EmoBench-M
Multimodal models are tested on emotional intelligence across 13 scenarios in three dimensions: emotion recognition, conversational emotion understanding and socially complex emotion analysis.
ACM MM 2026. About 155 GitHub stars.
- Made by
- EmoBench-M authors
- Released
- February 2025
- Kind
- General visual questions
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Multiple choice
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- GPT-5.2 #50 on the capability index
- Last model added
- December 2025
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
With the integration of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) into robotic systems and AI applications, embedding emotional intelligence (EI) capabilities is essential for enabling these models to perceive, interpret, and respond to human emotions effectively in real-world scenarios. Existing static, text-based, or text-image benchmarks overlook the multimodal complexities of real interactions and fail to capture the dynamic, context-dependent nature of emotional expressions, rendering them inadequate for evaluating MLLMs' EI capabilities. To address these limitations, we introduce EmoBench-M, a systematic benchmark grounded in established psychological theories, designed to evaluate MLLMs across 13 evaluation scenarios spanning three hierarchical dimensions: foundational emotion recognition (FER), conversational emotion understanding (CEU), and socially complex emotion analysis (SCEA). Evaluation was conducted on 27 state-of-the-art MLLMs, using both objective task-specific metrics and LLM-based evaluation, revealing a substantial performance gap relative to human-level competence. Even the best performing models, Gemini-3.0-Pro and GPT-5.2, achieve the highest scores on EmoBench-M, 70.5 and 66.5 points respectively. Specialized models such as AffectGPT exhibit uneven performance across EmoBench-M, demonstrating strengths in certain scenarios but generally lacking comprehensive emotional intelligence. By providing a comprehensive, multimodal evaluation framework, EmoBench-M captures both the strengths and weaknesses of current MLLMs across diverse emotional contexts. All benchmark resources, including datasets and code, are publicly available at https://emo-gml.github.io/, facilitating further research and advancement in MLLM emotional intelligence.
Gemini 3 Pro leads with 70.5% among models released by December 2025
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
The newest model with a score here came out in December 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 70.5
Gemini 3 Pro
- 66.5 GPT-5.2
- 65.5
Gemini 3 Flash
- 62.3
Gemini 2.0 Flash
- 61.3 Gemini-1.5-Flash (snapshot unspecified)
- 60.6
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
- 60.1 Qwen3-VL-Instruct-8B
- 57.8
Qwen2.5-VL-72B
- 57.7 GLM-4V-PLUS
- 56.7
Qwen2.5-VL-32B
- 54.4
InternVL2.5-38B
- 53.7
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
- 53.0
Qwen2-Audio-7B-Instruct
- 52.9
Qwen2.5-VL-7B
- 52.4
InternVL2_5-78B
- 51.5 InternVideo2-Chat-8B
- 51.5 Video-LLaMA2.1-7B-16F
- 50.9
InternVL2.5-4B
- 50.4
InternVL2.5-8B
- 49.9 Video-LLaMA2-72B
- 48.7 Video-LLaMA2.1-7B-AV
- 47.1 VideoLLAMA2-7B
- 46.5 MiniCPM-V-2.6-8B
- 43.9 AffectGPT
- 43.8 LongVA-DPO-7B
- 40.6 Emotion-LLaMA
- 1
Gemini 3 Pro 70.5%
- 2 GPT-5.2 66.5%
- 3
Gemini 3 Flash 65.5%
- 4
Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 62.3%
- 5 Gemini-1.5-Flash (snapshot unspecified) 61.3%
- 6
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Jan 2025 60.6%
- 7 Qwen3-VL-Instruct-8B 60.1%
- 8
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 57.8%
- 9 GLM-4V-PLUS 57.7%
- 10
Qwen2.5-VL-32B 56.7%
- 11
InternVL2.5-38B 54.4%
- 12
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 53.7%
- 13
Qwen2-Audio-7B-Instruct 53%
- 14
Qwen2.5-VL-7B 52.9%
- 15
InternVL2_5-78B 52.4%
- 16 InternVideo2-Chat-8B 51.5%
- 17 Video-LLaMA2.1-7B-16F 51.5%
- 18
InternVL2.5-4B 50.9%
- 19
InternVL2.5-8B 50.4%
- 20 Video-LLaMA2-72B 49.9%
- 21 Video-LLaMA2.1-7B-AV 48.7%
- 22 VideoLLAMA2-7B 47.1%
- 23 MiniCPM-V-2.6-8B 46.5%
- 24 AffectGPT 43.9%
- 25 LongVA-DPO-7B 43.8%
- 26 Emotion-LLaMA 40.6%
Source: Official EmoBench-M leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 70.5% | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | GPT-5.2 | 66.5% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | | 65.5% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | | 62.3% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | Gemini-1.5-Flash (snapshot unspecified) | 61.3% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 6 | | 60.6% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | Qwen3-VL-Instruct-8B | 60.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 8 | | 57.8% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | GLM-4V-PLUS | 57.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 10 | | 56.7% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | | 54.4% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | | 53.7% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | | 53% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | | 52.9% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | | 52.4% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | InternVideo2-Chat-8B | 51.5% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 17 | Video-LLaMA2.1-7B-16F | 51.5% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 18 | | 50.9% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | | 50.4% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | Video-LLaMA2-72B | 49.9% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 21 | Video-LLaMA2.1-7B-AV | 48.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 22 | VideoLLAMA2-7B | 47.1% | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 23 | MiniCPM-V-2.6-8B | 46.5% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 24 | AffectGPT | 43.9% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 25 | LongVA-DPO-7B | 43.8% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 26 | Emotion-LLaMA | 40.6% | Official leaderboard |
3 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in February 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official EmoBench-M leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official EmoBench-M leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Vision
- MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
- MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
- CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
- MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
- MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
- ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance.
Command A Vision 90.9%