 67.2%
- FinSearchComp In use Agents search the web to fetch live financial data, look up history, and run multi-step investigations, across 635 expert-written questions. Scored by answer accuracy.
Ling-3.1-flash 81.7%
- KBL In use Models answer Korean legal knowledge and reasoning tasks and Korean bar exam questions. It has 7 knowledge tasks, 4 reasoning tasks and 2,510 bar exam items.
Solar Pro 4 77.5%
- KorMedMCQA In use Models answer 7,469 multiple-choice questions from Korean licensing exams for doctors, nurses, pharmacists and dentists, held from 2012 to 2024.
Solar Pro 4 93.2%