GlobeBench
Models act as text world models. Given an agent's past actions and observations, they predict the environment's next observation across code, enterprise, games, math and science, and dialogue.
1,632 execution-grounded items and 20 evaluated models. A judge scores 606 items that lack a fixed scoring rule, and all judge records are released.
- Made by
- Patronus AI
- Released
- October 2026
- Kind
- Interactive world models
- Level
- Expert
- Scored
- Graded by a model
- Answers
- Open-ended
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- GPT-6 Astra #3 on the capability index
- Last model added
- September 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Text-based world models have recently shown potential to simulate complex RL environment state transitions for a diverse set of use cases. However, no standardized benchmark exists to compare, study and improve these models. Through this paper, we attempt to solve this problem by building GlobeBench, a novel benchmark with 1,632 tasks across five separate domains and nineteen simulation skills. The tasks check whether models can predict the environment's response to a specific action given the full agent trajectory by understanding earlier state changes, following environment rules, and predicting the effects of actions on both related and unrelated objects. We compare the predicted environment response with an execution-derived reference, using a hybrid architecture with both deterministic gates and a semantic judge. Among 20 general-purpose LLMs and specialized text world models, GPT-6 Astra achieves the highest task success rate at 49.57%. We find that model accuracy decreases as actions affect a larger portion of the environment. Specifically, when the agent's changes must propagate to dependent objects, task success drops to an average of 5.1% across all 20 models. Although model strengths differ across tasks, 631 tasks remain unsolved by any model, suggesting a significant gap in general LLM capabilities as a world model.
GPT-6 Astra leads with 49.6% among models released by September 2026
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
The newest model with a score here came out in September 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- GPT-6.1 Terra
- and 8 more
- 49.6 GPT-6 Astra
- 28.1 Grok 4.6
- 26.4 Claude Opus 5.5
- 25.3
Qwen 3.8 Max
- 25.2 GPT-5.5
- 25.0 GPT-6 Sol
- 23.6 GPT-5.6 Sol
- 23.2
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- 21.8
Gemini 3.7 Flash
- 21.6 Claude Fable 5.1
- 20.0 Claude Opus 4.8
- 17.8 GPT-6 Luna
- 15.9 Claude Opus 5
- 14.8 GLM-5.3
- 14.5
Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- 14.0 Kimi K3
- 11.9
Inkling
- 7.29 Claude Fable 5
- 5.21 Digital World Model (DWM)
- 2.45
Laguna S 2.1
- 1 GPT-6 Astra Released binary leaderboard; primary settings (retries may vary): reasoning effort high, seed 0 49.6%
- 2 Grok 4.6 Released binary leaderboard; primary settings (retries may vary): reasoning effort high, temperature 0, seed 0 28.1%
- 3 Claude Opus 5.5 Released binary leaderboard; primary settings (retries may vary): reasoning effort high; no temperature or seed sent 26.4%
- 4
Qwen 3.8 Max Released binary leaderboard; primary settings (retries may vary): reasoning effort high, temperature 0, seed 0 25.3%
- 5 GPT-5.5 Released binary leaderboard; primary settings (retries may vary): reasoning effort high, temperature 0, seed 0 25.2%
- 6 GPT-6 Sol Released binary leaderboard; primary settings (retries may vary): reasoning effort high; no temperature or seed sent 25%
- 7 GPT-5.6 Sol Released binary leaderboard; primary settings (retries may vary): reasoning_effort high, temperature 0, seed 0 23.6%
- 8
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next Released binary leaderboard; primary settings (retries may vary): thinking on with chat-template reasoning_effort: xhigh, temperature 1.0, top-p 0.95, top-k 20, seed 0 23.2%
- 9
Gemini 3.7 Flash Released binary leaderboard; primary settings (retries may vary): reasoning effort high, temperature 0, seed 0 21.8%
- 10 Claude Fable 5.1 Released binary leaderboard; primary settings (retries may vary): reasoning effort high; no temperature or seed sent 21.6%
- 11 Claude Opus 4.8 Released binary leaderboard; primary settings (retries may vary): adaptive thinking, effort high, temperature 0, seed 0 20%
- 12 GPT-6 Luna Released binary leaderboard; primary settings (retries may vary): reasoning effort high; no temperature or seed sent 17.8%
- 13 Claude Opus 5 Released binary leaderboard; primary settings (retries may vary): reasoning effort high; no temperature or seed sent 15.9%
- 14 GLM-5.3 Released binary leaderboard; primary settings (retries may vary): reasoning effort high, temperature 0, seed 0 14.8%
- 15
Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B Released binary leaderboard; primary settings (retries may vary): temperature 0.6, top-p 0.95, top-k 20, seed 0 (Qwen-AgentWorld's published recipe) 14.5%
- 16 Kimi K3 Released binary leaderboard; primary settings (retries may vary): reasoning effort high, temperature 0, seed 0 14%
- 17
Inkling Released binary leaderboard; primary settings (retries may vary): reasoning effort high, temperature 0, seed 0 11.9%
- 18 Claude Fable 5 Released binary leaderboard; primary settings (retries may vary): reasoning effort high; no temperature or seed sent 7.29%
- 19 Digital World Model (DWM) Released binary leaderboard; primary settings (retries may vary): temperature 0.6, top-p 0.95, top-k 20, seed 0 (Qwen-AgentWorld's published recipe) 5.21%
- 20
Laguna S 2.1 Released binary leaderboard; primary settings (retries may vary): reasoning enabled, temperature 0, seed 0 2.45%
Source: Official GlobeBench leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-6 Astra | 49.6% | Released binary leaderboard; primary settings (retries may vary): reasoning effort high, seed 0 | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | Grok 4.6 | 28.1% | Released binary leaderboard; primary settings (retries may vary): reasoning effort high, temperature 0, seed 0 | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | Claude Opus 5.5 | 26.4% | Released binary leaderboard; primary settings (retries may vary): reasoning effort high; no temperature or seed sent | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | | 25.3% | Released binary leaderboard; primary settings (retries may vary): reasoning effort high, temperature 0, seed 0 | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | GPT-5.5 | 25.2% | Released binary leaderboard; primary settings (retries may vary): reasoning effort high, temperature 0, seed 0 | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | GPT-6 Sol | 25% | Released binary leaderboard; primary settings (retries may vary): reasoning effort high; no temperature or seed sent | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | GPT-5.6 Sol | 23.6% | Released binary leaderboard; primary settings (retries may vary): reasoning_effort high, temperature 0, seed 0 | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | | 23.2% | Released binary leaderboard; primary settings (retries may vary): thinking on with chat-template reasoning_effort: xhigh, temperature 1.0, top-p 0.95, top-k 20, seed 0 | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | | 21.8% | Released binary leaderboard; primary settings (retries may vary): reasoning effort high, temperature 0, seed 0 | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | Claude Fable 5.1 | 21.6% | Released binary leaderboard; primary settings (retries may vary): reasoning effort high; no temperature or seed sent | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | Claude Opus 4.8 | 20% | Released binary leaderboard; primary settings (retries may vary): adaptive thinking, effort high, temperature 0, seed 0 | May 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 12 | GPT-6 Luna | 17.8% | Released binary leaderboard; primary settings (retries may vary): reasoning effort high; no temperature or seed sent | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 13 | Claude Opus 5 | 15.9% | Released binary leaderboard; primary settings (retries may vary): reasoning effort high; no temperature or seed sent | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 14 | GLM-5.3 | 14.8% | Released binary leaderboard; primary settings (retries may vary): reasoning effort high, temperature 0, seed 0 | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 15 | | 14.5% | Released binary leaderboard; primary settings (retries may vary): temperature 0.6, top-p 0.95, top-k 20, seed 0 (Qwen-AgentWorld's published recipe) | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 16 | Kimi K3 | 14% | Released binary leaderboard; primary settings (retries may vary): reasoning effort high, temperature 0, seed 0 | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 17 | | 11.9% | Released binary leaderboard; primary settings (retries may vary): reasoning effort high, temperature 0, seed 0 | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 18 | Claude Fable 5 | 7.29% | Released binary leaderboard; primary settings (retries may vary): reasoning effort high; no temperature or seed sent | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 19 | Digital World Model (DWM) | 5.21% | Released binary leaderboard; primary settings (retries may vary): temperature 0.6, top-p 0.95, top-k 20, seed 0 (Qwen-AgentWorld's published recipe) | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | | 2.45% | Released binary leaderboard; primary settings (retries may vary): reasoning enabled, temperature 0, seed 0 | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official GlobeBench leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official GlobeBench leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in World models
- AgentWorldBench In use Language world models predict the next environment observation after an agent action, in 7 domains from MCP and search to Android and desktop OS. A judge model scores each prediction against the real observation on five dimensions. GPT-5.4 58.3
- IntPhys 2 In use Models watch simulated videos and judge whether each event is physically possible, testing object permanence, immutability, continuity and solidity. Scored by accuracy.
Muse Spark Open 68.3%
- QwenWorldBench Fading Models act as world models that simulate agent environments in 7 domains, such as terminal, web, and Android. A rubric judge scores five dimensions.
Qwen3.7-Plus 62.1%
- VPCT Fading Models view an image of a ball, ramps, and three buckets and predict which bucket the ball falls into. Scored by accuracy on 100 problems.
Gemini 3 Pro 91%
- ContPhy Fading Models infer physical properties such as mass and density of fluids and soft bodies from videos and predict their dynamics.
Seed2.0 Pro 67.4%
- RBench Only in system cards 650 image+text prompts for robot video generation (tasks and embodiments). MLLM judge scores task completion, physical plausibility, stability.
Wan 2.6 60.7%