CulturalBench
Models answer 1,696 human-written and human-verified questions on cultural knowledge across 45 global regions and 17 topics. Scored by accuracy.
The Hard version turns each question into true or false items. Humans score 92.4% on it. Published at ACL 2025.
- Made by
- University of Washington and Allen Institute for AI
- Released
- October 2024
- Kind
- Knowledge in many languages
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Multiple choice
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
-
Llama 3.1-405B #162 on the capability index
- Last in a system card
- September 2025
- Last model added
- September 2025
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Robust, diverse, and challenging cultural knowledge benchmarks are essential for measuring our progress towards making LMs that are helpful across diverse cultures. We introduce CulturalBench: a set of 1,696 human-written and human-verified questions to assess LMs' cultural knowledge, covering 45 global regions including underrepresented ones like Bangladesh, Zimbabwe, and Peru. Questions are each verified by five independent annotators and span 17 diverse topics ranging from food preferences to greeting etiquette. We construct CulturalBench using methods inspired by Human-AI Red-Teaming. Compared to human performance (92.4% accuracy), the hard version of CulturalBench is challenging even for the best-performing frontier LMs, ranging from 28.7% to 61.5% in accuracy. We find that LMs often struggle with tricky questions that have multiple correct answers (e.g., What utensils do the Chinese usually use?), revealing a tendency to overfit to a single answer. Our results indicate that GPT-4o substantially outperform other models across cultures, besting local providers (e.g., Mistral on European culture and DeepSeek on Chinese culture). Across the board, models under-perform on questions related to North Africa, South America and Middle East.
GPT-4o leads with 62% among models released by August 2024
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
Apertus 70B leads with 74.2%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in August 2024, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 62.0 GPT-4o
- 61.6 GPT-4 Turbo (Jan 2024)
- 61.5 gpt4o (snapshot unspecified)
- 59.8 gpt-4-1106-preview
- 54.2
Llama 3.1-70B
- 52.9 opus
- 52.6
Llama 3.1-405B
- 51.5 sonnet35
- 48.7 mistral-large-2402
- 48.7
Qwen2-72B
- 48.3 GPT-4o mini
- 45.3 gemini-1-5-flash (snapshot unspecified)
- 44.7
Qwen1.5-72B
- 44.3
Mixtral 8x22B
- 43.9
Mistral Large
- 43.3 mistralsmall
- 43.0
Gemma 2 27B
- 39.0
Gemma 2 9B
- 38.0
Llama 3.1-8B
- 37.7
Mistral NeMo
- 34.8 mistral-7b-v2
- 34.5 sonnet3
- 32.8 gpt35turbo (snapshot unspecified)
- 30.4
Llama 3-70B
- 27.0 gpt-3-5-turbo-1106
- 25.4 haiku
- 21.4
Llama 3-8B
- 19.6 mistral-7b-v1
- 1 GPT-4o Aug 2024 62%
- 2 GPT-4 Turbo (Jan 2024) 61.6%
- 3 gpt4o (snapshot unspecified) 61.5%
- 4 gpt-4-1106-preview 59.8%
- 5
Llama 3.1-70B 54.2%
- 6 opus 52.9%
- 7
Llama 3.1-405B 52.6%
- 8 sonnet35 51.5%
- 9 mistral-large-2402 48.7%
- 10
Qwen2-72B 48.7%
- 11 GPT-4o mini 48.3%
- 12 gemini-1-5-flash (snapshot unspecified) 45.3%
- 13
Qwen1.5-72B 44.7%
- 14
Mixtral 8x22B 44.3%
- 15
Mistral Large 43.9%
- 16 mistralsmall 43.3%
- 17
Gemma 2 27B 43%
- 18
Gemma 2 9B 39%
- 19
Llama 3.1-8B 38%
- 20
Mistral NeMo 37.7%
- 21 mistral-7b-v2 34.8%
- 22 sonnet3 34.5%
- 23 gpt35turbo (snapshot unspecified) 32.8%
- 24
Llama 3-70B 30.4%
- 25 gpt-3-5-turbo-1106 27%
- 26 haiku 25.4%
- 27
Llama 3-8B 21.4%
- 28 mistral-7b-v1 19.6%
Source: Official CulturalBench leaderboard
- 1
Apertus 70B 74.2%
- 2 GPT-4o Aug 2024 62%
- 3 GPT-4 Turbo (Jan 2024) 61.6%
- 4
Llama 3.1-70B 54.2%
- 5
Llama 3.1-405B 52.6%
- 6
Qwen2-72B 48.7%
- 7 GPT-4o mini 48.3%
- 8
Qwen1.5-72B 44.7%
- 9
Mixtral 8x22B 44.3%
- 10
Mistral Large 43.9%
- 11
Gemma 2 27B 43%
- 12
Gemma 2 9B 39%
- 13
Llama 3.1-8B 38%
- 14
Mistral NeMo 37.7%
- 15
Llama 3-70B 30.4%
- 16
Llama 3-8B 21.4%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official CulturalBench leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-4o Aug 2024 | 62% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | GPT-4 Turbo (Jan 2024) | 61.6% | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | gpt4o (snapshot unspecified) | 61.5% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 4 | gpt-4-1106-preview | 59.8% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 5 | | 54.2% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | opus | 52.9% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 7 | | 52.6% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | sonnet35 | 51.5% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 9 | mistral-large-2402 | 48.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 10 | | 48.7% | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | GPT-4o mini | 48.3% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | gemini-1-5-flash (snapshot unspecified) | 45.3% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 13 | | 44.7% | Feb 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | | 44.3% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | | 43.9% | Feb 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | mistralsmall | 43.3% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 17 | | 43% | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | | 39% | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | | 38% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | | 37.7% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 21 | mistral-7b-v2 | 34.8% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 22 | sonnet3 | 34.5% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 23 | gpt35turbo (snapshot unspecified) | 32.8% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 24 | | 30.4% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 25 | gpt-3-5-turbo-1106 | 27% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 26 | haiku | 25.4% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 27 | | 21.4% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 28 | mistral-7b-v1 | 19.6% | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 74.2% | Sep 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | GPT-4o Aug 2024 | 62% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | GPT-4 Turbo (Jan 2024) | 61.6% | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | | 54.2% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | | 52.6% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | | 48.7% | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | GPT-4o mini | 48.3% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | | 44.7% | Feb 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | | 44.3% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | | 43.9% | Feb 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | | 43% | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | | 39% | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | | 38% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | | 37.7% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | | 30.4% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | | 21.4% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
Number one over time 2 models have held number one with claims included since its release in October 2024
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official CulturalBench leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official CulturalBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Labs report it only in system cards
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.
One system card reports it
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2025 | | 74.2 | Cultural Bench (Table 20) | Capabilities |
More in Multilingual
- MMMLU In use MMLU professionally translated into 14 languages. Multiple-choice accuracy. Claude Mythos Preview 92.7%
- WMT24++ In use English-to-55-language translation of WMT24 test data. Scored with automatic metrics such as MetricX or xCOMET.
K-EXAONE 90.5%
- MMLU-ProX In use MMLU-Pro translated into up to 29 languages with expert review. Multiple-choice accuracy per language.
Qwen3.7-Max 87%
- CLIcK In use Models answer 1,995 multiple-choice questions on Korean language and culture. Questions come from official Korean exams and textbooks in eleven categories.
Solar Open 2 90.7%
- Global MMLU Lite 3.0 In use Models answer 400 human-translated MMLU questions per language in 23 languages. Version 3.0 adds Czech, Hungarian, Oriya, Slovak and Tajik and updates Italian. Accuracy.
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B-A55B Base 90.1%
- MMMB In use Models answer multiple-choice questions about images in six languages across 15 categories. The set has about 12,000 questions. LFM2.5-VL-3B 83%