Benchmark Almanac

FollowBench

GPT-4 Turbo Nov 2023 73.4% leads since November 2023
Not in model cards

Models answer 820 English and Chinese instructions where each level adds one more constraint of content, situation, style, format or example type. Rules and an LLM judge check each constraint.

Reports Hard Satisfaction Rate (all constraints met) and Soft Satisfaction Rate. ACL 2024. About 120 GitHub stars.

Released
October 2023
Kind
Following precise instructions
Level
Everyday
Scored
Graded by a model
Answers
Open-ended
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
GPT-4 Turbo Nov 2023 #175 on the capability index
Last model added
November 2023
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

The ability to follow instructions is crucial for Large Language Models (LLMs) to handle various real-world applications. Existing benchmarks primarily focus on evaluating pure response quality, rather than assessing whether the response follows constraints stated in the instruction. To fill this research gap, in this paper, we propose FollowBench, a Multi-level Fine-grained Constraints Following Benchmark for LLMs. FollowBench comprehensively includes five different types (i.e., Content, Situation, Style, Format, and Example) of fine-grained constraints. To enable a precise constraint following estimation on diverse difficulties, we introduce a Multi-level mechanism that incrementally adds a single constraint to the initial instruction at each increased level. To assess whether LLMs' outputs have satisfied every individual constraint, we propose to prompt strong LLMs with constraint-evolution paths to handle challenging open-ended instructions. By evaluating 13 closed-source and open-source popular LLMs on FollowBench, we highlight the weaknesses of LLMs in instruction following and point towards potential avenues for future work. The data and code are publicly available at https://github.com/YJiangcm/FollowBench.

Abstract of FollowBench: A Multi-level Fine-grained Constraints Following Benchmark for Large Language Models (arXiv:2310.20410, CC0)
13
Entries on its own leaderboard, 3 models we track

GPT-4 Turbo leads with 73.4% among models released by November 2023

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

The newest model with a score here came out in November 2023, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 GPT-4 Turbo Nov 2023 73.4%
  2. 2 GPT-3.5 Turbo Nov 2023 66.2%
  3. 3 Qwen-Chat-72B 55.3%
  4. 4 WizardLM-13B-V1.2 52.5%
  5. 5 Vicuna-13B-V1.5 51.1%
  6. 6 LLaMA2-Chat-13B 49.2%
  7. 7 LLaMA2-Chat-70B 47.5%
  8. 8 Qwen-Chat-14B 47.3%
  9. 9 LLaMA2-Chat-7B 46.3%
  10. 10 Vicuna-7B-V1.5 42.4%
  11. 11 Qwen-Chat-7B 40.6%
  12. 12 Baichuan2-Chat-7B 40.2%
  13. 13 ChatGLM3-6B 38.7%

Source: Official FollowBench leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-4 Turbo Nov 2023 73.4% Nov 2023 Official leaderboard
2 GPT-3.5 Turbo Nov 2023 66.2% Nov 2023 Official leaderboard
3 Qwen-Chat-72B 55.3% Official leaderboard
4 WizardLM-13B-V1.2 52.5% Official leaderboard
5 Vicuna-13B-V1.5 51.1% Official leaderboard
6 LLaMA2-Chat-13B 49.2% Official leaderboard
7 LLaMA2-Chat-70B 47.5% Official leaderboard
8 Qwen-Chat-14B 47.3% Official leaderboard
9 LLaMA2-Chat-7B 46.3% Official leaderboard
10 Vicuna-7B-V1.5 42.4% Official leaderboard
11 Qwen-Chat-7B 40.6% Official leaderboard
12 Baichuan2-Chat-7B 40.2% Official leaderboard
13 ChatGLM3-6B 38.7% Oct 2023 Official leaderboard

2 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in October 2023

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Z.ai OpenAI
Own leaderboard Not tested since Nov 2023
GPT-4 Turbo 73.4%

Source: Official FollowBench leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-4 Turbo ChatGLM3-6B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-4 Turbo ChatGLM3-6B

Source: Official FollowBench leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Instructions and chat

All 81 in Instructions and chat
  • IFEval In use Models answer about 500 prompts containing verifiable instructions such as word limits or required keywords. Code checks each instruction for strict and loose accuracy. Gemma 4 31B IT 98.9%
  • IFBench In use 58 new out-of-domain verifiable output constraints. Scored by programmatic constraint checks (strict or loose). Nemotron-Cascade 2 30B-A3B 82.9%
  • MultiChallenge In use Multi-turn conversations testing instruction retention, inference memory, versioned editing and self-coherence. Graded by LLM judge with rubrics. GPT-6.1 Sol 82%
  • Multi-IF In use Models follow verifiable instructions over three-turn conversations in eight languages, extending IFEval. Scored by instruction accuracy at each turn. LFM3-1.7B 89.1%
  • AdvancedIF In use Models respond to over 1,600 prompts with complex, multi-turn, and system-level instructions. A judge model checks each response against expert-written rubrics. MAI-Thinking-1 85%
  • IFStruct In use Models generate JSON or YAML that must follow a requested schema and phrasing constraints, without constrained decoding. A response passes only if every structural constraint holds. Gemma 4 31B IT 95.9%