GMAI-MMBench
Vision-language models answer medical multiple-choice questions over many imaging modalities, clinical tasks and departments, at several perceptual granularities.
86 upvotes on Hugging Face papers.
- Released
- August 2024
- Kind
- Medicine
- Level
- Expert
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Multiple choice
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- Claude 3 Opus #172 on the capability index
- Last model added
- April 2024
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) are capable of handling diverse data types such as imaging, text, and physiological signals, and can be applied in various fields. In the medical field, LVLMs have a high potential to offer substantial assistance for diagnosis and treatment. Before that, it is crucial to develop benchmarks to evaluate LVLMs' effectiveness in various medical applications. Current benchmarks are often built upon specific academic literature, mainly focusing on a single domain, and lacking varying perceptual granularities. Thus, they face specific challenges, including limited clinical relevance, incomplete evaluations, and insufficient guidance for interactive LVLMs. To address these limitations, we developed the GMAI-MMBench, the most comprehensive general medical AI benchmark with well-categorized data structure and multi-perceptual granularity to date. It is constructed from 284 datasets across 38 medical image modalities, 18 clinical-related tasks, 18 departments, and 4 perceptual granularities in a Visual Question Answering (VQA) format. Additionally, we implemented a lexical tree structure that allows users to customize evaluation tasks, accommodating various assessment needs and substantially supporting medical AI research and applications. We evaluated 50 LVLMs, and the results show that even the advanced GPT-4o only achieves an accuracy of 53.96%, indicating significant room for improvement. Moreover, we identified five key insufficiencies in current cutting-edge LVLMs that need to be addressed to advance the development of better medical applications. We believe that GMAI-MMBench will stimulate the community to build the next generation of LVLMs toward GMAI.
GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) tops the leaderboard with 54%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is DeepSeek-VL-7B-Chat, at 43.4%.
The newest model with a score here came out in April 2024, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 54.0 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified)
- 48.4 Gemini 1.5
- 44.9 Gemini 1.0
- 44.1 GPT-4V (snapshot unspecified)
- 43.7 MedDr
- 43.4
DeepSeek-VL-7B-Chat
- 42.5
MiniCPM-V 2.0
- 42.2 Qwen-VL-Max
- 40.5 LLAVA-InternLM2-7b
- 39.7 InternVL-Chat-V1-5
- 39.3
OmniLMM-12B
- 39.2 XComposer2
- 38.7 TransCore-M
- 38.0 llava-v1.5-7b
- 37.6 Emu2-Chat
- 37.0 Qwen-VL-Chat
- 36.2
mPLUG-Owl2
- 36.1 CogVLM-17B-Chat
- 34.3
Yi-VL-6B
- 32.4 Claude 3 Opus
- 32.3 MMAlaya
- 31.1 Idelecs-9B-Instruct
- 31.1 Mini-Gemini-7B
- 30.9 instructblip-vicuna-7b
- 30.4 VisualGLM-6B
- 22.9 RadFM
- 22.1 Qilin-Med-VL-Chat
- 19.6 LLaVA-Med
- 11.6 Med-Flamingo
- 1 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 54%
- 2 Gemini 1.5 48.4%
- 3 Gemini 1.0 44.9%
- 4 GPT-4V (snapshot unspecified) 44.1%
- 5 MedDr 43.7%
- 6
DeepSeek-VL-7B-Chat 43.4%
- 7
MiniCPM-V 2.0 42.5%
- 8 Qwen-VL-Max 42.2%
- 9 LLAVA-InternLM2-7b 40.5%
- 10 InternVL-Chat-V1-5 39.7%
- 11
OmniLMM-12B 39.3%
- 12 XComposer2 39.2%
- 13 TransCore-M 38.7%
- 14 llava-v1.5-7b 38%
- 15 Emu2-Chat 37.6%
- 16 Qwen-VL-Chat 37%
- 17
mPLUG-Owl2 36.2%
- 18 CogVLM-17B-Chat 36.1%
- 19
Yi-VL-6B 34.3%
- 20 Claude 3 Opus 32.4%
- 21 MMAlaya 32.3%
- 22 Idelecs-9B-Instruct 31.1%
- 23 Mini-Gemini-7B 31.1%
- 24 instructblip-vicuna-7b 30.9%
- 25 VisualGLM-6B 30.4%
- 26 RadFM 22.9%
- 27 Qilin-Med-VL-Chat 22.1%
- 28 LLaVA-Med 19.6%
- 29 Med-Flamingo 11.6%
Source: Official GMAI-MMBench leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) | 54% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 2 | Gemini 1.5 | 48.4% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 3 | Gemini 1.0 | 44.9% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 4 | GPT-4V (snapshot unspecified) | 44.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 5 | MedDr | 43.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 6 | | 43.4% | Mar 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | | 42.5% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | Qwen-VL-Max | 42.2% | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | LLAVA-InternLM2-7b | 40.5% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 10 | InternVL-Chat-V1-5 | 39.7% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | | 39.3% | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | XComposer2 | 39.2% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 13 | TransCore-M | 38.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 14 | llava-v1.5-7b | 38% | Oct 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | Emu2-Chat | 37.6% | Dec 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | Qwen-VL-Chat | 37% | Aug 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | | 36.2% | Nov 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | CogVLM-17B-Chat | 36.1% | Nov 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | | 34.3% | Dec 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | Claude 3 Opus | 32.4% | Feb 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 21 | MMAlaya | 32.3% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 22 | Idelecs-9B-Instruct | 31.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 23 | Mini-Gemini-7B | 31.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 24 | instructblip-vicuna-7b | 30.9% | May 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 25 | VisualGLM-6B | 30.4% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 26 | RadFM | 22.9% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 27 | Qilin-Med-VL-Chat | 22.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 28 | LLaVA-Med | 19.6% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 29 | Med-Flamingo | 11.6% | Official leaderboard |
Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official GMAI-MMBench leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official GMAI-MMBench leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Law, finance and medicine
- MedXpertQA-MM In use Models answer expert-level medical exam questions that combine images with clinical records and test results. Scoring is accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 80.4%
- HealthBench Professional In use 525 physician-authored tasks from real clinician chats (care consult, documentation, research) with physician-adjudicated rubrics. Claude Sonnet 5.5 69.2%
- HealthBench In use 5,000 realistic health conversations graded against physician-written rubrics. A length-adjusted variant penalizes verbosity. GPT-5 67.2%
- FinSearchComp In use Agents search the web to fetch live financial data, look up history, and run multi-step investigations, across 635 expert-written questions. Scored by answer accuracy.
Ling-3.1-flash 81.7%
- KBL In use Models answer Korean legal knowledge and reasoning tasks and Korean bar exam questions. It has 7 knowledge tasks, 4 reasoning tasks and 2,510 bar exam items.
Solar Pro 4 77.5%
- KorMedMCQA In use Models answer 7,469 multiple-choice questions from Korean licensing exams for doctors, nurses, pharmacists and dentists, held from 2012 to 2024.
Solar Pro 4 93.2%