Benchmark Almanac

CocoaBench

GPT-5.4 45.1% leads since April 2026
Not in model cards

Unified digital agents do long human-designed tasks that mix vision, search and coding. An automatic function checks each final output.

36 upvotes on Hugging Face papers. Every Eval Ever holds results for Anthropic, Google, Moonshot, OpenAI and Qwen models.

Made by
UC San Diego
Released
April 2026
Kind
Web browsing
Level
Expert
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Agent task
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
GPT-5.4 #27 on the capability index
Last model added
March 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

LLM agents now perform strongly in software engineering, deep research, GUI automation, and various other applications, while recent agent scaffolds and models are increasingly integrating these capabilities into unified systems. Yet, most evaluations still test these capabilities in isolation, which leaves a gap for more diverse use cases that require agents to combine different capabilities. We introduce CocoaBench, a benchmark for unified digital agents built from human-designed, long-horizon tasks that require flexible composition of vision, search, and coding. Tasks are specified only by an instruction and an automatic evaluation function over the final output, enabling reliable and scalable evaluation across diverse agent infrastructures. We also present CocoaAgent, a lightweight shared scaffold for controlled comparison across model backbones. Experiments show that current agents remain far from reliable on CocoaBench, with the best evaluated system achieving only 45.1% success rate. Our analysis further points to substantial room for improvement in reasoning and planning, tool use and execution, and visual grounding.

Abstract of CocoaBench: Evaluating Unified Digital Agents in the Wild (arXiv:2604.11201, CC0)
8
Entries on its own leaderboard, 6 models we track

GPT-5.4 leads with 45.1% among models released by March 2026

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

The newest model with a score here came out in March 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 GPT-5.4 45.1%
  2. 2 Claude Sonnet 4.6 34%
  3. 3 Gemini 3.1 Pro 30.7%
  4. 4 ChatGPT agent 26.8%
  5. 5 Gemini-Flash-3.0 19.6%
  6. 6 Kimi K2.5 11.5%
  7. 7 Qwen3.5-397B-A13B 9.80%
  8. 8 o4-mini 3.30%

Source: Official CocoaBench leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-5.4 45.1% Codex Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
2 Claude Sonnet 4.6 34% OpenClaw Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
3 Gemini 3.1 Pro 30.7% Cocoa-Agent Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
4 ChatGPT agent 26.8% Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
5 Gemini-Flash-3.0 19.6% Cocoa-Agent Official leaderboard
6 Kimi K2.5 11.5% Cocoa-Agent Jan 2026 Official leaderboard
7 Qwen3.5-397B-A13B 9.80% Cocoa-Agent Official leaderboard
8 o4-mini 3.30% OpenAI Deep Research Apr 2025 Official leaderboard

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

OpenAI
Own leaderboard Not tested since Apr 2026
GPT-5.4 45.1%

Source: Official CocoaBench leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-5.4 Claude Sonnet 4.6 ChatGPT agent o4-mini 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-5.4 Claude Sonnet 4.6

Source: Official CocoaBench leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Computer and browser use

All 69 in Computer and browser use
  • BrowseComp In use Hard-to-find facts that need persistent web browsing. Short verifiable answers graded for exact correctness. Claude Fable 5 93.3%
  • ScreenSpot-Pro In use GUI grounding on high-resolution professional-software screenshots. The model must locate the target UI element. GPT-6 Astra 92.7%
  • AndroidWorld In use Agents complete 116 tasks across 20 real Android apps in an emulator. Each task checks the device's system state to judge success. GPT-6 Astra 100%
  • OSWorld 2.1 In use Agents complete 108 long-horizon workflows across 31 self-hosted websites and desktop apps, averaging 318 tool calls. Scored by binary completion and checkpoint partial credit. Claude Opus 5.5 81.8%
  • WebArena-Verified In use Agents complete 812 audited WebArena tasks on self-hosted websites. Deterministic evaluators check the agent's answer and captured network traces. Muse Spark 1.1 69%
  • MobileWorld In use Agents complete 201 tasks across 20 mobile apps, including tasks that need user clarification or MCP tools. Backend checks verify success. GPT-5 55.3%