Benchmark Almanac

CSVQA

o1 49.6% leads since May 2025
STEP3-VL-10B 63.3% leads since January 2026
Only in system cards

Models answer 1,378 Chinese STEM questions in physics, chemistry, biology and math that need domain knowledge and evidence from 14 kinds of scientific images.

The set mixes multiple choice and open questions. The top proprietary model scored 49.6% at release.

Released
May 2025
Kind
Visual math and diagrams
Level
School
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Multiple choice
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
o1 #117 on the capability index
Last in a system card
January 2026
Last model added
January 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have demonstrated remarkable progress in multimodal understanding, yet their capabilities for scientific reasoning remain inadequately assessed. Current multimodal benchmarks predominantly evaluate generic image comprehension or text-driven reasoning, lacking authentic scientific contexts that require domain-specific knowledge integration with visual evidence analysis. To fill this gap, we present CSVQA, a diagnostic multimodal benchmark specifically designed for evaluating scientific reasoning through domain-grounded visual question answering. Our benchmark features 1,378 carefully constructed question-answer pairs spanning diverse STEM disciplines, each demanding domain knowledge, integration of visual evidence, and higher-order reasoning. Compared to prior multimodal benchmarks, CSVQA places greater emphasis on real-world scientific content and complex reasoning. We additionally propose a rigorous evaluation protocol to systematically assess whether model predictions are substantiated by valid intermediate reasoning steps based on curated explanations. Our comprehensive evaluation of 15 VLMs on this benchmark reveals notable performance disparities, as even the top-ranked proprietary model attains only 49.6% accuracy. This empirical evidence underscores the pressing need for advancing scientific reasoning capabilities in VLMs. Our CSVQA is released at https://huggingface.co/datasets/Skywork/CSVQA

Abstract of CSVQA: A Chinese Multimodal Benchmark for Evaluating STEM Reasoning Capabilities of VLMs (arXiv:2505.24120, CC0)
16
Entries on its own leaderboard, 12 models we track
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

o1 leads with 49.6% among models released by April 2025

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

STEP3-VL-10B leads with 63.3%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in April 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 o1 49.6%
  2. 2 Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 44.1%
  3. 3 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 38.5%
  4. 4 InternVL3-78B 37.4%
  5. 5 Claude3.7 36.6%
  6. 6 QVQ-72B 36.6%
  7. 7 InternVL2_5-78B 28.4%
  8. 8 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 23.6%
  9. 9 Gemma 3 27B 22.9%
  10. 10 Phi-4 11.5%
  11. 11 Pixtral 12B 10.5%
  12. 12 Idefics3-8B-Llama3 10.1%
  13. 13 MonoInternVL 9.30%
  14. 14 LLaVA-v1.5-13B 7.50%
  15. 15 DeepSeek-VL2 6.20%
  16. 16 Fuyu-8B 4.90%

Source: Official CSVQA leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 o1 49.6% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
2 Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 44.1% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
3 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 38.5% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
4 InternVL3-78B 37.4% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
5 Claude3.7 36.6% Official leaderboard
6 QVQ-72B 36.6% Official leaderboard
7 InternVL2_5-78B 28.4% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
8 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 23.6% Official leaderboard
9 Gemma 3 27B 22.9% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
10 Phi-4 11.5% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
11 Pixtral 12B 10.5% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
12 Idefics3-8B-Llama3 10.1% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
13 MonoInternVL 9.30% Official leaderboard
14 LLaVA-v1.5-13B 7.50% Oct 2023 Official leaderboard
15 DeepSeek-VL2 6.20% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
16 Fuyu-8B 4.90% Oct 2023 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 STEP3-VL-10B 63.3% Jan 2026 Lab model card
2 o1 49.6% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
3 Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 44.1% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
4 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 38.5% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
5 InternVL3-78B 37.4% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
6 InternVL2_5-78B 28.4% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
7 Gemma 3 27B 22.9% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
8 Phi-4 11.5% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
9 Pixtral 12B 10.5% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
10 Idefics3-8B-Llama3 10.1% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
11 LLaVA-v1.5-13B 7.50% Oct 2023 Official leaderboard
12 DeepSeek-VL2 6.20% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
13 Fuyu-8B 4.90% Oct 2023 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

Number one over time 2 models have held number one with claims included since its release in May 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

OpenAI
Own leaderboard Not tested since May 2025
o1 49.6%

Source: Official CSVQA leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) STEP3-VL-10B o1 InternVL2_5-78B Pixtral 12B LLaVA-v1.5-13B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) STEP3-VL-10B o1

Sources: Official CSVQA leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Jan 14, 2026 STEP3-VL-10B technical report 63.3 CSVQA, SeRe (Table 1) Capabilities

More in Vision

All 281 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%