EBench
26 Isaac Sim household mobile-manipulation task types annotated by 5 capability and 4 generalization dimensions. Platform-scored success rate.
Diagnostic profile instead of one scalar. Leaderboard uses held-out Test-Mini split. Board lacks dates and trial counts. In September 2026 the maker raised the step limits for the bottle and shop tasks from 3,000 to 5,000 and called it a minor fix.
- Made by
- Shanghai AI Lab (InternRobotics)
- Released
- June 2026
- Kind
- Simulated robots
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Agent task
- Tasks
- Public, plus a private test set
In the authors’ words
We present EBench, a simulation benchmark that diagnoses generalist mobile manipulation policies beyond a single success-rate scalar. EBench comprises 26 diverse and challenging manipulation tasks annotated along 5 capability dimensions and 4 generalization dimensions. We evaluate state-of-the-art generalist manipulation models including π₀, π0.5, XVLA, and InternVLA-A1, and reveal that the models exhibit strikingly different capability profiles: π0.5 achieves the highest test success rate, the best train–test retention, and the strongest mobile manipulation performance; π₀ leads on dexterous fixed-base and high-precision tasks; XVLA and InternVLA-A1 exhibit complementary strengths across atomic skills and operating regimes. Beyond capability profiling, EBench analyzes the generalization ability from 4 representative perspectives, identifying the impact of different distribution shift factors. The results reveal strengths and weaknesses of models behind an overall score. We hope this benchmark offers a broad set of diagnostic signals to guide iteration on generalist manipulation models.
π 0.5 \pi_{0.5} tops the leaderboard with 41%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
- 1 π 0.5 \pi_{0.5} 41%
- 2 π 0 \pi_{0} 34.4%
- 3 InternVLA-A1 27.6%
- 4 XVLA 24.7%
Source: Official EBench leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | π 0.5 \pi_{0.5} | 41% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 2 | π 0 \pi_{0} | 34.4% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 3 | InternVLA-A1 | 27.6% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 4 | XVLA | 24.7% | Official leaderboard |
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Robotics
- ERQA In use 400 multiple-choice visual questions from robot and egocentric footage on spatial, trajectory, action and state reasoning. Accuracy.
Gemini Robotics ER 2 78.5%
- RoboDojo In use Generalist manipulation policies run 42 Isaac Sim tasks and 18 remote real-robot tasks. Scored by task score and success rate. GPT-6 Astra 29%
- RoboLab In use Zero-shot DROID Franka policies in Isaac Lab on 120 tabletop tasks at three instruction levels, 10 episodes each. Success rate. FLUX 3 Action 42.9%
- Progress classification (Google DeepMind) In use Models assign each frame of a robot video to one of five task-progress bands from 0 to 100 percent. Scored by accuracy.
Gemini Robotics ER 2 57.4%
- Human proximity (Google DeepMind robotics) In use Models judge from robot camera views whether a human is within 1 meter, a spatial awareness check for safe robot behavior. Scored by accuracy.
Gemini Robotics ER 2 93%
- Moment finding (Google DeepMind) In use Models find the moment in a robot video when an event happens. Scored by accuracy and mean absolute time distance in seconds.
Gemini Robotics ER 2 91.3%