FinSearchComp Greater China
Agents search for financial information about Greater China assets across three task types. The score is the published average accuracy for the Greater China subset.
One track of FinSearchComp. The FinSearchComp record keeps lab scores that combine tracks.
- Made by
- ByteDance Seed
- Released
- September 2025
- Kind
- Finance
- Level
- Expert
- Scored
- Graded by a model
- Answers
- Agent task
- Tasks
- All public
In the authors’ words
Search has emerged as core infrastructure for LLM-based agents and is widely viewed as critical on the path toward more general intelligence. Finance is a particularly demanding proving ground: analysts routinely conduct complex, multi-step searches over time-sensitive, domain-specific data, making it ideal for assessing both search proficiency and knowledge-grounded reasoning. Yet no existing open financial datasets evaluate data searching capability of end-to-end agents, largely because constructing realistic, complicated tasks requires deep financial expertise and time-sensitive data is hard to evaluate. We present FinSearchComp, the first fully open-source agent benchmark for realistic, open-domain financial search and reasoning. FinSearchComp comprises three tasks – Time-Sensitive Data Fetching, Simple Historical Lookup, and Complex Historical Investigation – closely reproduce real-world financial analyst workflows. To ensure difficulty and reliability, we engage 70 professional financial experts for annotation and implement a rigorous multi-stage quality-assurance pipeline. The benchmark includes 635 questions spanning global and Greater China markets, and we evaluate 21 models (products) on it. Grok 4 (web) tops the global subset, approaching expert-level accuracy. DouBao (web) leads on the Greater China subset. Experimental analyses show that equipping agents with web search and financial plugins substantially improves results on FinSearchComp, and the country origin of models and tools impact performance significantly.By aligning with realistic analyst tasks and providing end-to-end evaluation, FinSearchComp offers a professional, high-difficulty testbed for complex financial search and reasoning.
DouBao (web) tops the leaderboard with 54.2%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
- 54.2 DouBao (web)
- 52.5 YuanBao (DeepSeek R1) (web)
- 51.9 Grok 4 (web)
- 50.5 YuanBao (HunYuan-T1-Thinking) (web)
- 49.0 DouBao-Thinking (web)
- 48.8 YuanBao (DeepSeek V3) (web)
- 46.4 GPT-5-Thinking (web)
- 40.8 ERNIE X1 (web)
- 40.5 DeepSeek R1 (web)
- 38.3 Kimi k2 (web)
- 36.8 Gemini 2.5 pro (web)
- 21.9 Qwen3-235B-A22B-2507 (web)
- 1 DouBao (web) 54.2%
- 2 YuanBao (DeepSeek R1) (web) 52.5%
- 3 Grok 4 (web) 51.9%
- 4 YuanBao (HunYuan-T1-Thinking) (web) 50.5%
- 5 DouBao-Thinking (web) 49%
- 6 YuanBao (DeepSeek V3) (web) 48.8%
- 7 GPT-5-Thinking (web) 46.4%
- 8 ERNIE X1 (web) 40.8%
- 9 DeepSeek R1 (web) 40.5%
- 10 Kimi k2 (web) 38.3%
- 11 Gemini 2.5 pro (web) 36.8%
- 12 Qwen3-235B-A22B-2507 (web) 21.9%
Source: Official FinSearchComp Greater China leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DouBao (web) | 54.2% | web product | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | YuanBao (DeepSeek R1) (web) | 52.5% | web product | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | Grok 4 (web) | 51.9% | web product | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | YuanBao (HunYuan-T1-Thinking) (web) | 50.5% | web product | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | DouBao-Thinking (web) | 49% | web product | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | YuanBao (DeepSeek V3) (web) | 48.8% | web product | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | GPT-5-Thinking (web) | 46.4% | web product | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | ERNIE X1 (web) | 40.8% | web product | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | DeepSeek R1 (web) | 40.5% | web product | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | Kimi k2 (web) | 38.3% | web product | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | Gemini 2.5 pro (web) | 36.8% | web product | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | Qwen3-235B-A22B-2507 (web) | 21.9% | web product | Official leaderboard |
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Law, finance and medicine
- MedXpertQA-MM In use Models answer expert-level medical exam questions that combine images with clinical records and test results. Scoring is accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 80.4%
- HealthBench Professional In use 525 physician-authored tasks from real clinician chats (care consult, documentation, research) with physician-adjudicated rubrics. Claude Sonnet 5.5 69.2%
- HealthBench In use 5,000 realistic health conversations graded against physician-written rubrics. A length-adjusted variant penalizes verbosity. GPT-5 67.2%
- FinSearchComp In use Agents search the web to fetch live financial data, look up history, and run multi-step investigations, across 635 expert-written questions. Scored by answer accuracy.
Ling-3.1-flash 81.7%
- KBL In use Models answer Korean legal knowledge and reasoning tasks and Korean bar exam questions. It has 7 knowledge tasks, 4 reasoning tasks and 2,510 bar exam items.
Solar Pro 4 77.5%
- KorMedMCQA In use Models answer 7,469 multiple-choice questions from Korean licensing exams for doctors, nurses, pharmacists and dentists, held from 2012 to 2024.
Solar Pro 4 93.2%