Benchmark Almanac

CheXpert

Hierarchical-Learning-V1 (ensemble) Vingroup Big Data Institute 93% tops its leaderboard
Not in model cards

Models read chest radiographs and label up to 14 observations. The test labels come from board-certified radiologists.

The full set has 224,316 radiographs of 65,240 patients. Google's MedGemma cards report average F1 over 5 conditions.

Released
January 2019
Kind
Medicine
Level
Expert
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Short answer
Tasks
Public, plus a private test set

In the authors’ words

Large, labeled datasets have driven deep learning methods to achieve expert-level performance on a variety of medical imaging tasks. We present CheXpert, a large dataset that contains 224,316 chest radiographs of 65,240 patients. We design a labeler to automatically detect the presence of 14 observations in radiology reports, capturing uncertainties inherent in radiograph interpretation. We investigate different approaches to using the uncertainty labels for training convolutional neural networks that output the probability of these observations given the available frontal and lateral radiographs. On a validation set of 200 chest radiographic studies which were manually annotated by 3 board-certified radiologists, we find that different uncertainty approaches are useful for different pathologies. We then evaluate our best model on a test set composed of 500 chest radiographic studies annotated by a consensus of 5 board-certified radiologists, and compare the performance of our model to that of 3 additional radiologists in the detection of 5 selected pathologies. On Cardiomegaly, Edema, and Pleural Effusion, the model ROC and PR curves lie above all 3 radiologist operating points. We release the dataset to the public as a standard benchmark to evaluate performance of chest radiograph interpretation models. The dataset is freely available at https://stanfordmlgroup.github.io/competitions/chexpert .

Abstract of CheXpert: A Large Chest Radiograph Dataset with Uncertainty Labels and Expert Comparison (arXiv:1901.07031, CC0)
199
Entries on its own leaderboard, 0 models we track

Hierarchical-Learning-V1 (ensemble) Vingroup Big Data Institute tops the leaderboard with 93%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

199 entries. Scroll sideways for the rest.

  1. 93.0 Hierarchical-Learning-V1 (ensemble) Vingroup Big Data Institute
  2. 93.0 DeepAUC-v1 ensemble
  3. 92.9 YWW(ensemble) JF&NNU
  4. 92.9 Conditional-Training-LSR ensemble
  5. 92.9 Conditional-Training-LSR-V1 ensemble
  6. 92.9 Hierarchical-Learning-V0 (ensemble) Vingroup Big Data Institute
  7. 92.9 Hierarchical-Learning-V4 (ensemble) Vingroup Big Data Institute
  8. 92.8 Multi-Stage-Learning-CNN-V3 (ensemble) VINBDI Medical Imaging Team
  9. 92.8 DeepCNNsGM(ensemble) HUST
  10. 92.7 ihil (ensemble) UESTC
  11. 92.7 SenseXDR ensemble
  12. 92.7 desmond https://github.com/inisis/chexpert
  13. 92.7 inisis https://github.com/inisis/chexpert
  14. 92.7 DeepCNNs(ensemble) HUST
  15. 92.6 JF aboy ensemble_V2 JF HEALTHCARE
  16. 92.6 yww
  17. 92.6 DRNet (ensemble) UESTC and SenseTime
  18. 92.6 Anatomy-XNet-V1 ensemble
  19. 92.5 hoanganh_VB_ensemble35
  20. 92.5 hoanganh_VB_ensemble37
  21. 92.5 alimebkovkz
  22. 92.4 uestc
  23. 92.4 Hierarchical-CNN-Ensemble-V1 (ensemble) Vingroup Big Data Institute
  24. 92.4 as-hust-v3 ensemble
  25. 92.4 Hoang_VB_ensemble31_v2
  26. 92.4 Hoang_VB_ensemble31_v1
  27. 92.4 tedtta
  28. 92.4 hoanganh_VB_VN3
  29. 92.3 YJ&&YWW :
  30. 92.3 Multi-Stage-Learning-CNN-V2 (ensemble) VINBDI Medical Imaging Team
  31. 92.3 as-hust-v1 ensemble
  32. 92.3 hoanganhcnu_ensemble27_v1
  33. 92.3 hoanganhcnu_ensemble27_v2
  34. 92.3 Weighted-CNN(ensemble) HUST
  35. 92.3 DE_APR ensemble ltts
  36. 92.3 DE_APR_N ensemble ltts
  37. 92.3 Maxium (ensemble) Macao Polytechnic University
  38. 92.2 null
  39. 92.2 as-hust-v2 ensemble
  40. 92.2 Average-CNN(ensemble) HUST
  41. 92.2 MaxAUC ensemble
  42. 92.1 hyc ensemble
  43. 92.1 zjr(ensembel) CSU
  44. 92.1 hoangnguyenkcv17
  45. 92.1 SuperCNNv3 ensemble
  46. 92.0 HOANG_VB_VN_2 ensemble
  47. 91.9 JF Coolver ensemble ensemble model
  48. 91.9 JF aboy ensemble_V1 JF HEALTHCARE
  49. 91.9 BDNB ensemble
  50. 91.9 brian-baseline-v2 ensemble
  51. 91.9 hoangnn9 ensemble VBVN
  52. 91.9 thang ensemble coloa
  53. 91.8 Mehdi_You (ensemble) IPM_HPC
  54. 91.8 DE_JUN4_RS_EN ensemble LTTS
  55. 91.8 A Good Model (single model) Macao Polytechnic University
  56. 91.7 Ensemble_v2 Ian, Wingspan
  57. 91.7 Deep-CNNs-V1 ensemble
  58. 91.7 thangbk(ensemble) SNU
  59. 91.7 vdn6 ensemble ltts
  60. 91.7 Overfit ensemble OTH-AW
  61. 91.7 Anatomy-XNet (ensemble) mHealth-BUET
  62. 91.6 Multi-Stage-Learning-CNN-V0 ensemble
  63. 91.6 ATT-AW-v1 ensemble
  64. 91.6 DE_JUN1_RS_EN ensemble LTTS
  65. 91.6 DE_JUN3_RS_EN ensemble LTTS
  66. 91.5 Deadpoppy Ensemble ensemble model
  67. 91.5 zhangjingyang
  68. 91.5 TGNB ensemble
  69. 91.5 hoangnguyenkcv-ensemble28 ensemble
  70. 91.5 ensemble SNU
  71. 91.4 Deep-CNNs (ensemble) Vingroup Big Data Institute
  72. 91.4 GRNB ensemble
  73. 91.4 DE_JUN2_RS_EN ensemble LTTS
  74. 91.3 JF Deadpoppy ensemble
  75. 91.3 YWW-YJ:
  76. 91.3 Sky-Model ensemble
  77. 91.2 zjy ensemble
  78. 91.2 WL_Baseline (ensemble) WL
  79. 91.1 songtao
  80. 91.1 brian-baseline ensemble
  81. 91.1 bhtrung
  82. 91.1 KCV-CNN-ensemble-CNU
  83. 91.1 DS_APR single model LTTS
  84. 91.1 DS_APR_N single model ltts
  85. 91.1 anatomy_xnet_v1 (single model) BUET
  86. 91.0 ensemble SNU3
  87. 90.9 HinaNetV2 (ensemble) VietAI
  88. 90.9 G_Mans_ensemble
  89. 90.9 KD-Prune10 (Single model) MPU
  90. 90.8 guran_rib
  91. 90.8 vdnnn (ensemble) LTTS
  92. 90.8 BAAZT Ensemble
  93. 90.7 Stanford Baseline (ensemble) Stanford University
  94. 90.7 muti_base (ensemble) SCU_MILAB
  95. 90.7 vbn (single model) LTTS
  96. 90.7 Z_Ensemble_V1
  97. 90.6 {ForwardModelEnsembleCorrected} (ensemble) Stanford
  98. 90.6 LBC-v2 (ensemble) Macao Polytechnic University
  99. 90.5 Multi-CNN ensemble
  100. 90.5 hyc
  101. 90.5 ForwardMECorrectedFull (ensemble) Institution
  102. 90.4 JustAnotherDensenet single model
  103. 90.3 Orlando (single model) Macao Polytechnic University
  104. 90.2 DeepLungsEnsemble Alimbekov R. & Vassilenko I.
  105. 90.2 Max (single model) Macao Polytechnic University
  106. 90.1 Ensemble_v1 Ian, Wingspan
  107. 90.1 Nakajima_ayase
  108. 90.0 MLC11 NotDense (single-model) Leibniz University Hannover
  109. 90.0 vn_2 single_model ltts
  110. 89.9 {AVG_MAX}(ensemble) NNU
  111. 89.9 adoudou
  112. 89.9 llllldz single model
  113. 89.9 DiseaseNet Samg2003 single model, DPS RKP,
  114. 89.9 LBC-v0 (ensemble) Macao Polytechnic University
  115. 89.9 Z_Ensemble_2
  116. 89.8 BUAA
  117. 89.8 ljc2266
  118. 89.8 G_Mans_v2 (single model): LibAUC + coat_mini timm lib
  119. 89.7 ForwardModelEnsemble (ensemble) Stanford
  120. 89.7 NewTrickTest (ensemble) XBSJ
  121. 89.7 AccidentNet v1 (single model) Macao Polytechnic Institute
  122. 89.6 ldz single model
  123. 89.6 ylz-v01 single model
  124. 89.6 Densenet single
  125. 89.6 Stellarium-CheXpert-Local single model
  126. 89.5 Deadpoppy Single single model
  127. 89.5 hust(single model) HUST
  128. 89.5 {koala-large} (single model) SJTU
  129. 89.5 MVD121 single model
  130. 89.4 U-Random-Ind (single) BHSB
  131. 89.4 hycNB
  132. 89.4 zhujieru
  133. 89.4 MM1 ensemble
  134. 89.2 HybridModelEnsemble (ensemble) Stanford
  135. 89.1 ylz-v02 single model
  136. 89.1 MVD121-320 single model
  137. 89.0 Haruka_Hamasaki
  138. 89.0 pause single model
  139. 88.9 DenseNet169 at 320x320 (single model) Lafayette
  140. 88.9 LR-baseline (ensemble) IITB
  141. 88.8 DataAugFTW (single model) University Hannover
  142. 88.8 {koala} (single model) SJTU
  143. 88.7 Stellarium single model
  144. 88.7 pm_rn50_0.15ppl
  145. 88.6 baseline3 single model
  146. 88.6 MVR50 single model
  147. 88.6 PrateekMunjal
  148. 88.4 Coolver XH single model
  149. 88.4 MNet-Fix (Single Model) MPU
  150. 88.3 Naive Densenet single model
  151. 88.3 mhealth_buet (single model) BUET
  152. 88.2 DearBrave (single model) Macao Polytechnic Institute
  153. 88.2 Aoitori (single model) Macao Polytechnic Institute
  154. 88.2 {chexpert-classifier}(single model) G42
  155. 88.1 AccidentNet V2 (single model) Macao Polytechnic Institute
  156. 88.0 {densenet} (single model) Microsoft
  157. 87.9 Yoake (single model) Macao Polytechnic Institute
  158. 87.8 MLC11 Baseline (single-model) Leibniz University Hannover
  159. 87.6 DenseNet single
  160. 87.6 HCL1 (single model) LTTS
  161. 87.5 MLGCN (single model) sensetime
  162. 87.5 GCN_densenet121-single model
  163. 87.3 Multi-CNN (ensemble) VinGroup Big Data Institute
  164. 87.3 GreenTeaCalpis (single model) Macao Polytechnic Institute
  165. 87.1 BASELINE ResNet50 ensemble
  166. 86.8 baseline1 (single model) Endimension
  167. 86.8 Baseline DenseNet161 single model
  168. 86.5 DSENet single model
  169. 86.3 Densenet-Basic Single NUST
  170. 86.2 KD_Mobilenet (single model) IPM
  171. 86.1 {GoDense} (single model) UPenn
  172. 86.1 inceptionv3_single_NNU
  173. 86.0 BASELINE Acorn single model
  174. 86.0 MLKD (Single model) IPM
  175. 85.9 ErrorNet (single model) IPM
  176. 85.9 SleepNet (single model) MPI
  177. 85.8 baseline2 single model
  178. 85.8 UMLS_CLIP (single model) SJTU
  179. 85.4 haw02 (single model) IPM
  180. 85.3 CombinedTrainDenseNet121 (single model) University of Westminster, Silva R.
  181. 85.1 rayOfLightSingle (Single Model) GeorgiaTech CSE6250 Team58
  182. 85.0 Model_Team_34 (single model) Gatech
  183. 85.0 Test model habbes
  184. 84.8 Baseline Ensemble
  185. 84.8 model2_DenseNet121 single
  186. 84.4 HinaNet (single model) VietAI
  187. 84.2 singlehead_models (single model combined) Gatech CSE6250 Team30
  188. 84.0 mwowra-conditional (single) AGH UST
  189. 83.8 multihead_model (one model for all pathologies) Gatech CSE6250 Team30
  190. 83.7 mobilenet (single model) ipm
  191. 83.5 Grp12BigCNN ensemble
  192. 83.4 MLC9_Densenet (single model) Leibniz University Hannover
  193. 83.0 Grp12v2USup2OSamp (ensemble) AITD
  194. 82.2 DNET121-single Ian,Wingspan
  195. 76.9 12ASLv2(single) AITD
  196. 76.0 DenseNet121 (single model) hemil10
  197. 73.6 12ASLv1(single) AITD
  198. 72.7 rayOfLight (ensemble) GeorgiaTech CSE6250 Team58
  199. 72.4 BASELINE DenseNet121 single model
  1. 1 Hierarchical-Learning-V1 (ensemble) Vingroup Big Data Institute 93%
  2. 2 DeepAUC-v1 ensemble 93%
  3. 3 YWW(ensemble) JF&NNU 92.9%
  4. 4 Conditional-Training-LSR ensemble 92.9%
  5. 5 Conditional-Training-LSR-V1 ensemble 92.9%
  6. 6 Hierarchical-Learning-V0 (ensemble) Vingroup Big Data Institute 92.9%
  7. 7 Hierarchical-Learning-V4 (ensemble) Vingroup Big Data Institute 92.9%
  8. 8 Multi-Stage-Learning-CNN-V3 (ensemble) VINBDI Medical Imaging Team 92.8%
  9. 9 DeepCNNsGM(ensemble) HUST 92.8%
  10. 10 ihil (ensemble) UESTC 92.7%
  11. 11 SenseXDR ensemble 92.7%
  12. 12 desmond https://github.com/inisis/chexpert 92.7%
  13. 13 inisis https://github.com/inisis/chexpert 92.7%
  14. 14 DeepCNNs(ensemble) HUST 92.7%
  15. 15 JF aboy ensemble_V2 JF HEALTHCARE 92.6%
  16. 16 yww 92.6%
  17. 17 DRNet (ensemble) UESTC and SenseTime 92.6%
  18. 18 Anatomy-XNet-V1 ensemble 92.6%
  19. 19 hoanganh_VB_ensemble35 92.5%
  20. 20 hoanganh_VB_ensemble37 92.5%
  21. 21 alimebkovkz 92.5%
  22. 22 uestc 92.4%
  23. 23 Hierarchical-CNN-Ensemble-V1 (ensemble) Vingroup Big Data Institute 92.4%
  24. 24 as-hust-v3 ensemble 92.4%
  25. 25 Hoang_VB_ensemble31_v2 92.4%
  26. 26 Hoang_VB_ensemble31_v1 92.4%
  27. 27 tedtta 92.4%
  28. 28 hoanganh_VB_VN3 92.4%
  29. 29 YJ&&YWW : 92.3%
  30. 30 Multi-Stage-Learning-CNN-V2 (ensemble) VINBDI Medical Imaging Team 92.3%
  31. 31 as-hust-v1 ensemble 92.3%
  32. 32 hoanganhcnu_ensemble27_v1 92.3%
  33. 33 hoanganhcnu_ensemble27_v2 92.3%
  34. 34 Weighted-CNN(ensemble) HUST 92.3%
  35. 35 DE_APR ensemble ltts 92.3%
  36. 36 DE_APR_N ensemble ltts 92.3%
  37. 37 Maxium (ensemble) Macao Polytechnic University 92.3%
  38. 38 null 92.2%
  39. 39 as-hust-v2 ensemble 92.2%
  40. 40 Average-CNN(ensemble) HUST 92.2%
  41. 41 MaxAUC ensemble 92.2%
  42. 42 hyc ensemble 92.1%
  43. 43 zjr(ensembel) CSU 92.1%
  44. 44 hoangnguyenkcv17 92.1%
  45. 45 SuperCNNv3 ensemble 92.1%
  46. 46 HOANG_VB_VN_2 ensemble 92%
  47. 47 JF Coolver ensemble ensemble model 91.9%
  48. 48 JF aboy ensemble_V1 JF HEALTHCARE 91.9%
  49. 49 BDNB ensemble 91.9%
  50. 50 brian-baseline-v2 ensemble 91.9%
  51. 51 hoangnn9 ensemble VBVN 91.9%
  52. 52 thang ensemble coloa 91.9%
  53. 53 Mehdi_You (ensemble) IPM_HPC 91.8%
  54. 54 DE_JUN4_RS_EN ensemble LTTS 91.8%
  55. 55 A Good Model (single model) Macao Polytechnic University 91.8%
  56. 56 Ensemble_v2 Ian, Wingspan 91.7%
  57. 57 Deep-CNNs-V1 ensemble 91.7%
  58. 58 thangbk(ensemble) SNU 91.7%
  59. 59 vdn6 ensemble ltts 91.7%
  60. 60 Overfit ensemble OTH-AW 91.7%
  61. 61 Anatomy-XNet (ensemble) mHealth-BUET 91.7%
  62. 62 Multi-Stage-Learning-CNN-V0 ensemble 91.6%
  63. 63 ATT-AW-v1 ensemble 91.6%
  64. 64 DE_JUN1_RS_EN ensemble LTTS 91.6%
  65. 65 DE_JUN3_RS_EN ensemble LTTS 91.6%
  66. 66 Deadpoppy Ensemble ensemble model 91.5%
  67. 67 zhangjingyang 91.5%
  68. 68 TGNB ensemble 91.5%
  69. 69 hoangnguyenkcv-ensemble28 ensemble 91.5%
  70. 70 ensemble SNU 91.5%
  71. 71 Deep-CNNs (ensemble) Vingroup Big Data Institute 91.4%
  72. 72 GRNB ensemble 91.4%
  73. 73 DE_JUN2_RS_EN ensemble LTTS 91.4%
  74. 74 JF Deadpoppy ensemble 91.3%
  75. 75 YWW-YJ: 91.3%
  76. 76 Sky-Model ensemble 91.3%
  77. 77 zjy ensemble 91.2%
  78. 78 WL_Baseline (ensemble) WL 91.2%
  79. 79 songtao 91.1%
  80. 80 brian-baseline ensemble 91.1%
  81. 81 bhtrung 91.1%
  82. 82 KCV-CNN-ensemble-CNU 91.1%
  83. 83 DS_APR single model LTTS 91.1%
  84. 84 DS_APR_N single model ltts 91.1%
  85. 85 anatomy_xnet_v1 (single model) BUET 91.1%
  86. 86 ensemble SNU3 91%
  87. 87 HinaNetV2 (ensemble) VietAI 90.9%
  88. 88 G_Mans_ensemble 90.9%
  89. 89 KD-Prune10 (Single model) MPU 90.9%
  90. 90 guran_rib 90.8%
  91. 91 vdnnn (ensemble) LTTS 90.8%
  92. 92 BAAZT Ensemble 90.8%
  93. 93 Stanford Baseline (ensemble) Stanford University 90.7%
  94. 94 muti_base (ensemble) SCU_MILAB 90.7%
  95. 95 vbn (single model) LTTS 90.7%
  96. 96 Z_Ensemble_V1 90.7%
  97. 97 {ForwardModelEnsembleCorrected} (ensemble) Stanford 90.6%
  98. 98 LBC-v2 (ensemble) Macao Polytechnic University 90.6%
  99. 99 Multi-CNN ensemble 90.5%
  100. 100 hyc 90.5%
  101. 101 ForwardMECorrectedFull (ensemble) Institution 90.5%
  102. 102 JustAnotherDensenet single model 90.4%
  103. 103 Orlando (single model) Macao Polytechnic University 90.3%
  104. 104 DeepLungsEnsemble Alimbekov R. & Vassilenko I. 90.2%
  105. 105 Max (single model) Macao Polytechnic University 90.2%
  106. 106 Ensemble_v1 Ian, Wingspan 90.1%
  107. 107 Nakajima_ayase 90.1%
  108. 108 MLC11 NotDense (single-model) Leibniz University Hannover 90%
  109. 109 vn_2 single_model ltts 90%
  110. 110 {AVG_MAX}(ensemble) NNU 89.9%
  111. 111 adoudou 89.9%
  112. 112 llllldz single model 89.9%
  113. 113 DiseaseNet Samg2003 single model, DPS RKP, 89.9%
  114. 114 LBC-v0 (ensemble) Macao Polytechnic University 89.9%
  115. 115 Z_Ensemble_2 89.9%
  116. 116 BUAA 89.8%
  117. 117 ljc2266 89.8%
  118. 118 G_Mans_v2 (single model): LibAUC + coat_mini timm lib 89.8%
  119. 119 ForwardModelEnsemble (ensemble) Stanford 89.7%
  120. 120 NewTrickTest (ensemble) XBSJ 89.7%
  121. 121 AccidentNet v1 (single model) Macao Polytechnic Institute 89.7%
  122. 122 ldz single model 89.6%
  123. 123 ylz-v01 single model 89.6%
  124. 124 Densenet single 89.6%
  125. 125 Stellarium-CheXpert-Local single model 89.6%
  126. 126 Deadpoppy Single single model 89.5%
  127. 127 hust(single model) HUST 89.5%
  128. 128 {koala-large} (single model) SJTU 89.5%
  129. 129 MVD121 single model 89.5%
  130. 130 U-Random-Ind (single) BHSB 89.4%
  131. 131 hycNB 89.4%
  132. 132 zhujieru 89.4%
  133. 133 MM1 ensemble 89.4%
  134. 134 HybridModelEnsemble (ensemble) Stanford 89.2%
  135. 135 ylz-v02 single model 89.1%
  136. 136 MVD121-320 single model 89.1%
  137. 137 Haruka_Hamasaki 89%
  138. 138 pause single model 89%
  139. 139 DenseNet169 at 320x320 (single model) Lafayette 88.9%
  140. 140 LR-baseline (ensemble) IITB 88.9%
  141. 141 DataAugFTW (single model) University Hannover 88.8%
  142. 142 {koala} (single model) SJTU 88.8%
  143. 143 Stellarium single model 88.7%
  144. 144 pm_rn50_0.15ppl 88.7%
  145. 145 baseline3 single model 88.6%
  146. 146 MVR50 single model 88.6%
  147. 147 PrateekMunjal 88.6%
  148. 148 Coolver XH single model 88.4%
  149. 149 MNet-Fix (Single Model) MPU 88.4%
  150. 150 Naive Densenet single model 88.3%
  151. 151 mhealth_buet (single model) BUET 88.3%
  152. 152 DearBrave (single model) Macao Polytechnic Institute 88.2%
  153. 153 Aoitori (single model) Macao Polytechnic Institute 88.2%
  154. 154 {chexpert-classifier}(single model) G42 88.2%
  155. 155 AccidentNet V2 (single model) Macao Polytechnic Institute 88.1%
  156. 156 {densenet} (single model) Microsoft 88%
  157. 157 Yoake (single model) Macao Polytechnic Institute 87.9%
  158. 158 MLC11 Baseline (single-model) Leibniz University Hannover 87.8%
  159. 159 DenseNet single 87.6%
  160. 160 HCL1 (single model) LTTS 87.6%
  161. 161 MLGCN (single model) sensetime 87.5%
  162. 162 GCN_densenet121-single model 87.5%
  163. 163 Multi-CNN (ensemble) VinGroup Big Data Institute 87.3%
  164. 164 GreenTeaCalpis (single model) Macao Polytechnic Institute 87.3%
  165. 165 BASELINE ResNet50 ensemble 87.1%
  166. 166 baseline1 (single model) Endimension 86.8%
  167. 167 Baseline DenseNet161 single model 86.8%
  168. 168 DSENet single model 86.5%
  169. 169 Densenet-Basic Single NUST 86.3%
  170. 170 KD_Mobilenet (single model) IPM 86.2%
  171. 171 {GoDense} (single model) UPenn 86.1%
  172. 172 inceptionv3_single_NNU 86.1%
  173. 173 BASELINE Acorn single model 86%
  174. 174 MLKD (Single model) IPM 86%
  175. 175 ErrorNet (single model) IPM 85.9%
  176. 176 SleepNet (single model) MPI 85.9%
  177. 177 baseline2 single model 85.8%
  178. 178 UMLS_CLIP (single model) SJTU 85.8%
  179. 179 haw02 (single model) IPM 85.4%
  180. 180 CombinedTrainDenseNet121 (single model) University of Westminster, Silva R. 85.3%
  181. 181 rayOfLightSingle (Single Model) GeorgiaTech CSE6250 Team58 85.1%
  182. 182 Model_Team_34 (single model) Gatech 85%
  183. 183 Test model habbes 85%
  184. 184 Baseline Ensemble 84.8%
  185. 185 model2_DenseNet121 single 84.8%
  186. 186 HinaNet (single model) VietAI 84.4%
  187. 187 singlehead_models (single model combined) Gatech CSE6250 Team30 84.2%
  188. 188 mwowra-conditional (single) AGH UST 84%
  189. 189 multihead_model (one model for all pathologies) Gatech CSE6250 Team30 83.8%
  190. 190 mobilenet (single model) ipm 83.7%
  191. 191 Grp12BigCNN ensemble 83.5%
  192. 192 MLC9_Densenet (single model) Leibniz University Hannover 83.4%
  193. 193 Grp12v2USup2OSamp (ensemble) AITD 83%
  194. 194 DNET121-single Ian,Wingspan 82.2%
  195. 195 12ASLv2(single) AITD 76.9%
  196. 196 DenseNet121 (single model) hemil10 76%
  197. 197 12ASLv1(single) AITD 73.6%
  198. 198 rayOfLight (ensemble) GeorgiaTech CSE6250 Team58 72.7%
  199. 199 BASELINE DenseNet121 single model 72.4%

Source: Official CheXpert leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Hierarchical-Learning-V1 (ensemble) Vingroup Big Data Institute 93% Sep 2019 Official leaderboard
2 DeepAUC-v1 ensemble 93% Aug 2020 Official leaderboard
3 YWW(ensemble) JF&NNU 92.9% Oct 2019 Official leaderboard
4 Conditional-Training-LSR ensemble 92.9% Oct 2019 Official leaderboard
5 Conditional-Training-LSR-V1 ensemble 92.9% Oct 2019 Official leaderboard
6 Hierarchical-Learning-V0 (ensemble) Vingroup Big Data Institute 92.9% Nov 2019 Official leaderboard
7 Hierarchical-Learning-V4 (ensemble) Vingroup Big Data Institute 92.9% Dec 2019 Official leaderboard
8 Multi-Stage-Learning-CNN-V3 (ensemble) VINBDI Medical Imaging Team 92.8% Sep 2019 Official leaderboard
9 DeepCNNsGM(ensemble) HUST 92.8% Dec 2019 Official leaderboard
10 ihil (ensemble) UESTC 92.7% Sep 2019 Official leaderboard
11 SenseXDR ensemble 92.7% Sep 2019 Official leaderboard
12 desmond https://github.com/inisis/chexpert 92.7% Dec 2019 Official leaderboard
13 inisis https://github.com/inisis/chexpert 92.7% Dec 2019 Official leaderboard
14 DeepCNNs(ensemble) HUST 92.7% Dec 2019 Official leaderboard
15 JF aboy ensemble_V2 JF HEALTHCARE 92.6% Jul 2019 Official leaderboard
16 yww 92.6% Sep 2019 Official leaderboard
17 DRNet (ensemble) UESTC and SenseTime 92.6% Sep 2019 Official leaderboard
18 Anatomy-XNet-V1 ensemble 92.6% Jul 2022 Official leaderboard
19 hoanganh_VB_ensemble35 92.5% Dec 2019 Official leaderboard
20 hoanganh_VB_ensemble37 92.5% Dec 2019 Official leaderboard
21 alimebkovkz 92.5% Feb 2020 Official leaderboard
22 uestc 92.4% Sep 2019 Official leaderboard
23 Hierarchical-CNN-Ensemble-V1 (ensemble) Vingroup Big Data Institute 92.4% Sep 2019 Official leaderboard
24 as-hust-v3 ensemble 92.4% Dec 2019 Official leaderboard
25 Hoang_VB_ensemble31_v2 92.4% Dec 2019 Official leaderboard
26 Hoang_VB_ensemble31_v1 92.4% Dec 2019 Official leaderboard
27 tedtta 92.4% Dec 2019 Official leaderboard
28 hoanganh_VB_VN3 92.4% Jan 2020 Official leaderboard
29 YJ&&YWW : 92.3% Aug 2019 Official leaderboard
30 Multi-Stage-Learning-CNN-V2 (ensemble) VINBDI Medical Imaging Team 92.3% Aug 2019 Official leaderboard
31 as-hust-v1 ensemble 92.3% Dec 2019 Official leaderboard
32 hoanganhcnu_ensemble27_v1 92.3% Dec 2019 Official leaderboard
33 hoanganhcnu_ensemble27_v2 92.3% Dec 2019 Official leaderboard
34 Weighted-CNN(ensemble) HUST 92.3% Dec 2019 Official leaderboard
35 DE_APR ensemble ltts 92.3% Apr 2020 Official leaderboard
36 DE_APR_N ensemble ltts 92.3% Apr 2020 Official leaderboard
37 Maxium (ensemble) Macao Polytechnic University 92.3% Sep 2022 Official leaderboard
38 null 92.2% Sep 2019 Official leaderboard
39 as-hust-v2 ensemble 92.2% Dec 2019 Official leaderboard
40 Average-CNN(ensemble) HUST 92.2% Dec 2019 Official leaderboard
41 MaxAUC ensemble 92.2% Aug 2020 Official leaderboard
42 hyc ensemble 92.1% Aug 2019 Official leaderboard
43 zjr(ensembel) CSU 92.1% Aug 2019 Official leaderboard
44 hoangnguyenkcv17 92.1% Nov 2019 Official leaderboard
45 SuperCNNv3 ensemble 92.1% Sep 2020 Official leaderboard
46 HOANG_VB_VN_2 ensemble 92% Jan 2020 Official leaderboard
47 JF Coolver ensemble ensemble model 91.9% Jul 2019 Official leaderboard
48 JF aboy ensemble_V1 JF HEALTHCARE 91.9% Jul 2019 Official leaderboard
49 BDNB ensemble 91.9% Aug 2019 Official leaderboard
50 brian-baseline-v2 ensemble 91.9% Nov 2019 Official leaderboard
51 hoangnn9 ensemble VBVN 91.9% Nov 2019 Official leaderboard
52 thang ensemble coloa 91.9% Dec 2019 Official leaderboard
53 Mehdi_You (ensemble) IPM_HPC 91.8% Jun 2019 Official leaderboard
54 DE_JUN4_RS_EN ensemble LTTS 91.8% Jun 2020 Official leaderboard
55 A Good Model (single model) Macao Polytechnic University 91.8% Sep 2022 Official leaderboard
56 Ensemble_v2 Ian, Wingspan 91.7% Jul 2019 Official leaderboard
57 Deep-CNNs-V1 ensemble 91.7% Aug 2019 Official leaderboard
58 thangbk(ensemble) SNU 91.7% Nov 2019 Official leaderboard
59 vdn6 ensemble ltts 91.7% Jan 2020 Official leaderboard
60 Overfit ensemble OTH-AW 91.7% Oct 2021 Official leaderboard
61 Anatomy-XNet (ensemble) mHealth-BUET 91.7% Apr 2022 Official leaderboard
62 Multi-Stage-Learning-CNN-V0 ensemble 91.6% Aug 2019 Official leaderboard
63 ATT-AW-v1 ensemble 91.6% Nov 2019 Official leaderboard
64 DE_JUN1_RS_EN ensemble LTTS 91.6% Jun 2020 Official leaderboard
65 DE_JUN3_RS_EN ensemble LTTS 91.6% Jun 2020 Official leaderboard
66 Deadpoppy Ensemble ensemble model 91.5% Jul 2019 Official leaderboard
67 zhangjingyang 91.5% Aug 2019 Official leaderboard
68 TGNB ensemble 91.5% Aug 2019 Official leaderboard
69 hoangnguyenkcv-ensemble28 ensemble 91.5% Nov 2019 Official leaderboard
70 ensemble SNU 91.5% Dec 2019 Official leaderboard
71 Deep-CNNs (ensemble) Vingroup Big Data Institute 91.4% Jul 2019 Official leaderboard
72 GRNB ensemble 91.4% Aug 2019 Official leaderboard
73 DE_JUN2_RS_EN ensemble LTTS 91.4% Jun 2020 Official leaderboard
74 JF Deadpoppy ensemble 91.3% Jul 2019 Official leaderboard
75 YWW-YJ: 91.3% Aug 2019 Official leaderboard
76 Sky-Model ensemble 91.3% Dec 2019 Official leaderboard
77 zjy ensemble 91.2% Aug 2019 Official leaderboard
78 WL_Baseline (ensemble) WL 91.2% Jun 2020 Official leaderboard
79 songtao 91.1% Aug 2019 Official leaderboard
80 brian-baseline ensemble 91.1% Oct 2019 Official leaderboard
81 bhtrung 91.1% Oct 2019 Official leaderboard
82 KCV-CNN-ensemble-CNU 91.1% Oct 2019 Official leaderboard
83 DS_APR single model LTTS 91.1% Apr 2020 Official leaderboard
84 DS_APR_N single model ltts 91.1% Apr 2020 Official leaderboard
85 anatomy_xnet_v1 (single model) BUET 91.1% Oct 2021 Official leaderboard
86 ensemble SNU3 91% Dec 2019 Official leaderboard
87 HinaNetV2 (ensemble) VietAI 90.9% Dec 2019 Official leaderboard
88 G_Mans_ensemble 90.9% Jun 2022 Official leaderboard
89 KD-Prune10 (Single model) MPU 90.9% Oct 2022 Official leaderboard
90 guran_rib 90.8% Jul 2019 Official leaderboard
91 vdnnn (ensemble) LTTS 90.8% Jan 2020 Official leaderboard
92 BAAZT Ensemble 90.8% May 2022 Official leaderboard
93 Stanford Baseline (ensemble) Stanford University 90.7% Jan 2019 Official leaderboard
94 muti_base (ensemble) SCU_MILAB 90.7% Apr 2019 Official leaderboard
95 vbn (single model) LTTS 90.7% Jan 2020 Official leaderboard
96 Z_Ensemble_V1 90.7% Mar 2022 Official leaderboard
97 {ForwardModelEnsembleCorrected} (ensemble) Stanford 90.6% Sep 2019 Official leaderboard
98 LBC-v2 (ensemble) Macao Polytechnic University 90.6% Oct 2021 Official leaderboard
99 Multi-CNN ensemble 90.5% Jun 2019 Official leaderboard
100 hyc 90.5% Jul 2019 Official leaderboard
101 ForwardMECorrectedFull (ensemble) Institution 90.5% Oct 2019 Official leaderboard
102 JustAnotherDensenet single model 90.4% Jun 2019 Official leaderboard
103 Orlando (single model) Macao Polytechnic University 90.3% May 2022 Official leaderboard
104 DeepLungsEnsemble Alimbekov R. & Vassilenko I. 90.2% Mar 2020 Official leaderboard
105 Max (single model) Macao Polytechnic University 90.2% May 2022 Official leaderboard
106 Ensemble_v1 Ian, Wingspan 90.1% Jul 2019 Official leaderboard
107 Nakajima_ayase 90.1% Sep 2019 Official leaderboard
108 MLC11 NotDense (single-model) Leibniz University Hannover 90% May 2019 Official leaderboard
109 vn_2 single_model ltts 90% Jan 2020 Official leaderboard
110 {AVG_MAX}(ensemble) NNU 89.9% Jul 2019 Official leaderboard
111 adoudou 89.9% Jul 2019 Official leaderboard
112 llllldz single model 89.9% Jul 2019 Official leaderboard
113 DiseaseNet Samg2003 single model, DPS RKP, 89.9% Aug 2020 Official leaderboard
114 LBC-v0 (ensemble) Macao Polytechnic University 89.9% Sep 2021 Official leaderboard
115 Z_Ensemble_2 89.9% Apr 2022 Official leaderboard
116 BUAA 89.8% Nov 2019 Official leaderboard
117 ljc2266 89.8% May 2021 Official leaderboard
118 G_Mans_v2 (single model): LibAUC + coat_mini timm lib 89.8% Jan 2022 Official leaderboard
119 ForwardModelEnsemble (ensemble) Stanford 89.7% Jun 2019 Official leaderboard
120 NewTrickTest (ensemble) XBSJ 89.7% Aug 2020 Official leaderboard
121 AccidentNet v1 (single model) Macao Polytechnic Institute 89.7% May 2021 Official leaderboard
122 ldz single model 89.6% Jun 2019 Official leaderboard
123 ylz-v01 single model 89.6% Feb 2020 Official leaderboard
124 Densenet single 89.6% Feb 2020 Official leaderboard
125 Stellarium-CheXpert-Local single model 89.6% Aug 2021 Official leaderboard
126 Deadpoppy Single single model 89.5% Jul 2019 Official leaderboard
127 hust(single model) HUST 89.5% Jul 2019 Official leaderboard
128 {koala-large} (single model) SJTU 89.5% Sep 2020 Official leaderboard
129 MVD121 single model 89.5% May 2021 Official leaderboard
130 U-Random-Ind (single) BHSB 89.4% Jul 2019 Official leaderboard
131 hycNB 89.4% Jul 2019 Official leaderboard
132 zhujieru 89.4% Jul 2019 Official leaderboard
133 MM1 ensemble 89.4% Dec 2019 Official leaderboard
134 HybridModelEnsemble (ensemble) Stanford 89.2% Jun 2019 Official leaderboard
135 ylz-v02 single model 89.1% Feb 2020 Official leaderboard
136 MVD121-320 single model 89.1% May 2021 Official leaderboard
137 Haruka_Hamasaki 89% Jul 2019 Official leaderboard
138 pause single model 89% Jul 2019 Official leaderboard
139 DenseNet169 at 320x320 (single model) Lafayette 88.9% Aug 2019 Official leaderboard
140 LR-baseline (ensemble) IITB 88.9% Apr 2020 Official leaderboard
141 DataAugFTW (single model) University Hannover 88.8% Jul 2019 Official leaderboard
142 {koala} (single model) SJTU 88.8% Aug 2020 Official leaderboard
143 Stellarium single model 88.7% May 2021 Official leaderboard
144 pm_rn50_0.15ppl 88.7% Nov 2022 Official leaderboard
145 baseline3 single model 88.6% Oct 2019 Official leaderboard
146 MVR50 single model 88.6% May 2021 Official leaderboard
147 PrateekMunjal 88.6% Nov 2022 Official leaderboard
148 Coolver XH single model 88.4% Jun 2019 Official leaderboard
149 MNet-Fix (Single Model) MPU 88.4% Aug 2022 Official leaderboard
150 Naive Densenet single model 88.3% Mar 2019 Official leaderboard
151 mhealth_buet (single model) BUET 88.3% Mar 2021 Official leaderboard
152 DearBrave (single model) Macao Polytechnic Institute 88.2% Mar 2021 Official leaderboard
153 Aoitori (single model) Macao Polytechnic Institute 88.2% Apr 2021 Official leaderboard
154 {chexpert-classifier}(single model) G42 88.2% Feb 2022 Official leaderboard
155 AccidentNet V2 (single model) Macao Polytechnic Institute 88.1% Jun 2021 Official leaderboard
156 {densenet} (single model) Microsoft 88% May 2019 Official leaderboard
157 Yoake (single model) Macao Polytechnic Institute 87.9% Mar 2021 Official leaderboard
158 MLC11 Baseline (single-model) Leibniz University Hannover 87.8% May 2019 Official leaderboard
159 DenseNet single 87.6% Jul 2019 Official leaderboard
160 HCL1 (single model) LTTS 87.6% Nov 2019 Official leaderboard
161 MLGCN (single model) sensetime 87.5% Jul 2019 Official leaderboard
162 GCN_densenet121-single model 87.5% Oct 2019 Official leaderboard
163 Multi-CNN (ensemble) VinGroup Big Data Institute 87.3% Jun 2019 Official leaderboard
164 GreenTeaCalpis (single model) Macao Polytechnic Institute 87.3% Feb 2021 Official leaderboard
165 BASELINE ResNet50 ensemble 87.1% Oct 2021 Official leaderboard
166 baseline1 (single model) Endimension 86.8% Oct 2019 Official leaderboard
167 Baseline DenseNet161 single model 86.8% Aug 2021 Official leaderboard
168 DSENet single model 86.5% May 2020 Official leaderboard
169 Densenet-Basic Single NUST 86.3% Apr 2019 Official leaderboard
170 KD_Mobilenet (single model) IPM 86.2% Aug 2022 Official leaderboard
171 {GoDense} (single model) UPenn 86.1% Apr 2019 Official leaderboard
172 inceptionv3_single_NNU 86.1% May 2019 Official leaderboard
173 BASELINE Acorn single model 86% Jun 2020 Official leaderboard
174 MLKD (Single model) IPM 86% Aug 2022 Official leaderboard
175 ErrorNet (single model) IPM 85.9% Mar 2022 Official leaderboard
176 SleepNet (single model) MPI 85.9% Mar 2022 Official leaderboard
177 baseline2 single model 85.8% Oct 2019 Official leaderboard
178 UMLS_CLIP (single model) SJTU 85.8% Oct 2022 Official leaderboard
179 haw02 (single model) IPM 85.4% Feb 2022 Official leaderboard
180 CombinedTrainDenseNet121 (single model) University of Westminster, Silva R. 85.3% Jul 2020 Official leaderboard
181 rayOfLightSingle (Single Model) GeorgiaTech CSE6250 Team58 85.1% Apr 2019 Official leaderboard
182 Model_Team_34 (single model) Gatech 85% Apr 2019 Official leaderboard
183 Test model habbes 85% Apr 2019 Official leaderboard
184 Baseline Ensemble 84.8% Apr 2019 Official leaderboard
185 model2_DenseNet121 single 84.8% Feb 2021 Official leaderboard
186 HinaNet (single model) VietAI 84.4% Nov 2019 Official leaderboard
187 singlehead_models (single model combined) Gatech CSE6250 Team30 84.2% Apr 2019 Official leaderboard
188 mwowra-conditional (single) AGH UST 84% Jan 2021 Official leaderboard
189 multihead_model (one model for all pathologies) Gatech CSE6250 Team30 83.8% Apr 2019 Official leaderboard
190 mobilenet (single model) ipm 83.7% Aug 2022 Official leaderboard
191 Grp12BigCNN ensemble 83.5% Sep 2020 Official leaderboard
192 MLC9_Densenet (single model) Leibniz University Hannover 83.4% Jun 2019 Official leaderboard
193 Grp12v2USup2OSamp (ensemble) AITD 83% Feb 2020 Official leaderboard
194 DNET121-single Ian,Wingspan 82.2% May 2019 Official leaderboard
195 12ASLv2(single) AITD 76.9% Jul 2020 Official leaderboard
196 DenseNet121 (single model) hemil10 76% May 2019 Official leaderboard
197 12ASLv1(single) AITD 73.6% Jul 2020 Official leaderboard
198 rayOfLight (ensemble) GeorgiaTech CSE6250 Team58 72.7% Apr 2019 Official leaderboard
199 BASELINE DenseNet121 single model 72.4% Nov 2019 Official leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Law, finance and medicine

All 179 in Law, finance and medicine
  • MedXpertQA-MM In use Models answer expert-level medical exam questions that combine images with clinical records and test results. Scoring is accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 80.4%
  • HealthBench Professional In use 525 physician-authored tasks from real clinician chats (care consult, documentation, research) with physician-adjudicated rubrics. Claude Sonnet 5.5 69.2%
  • HealthBench In use 5,000 realistic health conversations graded against physician-written rubrics. A length-adjusted variant penalizes verbosity. GPT-5 67.2%
  • FinSearchComp In use Agents search the web to fetch live financial data, look up history, and run multi-step investigations, across 635 expert-written questions. Scored by answer accuracy. Ling-3.1-flash 81.7%
  • KBL In use Models answer Korean legal knowledge and reasoning tasks and Korean bar exam questions. It has 7 knowledge tasks, 4 reasoning tasks and 2,510 bar exam items. Solar Pro 4 77.5%
  • KorMedMCQA In use Models answer 7,469 multiple-choice questions from Korean licensing exams for doctors, nurses, pharmacists and dentists, held from 2012 to 2024. Solar Pro 4 93.2%