Benchmark Almanac

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B ranks first on 4 of the 55 benchmarks with five or more models scored.

Qwen Released March 27th, 2025 Family Qwen2.5-Omni The lab's model card Compare with others
59
Benchmarks with a score
4
Ranked first, out of five or more models
6
In the top three
Qwen Mar 2025

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Open weights Small

120.3 #344 of 404
Self-Reported Index, from the lab's own numbers. No Epoch Capabilities Index score yet.
  • MMMU-Pro 36.6% #86 /90
  • MVBench 70.3% #19 /23
  • ODinW-13 42.4% #10 /13

Where it ranks

Its best score on each benchmark, and where that ranks among every model with a score there. We rank each model once, at its best setting.

Knowledge and language

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
MMLU-Pro 47% #158 of 167 Lab model card
MMLU-Redux 71% #44 of 45 Lab model card

Math and science

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
MATH 71.5% #43 of 99 Lab model card
GSM8K 88.7% #48 of 92 Lab model card
GPQA Diamond 30.8% #293 of 302 Lab model card

Coding

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
MBPP 73.2% #38 of 71 Lab model card
HumanEval 78.7% #57 of 101 Lab model card
MultiPL-E 65.8% #15 of 18 Lab model card
LiveCodeBench 24.6% #48 of 54 Lab model card

Agents and tools

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
OmniGAIA 3.60% #5 of 5 Official leaderboard

Professional work

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
MultiFinBen 33.5 #1 of 9 Official leaderboard

Vision, audio and robotics

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
OmniBench 56.1% #1 of 16 Official leaderboard
DECIDE 66.6 #1 of 8 Official leaderboard
TextVQA 84.4% #3 of 17 Lab model card
MMSU 60.6% #1 of 5 Official leaderboard
DocVQA 95.2% #11 of 36 Lab model card
JointAVBench 56.5% #2 of 6 Official leaderboard
MMBench-Video 1.65 #12 of 28 Official leaderboard
SpatialViz-Bench 31.4% #7 of 14 Official leaderboard
WorldSense (omnimodal) 45.4% #6 of 12 Official leaderboard
ChartQA 85.3% #22 of 37 Lab model card
EmoBench-M 53.7% #9 of 15 Official leaderboard
AHELM 49.5 #6 of 10 Official leaderboard
MMAU-Pro 52.2% #6 of 10 Official leaderboard
LVOmniBench 32% #4 of 6 Official leaderboard
MME 2340.0 #4 of 6 Lab model card
CrossVid 24.6% #9 of 13 Official leaderboard
UNO-Bench 30.2% #5 of 7 Official leaderboard
RefCOCO / RefCOCO+ / RefCOCOg 87.7% #21 of 29 Lab model card
MORSE-500 11.4% #8 of 11 Official leaderboard
MathVista 67.9% #51 of 70 Lab model card
MuirBench 59.2% #9 of 12 Lab model card
MM-Vet 66.8% #6 of 8 Lab model card
CRPE 76.5% #3 of 4 Lab model card
ODinW-13 42.4% #10 of 13 Lab model card
OCRBench v2 57.8% #17 of 22 Lab model card
MMAU 65.6% #12 of 15 Lab model card
AV-SpeakerBench 42.3% #4 of 5 Official leaderboard
Video-Holmes 24.4% #4 of 5 Official leaderboard
Video-MME 72.4% #41 of 51 Lab model card
RealWorldQA 70.3% #31 of 38 Lab model card
MVBench 70.3% #19 of 23 Lab model card
AI2D 83.2% #43 of 52 Lab model card
EgoSchema 68.6% #10 of 12 Lab model card
MMMU 59.2% #88 of 103 Lab model card
MMBench-EN v1.1 81.8% #20 of 23 Lab model card
MMStar 64% #32 of 36 Lab model card
CoreCognition 40.9% #110 of 119 Official leaderboard
MMMU-Pro 36.6% #86 of 90 Lab model card
MATH-Vision (MathVision) 25% #51 of 51 Lab model card
Audio MC 11.9% #18 of 18 Official leaderboard
CoVoST2 34.7 #14 of 14 Lab model card
VoiceBench 74.1% #12 of 12 Lab model card
MM-MT-Bench 6.00 #6 of 6 Lab model card
OmniCap-IF 49.2% #6 of 6 Official leaderboard
MME-RealWorld 61.6% #4 of 4 Lab model card
MusTBench 24.3% #4 of 4 Official leaderboard
QIVD 45.9% #4 of 4 Official leaderboard

Other

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
LiveBench 29.6% #27 of 27 Lab model card

Its lab's numbers put it at 120.3, number 344 of 404

The Self-Reported Index fits one score to the 29 capability results Qwen reported for this model, on the scale of the Epoch Capabilities Index. Labs choose which benchmarks to show and how to run them, so read it as the lab's claim, not an independent measurement. The 90% interval runs from 118.1 to 122.5. How we compute it.

Its lab's number next to a leaderboard

Where the benchmark's own leaderboard, or Epoch AI's run, also has this model. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. Every pair.

Benchmark Lab says Board says Gap
OmniBench 56.1% OmniBench Avg (Speech 55.25 / Sound Event 60.00 / Music 52.83) 56.1% Leaderboard, image-audio Same

Its launch post

The benchmarks the lab chose to headline, with the scores it gave.

Its system card

Every result in the longer documents the lab published with it. 1 of them isn't in the launch post.

Hallucination