CSVQA
Models answer 1,378 Chinese STEM questions in physics, chemistry, biology and math that need domain knowledge and evidence from 14 kinds of scientific images.
The set mixes multiple choice and open questions. The top proprietary model scored 49.6% at release.
- Made by
- Skywork AI (Kunlun Inc.)
- Released
- May 2025
- Kind
- Visual math and diagrams
- Level
- School
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Multiple choice
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- o1 #117 on the capability index
- Last in a system card
- January 2026
- Last model added
- January 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have demonstrated remarkable progress in multimodal understanding, yet their capabilities for scientific reasoning remain inadequately assessed. Current multimodal benchmarks predominantly evaluate generic image comprehension or text-driven reasoning, lacking authentic scientific contexts that require domain-specific knowledge integration with visual evidence analysis. To fill this gap, we present CSVQA, a diagnostic multimodal benchmark specifically designed for evaluating scientific reasoning through domain-grounded visual question answering. Our benchmark features 1,378 carefully constructed question-answer pairs spanning diverse STEM disciplines, each demanding domain knowledge, integration of visual evidence, and higher-order reasoning. Compared to prior multimodal benchmarks, CSVQA places greater emphasis on real-world scientific content and complex reasoning. We additionally propose a rigorous evaluation protocol to systematically assess whether model predictions are substantiated by valid intermediate reasoning steps based on curated explanations. Our comprehensive evaluation of 15 VLMs on this benchmark reveals notable performance disparities, as even the top-ranked proprietary model attains only 49.6% accuracy. This empirical evidence underscores the pressing need for advancing scientific reasoning capabilities in VLMs. Our CSVQA is released at https://huggingface.co/datasets/Skywork/CSVQA
o1 leads with 49.6% among models released by April 2025
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
STEP3-VL-10B leads with 63.3%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in April 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 1 o1 49.6%
- 2
Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 44.1%
- 3
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 38.5%
- 4
InternVL3-78B 37.4%
- 5 Claude3.7 36.6%
- 6 QVQ-72B 36.6%
- 7
InternVL2_5-78B 28.4%
- 8 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 23.6%
- 9
Gemma 3 27B 22.9%
- 10
Phi-4 11.5%
- 11
Pixtral 12B 10.5%
- 12
Idefics3-8B-Llama3 10.1%
- 13 MonoInternVL 9.30%
- 14
LLaVA-v1.5-13B 7.50%
- 15
DeepSeek-VL2 6.20%
- 16 Fuyu-8B 4.90%
Source: Official CSVQA leaderboard
- 1
STEP3-VL-10B 63.3%
- 2 o1 49.6%
- 3
Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 44.1%
- 4
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 38.5%
- 5
InternVL3-78B 37.4%
- 6
InternVL2_5-78B 28.4%
- 7
Gemma 3 27B 22.9%
- 8
Phi-4 11.5%
- 9
Pixtral 12B 10.5%
- 10
Idefics3-8B-Llama3 10.1%
- 11
LLaVA-v1.5-13B 7.50%
- 12
DeepSeek-VL2 6.20%
- 13 Fuyu-8B 4.90%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official CSVQA leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | o1 | 49.6% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | | 44.1% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | | 38.5% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | | 37.4% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | Claude3.7 | 36.6% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 6 | QVQ-72B | 36.6% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 7 | | 28.4% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) | 23.6% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 9 | | 22.9% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | | 11.5% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | | 10.5% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | | 10.1% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | MonoInternVL | 9.30% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 14 | | 7.50% | Oct 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | | 6.20% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | Fuyu-8B | 4.90% | Oct 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 63.3% | Jan 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | o1 | 49.6% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | | 44.1% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | | 38.5% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | | 37.4% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | | 28.4% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | | 22.9% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | | 11.5% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | | 10.5% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | | 10.1% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | | 7.50% | Oct 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | | 6.20% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | Fuyu-8B | 4.90% | Oct 2023 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
Number one over time 2 models have held number one with claims included since its release in May 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official CSVQA leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official CSVQA leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Labs report it only in system cards
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.
One system card reports it
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2026 | | 63.3 | CSVQA, SeRe (Table 1) | Capabilities |
More in Vision
- MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
- MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
- CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
- MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
- MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
- ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance.
Command A Vision 90.9%