CHI-Bench
Agents run long healthcare operations workflows such as prior authorization through 87 MCP tools over 20 simulated apps. Tasks need policy lookups, role handoffs and multi-turn dialogs.
55 upvotes on Hugging Face papers. Covers provider, payer and care management domains.
- Made by
- Actava AI
- Released
- May 2026
- Kind
- Medicine
- Level
- Expert
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Agent task
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- Claude Opus 5 #10 on the capability index
- Last model added
- July 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
End-to-end automation of realistic healthcare operations stresses three capabilities underrepresented in current benchmarks: policy density, decisions must be grounded in a large library of medical, insurance, and operational rules; Multi-role composition: a single task requires the agent to play multiple roles with handoffs; and multilateral interaction: intermediate workflow steps are multi-turn dialogs, such as peer-to-peer review and patient outreach. We introduce χ-Bench, a benchmark of long-horizon healthcare workflows across three domains: provider prior authorization, payer utilization management, and care management. Each task hands the agent a clinical case in a high-fidelity simulator of 20 healthcare apps exposed via 87 MCP tools, which it must drive to a terminal status through tool calls and writing the role's artifacts, guided by a 1,290+ document managed-care operations handbook skill. Across 30 agent harness/models configurations, the best agent resolves only 28.0% of tasks, no agent clears 20% on strict pass^3, and executing all tasks in a single session slumps the performance to 3.8%. These results raise the hypothesis that similar gaps are likely to surface in other policy-dense, role-composed, irreversible enterprise domains.
Claude Opus 5 leads with 54.7% among models released by July 2026
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Every run is in the next chart. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
The newest model with a score here came out in July 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 11 more
- 54.7 Claude Opus 5
- 37.3 Claude Opus 4.8
- 28.0 Claude Opus 4.6
- 26.2 Claude Sonnet 4.6
- 25.3 GPT-5.6 Sol
- 25.3 Kimi K3
- 24.4 Claude Opus 4.7
- 24.0 Claude Fable 5
- 22.7 MedGuard
- 20.9 GPT-5.5
- 20.0 Claude Sonnet 5
- 18.7 GLM-5.1
- 18.7 GLM-5.2
- 16.4
Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview)
- 16.0 GPT-5.4
- 15.6 Kimi K2.6
- 14.2
DeepSeek-V4-Pro
- 13.3 GPT-5.6 Luna
- 13.3 GPT-5.6 Terra
- 12.5
Gemini 3 Flash
- 8.40 GPT-5.4 Mini
- 8.00 TML Inkling 256K
- 7.10
Gemini 3.1 Pro
- 6.20 Claude Haiku 4.5
- 5.80 Grok 4.3
- 0.0 Nemotron 3 Ultra 256K
- 1 Claude Opus 5 54.7%
- 2 Claude Opus 4.8 37.3%
- 3 Claude Opus 4.6 28%
- 4 Claude Sonnet 4.6 26.2%
- 5 GPT-5.6 Sol 25.3%
- 6 Kimi K3 25.3%
- 7 Claude Opus 4.7 24.4%
- 8 Claude Fable 5 24%
- 9 MedGuard 22.7%
- 10 GPT-5.5 20.9%
- 11 Claude Sonnet 5 20%
- 12 GLM-5.1 18.7%
- 13 GLM-5.2 18.7%
- 14
Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview) 16.4%
- 15 GPT-5.4 16%
- 16 Kimi K2.6 15.6%
- 17
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 14.2%
- 18 GPT-5.6 Luna 13.3%
- 19 GPT-5.6 Terra 13.3%
- 20
Gemini 3 Flash 12.5%
- 21 GPT-5.4 Mini 8.40%
- 22 TML Inkling 256K 8.00%
- 23
Gemini 3.1 Pro 7.10%
- 24 Claude Haiku 4.5 6.20%
- 25 Grok 4.3 5.80%
- 26 Nemotron 3 Ultra 256K 0%
Source: Official CHI-Bench leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Opus 5 | 54.7% | erius by Michael Johnson (MJ) | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | Claude Opus 4.8 | 37.3% | erius by Michael Johnson (MJ) | May 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | Claude Opus 4.6 | 28% | claude-code | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 26.2% | claude-code | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | GPT-5.6 Sol | 25.3% | codex | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | Kimi K3 | 25.3% | openai-agents | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | Claude Opus 4.7 | 24.4% | claude-code | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | Claude Fable 5 | 24% | claude-code | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | MedGuard | 22.7% | hermes by cuilinke | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | GPT-5.5 | 20.9% | codex | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | Claude Sonnet 5 | 20% | claude-code | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 12 | GLM-5.1 | 18.7% | openai-agents | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 13 | GLM-5.2 | 18.7% | openai-agents | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 14 | | 16.4% | hermes | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 15 | GPT-5.4 | 16% | codex | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 16 | Kimi K2.6 | 15.6% | hermes | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 17 | | 14.2% | openai-agents | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 18 | GPT-5.6 Luna | 13.3% | codex | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 19 | GPT-5.6 Terra | 13.3% | codex | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 20 | | 12.5% | gemini-cli | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 21 | GPT-5.4 Mini | 8.40% | codex | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 22 | TML Inkling 256K | 8.00% | openai-agents | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 23 | | 7.10% | gemini-cli | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 24 | Claude Haiku 4.5 | 6.20% | claude-code | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 25 | Grok 4.3 | 5.80% | openai-agents | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 26 | Nemotron 3 Ultra 256K | 0% | openai-agents | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
Cost versus pass@1
The line joins the runs that no other run beats on both measures. We redrew this chart from the numbers on the official leaderboard.
| Model | Setting | Pass@1 | Average cost per trial |
|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.6 | claude-code | 28% | $6.47 |
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | claude-code | 26.2% | $1.3 |
| Claude Opus 4.7 | claude-code | 24.4% | $9.91 |
| GPT-5.5 | codex | 20.9% | $1.29 |
| GLM-5.1 | openai-agents | 18.7% | $0.27 |
| GLM-5.1 | hermes | 18.7% | $1.04 |
| Claude Opus 4.7 | openclaw | 17.3% | $11.48 |
| GLM-5.1 | openclaw | 16.9% | $0.96 |
| | hermes | 16.4% | $4.12 |
| GPT-5.4 | codex | 16% | $1.3 |
| | openai-agents | 15.6% | $0.58 |
| Kimi K2.6 | hermes | 15.6% | $1.07 |
| Kimi K2.6 | openai-agents | 15.1% | $0.43 |
| | openai-agents | 14.2% | $0.25 |
| | hermes | 13.8% | $2.19 |
| | gemini-cli | 12.5% | $0.33 |
| GLM-5.1 | deepagents | 11.1% | $0.26 |
| | openclaw | 11.1% | $0.53 |
| | deepagents | 10.7% | $0.21 |
| Kimi K2.6 | openclaw | 10.2% | $0.91 |
| | deepagents | 9.3% | $0.57 |
| GPT-5.4 Mini | codex | 8.4% | $0.27 |
| | gemini-cli | 7.1% | $2.11 |
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-code | 6.2% | $0.16 |
| Grok 4.3 | openai-agents | 5.8% | $1.54 |
| | openclaw | 4.9% | $2.8 |
| Grok 4.3 | hermes | 4.4% | $1.05 |
| Kimi K2.6 | deepagents | 3.1% | $0.55 |
| Grok 4.3 | deepagents | 2.2% | $1.43 |
| Grok 4.3 | openclaw | 0.4% | $2.66 |
Of runs with a cost, the best scores 28% for $6.47 a task
Runs on the cost frontier score higher than any run that's cheaper. Claude Sonnet 4.6 comes within 1.8 points of the best for $1.30 a task, 5 times cheaper. The costs are the leaderboard's own estimates, so compare them only within this benchmark.
Source: Official CHI-Bench leaderboard
| Model | Effort | Harness | Score | Cost per task | Output tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5 | erius by Michael Johnson (MJ) | 54.7% | |||
| Claude Opus 4.8 | erius by Michael Johnson (MJ) | 37.3% | |||
| Claude Opus 5 | claude-code | 37.3% | |||
| Claude Opus 4.8 | claude-code | 33.3% | |||
| Claude Opus 4.6 | claude-code | 28% | $6.47 | ||
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | claude-code | 26.2% | $1.30 | ||
| GPT-5.6 Sol | codex | 25.3% | |||
| Kimi K3 | openai-agents | 25.3% | |||
| Claude Opus 4.7 | claude-code | 24.4% | $9.91 | ||
| Claude Fable 5 | claude-code | 24% | |||
| GPT-5.5 | codex | 20.9% | $1.29 | ||
| Claude Sonnet 5 | claude-code | 20% | |||
| GLM-5.1 | openai-agents | 18.7% | $0.27 | ||
| GLM-5.1 | hermes | 18.7% | $1.04 | ||
| GLM-5.2 | openai-agents | 18.7% | |||
| Claude Opus 4.7 | openclaw | 17.3% | $11 | ||
| GLM-5.1 | openclaw | 16.9% | $0.96 | ||
| | hermes | 16.4% | $4.12 | ||
| GPT-5.4 | codex | 16% | $1.30 | ||
| Kimi K2.6 | hermes | 15.6% | $1.07 | ||
| | openai-agents | 15.6% | $0.58 | ||
| Kimi K2.6 | openai-agents | 15.1% | $0.43 | ||
| | openai-agents | 14.2% | $0.25 | ||
| | hermes | 13.8% | $2.19 | ||
| GPT-5.6 Luna | codex | 13.3% | |||
| GPT-5.6 Terra | codex | 13.3% | |||
| | gemini-cli | 12.5% | $0.33 | ||
| GLM-5.1 | deepagents | 11.1% | $0.26 | ||
| | openclaw | 11.1% | $0.53 | ||
| | deepagents | 10.7% | $0.21 | ||
| Kimi K2.6 | openclaw | 10.2% | $0.91 | ||
| | deepagents | 9.30% | $0.57 | ||
| GPT-5.4 Mini | codex | 8.40% | $0.27 | ||
| | gemini-cli | 7.10% | $2.11 | ||
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-code | 6.20% | $0.16 | ||
| Grok 4.3 | openai-agents | 5.80% | $1.54 | ||
| | openclaw | 4.90% | $2.80 | ||
| Grok 4.3 | hermes | 4.40% | $1.05 | ||
| Kimi K2.6 | deepagents | 3.10% | $0.55 | ||
| Grok 4.3 | deepagents | 2.20% | $1.43 | ||
| Grok 4.3 | openclaw | 0.40% | $2.66 |
3 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in May 2026
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official CHI-Bench leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official CHI-Bench leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Law, finance and medicine
- MedXpertQA-MM In use Models answer expert-level medical exam questions that combine images with clinical records and test results. Scoring is accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 80.4%
- HealthBench Professional In use 525 physician-authored tasks from real clinician chats (care consult, documentation, research) with physician-adjudicated rubrics. Claude Sonnet 5.5 69.2%
- HealthBench In use 5,000 realistic health conversations graded against physician-written rubrics. A length-adjusted variant penalizes verbosity. GPT-5 67.2%
- FinSearchComp In use Agents search the web to fetch live financial data, look up history, and run multi-step investigations, across 635 expert-written questions. Scored by answer accuracy.
Ling-3.1-flash 81.7%
- KBL In use Models answer Korean legal knowledge and reasoning tasks and Korean bar exam questions. It has 7 knowledge tasks, 4 reasoning tasks and 2,510 bar exam items.
Solar Pro 4 77.5%
- KorMedMCQA In use Models answer 7,469 multiple-choice questions from Korean licensing exams for doctors, nurses, pharmacists and dentists, held from 2012 to 2024.
Solar Pro 4 93.2%