Benchmark Almanac

Contextual Nuclear Knowledge

OpenAI deep research 77% leads since February 2025
Only in system cards

Models answer 222 multiple choice questions on nuclear engineering with a nonproliferation focus. Scored as cons@32 accuracy.

Questions written by an MIT nuclear security fellow for OpenAI Preparedness.

Made by
OpenAI
Released
December 2024
Kind
Dangerous capabilities
Level
Expert
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Multiple choice
Tasks
Kept private
Strongest model tested
o1 #117 on the capability index
Last in a system card
February 2025
Last model added
February 2025
4
Models scored in lab cards
4
System cards report it, from 1 lab

OpenAI deep research leads with 77% among models released by February 2025

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in February 2025, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 OpenAI deep research 77%
  2. 2 o1 74%
  3. 3 o3-mini 73%
  4. 4 GPT-4.5 71%

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 OpenAI deep research 77% Feb 2025 Lab model card
2 o1 74% Dec 2024 Lab model card
3 o3-mini 73% Jan 2025 Lab model card
4 GPT-4.5 71% Feb 2025 Lab model card

2 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in December 2024

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

OpenAI
Lab claims Not tested since Feb 2025

Source: Labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) OpenAI deep research o1 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) OpenAI deep research

Source: Labs’ model cards

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

4 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Feb 27, 2025 GPT-4.5 system card 71 Contextual Nuclear Knowledge, cons@32, GPT-4.5 (Post), printed chart label (4.4.1) Bio and chem risk
Feb 25, 2025 OpenAI deep research system card 77 Contextual Nuclear Knowledge, cons@32, post-mitigation with browsing, printed chart label (without browsing 75%) (3.4.5) Bio and chem risk
Jan 31, 2025 o3-mini system card 73 Contextual Nuclear Knowledge, cons@32, o3-mini (Post), printed chart label (5.5.2) Bio and chem risk
Dec 5, 2024 o1 system card 74 Contextual Nuclear Knowledge, accuracy cons@32, o1 (post-mitigation), printed chart label (5.6.2) Bio and chem risk

More in Safety and alignment

All 465 in Safety and alignment
  • FORTRESS In use Paired adversarial and benign national-security misuse prompts. Rubric-graded risk score on adversarial and over-refusal score on benign prompts. Claude Opus 5.5 5.78%
  • StrongREJECT In use Forbidden-prompt jailbreak benchmark with a rubric grader that scores how useful a non-refusal actually is. Inkling 98.6%
  • Gray Swan IPI Arena benchmark In use Indirect prompt-injection attacks from public red-teaming competitions replayed on tool, coding and browser agents. Attack success rate at k attempts. Gemini 4 Carbon 0%
  • DistressBench In use Models reply as a chatbot to 718 simulated users in psychological crisis, in single-turn and multi-turn chats. Three judge models score replies against clinician-written rubrics. Muse Spark 1.2 88.4%
  • Lakera B3 (Backbone Breaker Benchmark) In use Crowdsourced prompt-injection attacks hit backbone LLMs inside agent threat snapshots at three defense levels. The score is attack resistance, 100 minus the board's vulnerability percentage. Claude Opus 4.5 89%
  • IHEval In use Models face conflicts between system, user and tool instructions. Reports a composite score for following the higher-priority instruction. GPT-4o 70%