Benchmark Almanac

GMAI-MMBench

GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 54% tops its leaderboard DeepSeek-VL-7B-Chat 43.4% leads the models we track
Not in model cards

Vision-language models answer medical multiple-choice questions over many imaging modalities, clinical tasks and departments, at several perceptual granularities.

86 upvotes on Hugging Face papers.

Released
August 2024
Kind
Medicine
Level
Expert
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Multiple choice
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Claude 3 Opus #172 on the capability index
Last model added
April 2024
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) are capable of handling diverse data types such as imaging, text, and physiological signals, and can be applied in various fields. In the medical field, LVLMs have a high potential to offer substantial assistance for diagnosis and treatment. Before that, it is crucial to develop benchmarks to evaluate LVLMs' effectiveness in various medical applications. Current benchmarks are often built upon specific academic literature, mainly focusing on a single domain, and lacking varying perceptual granularities. Thus, they face specific challenges, including limited clinical relevance, incomplete evaluations, and insufficient guidance for interactive LVLMs. To address these limitations, we developed the GMAI-MMBench, the most comprehensive general medical AI benchmark with well-categorized data structure and multi-perceptual granularity to date. It is constructed from 284 datasets across 38 medical image modalities, 18 clinical-related tasks, 18 departments, and 4 perceptual granularities in a Visual Question Answering (VQA) format. Additionally, we implemented a lexical tree structure that allows users to customize evaluation tasks, accommodating various assessment needs and substantially supporting medical AI research and applications. We evaluated 50 LVLMs, and the results show that even the advanced GPT-4o only achieves an accuracy of 53.96%, indicating significant room for improvement. Moreover, we identified five key insufficiencies in current cutting-edge LVLMs that need to be addressed to advance the development of better medical applications. We believe that GMAI-MMBench will stimulate the community to build the next generation of LVLMs toward GMAI.

Abstract of GMAI-MMBench: A Comprehensive Multimodal Evaluation Benchmark Towards General Medical AI (arXiv:2408.03361, CC0)
29
Entries on its own leaderboard, 13 models we track

GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) tops the leaderboard with 54%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is DeepSeek-VL-7B-Chat, at 43.4%.

The newest model with a score here came out in April 2024, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 54%
  2. 2 Gemini 1.5 48.4%
  3. 3 Gemini 1.0 44.9%
  4. 4 GPT-4V (snapshot unspecified) 44.1%
  5. 5 MedDr 43.7%
  6. 6 DeepSeek-VL-7B-Chat 43.4%
  7. 7 MiniCPM-V 2.0 42.5%
  8. 8 Qwen-VL-Max 42.2%
  9. 9 LLAVA-InternLM2-7b 40.5%
  10. 10 InternVL-Chat-V1-5 39.7%
  11. 11 OmniLMM-12B 39.3%
  12. 12 XComposer2 39.2%
  13. 13 TransCore-M 38.7%
  14. 14 llava-v1.5-7b 38%
  15. 15 Emu2-Chat 37.6%
  16. 16 Qwen-VL-Chat 37%
  17. 17 mPLUG-Owl2 36.2%
  18. 18 CogVLM-17B-Chat 36.1%
  19. 19 Yi-VL-6B 34.3%
  20. 20 Claude 3 Opus 32.4%
  21. 21 MMAlaya 32.3%
  22. 22 Idelecs-9B-Instruct 31.1%
  23. 23 Mini-Gemini-7B 31.1%
  24. 24 instructblip-vicuna-7b 30.9%
  25. 25 VisualGLM-6B 30.4%
  26. 26 RadFM 22.9%
  27. 27 Qilin-Med-VL-Chat 22.1%
  28. 28 LLaVA-Med 19.6%
  29. 29 Med-Flamingo 11.6%

Source: Official GMAI-MMBench leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 54% Official leaderboard
2 Gemini 1.5 48.4% Official leaderboard
3 Gemini 1.0 44.9% Official leaderboard
4 GPT-4V (snapshot unspecified) 44.1% Official leaderboard
5 MedDr 43.7% Official leaderboard
6 DeepSeek-VL-7B-Chat 43.4% Mar 2024 Official leaderboard
7 MiniCPM-V 2.0 42.5% Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
8 Qwen-VL-Max 42.2% Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
9 LLAVA-InternLM2-7b 40.5% Official leaderboard
10 InternVL-Chat-V1-5 39.7% Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
11 OmniLMM-12B 39.3% Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
12 XComposer2 39.2% Official leaderboard
13 TransCore-M 38.7% Official leaderboard
14 llava-v1.5-7b 38% Oct 2023 Official leaderboard
15 Emu2-Chat 37.6% Dec 2023 Official leaderboard
16 Qwen-VL-Chat 37% Aug 2023 Official leaderboard
17 mPLUG-Owl2 36.2% Nov 2023 Official leaderboard
18 CogVLM-17B-Chat 36.1% Nov 2023 Official leaderboard
19 Yi-VL-6B 34.3% Dec 2023 Official leaderboard
20 Claude 3 Opus 32.4% Feb 2024 Official leaderboard
21 MMAlaya 32.3% Official leaderboard
22 Idelecs-9B-Instruct 31.1% Official leaderboard
23 Mini-Gemini-7B 31.1% Official leaderboard
24 instructblip-vicuna-7b 30.9% May 2023 Official leaderboard
25 VisualGLM-6B 30.4% Official leaderboard
26 RadFM 22.9% Official leaderboard
27 Qilin-Med-VL-Chat 22.1% Official leaderboard
28 LLaVA-Med 19.6% Official leaderboard
29 Med-Flamingo 11.6% Official leaderboard

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

DeepSeek
Own leaderboard Not tested since Aug 2024

Source: Official GMAI-MMBench leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2023 2024 Near the ceiling (85%) DeepSeek-VL-7B-Chat llava-v1.5-7b instructblip-vicuna-7b 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2023 2024 Near the ceiling (85%) DeepSeek-VL-7B-Chat Qwen-VL-Chat

Source: Official GMAI-MMBench leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Law, finance and medicine

All 179 in Law, finance and medicine
  • MedXpertQA-MM In use Models answer expert-level medical exam questions that combine images with clinical records and test results. Scoring is accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 80.4%
  • HealthBench Professional In use 525 physician-authored tasks from real clinician chats (care consult, documentation, research) with physician-adjudicated rubrics. Claude Sonnet 5.5 69.2%
  • HealthBench In use 5,000 realistic health conversations graded against physician-written rubrics. A length-adjusted variant penalizes verbosity. GPT-5 67.2%
  • FinSearchComp In use Agents search the web to fetch live financial data, look up history, and run multi-step investigations, across 635 expert-written questions. Scored by answer accuracy. Ling-3.1-flash 81.7%
  • KBL In use Models answer Korean legal knowledge and reasoning tasks and Korean bar exam questions. It has 7 knowledge tasks, 4 reasoning tasks and 2,510 bar exam items. Solar Pro 4 77.5%
  • KorMedMCQA In use Models answer 7,469 multiple-choice questions from Korean licensing exams for doctors, nurses, pharmacists and dentists, held from 2012 to 2024. Solar Pro 4 93.2%