Benchmark Almanac

Llama 3.1-8B

Llama 3.1-8B ranks first on AgentHarm.

Meta Released July 23rd, 2024 Compare with others
129
Benchmarks with a score
1
Ranked first, out of five or more models
1
In the top three
Meta Jul 2024

Llama 3.1-8B

Open weights

111.1 #202 of 256
Epoch Capabilities Index
Self-Reported Index 112.4 #369 of 404
  • MultiChallenge 23.7% #41 /42
  • GPQA Diamond 27% #217 /229
  • KoBALT 17% #10 /12

Where it ranks

Its best score on each benchmark, and where that ranks among every model with a score there. We rank each model once, at its best setting.

Knowledge and language

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
AlGhafa 70.9% #11 of 39 Official leaderboard
HELMET 37.1% #6 of 16 Official leaderboard
ArabicMMLU 53.6% #15 of 39 Official leaderboard
ArbMMLU-HT 47.9% #15 of 39 Official leaderboard
BullshitBench 34.5% #43 of 107 Official leaderboard
Open Arabic LLM Leaderboard v2 55.4% #17 of 39 Official leaderboard
MadinahQA 43.1% #21 of 39 Official leaderboard
ARC-Challenge 83.4% #27 of 49 Lab model card
Needle In A Haystack 98.8% #5 of 9 Lab model card
AlpacaEval 2.0 20.9% #27 of 47 Official leaderboard
Open Arabic LLM Leaderboard v1 43% #32 of 55 Official leaderboard
TriviaQA 77.6% #24 of 40 Lab model card
WinoGrande 75.7% #29 of 47 Lab model card
CommonSenseQA 75% #12 of 19 Lab model card
MLogiQA 39.9% #11 of 17 Official leaderboard
AP Calculus 57.1% #2 of 3 Lab model card
Vectara Hallucination Leaderboard (HHEM) 5.40% #99 of 148 Official leaderboard
MMLU-CF 57.1% #25 of 37 Official leaderboard
Phare 62.5% #42 of 62 Official leaderboard
AGIEval 47.8% #28 of 40 Lab model card
MMLU 73% #95 of 131 Lab model card
FaithJudge 28.4% #27 of 37 Official leaderboard
PIQA 81% #27 of 37 Lab model card
MuSR 38.1% #72 of 98 Official leaderboard
SQuAD v2 77% #6 of 8 Lab model card
QIMMA 45.3% #19 of 25 Official leaderboard
BIG-Bench Hard 64.2% #56 of 73 Lab model card
IFEval 80.4% #104 of 135 Lab model card
MGSM 68.9% #44 of 57 Lab model card
BuzzBench 32.9 #16 of 20 Official leaderboard
CulturalBench 38% #12 of 15 Official leaderboard
SQuAD 77% #4 of 5 Lab model card
BullshitBench V2 14% #104 of 129 Official leaderboard
Chinese SimpleQA 17.7% #22 of 27 Official leaderboard
AraGen 24.9% #35 of 42 Official leaderboard
SIQA 49.5% #20 of 24 Lab model card
KoBALT 17% #10 of 12 Official leaderboard
LMArena (Elo) 1,211 #280 of 335 Official leaderboard
Wer wird Millionär? LLM Benchmark 118.0 #67 of 77 Official leaderboard
ALRAGE 49.9% #34 of 39 Official leaderboard
BoolQ 75% #25 of 28 Lab model card
SuperGPQA 20.5% #53 of 59 Official leaderboard
BIG-Bench Extra Hard 3.60% #10 of 11 Official leaderboard
AgentIF 53.6% #11 of 12 Official leaderboard
SEA-HELM 37.2 #66 of 71 Official leaderboard
Creative Writing v3 47.2 #112 of 120 Official leaderboard
MMLU-Pro 48.3% #156 of 167 Lab model card
WritingBench 40.2 #43 of 45 Official leaderboard
OpenBookQA 45% #23 of 24 Lab model card
ThaiExam 24% #23 of 24 Official leaderboard
MultiChallenge 23.7% #41 of 42 Official leaderboard
Judgemark v2.1 19.2 #42 of 42 Official leaderboard
LongBench v2 30.4% #33 of 33 Official leaderboard
ToRR 28.9 #14 of 14 Official leaderboard
BBEH micro average 10.6% #11 of 11 Official leaderboard
RACE 54.3% #8 of 8 Lab model card
QuALITY 56% #7 of 7 Lab model card
GRE Verbal 149.0 #6 of 6 Lab model card
WorldSense 45.5% #4 of 4 Lab model card
AP Physics 57.1% #3 of 3 Lab model card
GMAT Verbal 65.7% #3 of 3 Lab model card
InfiniteBench/En.MC 65.1% #3 of 3 Lab model card
InfiniteBench/En.QA 27.1 #3 of 3 Lab model card
Multilingual MMLU (Meta) 58.6% #3 of 3 Lab model card
SAT Reading 57.4% #3 of 3 Lab model card
ZeroSCROLLS/QuALITY 81% #3 of 3 Lab model card

Math and science

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
GSM8K 84.5% #57 of 92 Lab model card
OlympicArena 19.4% #16 of 25 Official leaderboard
ZebraLogic 12.8% #30 of 46 Official leaderboard
MATH 51.9% #66 of 99 Lab model card
KOR-Bench 37.2% #23 of 33 Official leaderboard
PHYSICS 11.7% #15 of 20 Official leaderboard
MATH Level 5 22.9% #74 of 94 Epoch AI run
DTBench 50.9% #162 of 180 Official leaderboard
U-MATH 29.6% #27 of 30 Official leaderboard
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 1.67% #200 of 212 Epoch AI run
GPQA Diamond 27% #217 of 229 Epoch AI run
IneqMath 0% #33 of 34 Official leaderboard
GPQA Main 24.7% #60 of 60 Official leaderboard
SciPredict 14.7% #12 of 12 Official leaderboard
GRE Quantitative 152.0 #6 of 6 Lab model card
GMAT Quantitative 56% #3 of 3 Lab model card
GRE Physics 48% #3 of 3 Lab model card

Coding

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
MBPP 72.8% #41 of 71 Lab model card
MBPP+ 55.6% #24 of 35 Official leaderboard
HumanEval 72.6% #70 of 101 Lab model card
BigCodeBench 36.6% #53 of 69 Official leaderboard
BigCodeBench-Hard 13.5% #75 of 96 Official leaderboard
MHPP 17.1% #20 of 23 Official leaderboard
StructEval 61.8% #25 of 28 Official leaderboard
HumanEval+ 67.1% #26 of 27 Lab model card
BigO(Bench) 21.8% #18 of 18 Official leaderboard

Agents and tools

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) 76.1% #6 of 41 Lab model card
BFCL V4 25.8% #50 of 65 Official leaderboard
BALROG 15.1% #27 of 33 Official leaderboard
AceBench 33.4% #14 of 16 Official leaderboard
LLM Chess -796 #120 of 123 Official leaderboard
LisanBench 12.7 #131 of 133 Official leaderboard
ToolComp 17.4% #32 of 32 Official leaderboard
MCP-Bench 0.43 #15 of 15 Official leaderboard
ComplexFuncBench 0.10% #11 of 11 Official leaderboard
When2Call 16.6% #10 of 10 Official leaderboard
CRMArena 3.10% #9 of 9 Official leaderboard
AdaExploreBench 13.8% #8 of 8 Official leaderboard
API-Bank 82.6% #3 of 3 Lab model card
Gorilla APIBench 8.20% #3 of 3 Lab model card
Nexus 38.5% #3 of 3 Lab model card

Professional work

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
CorpFin v2 37.8% #116 of 119 Official leaderboard
TaxEval v2 32.3% #128 of 129 Official leaderboard
MedQA 24.4% #71 of 71 Official leaderboard
LEXam 10% #30 of 30 Official leaderboard

Vision, audio and robotics

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
SGP-Bench 46.5% #15 of 22 Official leaderboard

Safety and security

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
AgentHarm 3.10% #1 of 8 Official leaderboard
CyberSecEval Prompt Injection 19% #1 of 3 Lab model card
AraTrust 75.6% #19 of 39 Official leaderboard
SimpleSafetyTests 98.8% #40 of 75 Official leaderboard
AIR-Bench 2024 62.3% #49 of 82 Official leaderboard
Anthropic Red Team 96.8% #61 of 75 Official leaderboard
HELM Safety 86.2 #61 of 75 Official leaderboard
AthenaBench 38.8% #5 of 6 Official leaderboard
nocot-bench (NCRI) 40.6 #177 of 185 Official leaderboard
BrowseSafe++ 23.1% #15 of 15 Official leaderboard
IHEval 11.3% #10 of 10 Official leaderboard

Other

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
Open LLM Leaderboard v2 14.4 #73 of 99 Official leaderboard
HELM Lite 30.3 #58 of 71 Official leaderboard
ACCoRD 33.7 #138 of 152 Official leaderboard
Conceptual Reasoning Index 13.6 #140 of 151 Official leaderboard
LMCA 5.37% #142 of 147 Official leaderboard
HELM Capabilities 44.4 #58 of 60 Official leaderboard

Its lab's numbers put it at 112.4, 1.3 points above its ECI

The Self-Reported Index fits one score to the 24 capability results Meta reported for this model, on the scale of the Epoch Capabilities Index. Labs choose which benchmarks to show and how to run them, so read it as the lab's claim, not an independent measurement. The 90% interval runs from 110.0 to 114.8. How we compute it.

Its lab's numbers next to 8 leaderboards

Where the benchmark's own leaderboard, or Epoch AI's run, also has this model. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. Every pair.

Benchmark Lab says Board says Gap
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) 76.1% BFCL, 0-shot, acc, instruction tuned (Instruction tuned models table) 49.6% Leaderboard, prompted +27 pts
IFEval 80.4% IFEval, instruction tuned (Instruction tuned models table) 74.3% Leaderboard, strict, share of instructions followed +6.1 pts
GPQA Diamond 32.8% GPQA (0-shot, CoT), subset not stated, post-trained (Table 2) 27% Epoch AI run +5.8 pts
MBPP 72.8% MBPP ++ base version, 0-shot, pass@1, instruction tuned (Instruction tuned models table) 68.3% Leaderboard, EvalPlus subset, original tests +4.5 pts
HumanEval+ 67.1% HumanEval+, pass@1, post-trained (Table 18) 62.8% Leaderboard +4.3 pts
MMLU-Pro 48.3% MMLU-Pro (CoT), 5-shot, macro_avg/acc, instruction tuned (Instruction tuned models table) 44.3% Leaderboard +4.0 pts
HumanEval 72.6% HumanEval, 0-shot, pass@1, instruction tuned (Instruction tuned models table) 69.5% Leaderboard +3.1 pts
GMAT Quantitative 56% GMAT Quant., accuracy (Table 17) 56% Leaderboard Same

Meta's models over time

Meta's models in color, against every other model on the Epoch Capabilities Index, by release date.

50 100 150 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Muse Spark Open Llama 4 Maverick Llama 3.2 90B Llama 3.1-8B Llama 2-13B Llama 2-70B Llama 2-7B 50 100 150 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Muse Spark Open Llama 4 Maverick

Source: Epoch Capabilities Index, Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0)

Its system cards

Every result in the longer documents the lab published with it. 25 of them aren't in the launch post.