GroundUI
Agents get a screenshot and an instruction and must click the right UI element. About 18K test samples cover web, desktop and mobile screens. Scored by whether the point falls in the target box.
Part of the AgentStudio toolkit. Labs often report only the web split, called GroundUI Web. The release month is the dataset upload. The affiliation is likely, not verified.
- Released
- June 2024
- Kind
- Finding things on screen
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Short answer
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- Claude 3.5 Sonnet #157 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- March 2025, dropped before it saturated
- Last model added
- March 2025
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
General virtual agents need to handle multimodal observations, master complex action spaces, and self-improve in dynamic, open-domain environments. However, existing environments are often domain-specific and require complex setups, which limits agent development and evaluation in real-world settings. As a result, current evaluations lack in-depth analyses that decompose fundamental agent capabilities. We introduce AgentStudio, a trinity of environments, tools, and benchmarks to address these issues. AgentStudio provides a lightweight, interactive environment with highly generic observation and action spaces, e.g., video observations and GUI/API actions. It integrates tools for creating online benchmark tasks, annotating GUI elements, and labeling actions in videos. Based on our environment and tools, we curate an online task suite that benchmarks both GUI interactions and function calling with efficient auto-evaluation. We also reorganize existing datasets and collect new ones using our tools to establish three datasets: GroundUI, IDMBench, and CriticBench. These datasets evaluate fundamental agent abilities, including GUI grounding, learning from videos, and success detection, pointing to the desiderata for robust, general, and open-ended virtual agents.
SeeClick tops the leaderboard with 61.1%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Gemini 1.5 Pro, at 35.2%.
Amazon Nova Act leads with 80.5%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in June 2024, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 1 SeeClick 61.1%
- 2
Gemini 1.5 Pro May 2024 35.2%
- 3 CogAgent 25.5%
- 4 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 17.3%
- 5 GPT-4o May 2024 13.4%
- 6 GPT-4 Turbo Apr 2024 12.3%
- 7
Gemini 1.5 Flash May 2024 9.40%
- 8 CogVLM2-19B-Chat 3.40%
- 9
Gemini 1.0 Pro 1.80%
- 10
MiniCPM-Llama3-V 2.5 0.90%
- 11 Qwen-VL-Chat 0%
- 12
PaliGemma-3B-mix-448 0%
- 13 PaliGemma-3B-896 0%
Source: Official GroundUI leaderboard
- 1
Amazon Nova Act 80.5%
- 2
Gemini 1.5 Pro May 2024 35.2%
- 3 CogAgent 25.5%
- 4 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 17.3%
- 5 GPT-4o May 2024 13.4%
- 6 GPT-4 Turbo Apr 2024 12.3%
- 7
Gemini 1.5 Flash May 2024 9.40%
- 8 CogVLM2-19B-Chat 3.40%
- 9
Gemini 1.0 Pro 1.80%
- 10
MiniCPM-Llama3-V 2.5 0.90%
- 11 Qwen-VL-Chat 0%
- 12
PaliGemma-3B-mix-448 0%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official GroundUI leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SeeClick | 61.1% | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | | 35.2% | May 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | CogAgent | 25.5% | Dec 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | 17.3% | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | GPT-4o May 2024 | 13.4% | May 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | GPT-4 Turbo Apr 2024 | 12.3% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | | 9.40% | May 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | CogVLM2-19B-Chat | 3.40% | May 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | | 1.80% | Dec 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | | 0.90% | May 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | Qwen-VL-Chat | 0% | Aug 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | | 0% | May 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | PaliGemma-3B-896 | 0% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 80.5% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 35.2% | May 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | CogAgent | 25.5% | Dec 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | 17.3% | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | GPT-4o May 2024 | 13.4% | May 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | GPT-4 Turbo Apr 2024 | 12.3% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | | 9.40% | May 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | CogVLM2-19B-Chat | 3.40% | May 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | | 1.80% | Dec 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | | 0.90% | May 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | Qwen-VL-Chat | 0% | Aug 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | | 0% | May 2024 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
Number one over time 2 models have held number one with claims included since its release in June 2024
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official GroundUI leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official GroundUI leaderboard and labs’ model cards
No launch post has listed it since March 2025
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2025 | 80.5 | GroundUI Web 0.805 |
More in Computer and browser use
- BrowseComp In use Hard-to-find facts that need persistent web browsing. Short verifiable answers graded for exact correctness. Claude Fable 5 93.3%
- ScreenSpot-Pro In use GUI grounding on high-resolution professional-software screenshots. The model must locate the target UI element. GPT-6 Astra 92.7%
- AndroidWorld In use Agents complete 116 tasks across 20 real Android apps in an emulator. Each task checks the device's system state to judge success. GPT-6 Astra 100%
- OSWorld 2.1 In use Agents complete 108 long-horizon workflows across 31 self-hosted websites and desktop apps, averaging 318 tool calls. Scored by binary completion and checkpoint partial credit. Claude Opus 5.5 81.8%
- WebArena-Verified In use Agents complete 812 audited WebArena tasks on self-hosted websites. Deterministic evaluators check the agent's answer and captured network traces.
Muse Spark 1.1 69%
- MobileWorld In use Agents complete 201 tasks across 20 mobile apps, including tasks that need user clarification or MCP tools. Backend checks verify success. GPT-5 55.3%