Benchmark Almanac

Complex Workflow (ByteDance Seed in-house)

Seed2.0 Pro 64.7% leads since February 2026
Fading

Models carry out step-by-step tasks that follow a given standard operating procedure, such as multi-turn after-sales service in support, sales and healthcare.

One of six in-house application sets in the Seed1.8 and Seed2.0 model cards. Scoring is a guess.

Made by
ByteDance Seed
Released
December 2025
Kind
Following precise instructions
Level
Everyday
Scored
Graded by a model
Answers
Open-ended
Tasks
Kept private
Last in a launch post
December 2025, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
March 2026
2
Models scored in lab cards
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab
2
System cards report it, from 1 lab

Seed2.0 Pro leads with 64.7%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 Seed2.0 Pro 64.7%
  2. 2 Seed1.8 54.6%

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Seed2.0 Pro 64.7% Feb 2026 Lab model card
2 Seed1.8 54.6% Dec 2025 Lab model card

2 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in December 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

ByteDance Seed
Lab claims Not tested since Mar 2026
Seed2.0 Pro 64.7%

Source: Labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed2.0 Pro Seed1.8 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed2.0 Pro Seed1.8

Source: Labs’ model cards

Labs headline it less often now, last in December 2025

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

ByteDance Seed
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Dec 18, 2025 Seed1.8 54.6 Complex Workflow

2 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Mar 21, 2026 Seed1.8 model card 54.6 Complex Workflow (Table 1) Capabilities
Feb 14, 2026 Seed2.0 Pro model card 64.7 ToB-Complex Workflows (Table 13) Capabilities

More in Instructions and chat

All 81 in Instructions and chat
  • IFEval In use Models answer about 500 prompts containing verifiable instructions such as word limits or required keywords. Code checks each instruction for strict and loose accuracy. Gemma 4 31B IT 98.9%
  • IFBench In use 58 new out-of-domain verifiable output constraints. Scored by programmatic constraint checks (strict or loose). Nemotron-Cascade 2 30B-A3B 82.9%
  • MultiChallenge In use Multi-turn conversations testing instruction retention, inference memory, versioned editing and self-coherence. Graded by LLM judge with rubrics. GPT-6.1 Sol 82%
  • Multi-IF In use Models follow verifiable instructions over three-turn conversations in eight languages, extending IFEval. Scored by instruction accuracy at each turn. LFM3-1.7B 89.1%
  • AdvancedIF In use Models respond to over 1,600 prompts with complex, multi-turn, and system-level instructions. A judge model checks each response against expert-written rubrics. MAI-Thinking-1 85%
  • IFStruct In use Models generate JSON or YAML that must follow a requested schema and phrasing constraints, without constrained decoding. A response passes only if every structural constraint holds. Gemma 4 31B IT 95.9%